Biomedical subjects

Anthony N Carlsen

Publications and source records attributed to Anthony N Carlsen.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2007

Startle produces early response latencies that are distinct from stimulus intensity effects.

Recent experiments pairing a startling stimulus with a simple reaction time (RT) task have shown that when participants are startled, a prepared movement was initiated earlier in comparison to voluntary initiation. It has been argued that the startle acts to trigger the response involuntarily. However, an alternative explanation is that the decrease in RT may be due to stimulus intensity effects, not involuntary triggering. Thus the aim of the current investigation was to determine if RT simply declined in a linear fashion with increasing stimulus intensity, or if there was a point at which RT dramatically decreased. In the present experiment participants completed 50 active wrist extension trials to a target in response to an auditory stimulus of varying stimulus intensity (83-123 dB). The presented data show that RTs associated with a startle response are separate from stimulus intensity facilitated responses. Furthermore, this startle facilitation is more highly associated with sternocleidomastoid electromyographic (EMG) activity, rather than the EMG from the widely used startle response indicator muscle orbicularis oculi.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2006

Temporal uncertainty does not affect response latencies of movements produced during startle reactions.

Previous research has shown that a startle 'go' stimulus, presented at a constant latency with respect to a warning stimulus, is capable of eliciting an intended voluntary movement in a simple reaction time (RT) task at very short latencies without involvement of the cerebral cortex (Carlsen et al. in Exp Brain Res 152:510-518, 2003; J Motor Behav 36:253-264, 2004a; Exp Brain Res 159:301-309 2004b; Valls-Solé et al. in J Physiol 516:931-938, 1999). The purpose of the present experiment was to determine the effect of temporal uncertainty on response latency during an RT task that comprised a startle stimulus. Participants were required to perform an active 20 degrees wrist extension movement in response to an auditory tone that was presented 2,500 to 5,500 ms after a warning stimulus, in 1,000 ms increments. On certain trials the control auditory stimulus (80 dB) was unexpectedly replaced by the startle stimulus (124 dB). When participants were startled the intended voluntary movement was initiated at approximately 70 ms, regardless of foreperiod duration. The magnitude and invariance of response latencies to the startle stimulus suggest that the intended movement had indeed been prepared prior to the arrival of the imperative go stimulus, within 2.5 s of the warning stimulus. Furthermore, there was no evidence that the prepared movement decayed over a period of at least 3 s.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2005

Identifying visual-vestibular contributions during target-directed locomotion.

The purpose of this experiment was to examine the potential interaction between visual and vestibular inputs as participants walked towards 1 of 3 targets located on a barrier 5m away. Visual and vestibular inputs were perturbed with displacing prisms and galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS), respectively. For each target there were three vision conditions (no prisms, prisms left, and prisms right), and three GVS conditions (no GVS, anode left, and anode right). Participants were instructed to start with eyes closed, and to open the eyes at heel contact of the first step. GVS and target illumination were triggered by the first heel contact. This ensured that the upcoming visual condition and target were unknown and that both sensory perturbations occurred simultaneously. Lateral displacement was determined every 40 cm. Irrespective of target or direction, GVS or prism perturbation alone resulted in similar lateral deviations. When combined, the GVS and prism perturbations that had similar singular effects led to significantly larger deviations in the direction of the perturbations. The deviations were approximately equal to the sum of the single deviations indicating that the combined effects were additive. Conflicting GVS and prism perturbations led to significantly smaller deviations that were close to zero, indicating that opposite perturbations cancelled each other. These results show that when both visual and vestibular information remain important during task performance, the nervous system integrates the inputs equally.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Assessing vestibular contributions during changes in gait trajectory.

Displacing prisms and galvanic stimulation were used to examine visual-vestibular interactions during target-directed gait. Participants walked towards a wall 6 m away. After taking four steps, a target on the wall, located directly in front or to the right of the participant, was illuminated. Participants continued walking towards the target. Galvanic vestibular stimulation was triggered at either gait initiation, a step before the potential turn, or at target illumination. Although the visual and vestibular perturbations significantly altered gait trajectory, the greatest interaction occurred when galvanic stimulation was triggered one step before the target appeared. This implies an increase in the weighting of vestibular inputs just before turning to prepare for the potential change in direction.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Can prepared responses be stored subcortically?

Quick voluntary responses to environmental stimuli are required of people on a daily basis. These movements have long been thought to be controlled via cortical loops involving processing of the stimulus and generation of a suitable response. Recent experiments have shown that in simple reaction time (RT) tasks, the appropriate response can be elicited much earlier (facilitated) when the "go" signal is replaced by a startling (124 dB) auditory stimulus. In the present experiment we combined a startling acoustic stimulus with an established RT paradigm that involved simple and choice RT. In a simple RT condition the prepared voluntary response was elicited at very short latencies following the startle. However, when cortical processing was required prior to responding (choice RT task), the startle did not facilitate the voluntary response, and gave rise to more movement production errors. Since movements requiring ongoing cortical processing following the stimulus are not facilitated by startle, it is unlikely that the startle facilitation is due to increased neural activation. In contrast, it appears more likely that the startle acts as an early trigger for subcortically stored prepared movements since movements that are prepared in advance can be initiated at such short latencies (<60 ms).

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2004

Prepared movements are elicited early by startle.

A startle stimulus has been shown to elicit a ballistic response in a reaction time (RT) task at very short latencies without involvement of the cerebral cortex (J. Valls-Sole, J. C. Rothwell, F. Gooulard, G. Cossu, & E. Munoz, 1999). The present authors examined the nature of the startle response. A simple RT task was used in which 8 participants performed arm extension movements to 3 target distances (20 degrees, 40 degrees, and 60 degrees ) in a blocked design. An unpredictable startling acoustic stimulus (124 dB) replaced the imperative stimulus in certain trials. The authors verified the presence of a startle response independent from the prepared response by observing electromyographic (EMG) activity in sternocleidomastoid and orbicularis oculi muscles. Findings indicated that when the participant was startled, the intended voluntary response was produced at significantly shorter response latencies. Furthermore, the kinematic variables of the observed response during startle trials for all 3 target distances were mostly unchanged. The EMG characteristics of the responses were not modified, indicating that the response produced was indeed the prepared and intended response.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Relative contributions of visual and vestibular information on the trajectory of human gait.

Seven healthy individuals were recruited to examine the interaction between visual and vestibular information on locomotor trajectory during walking. Subjects wore goggles that either contained a clear lens or a prism that displaced the visual scene either 20 degrees to the left or right. A 5-s bipolar, binaural galvanic stimulus (GVS) was also applied at three times the subject's individual threshold (ranged between 1.2 to 1.5 mA). Subjects stood with their eyes closed and walked forward at a casual pace. At first heel contact, subjects opened their eyes and triggered the galvanic stimulus by foot switches positioned underneath a board. Reflective markers were placed bilaterally on the shoulders as the walking trajectory was captured using a camera mounted on the ceiling above the testing area. Twelve conditions were randomly assigned that combined four visual conditions (eyes closed, eyes open, left prism, right prism) and three GVS conditions (no GVS, GVS anode left, GVS anode right). As subjects walked forward, there was a tendency to deviate in the direction of the prisms. During GVS trials, subjects deviated towards the anode while walking, with the greatest deviations occurring with the eyes closed. However, when GVS was presented with the prisms, subjects always deviated to the side of the prisms, regardless of the position of the anode. Furthermore, the visual-vestibular conditions produced a larger lateral deviation than those observed in the prisms-only trials. This suggests that the nervous system examines the sensory inputs and takes into account the most reliable and relevant sensory input.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Startle response is dishabituated during a reaction time task.

Recent experiments pairing a startling stimulus with a simple reaction time (RT) task have shown that when participants are startled, a prepared movement may be triggered earlier in comparison to voluntary initiation (Carlsen et al. 2003, in press; Siegmund et al. 2001; Valls-Solé et al. 1999). The use of this paradigm in experiments may provide new insights into processes that control rapid voluntary actions. However, because the startle response habituates with repeated exposure to the startling stimulus, its use in experiments may be limited. Previously Brown et al. (1991) and later Siegmund et al. (2001) noted that individuals habituate to a startling stimulus at different rates depending on the required activity level of the participant in the task. The present experiment was designed to determine the rate at which participants habituate to a startle during the completion of a RT task. Participants completed 100 trials in which an active wrist extension to a target was performed as fast as possible following an auditory tone. An unexpected 124 dB auditory startle stimulus accompanied the imperative stimulus in 20 of these trials. For the duration of the experiment, startle response electromyographic (EMG) activity continued to be produced in the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) indicating that habituation was not complete after 20 startle trials. Furthermore RT in the startle condition was significantly shorter than control RT. However, findings indicate that when a measurable EMG burst in the SCM was present, RT was significantly shorter than when no SCM burst was present.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2002

Altered triggering of a prepared movement by a startling stimulus.

An experiment is reported that investigated the effects of an auditory startling stimulus on a compound movement task. Previous findings have shown that, in a targeting task, a secondary movement can be initiated based on the proprioceptive information provided by a primary movement. Studies involving the presentation of a startling stimulus have shown that in reaction time (RT) tasks, prepared ballistic movements could be released early when participants are startled. In the present study we sought to determine whether the secondary component in an ongoing movement task, once prepared, could also be triggered by a startling stimulus. Participants performed a slow active elbow extension (22 degrees /s), opening their hand when the arm passed 55 degrees of extension from the starting point. An unexpected 124 dB startle stimulus was presented 5, 25, or 45 degrees into the movement. Findings showed that, when participants were startled, the secondary component was triggered despite incongruent kinesthetic information. However, this only occurred when the startle was presented late in the primary movement. This suggests that the secondary movement was not prepared prior to task initiation, but was "loaded" into lower brain structures at some point during the movement in preparation to be triggered by the CNS. This occurred late in the movement sequence, but >/=400 ms prior to reaching the target. These findings indicate that, in addition to ballistic RT tasks, a startle can be used to probe response preparation in ongoing compound movement tasks.

Adult↗