Biomedical subjects

Anthony Vu

Publications and source records attributed to Anthony Vu.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Fast spin echo sequences with very long echo trains: design of variable refocusing flip angle schedules and generation of clinical T2 contrast.

Reducing and continuously varying the flip angle of the refocusing RF pulses in a rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE; fast/turbo spin echo) sequence is a useful means of addressing high RF power deposition and modulation transfer function (MTF) distortion due to relaxation. This work presents a streamlined technique to generate a sequence of refocusing flip angles on a per-prescription basis that produces relatively high SNR and limits blurring in a wide range of materials encountered in vivo. Since the "effective TE" (traditionally defined as the time at which the center of k-space is sampled) no longer corresponds to the expected amount of spin-echo T2 contrast due to the mixing of stimulated and spin echoes, a "contrast-equivalent" TE is defined and experimentally demonstrated that allows annotation of a more accurate effective TE that matches the contrast produced by 180 degrees refocusing. Furthermore, contrast is shown to be manipulable by the addition of magnetization preparation pulse sequence segments, such as T2-prep, to produce clinically desirable contrast for routine head and body imaging.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2006

Evaluation of intrarenal oxygenation at 3.0 T using 3-dimensional multiple gradient-recalled echo sequence.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to validate quantitation of R2* and DeltaR2* measurements obtained with a 3-dimensional (3-D) multiple gradient-recalled echo (mGRE) sequence for evaluating intrarenal oxygenation in humans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Validation was accomplished (1) by comparing R2* values with previously established 2-D techniques (n = 5, mean age = 33.6 years) and (2) by measuring change in DeltaR2* after furosemide (20 mg intravenously) administration (n = 5, mean age = 22 years). Additional pre- and postfurosemide scans were done at 1.5 T for comparison purposes. RESULTS: R2* measurements with the 3-D technique showed good agreement with the 2-D techniques. The baseline medullary R2* at 3.0 T was about twice the value found at 1.5 T. Furosemide-induced change in R2* was observed within 5 minutes after administration. CONCLUSIONS: R2* measurements with 3-D mGRE were comparable with those reported using 2-D techniques. The 3-D implementation facilitates observation of temporal changes in the medullary oxygenation without compromising spatial coverage.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Three-dimensional T1 mapping for dGEMRIC at 3.0 T using the Look Locker method.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to implement a three-dimensional (3-D) T1 mapping sequence (3DLL) at 3.0 T for dGEMRIC based on the Look Locker scheme. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Because all current reports on dGEMRIC are at 1.5 T and mostly using 2-D IR fast spin echo (FSE), data were acquired at 1.5 T and 3.0 T with both 3DLL and 2-D IR-FSE sequence. Phantoms with different concentrations of Gd(DTPA) were used and seven subjects (three asymptomatic, four symptomatic) were scanned using the dGEMRIC technique. RESULTS: The T1 measurements obtained on the phantom with 3DLL show very good agreement with those acquired with 2-D IR-FSE. Using a two-tailed paired t test, the T1 (Gd) measurements in two sections obtained in all subjects with both sequences were found to be statistically indistinguishable at either field strength (P = 0.07 at 1.5 T and P = 0.07 at 3.0 T). CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary data presented here suggest that the 3DLL sequence provides accurate T1 values with sufficient in-plane resolution and allows full joint coverage in less than 10 minutes.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas at 3.0 tesla: qualitative and quantitative comparison with 1.5 tesla.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to perform a preliminary comparison of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and image quality for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pancreas at 1.5 and 3 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two imaging cohorts were studied using a T2-weighted, single-shot fast spin-echo pulse sequence and a T1-weighted, fat-suppressed 3D gradient-echo pulse sequence. In the first cohort, 4 subjects were imaged using identical imaging parameters before and after contrast administration at 1.5 and 3.0 T. The SNR was quantified for the pancreas as well as for the liver, spleen, and muscle. In a second cohort of 12 subjects in whom the receiver bandwidth was adjusted for field strength, SNR measurements and qualitative rankings of image quality were performed. RESULTS: In the study cohort using identical imaging parameters at both magnetic field strengths, the mean (SD) ratios of SNR at 3.0 to 1.5 T of the single-shot fast spin-echo images for the pancreas, liver, spleen, and muscle were 1.63 (0.39), 1.82 (0.39), 1.45 (0.18), 2.01 (0.16), respectively. For the precontrast fat-suppressed 3D gradient-echo sequence, the corresponding ratios were 1.28 (0.29), 1.26 (0.30), 1.16 (0.27), and 1.76 (0.45), respectively; for the arterial phase, the corresponding ratios were 2.02 (0.28), 1.60 (0.42), 1.47 (0.26), and 1.94 (0.32), respectively; and for the delayed postcontrast phase, the corresponding ratios were 1.63 (0.51), 2.01 (0.25), 1.66 (0.06), and 2.31 (0.47), respectively. The SNR benefit of 3.0 T was significantly greater on contrast-enhanced as compared with noncontrast T1-weighted 3D gradient-echo images. In the second study cohort, SNR was superior at 3.0 T, although the use of a reduced readout bandwidth at 1.5 T substantially diminished the advantage of the higher field system. With qualitative comparison of images obtained at the 2 magnetic field strengths, the fat-suppressed 3D gradient-echo images obtained at 3.0 T were preferred, whereas the single shot fast spin-echo images obtained at 1.5 T were preferred because of better signal homogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Our results in a small cohort of volunteers and patients demonstrate a marked improvement in SNR at 3.0 T compared with 1.5 T (by a factor of 2 in some cases) when identical imaging parameters were used. The SNR advantage at 3.0 T is diminished but persists when the receiver bandwidth is adjusted for magnetic field strength. The results suggest that 3.0 T may offer promise for improved body MRI, although further technical development to optimize SNR and improve signal homogeneity will be needed before its full potential can be achieved.

Adult↗