Biomedical subjects

Anthony Sclafani

Publications and source records attributed to Anthony Sclafani.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2007

Fat and sugar flavor preference and acceptance in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: experience attenuates strain differences.

C57BL/6J (B6) mice display stronger preference and acceptance for various sweeteners than do 129 mice (129P3/J, 129X1/SvJ). The present experiment compared the preference of these strains for fat flavor as well as sweet taste using 24-h two-bottle preference tests. Fat flavor preference was evaluated using non-nutritive (olestra) and nutritive (Intralipid) oil emulsions. In initial oil vs. water tests olestra preference and intake were greater in B6 mice than 129 mice. Similar strain differences were obtained with low (0.313%-5%) but not high (10%-20%) Intralipid concentrations. When retested with Intralipid the B6 and 129 mice showed strong (>90%) preferences for the nutritive oil although B6 mice still consumed more oil at low concentrations. A second olestra test revealed increased oil preference and acceptance in B6 and 129X1/SvJ mice while 129P3/J mice still did not prefer olestra to water. Sweetener tests revealed stronger saccharin and sucrose preferences in B6 mice than in 129 mice. These strain differences in sweetener preference disappeared when the mice were retested with sucrose and saccharin. However, B6 mice continued to consume more saccharin and sucrose (at low concentrations) than did 129 mice. The profile of strain differences for non-nutritive and nutritive oils was similar to those observed for non-nutritive and nutritive sweeteners. The differential sweetener preferences of B6 and 129 mice is explained by differences in their sweet taste receptors but why the strains also differ in their initial fat flavor preference is not clear. The experientially-induced increases in oil and sweetener preferences displayed by the mice are attributed to the post-oral actions of Intralipid and sucrose. These findings along with intragastric infusion data suggest that B6 and 129 mice differ in their oral but not their post-oral response to fat and sugar.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Energy density and macronutrient composition determine flavor preference conditioned by intragastric infusions of mixed diets.

In prior studies rats preferred a flavor (CS+HF) paired with intragastric (IG) infusions of a high-fat diet to a flavor (CS+HC) paired with a high-carbohydrate diet, yet just the opposite preference was observed with pure-nutrient infusions. The present study tested the hypothesis that variations in nutrient density as well as composition influence flavor learning. Animals were trained (22 h/day) with IG infusion of milk-based high-fat and high-carbohydrate liquid diets paired with intakes of flavored, noncaloric CS+ solutions. A third flavor, the CS-, was paired with water infusion. Standard chow was available ad libitum. The rats preferred both CS+ flavors to the CS-, whether the infused diets were dense (HF and HC, 2.1 kcal/ml) or dilute (hf and hc, 0.5 kcal/ml), indicating that all diet infusions were reinforcing. They consumed the CS+hc and CS+hf equally in training, and preferred the CS+hc, showing that at low-energy density carbohydrate was more reinforcing than fat. In contrast, CS+HF intake exceeded that of CS+HC in training, and the rats preferred the CS+HF to the CS+HC. In further tests the rats preferred the CS+HF to the CS+hc, the CS+HF to the CS+hf, and the CS+HC to the CS+hc; i.e., when the diets differed in energy density the flavors associated with the more concentrated infusions were preferred. In the absence of influence by flavor cues from the nutrients themselves, rats' preferences for flavors associated with diets high in fat or carbohydrate are dependent on energy density. The differential satiating effects of fat and carbohydrate may contribute to these density-dependent preferences.

Animal Feed↗

PubMed2006

Oral, post-oral and genetic interactions in sweet appetite.

Inbred mouse strains differ in their preferences for sweeteners, due in part to variations in their T1R3 sweet taste receptor. Recent studies of sweet sensitive C57BL/6J (B6) and subsensitive 129P3/J (129) mice indicate that experiential and post-oral effects of sugar substantially modify sweetener preference. In fact, the strain difference in sucrose preference disappeared after the mice were given 23 h/day tests with sucrose at ascending concentrations (0.5-32%). Intragastric infusions of sucrose (16%) also conditioned increased preference for and absolute intake of flavored sweet solutions in B6 and 129 mice. An operant analysis of sweetener appetite revealed, unexpectedly, that sugar-experienced 129 mice respond more vigorously than B6 mice for 16% sucrose rewards. These findings indicate that experiential and nutritional factors can, to some degree, override genetic differences in peripheral taste sensitivity in determining food appetite.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Nutrient-conditioned flavor preference and incentive value measured by progressive ratio licking in rats.

Rats develop strong preferences for flavors associated with the postingestive actions of glucose and other nutrients. This preference may involve changes in both the hedonic appeal and incentive salience of the nutrient-paired flavor. The present study used a progressive ratio (PR) operant licking task to evaluate the degree to which nutrient conditioning changes the incentive value of flavors. Food restricted rats were trained to associate one flavored saccharin solution (CS+) with intragastric glucose infusions and another flavored solution (CS-) with water infusions. The rats subsequently showed a strong preference for the CS+ in two-bottle tests and also licked more for the CS+ than CS- in PR tests. PR licking for the CS+ was similar to that for an 8% fructose solution. Together with earlier data indicating that the CS- is isopreferred to a 3% fructose solution, these findings indicate that IG glucose conditioning enhances the hedonic and incentive value of the CS+ solution so that the animal responds as if the solution had a sweeter taste.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Sucrose motivation in sweet "sensitive" (C57BL/6J) and "subsensitive" (129P3/J) mice measured by progressive ratio licking.

As compared to C57BL/6J mice, 129P3/J mice show weaker preferences for and lower intakes of dilute sugar solutions. These differences have been attributed to genetic differences in their sweet taste receptor. The two mouse strains do not differ, however, in their intake of concentrated sugar solutions. The post-oral satiating effect of concentrated sugar solutions may mask strain differences in the avidity for these solutions. This hypothesis was investigated using fixed ratio (FR, low demand) and progressive ratio (PR, high demand) operant licking tests (22h/day) to measure sugar appetite. In Experiment 1, sucrose-experienced 129 mice licked less than did B6 mice for 4% but not for 16% sucrose in free access bottle tests and FR operant tests. Yet, in PR tests the 129 mice licked as much for 4% sucrose and more for 16% sucrose than did B6 mice. In Experiment 2, sucrose-naive 129 mice licked less than did B6 mice in FR and PR tests with 0.4% saccharin but the strains did not differ in PR licking in their first test with 16% sucrose. After they were given unconstrained bottle access to 16% sucrose for 3 days, the 129 mice now licked more than B6 mice in a second sucrose PR test. Thus, despite having a less sensitive sweet taste receptor, 129 mice are as much or more motivated to obtain sucrose than are B6 mice and appear to be more influenced by prior experience with sugar. This suggests that the strains differ in their central reward processing of sweet taste.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Enhanced sucrose and Polycose preference in sweet "sensitive" (C57BL/6J) and "subsensitive" (129P3/J) mice after experience with these saccharides.

Prior research with inbred mouse strains indicates that C57BL/6J (B6) mice display stronger preference and acceptance for various sweeteners than do 129P3/J (129) mice. Experiment 1 examined the extent to which this strain difference could be modified by repeated exposure to sucrose. Sucrose-naive 129 mice displayed weaker preferences than did B6 mice for 0.5% to 4% sucrose solutions during 23h/day sugar vs. water tests. Sucrose preference did not differ at 8-32% concentrations. Yet, when retested with sucrose, the 129 and B6 mice showed identical robust preferences (>90%) for 0.5-32% solutions. The strains also did not differ in sucrose preference in tests with descending sucrose concentrations (0.5-0.0625%). Sucrose-experienced 129 mice also showed enhanced preference for dilute saccharin solutions suggesting that their sweet taste responsivity was enhanced. Experiment 2 revealed that preference for dilute saccharin solutions was enhanced by prior saccharin experience in B6 but not 129 mice. Experiment 3 tested the strains with Polycose which has a palatable taste different from that of sucrose. Polycose-naive 129 mice displayed weaker preferences for dilute (0.5-4%) but not concentrated (8-32%) Polycose solutions relative to B6 mice. In the second test series Polycose preferences were nearly identical in the two strains. In Experiments 1 and 3, prior sucrose or Polycose experience also reduced or eliminated strain differences in saccharide acceptance (absolute intake) at higher but not lower concentrations. Thus, exposure to the oral and post-oral actions of sucrose and Polycose increased saccharide preference in B6 mice and even more in 129 mice so that the strain difference virtually disappeared. Whether the 129 mice responded to the taste or other properties (e.g., odor) of the dilute saccharide solutions is not certain but their gustatory sensitivity needs to be reconsidered.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Development of learned flavor preferences.

Rats, like humans, are born with only a few innate flavor preferences and aversions. Preferences retain great plasticity throughout the lifespan because they are sensitive to modification by experience. From an early age, rats can rapidly learn to prefer or avoid a flavor (conditioned stimulus, CS) that is associated with a positive or negative unconditioned stimulus (US). The US may be the mother's milk, social or thermotactile stimulation, or other food-related stimuli. Flavor-flavor learning occurs when the CS flavor is mixed with a naturally preferred (e.g., sweet) or avoided (e.g., bitter) US flavor. Flavor preferences and aversions are also produced by USs that have postoral positive (e.g., nutritious) or negative (e.g., toxic) actions. These types of learning appear to involve different behavioral and neural mechanisms as indicated by differences in conditioned responses, effective temporal parameters, resistance to extinction, and neurochemical mechanisms. New evidence indicates that flavor-nutrient preference learning can occur before weaning and influence food selection after weaning. Flavor conditioning not only affects food choice, but can also significantly increase food acceptance, that is, total consumption. Thus, from an early age, learning processes shape the feeding behavior of animals. While primarily serving an adaptive function, learning may play a role in biasing individuals towards excessive intake and weight gain.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Unconditioned stimulus devaluation effects in nutrient-conditioned flavor preferences.

Experiments with different temporal relations between the conditioned stimulus (CS) and the unconditioned stimulus (US) in conditioning assessed whether US devaluation effects can be obtained after nutrient-conditioned flavor preference learning. One flavor (CScarb) was paired with a carbohydrate, Polycose; a 2nd flavor (CSprot) was paired with a protein, casein; and a 3rd flavor (CS-) was presented by itself. Following conditioning, one of the nutrients was devalued through pairings with lithium chloride in the absence of the CS flavors. In a subsequent 2-bottle test, rats preferred CScarb over CSprot; however, this preference was smaller when the carbohydrate was devalued than when the protein was devalued. Results suggest that CS flavors are able to form associations with the sensory features of nutrient USs under a wide variety of circumstances.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed2005

Flavor preference conditioning as a function of fat source.

Rats learn to prefer foods based, in part, on postingestive nutrient actions. This study compared the effectiveness of intragastric (IG) infusions of fat emulsions which varied in their fatty acid composition (chain length and saturation) to condition preferences for flavored saccharin solutions. In Experiment 1, food-restricted rats were trained (30 min/day) with one flavor (CS+CO) paired with IG corn oil (CO) and a second flavor (CS+MCT) paired with IG medium chain triglyceride (MCT); the fats were prepared as isocaloric emulsions. A third flavor (CS-) was paired with IG water. The rats subsequently showed a strong preference for the CS+CO (84%) and a weaker preference for the CS+MCT (65%) relative to the CS-. In a direct choice test, the CS+CO was preferred to the CS+MCT by 75%. In Experiment 2, new rats trained with flavors paired with IG corn oil and beef tallow (BT) infusions learned to prefer both the CS+CO (89%) and the CS+BT (82%) relative to the CS-, and preferred the CS+CO to the CS+BT by 67%. The same rats were trained with three new flavors paired with IG infusions of corn oil, vegetable shortening (VS), and water. The rats strongly preferred both the CS+CO (91%) and CS+VS (86%) over the CS-, and they preferred the CS+CO to the CS+VS by 64%. In Experiment 3, new rats trained with corn oil and safflower oil (SO) paired flavors preferred both the CS+CO and CS+SO to the CS-, and equally preferred the CS+CO and CS+SO in two-bottle tests. The rats were also given one-and two-bottle tests with the various fat emulsions and their preference profile was consistent with their conditioned preferences for the flavored saccharin solutions. These findings demonstrate that many different fat sources can condition flavor preferences. Fats with high polyunsaturated content and/or lower saturated fat content are the most reinforcing.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Sugar and fat conditioned flavor preferences in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: oral and postoral interactions.

C57BL/6J (B6) mice consume more sugar and fat solutions than do 129 mice in 24-h preference tests. Previous studies have attributed this observation to strain differences in taste responsiveness to these nutrients. We tested the hypothesis that differences in postingestive responsiveness contribute to the strain differences. In experiment 1, B6 and 129 mice were trained to associate consumption of a flavored solution (CS+) with intragastric (IG) infusions of 16% sucrose and a different flavored solution (CS-) with IG water infusions (22 h/day). They were then retrained with new flavors paired with IG infusions of 5.6% soybean oil and water. Although both strains developed preferences for the nutrient-paired CS+ solutions, the B6 mice displayed significantly stronger preferences. The B6 mice consumed more CS+ during training, which may have contributed to their enhanced preference. In a second experiment, training intakes were equated by giving B6 and 129 mice "isosweet" CS solutions prepared with different amounts of sucrose and saccharin. The B6 and 129 mice consumed more of the sugar- or fat-paired CS+ than the water-paired CS- during training. The two strains also displayed equally strong preferences for the CS+ over CS- in choice tests, indicating that they had similar postingestive responsiveness to the sucrose and soybean oil. We propose that B6 mice consume more sugar and fat than 129 mice because their stronger orosensory response stimulates greater intake, which leads to greater stimulation of postingestive nutrient detectors and further enhancement of consumption.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Flavor preferences conditioned by postingestive effects of nutrients in preweanling rats.

The purpose of these experiments was to determine if preweanling rats, like adults, are capable of learning to associate an arbitrary flavor with the postingestive effects of nutrients, and then demonstrate a preference for that flavor after weaning. In Experiment 1, preweanlings were trained daily from postnatal day (P) 16 through P19 with intraoral (IO) infusions of a grape or cherry flavor (CS+) mixed with 20% glucose (US), and the opposite flavor (CS-) mixed with 0.05% saccharin. After weaning, rats were given a 4-h two-bottle choice between the CS+ and CS- flavors both presented in 0.05% saccharin. Rats preferred the flavor previously paired with glucose. In Experiment 2 using similar methods, rats learned to prefer a flavor (CS+G) paired with a glucose US over a flavor (CS+S) paired with a sweeter but less nutritive sucrose US, indicating involvement of postingestive reinforcement. In Experiment 3 preweanling rats with IO and intragastric (IG) catheters were trained with a CS+ flavor paired with IG nutrient infusion, and a CS- flavor paired with no IG infusion. These rats showed no flavor preference 3 days after weaning, but did significantly prefer the CS+ flavor over the CS- flavor 10 days after weaning. Together these experiments demonstrate that neural mechanisms for flavor-nutrient associations are developed before weaning, allowing young rats to learn associations between arbitrary flavors and nutritive consequences. Thus nutrient conditioning may be one way that early experience (such as flavors from the maternal diet transmitted in milk) influences later dietary preferences.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric nutrient infusions in food restricted and free-feeding rats.

The role of deprivation state in flavor preference conditioning by nutrients was investigated in rats fitted with intragastric (IG) catheters. In different experiments, food restricted (FR) and food ad libitum (AL) groups were trained to drink one flavored solution (CS+) paired with IG infusions of maltodextrin, corn oil, or casein and another flavored solution (CS-) paired with IG water infusions. Training intakes of the CS solutions were limited to equate the exposure of the FR and AL groups. The IG nutrient infusions conditioned flavor preferences in FR and AL groups which, in three of four experiments, were of similar magnitude. Food restriction did, however, increase the overall intake of the CS+ solutions during testing. Rats trained with one CS+ while food restricted and a second CS+ while food unrestricted showed similar preferences for the two CS+ flavors. Prefeeding AL rats to satiety with chow prior to daily training sessions did not prevent them from developing a preference for a CS+ paired with IG maltodextrin. These findings indicate that the postoral actions of nutrients are reinforcing in food sated as well as hungry rats.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed2005

Food deprivation enhances the expression but not acquisition of flavor acceptance conditioning in rats.

The postingestive actions of nutrients condition strong flavor preferences in rats and may also enhance flavor acceptance (increase total intake) in some situations. This study determined the impact of food deprivation on flavor preference and acceptance conditioned by intragastric (i.g.) infusions of glucose. Rats fitted with gastric catheters were trained (20 h/day) to associate a CS+ solution (bitter or sour) with i.g. 16% glucose and a CS- solution with water infusions. One group (FR) was food-restricted during the training sessions, while a second group (AL) was given food ad libitum. All rats were given 2-h access to food prior to the daily sessions. During one-bottle training, the FR rats consumed substantially more CS+ than CS- whereas AL rats drank only slightly more CS+ than CS-. In additional one-bottle acceptance tests, the FR and AL rats consumed substantially more CS+ than CS- when both groups were food-restricted, but only slightly more CS+ than CS- when both groups had food ad libitum. Throughout the experiment, the FR and AL rats displayed equally strong CS+ preferences in two-bottle choice tests irrespective of their deprivation state during the test. The findings indicate that food restriction stimulates the intake of a CS+ flavor that is (or was previously) paired with i.g. glucose infusions but does not fundamentally alter the learned association between the CS+ flavor and the post-oral nutrient stimulus.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Critical role of amygdala in flavor but not taste preference learning in rats.

The role of the amygdala (AMY) in learning to associate complex flavor (taste + odor cues) with the oral and post-oral properties of nutrients was examined. Rats with excitotoxic lesions of the basolateral AMY learned to prefer flavors paired with intragastric (IG) infusions of maltodextrin or corn oil (Experiment 1), although the preference was slightly attenuated. However, rats with large AMY lesions failed to develop a preference for flavors paired with IG infusions of the same nutrients (Experiments 2 and 4) but were able to learn a preference for a taste mixture paired with IG maltodextrin infusions (Experiment 3). The rats with large AMY lesions also did not acquire a preference for a flavor cue paired with the sweet taste of fructose (Experiment 5). Collectively, these data provide evidence that AMY is essential for flavor- but not taste-nutrient preference learning.

Amygdala↗

PubMed2004

Fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in male and female rats: effects of sweet taste and sugar concentration.

Previous studies indicate that fructose postingestive reward for flavor preference learning is weaker than that of glucose. The present experiments explored the effects of several variables that modulate the response to fructose. In Experiment 1, ad libitum fed male rats were trained in 22 h sessions with one flavor (the CS+) paired with intragastric infusions of 7.18% fructose and another flavor (the CS-) paired with intragastric water infusion. Subsequent preference for the CS+ relative to the CS- was 90% with saccharin-sweetened flavors and only 67% with nonsweet flavors. Experiments 2 (males) and 3 (females) examined the effects of taste quality on conditioning with 16% fructose infusions. Males and females both preferred the sweet CS+ flavor (71-72%). In contrast, males avoided the nonsweet CS+ flavor (31%) and females were indifferent (47%). The different preference patterns were accompanied by differences in sweet and nonsweet training intakes and bout patterns, suggesting stimulation of intake with sweet flavor and 7.18% fructose, and satiating effects of 16% fructose. The sex difference in response to nonsweet flavors may reflect a greater sensitivity of male rats to fructose's postingestive satiating or aversive effects. Possible mechanisms for the sweet-taste enhancement of conditioning include increasing CS intakes in training, facilitating fructose metabolism and increasing flavor salience.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

The sixth taste?

Five taste qualities are recognized in humans: sweet, bitter, sour, salty, and umami. Rats and some other species may also have a sixth taste. Behavioral and electrophysiological data suggest that rats can taste polysaccharides derived from starch. Furthermore, the tastes of sugars and polysaccharides appear to differ in quality. Rats also discriminate different types of polysaccharide and starch molecules. Recent studies indicate that sweet taste is mediated by a T1R2 and T1R3 receptor complex but the identity of the hypothesized polysaccharide taste receptor remains to be established.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Naltrexone does not prevent acquisition or expression of flavor preferences conditioned by fructose in rats.

The effects of the general opioid antagonist, naltrexone, on the acquisition and expression of flavor preferences conditioned by the sweet taste of fructose were examined. Food-restricted rats were trained over eight daily alternating one-bottle sessions (2 h) to drink an 8% fructose solution containing one novel flavor (CS+/F) and a less preferred 0.2% saccharin solution containing a different flavor (CS-/S). Four groups of rats were treated daily with either saline (control group) or naltrexone doses of 0.1, 1.0, or 5.0 mg/kg during training. Preferences were assessed in two-bottle tests with the CS+/S and CS-/S flavors presented in 0.2% saccharin solutions following saline injections. Naltrexone dose-dependently reduced fructose and saccharin intakes during training, confirming the drug's well-known suppressive effect on the intake of sweet solutions. Despite their reduced training intakes, the naltrexone groups displayed preferences for the CS+/S over the CS-/S (72-86%) that were similar to that of the control group (78%). The effect of naltrexone on the expression of the CS+/S flavor preference was evaluated by treating control rats with naltrexone (0.1-5 mg/kg) prior to CS+/S vs. CS-/S choice tests. The drug doses produced a dose-dependent reduction in CS+/S intake but did not significantly attenuate the CS+/S preference. These data are consistent with the relative inability of naltrexone to reduce flavor-flavor conditioning by sucrose in sham-feeding rats and flavor-nutrient conditioning in rats receiving intragastric sucrose infusions. In contrast, dopamine antagonists reduce both sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences, which indicates the sensitivity of these conditioning paradigms to neuropharmacological manipulations. These data indicate that the endogenous opioid system, unlike the dopamine system, does not play a major role in either the acquisition or expression of flavor preference learning as measured in two-bottle choice tests.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Ethanol-conditioned flavor preferences compared with sugar- and fat-conditioned preferences in rats.

Rats can learn to prefer flavors paired with ethanol and various nutrients. The present study examined the relative strengths of flavor preferences conditioned by 5% ethanol and isocaloric solutions of 7.18% sucrose, 7.18% fructose, or 3.26% corn oil. In three experiments, nondeprived rats were trained with different flavored solutions (conditioned stimuli, CS) paired with intragastric (IG) infusions: a CS+E flavor paired with ethanol infusion, a second CS+ paired with a nutrient infusion, and a CS- paired with water infusion. In two-bottle tests, rats strongly preferred a sucrose-paired CS+S over the CS- and over the CS+E. The preference for the CS+E over CS- was weaker. These effects occurred when the rats drank substantially more CS+S than CS+E in training and when training intakes were matched. Similar results were obtained when the nutrient infusion was fructose or corn oil, except that preferences for the CS+F or CS+O over the CS+E were less pronounced than with CS+S. Consistent with the IG results, rats trained to drink flavored sucrose and ethanol solutions preferred the CS+S to CS+E in a flavored water test. These results confirm prior reports of ethanol-conditioned preferences but show that ethanol is less effective than other nutrients at isocaloric concentrations. The marked individual differences in ethanol-conditioned preferences may be related to the impact of the sugar or fat infusions on the reward evaluation of the ethanol-paired flavor.

Animals↗