PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Anthony M Digioia

Publications and source records attributed to Anthony M Digioia.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Accuracy of pelvic flexion measurements from lateral radiographs.

Variations in pelvic orientation affect preoperative planning decisions, intraoperative navigation, and postoperative measurements. By providing the means to measure pelvic flexion at low cost and reporting pelvic flexion using the standard reference system, a lateral radiograph technique based on the pubic tubercles and anterior superior iliac spines may be useful for studying functional pelvic orientation and functional alignment and for improving accuracy of postoperative measurement. We evaluated the accuracy of this method by synthesizing 50 lateral pelvic radiographs. Six observers performed manual landmark-based pelvic flexion measurements on the resultant radiographs. Pelvic flexion measurement errors were small (0.004 masculine +/- 1.38 masculine). Apart from one outlier with an error of 12.4 masculine, the errors ranged from -4.0 masculine to 3.0 masculine. The data suggest that accurate measurements of pelvic flexion can be made from lateral radiographs with respect to the standard anatomic reference system. However, failure to correctly observe a landmark can introduce large errors. Therefore, the clarity of the relevant landmarks should be considered carefully before applying this technique. Lateral radiographs can be easily acquired and analyzed, making this technique convenient and inexpensive.

Body Weights and Measures↗

Cup alignment error model for total hip arthroplasty.

Almost all computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery systems that rely on the anterior pelvic plane definition, such as in computed tomography and magnetic resonance image-based, fluoroscopy-based, and nonimage total hip replacement approaches, are derived from identifying two pairs of pelvic bony landmarks: anterior superior iliac spines and the pubic tubercles. Although these systems strive to achieve cup alignment accuracy of approximately 1 degree, even a minor failure to correctly identify these anatomic landmarks can lead to higher inaccuracies in the final cup alignment. This study shows how to examine the effects of these inaccuracies on the final acetabular cup implant orientation during total hip replacement by generating a kinematic model, which then is simulated. Simulation results indicate that, for example, a total error of 4 mm in measuring the anterior superior iliac spine and the pubic tubercles would result in a final cup orientation of 47 degrees and 27 degrees in abduction and version respectively, resulting in a 2 degrees abduction error and 7 degrees error in version when targeting 45 degrees abduction and 20 degrees version results. These calculations can be repeated for any error values.

Acetabulum↗

Measurements of acetabular cup position and pelvic spatial orientation after total hip arthroplasty using computed tomography/radiography matching.

This study presents a clinical validation of postoperative measurements of acetabular cup alignment following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The methodology was based on concurrent anatomic three-dimensional (3D) measurements of both the acetabular cup alignment and pelvic orientation, using an original CT/X-ray matching algorithm named Xalign. The subjects were 19 patients who had undergone bilateral THA using CT-based surgical navigation. All patients had postoperative pelvic CT scans and multiple antero-posterior (AP) pelvic X-rays. Using a proprietary software algorithm, the X-rays included in the study were matched with the corresponding postoperative CT scans. The goal of this method was to allow 3D anatomic pelvic and acetabular measurements on two-dimensional AP X-rays. The postoperative cup abduction, version and pelvic flexion angles were determined in three different ways: using CT images directly, applying the Xalign method, and finally by performing conventional (abduction only) measurements on AP pelvic X-rays. The cup orientation measured on CT images was taken as the ground truth. The Xalign measurement errors were defined as the difference between the CT cup values and those obtained by applying the matching method. The mean cup abduction error was 0.85 degrees +/- 1.3 degrees (+/- standard deviation) and the mean version error was 0.01 degrees +/- 1.99 degrees . Conventionally measured cup abduction ranged from 44 degrees to 62 degrees and correlated significantly (p = 0.001, r = -0.5) with pelvic flexion angle, proving the linear negative correlation between pelvic flexion and the error in conventional radiographic cup measurements. The Xalign method offered reasonable accuracy for cup orientation, and allowed cup and pelvic 3D anatomic measurements at different times.

Acetabulum↗

Comparison of a mechanical acetabular alignment guide with computer placement of the socket.

We hypothesized that use of mechanical acetabular guides for intraoperative alignment leads to variations between the actual and desired implant orientation. Acetabular implant orientation using only the mechanical guide was studied in 78 patients (82 hips) undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty. A computer-assisted navigation system was used to measure alignment and to monitor the orientation of the pelvis during surgery. When using the mechanical guide, there was significant variation in cup alignment from the desired goal of 45 degrees of abduction and 20 degrees of flexion, and this would have resulted in unacceptable acetabular alignment in 78% of hips. With the support system used, there was significant variability in pelvic orientation during surgery. The mean anteversion of the pelvis was an average of 18 degrees from the optimal orientation. These results show a clear need to develop more reliable tools than were used or anatomically based alignment strategies to provide reproducible and accurate acetabular alignment.

Acetabulum↗