Biomedical subjects

Antoinette S Peters

Publications and source records attributed to Antoinette S Peters.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Cooperative learning: a new application of problem-based learning in mental health training.

Interaction in problem-based learning (PBL) tutorials is not necessarily cooperative, which may account for variation in learning outcomes. Therefore, a cooperative assessment structure was introduced in a PBL course and the difference examined between this method and individual, lecture-based learning in mental health training. Experimental student groups gained more knowledge between pre- and post-test than did control groups, and the experimental students who scored low on the pre-test made the greatest gains. Groups that reported greater cooperation tended to have higher achievement scores. Experimental students felt that cooperation helped them learn but it also took more time and was sometimes chaotic.

Clinical Clerkship↗

PubMed2006

Creating enduring change: demonstrating the long-term impact of a faculty development program in palliative care.

BACKGROUND: Improved educational and evaluation methods are needed in continuing professional development programs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term impact of a faculty development program in palliative care education and practice. DESIGN: Longitudinal self-report surveys administered from April 2000 to April 2005. PARTICIPANTS: Physician and nurse educators from North America and Europe. All program graduates (n = 156) were invited to participate. INTERVENTION: Two-week program offered annually (2000 to 2003) with 2 on-site sessions and 6-month distance-learning period. Learner-centered training addressed teaching methods, clinical skill development, and organizational and professional development. MEASURES: Self-administered survey items assessing behaviors and attitudes related to palliative care teaching, clinical care, and organizational and professional development at pre-, postprogram, and long-term (6, 12, or 18 months) follow-up. RESULTS: Response rates: 96% (n = 149) preprogram, 73% (n = 114) follow-up. Participants reported increases in: time spent in palliative care practice (38% preprogram, 47% follow-up, P < .01); use of learner-centered teaching approaches (sum of 8 approaches used "a lot": preprogram 0.7 +/- 1.1, follow-up 3.1 +/- 2.0, P < .0001); and palliative care topics taught (sum of 11 topics taught "a lot": preprogram 1.6 +/- 2.0, follow-up 4.9 +/- 2.9, P < .0001). Reported clinical practices in psychosocial dimensions of care improved (e.g., assessed psychosocial needs of patient who most recently died: 68% preprogram, 85% follow-up, P = .01). Nearly all (90%) reported launching palliative care initiatives, and attributed their success to program participation. Respondents reported major improvements in confidence, commitment to palliative care, and enthusiasm for teaching. Eighty-two percent reported the experience as "transformative." CONCLUSIONS: This evidence of enduring change provides support for the potential of this educational model to have measurable impact on practices and professional development of physician and nurse educators.

Chi-Square Distribution↗

PubMed2005

Teaching and learning end-of-life care: evaluation of a faculty development program in palliative care.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Program in Palliative Care Education and Practice (PCEP), an intensive faculty development program at Harvard Medical School. METHOD: PCEP is a two-week program offered annually with two on-site sessions in Boston, MA, and an interim period distance-learning component. Training integrates palliative care clinical skill development, learning theory and teaching methods, and leadership and organizational change. Longitudinal surveys (preprogram, retrospective preprogram, and postprogram) of participants from 2000-03 assessed self-reported preparation in providing and teaching palliative care; teaching and patient care practices; and satisfaction with program. RESULTS: The response rate was 96% (n=149) for Session I and 72% for both Session I and II (n=113). Questionnaire responses demonstrated statistically significant improvements with large effect sizes (range 0.7-1.8) on nearly all measures. Preparation increased from 3.0+/-1.1 to 4.2+/-0.7 for providing end-of-life care (1=not well prepared, 5=very well prepared), and from 2.6+/-1.0 to 4.3+/-0.7 for teaching this topic. Respondents reported behavioral changes in patient care and teaching; e.g., after the program, 63% noted that, specifically as a result of attending the course, they encouraged learners to reflect on their emotional responses to dying patients, and 57% conducted experiential exercises (e.g., role-play). Eighty-two percent rated the experience as "transformative," and many responses to open-ended items described powerful learning experiences. Participants rated the program highly (4.9+/-0.1, 1=lowest, 5=highest rating). CONCLUSIONS: Integrating clinical content with learning about educational methods is an efficient and effective approach to enhancing clinical faculty's capacity to model and teach clinical care. This program offers an educational model that engages practitioners, stimulates changes in practice, and offers opportunities for reflection and professional revitalization.

Academic Medical Centers↗

PubMed2005

Teaching care management in a longitudinal primary care clerkship.

BACKGROUND: Harvard Medical School developed a longitudinal primary care clerkship as an opportunity to teach 7 themes of modern medicine: care over time, evidence-based medicine, prevention, uncertainty, cost effectiveness, teamwork, and shared decision making. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the longitudinal experience. METHODS: Students followed 1 patient throughout a 9-month clerkship and integrated the 7 themes into their management plans. We coded their written reports for number and duration of student-patient encounters; characteristics of students, preceptors, sites, and patients related to encounter frequency; and integration of themes into management plans. RESULTS: The median number of student-patient contacts was 4.0, as was the median number of months that students maintained contact with the patients. Patients with complex diagnoses were seen more times. No characteristics of patient, student, preceptor, or site limited the number or duration of contacts. Proportions of students integrating each theme into their plans ranged from 66% (care over time) to 11% (cost effectiveness). Those who had a greater number of patient contacts integrated more themes into their plans. CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal relationships with patients can be achieved with a variety of patients and drive integration of some themes.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Preparing faculty to teach managing care competencies: lessons learned from a national faculty development program.

BACKGROUND: Although competencies for managing care are often described in the medical literature, educators have been slow to integrate these competencies into clinical curricula. Backlash against managed care has created a skeptical educational environment. Many faculty feel unprepared to teach the competencies in clinical settings. METHODS: From 1999 to 2001, we designed, implemented, and evaluated a faculty development program, funded by the Bureau of Health Professions, Division of Medicine. The goal of the program was to increase Undergraduate Medical Education for the 21st Century (UME-21) and Partnerships for Quality Education (PQE) faculty skills in teaching quality improvement and costeffectiveness in the clinical setting and to prepare them to teach these topics to other faculty. RESULTS: Thirty-nine faculty attended the 4-month faculty development program. The program, in a train-the-trainer model, consisted of two 2-day workshops as well as pre-, mid-, and end-program activities and teaching experiences. Readings, brief lectures followed by focused discussion, and active learning experiences were used to teach content, provide experience and feedback with teaching skills, and model a variety of teaching approaches. CONCLUSIONS: By the end of the program, participants believed that they had learned content (knowledge) and gained practical teaching skills. To be successful in effecting curriculum change around new topics, such as the managing care competencies, faculty need to not only master new content and methods but also learn how to be change agents in their schools. Because this work can be lonely, faculty need support within the school and connections with others, locally and nationally, who have similar ideas.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed2003

Variation in predictors of primary care career choice by year and stage of training.

CONTEXT: It is not known whether factors associated with primary care career choice affect trainees differently at different times or stages of medical education. OBJECTIVE: To examine how role models, encouragement, and personal characteristics affect career choice at different stages (medical school vs residency) and periods (1994 vs 1997) of training. DESIGN: A split-panel design with 2 cross-sectional telephone surveys and a panel survey in 1994 and 1997. PARTICIPANTS: A national probability sample of fourth-year students (307 in 1994, 219 in 1997), 645 second-year residents in 1994, and 494 third-year residents in 1997. Of the fourth-year students interviewed in 1994, 241 (78.5%) were re-interviewed as third-year residents in 1997. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Primary care (general internal medicine, general pediatrics, or family medicine) career choice. RESULTS: Having a primary care role model was a stronger predictor of primary care career choice for residents (odds ratio [OR], 18.0; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 11.2 to 28.8 in 1994; OR, 43.7; 95% CI, 24.4 to 78.3 in 1997) than for students (OR, 6.5; 95% CI, 4.3 to 10.2; no variation by year). Likewise, peer encouragement was more predictive for residents (OR, 5.4; 95% CI, 3.3 to 8.9 in 1994; OR, 16.6; 95% CI; 9.7 to 28.4 in 1997) than for students (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.2; no variation by year). Orientation to the emotional aspects of care was consistently associated with primary care career choice across stages and years of training. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of peer encouragement and role models on career choice differed for students and residents and, in the case of residents, by year of training, suggesting that interventions to increase the primary care workforce should be tailored to stage of training.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

How do precepting physicians select patients for teaching medical students in the ambulatory primary care setting?

OBJECTIVE: To study how clinical preceptors select patients for medical student teaching in ambulatory care and to explore key factors they consider in the selection process. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of transcribed interviews. SETTING: Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass. PARTICIPANTS: Nineteen physicians (14 general internists and 5 general pediatricians) who serve as clinical preceptors. MEASUREMENTS: Responses to in-depth open-ended interview regarding selection of patients for participation in medical student teaching. MAIN RESULTS: Preceptors consider the competing needs of the patient, the student, and the practice the most important factors in selecting patients for medical student teaching. Three dominant themes emerged: time and efficiency, educational value, and the influence of teaching on the doctor-patient relationship. These physicians consciously attempt to select patients whose participation in medical student teaching maximizes the efficiency of the clinical practice and optimizes the students' educational experiences, while minimizing any potential for harming the relationship between preceptor and patient. CONCLUSIONS: These findings may help validate the frustration preceptors frequently feel in their efforts to teach in the outpatient setting. Becoming more cognizant of the competing interests-the needs of the patient, the student, and the practice-may help physicians to select patients to enhance the educational experience without compromising efficiency or the doctor-patient relationship. For educators, this study suggests an opportunity for faculty development programs to assist the clinical preceptor both in selecting patients for medical student teaching and in finding ways to maximize the efficiency and educational quality of the outpatient teaching environment.

Ambulatory Care↗

PubMed2002

Evaluation of a faculty development program in managing care.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a faculty development program that teaches quality improvement and cost-effectiveness. METHOD: From October 2000 to February 2001, a two-part faculty development program was offered to 39 physicians from 19 U.S. medical schools supported by grants from the Partnerships for Quality Education (PQE) and Undergraduate Medical Education in the 21st Century (UME-21). Special features of the program included partnerships between academic and community physicians from each school, development of an educational innovation of interest to the participants, concurrent development of teaching skills and new medical knowledge, learning leadership skills (e.g., how to train colleagues to teach), and practice periods. The program focused on quality improvement and cost-effectiveness, but included other "managing care" topics. Prior to and after the course, participants assessed their knowledge of and competence to teach these topics, as well as other managing care topics. They also assessed their competence as medical educators and leaders. After the course, they indicated their progress in implementing their proposed educational innovations. RESULTS: Thirty-two of the 39 physicians completed evaluations both before and after the program. Self-assessed knowledge and competence to teach quality improvement and cost-effectiveness were significantly higher at the end of the course, as were all self-assessed teaching and leadership skills. The largest change scores occurred in assessments of competency to teach the new topics and to teach in new ways. Participants who implemented their innovations rated their competencies to teach quality improvement and cost-effectiveness higher than did non-implementers. CONCLUSION: Opportunities for faculty to learn how to teach a topic of stated importance to them, to practice what they have learned, and to work collaboratively with partners improved teaching skills.

Academic Medical Centers↗