Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Anthony Waites.
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to study the cortical integration of an osseointegrated prosthetic thumb that had been attached to the amputee's hand 13 years ago. We found that tactile stimuli applied to the prosthesis activated the primary somatosensory cortex on both sides.
We investigated the effects of motion-correction strategy and time course selection method when structural equation modeling is applied to fMRI data in the presence of task-correlated motion. Three motion-correction methods were employed for a group of 12 subjects performing an orthographic lexical retrieval task: (1) a rigid body realignment as implemented in SPM99, (2) a rigid body realignment combined with the inclusion of motion parameters in the statistical model, and (3) the FLIRT motion correction followed by an ICA analysis aiming to identify and remove the motion-related components and the ghosting artifacts. For each motion correction, the time courses of the activated regions were selected in three ways: (1) using the voxels with the highest Z scores, (2) using the average across all the statistically significant voxels in the region of interest, and (3) using a within-region, across-subjects, singular value decomposition. The resulting models of effective connectivity were markedly different, although the activation pattern was not substantially altered by the motion-correction method. Higher values for the path coefficients were obtained for the models fitted to the covariance matrices based on the average time courses than for the covariance matrices based on a single voxel time course. Our results suggest caution with the interpretation of task-induced changes in effective connectivity since, for higher-order cognitive brain functions, multiple models can be fitted to a given data set and these models cannot be rejected on an anatomical or cognitive basis. Hum. Brain Mapping 21:49-63, 2004.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This study investigated the possible benefit of subject specific optimization of preprocessing strategies in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiments. The optimization was performed using the data-driven performance metrics developed recently [Neuroimage 15 (2002), 747]. We applied numerous preprocessing strategies and a multivariate statistical analysis to each of the 20 subjects in our two example fMRI data sets. We found that the optimal preprocessing strategy varied, in general, from subject to subject. For example, in one data set, optimum smoothing levels varied from 16 mm (4 subjects), 10 mm (5 subjects), to no smoothing at all (1 subject). This strongly suggests that group-specific preprocessing schemes may not give optimum results. For both studies, optimizing the preprocessing for each subject resulted in an increased number of suprathresholded voxels in within-subject analyses. Furthermore, we demonstrated that we were able to aggregate the optimized data with a random effects group analysis, resulting in improved sensitivity in one study and the detection of interesting, previously undetected results in the other.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to make a computer simulation of tissues with different vascular structures and to simulate measurements of oxygen tension using an Eppendorf-like electrode in these tissues and to compare the response to radiation of the tissues with the real oxygen distributions (called input distribution) with the response to radiation of the tissues in which the oxygen distribution is given by the results of the simulated measurements (called output distribution). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The structure of various tissues and the measurements of oxygen tension using a microelectrode were simulated using a computer program. The mathematical model used combines the description of a gradient of tissue oxygenation and the electrode absorption process. RESULTS: We have compared the oxygen distributions resulting from diffusion (input) with those obtained from a simulation of measurements (output) for various tissues in the same points. Because the electrode measurement is an averaging process, the calculated oxygen distributions are different from the expected ones and the extreme high and low values are not detected. We have then calculated the survival curves describing the response to radiation if there is a small fraction of truly hypoxic cells (expected values) or a large fraction of cells at intermediate values (observed results) in order to determine the differences between them. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study show that oxygen electrode measurements do not give the true distribution of pO(2) values in the tissue. However, our results do not contradict the numerous empirical correlations between the Eppendorf measurements of tumour oxygenation and the outcome of treatments. Measurement results will be misleading for modelling purposes since they do not reflect the actual distributions of oxygen tensions in the measured tissue. Decisions based on such modelling could be very dangerous, especially with respect to the clinical response of tumours to new treatments.