PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Antonello Di Paolo

Publications and source records attributed to Antonello Di Paolo.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

In vitro and in vivo antitumour effects of novel, orally active bile acid-conjugated platinum complexes on rat hepatoma.

(NH3)2Pt(triacid) and (PPh3)2Pt(dehydrocholate)2 are novel bile acid-conjugated platinum complexes administered by oral route. The aims of the present study were to evaluate their in vitro cytotoxic activities on rat hepatoma cell line N1-S1, the in vivo antitumour effects in a syngeneic and orthotopic rat hepatoma model and the drug-related toxicities. Cisplatin, carboplatin and mitoxantrone were used as control drugs. In vitro experiments showed a concentration- and time-dependent antiproliferative activity of bile-conjugated platinum complexes. (NH3)2Pt(triacid) had similar effects on cell growth of cisplatin and carboplatin (e.g. at 48 h, IC50 0.7+/-0.05 microM vs. 0.63+/-0.28 microM and 1.1+/-0.3 microM, respectively; mean+/-S.D.). (NH3)2Pt(triacid) was able to inhibit tumour growth in a dose-dependent extent, reaching the maximum inhibitory effect at the 80 mg/kg dose (1.95+/-0.5 g vs. 13.85+/-3.9 g of control tumour weight). By contrast, despite the promising in vitro antiproliferative activity, (PPh3)2Pt(dehydrocholate)2 showed no significant in vivo antitumour effect. The toxicity profile of (NH3)2Pt(triacid) resulted favourable with minimal loss of weight and no gastrointestinal or neurological symptoms. Instead, (PPh3)2Pt(dehydrocholate)2 showed dose-dependent signs of severe weight loss and neurological alterations. In conclusion (NH3)2Pt(triacid) is a tolerable and active platinum derivative endowed by a preclinical antitumour activity by oral route.

Administration, Oral↗

Irinotecan in combination with thalidomide in patients with advanced solid tumors: a clinical study with pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic evaluation.

PURPOSE: Recent clinical studies have demonstrated a reduction of irinotecan (CPT-11) gastrointestinal toxicities when the CPT-11 is administered in combination with thalidomide in patients with diagnosis of colorectal cancer. The main purpose of this study was to investigate possible interactions between CPT-11 pharmacokinetics and thalidomide to explain the previously described gastrointestinal toxicity reduction. METHODS: In our clinical trial, advanced cancer patients were treated with CPT-11 on a dose of 350 mg/m2 at day 1 every 3 weeks. Only at the first cycle, CPT-11 was administered in association with thalidomide on a dose of 400 mg/day given from day 1 to day 14. From the second cycle, the treatment was continued with irinotecan alone at the same dose. Pharmacokinetics analysis of irinotecan and its metabolites, SN-38 and SN-38-glucuronide, were performed at the first and second cycle. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients entered the study. The pharmacokinetic analysis were performed on 16 patients. Pharmacokinetic data suggested a decreased metabolism of irinotecan into SN-38 and SN-38-glucuronide when it was administered with thalidomide. Indeed, area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) of SN-38 was significantly lower at the first cycle than the second cycle (0.99+/-0.45 hxmicrog/ml vs 1.34+/-0.65, respectively, P=0.027) whereas AUC of irinotecan and SN-38-glucuronide were higher at first cycle than second cycle (34.53+/-11.38 hxmicrog/ml vs. 28.42+/-12.23 hxmicrog/ml, P=0.064 and 2.39+/-1.21 h(microg/ml vs. 1.86+/-1.11 hxmicrog/ml, P=0.018, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates a significant decreased metabolism of CPT-11 into the active metabolite SN-38 when CPT-11 is administered in association with thalidomide. These observations strongly suggest an interaction of thalidomide with CPT-11 metabolism and, at least in part, it might explain the previously described improvement in tolerability.

Administration, Oral↗

A pharmacokinetic-based test to prevent severe 5-fluorouracil toxicity.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) plays a key role in the catabolism of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) to 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil (5-FDHU), and as such, an impairment of DPD has been recognized as an important factor for altered 5-FU and 5-FDHU pharmacokinetics, predisposing patients to the development of severe 5-FU-associated toxicity. Our objectives were to avoid severe 5-FU toxicities in patients with greatly impaired 5-FU and 5-FDHU pharmacokinetics after the administration of a reduced test dose of 5-FU and to investigate possible 5-FU or 5-FDHU pharmacokinetic parameters of the test dose related to the most common drug toxicities that affect patients after the first cycle of 5-FU chemotherapy. METHODS: Pharmacokinetics of 5-FU/5-FDHU and DPD activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were examined in 188 gastrointestinal cancer patients given a test dose of 5-FU, 250 mg/m2, 2 weeks before starting the planned 5-FU treatment of 370 mg/m2 plus l-folinic acid, 100 mg/m2, for 5 days every 4 weeks. Drug levels were examined by HPLC, and toxicities were graded according to World Health Organization criteria. RESULTS: The 5-FU test dose was well tolerated in all patients. Of 188 patients, 3 (1.6%) had marked alterations of 5-FU/5-FDHU pharmacokinetics (ie, 5-FU half-life [t(1/2 beta)] >5 hours, 5-FU total body clearance [CL(TB)] <1 L x h(-1) x m(-2), and 5-FDHU time to reach maximum plasma concentration [t max] > or = 45 minutes); they were excluded from 5-FU treatments and treated with irinotecan, which was well tolerated. The plasma disposition of 5-FU in the remaining 185 patients revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 3.73 +/- 2.18 h x microg/mL (mean +/- SD), maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of 16.78 +/- 8.61 microg/mL, and t(1/2 beta) of 0.16 +/- 0.15 hour, whereas the CL(TB) was 65.67 +/- 31.86 L x h(-1) x m(-2). The 5-FDHU plasma profile showed a Cmax value of 3.64 +/- 1.94 microg/mL, whereas the t max value was 26.63 +/- 10.06 minutes, with an AUC value of 3.71 +/- 1.90 h x microg/mL. The PBMC DPD activity was 202.15 +/- 141.14 pmol 5-FDHU x min(-1) x mg(-1) protein (95% confidence interval, 165-239.3 pmol 5-FDHU x min(-1) x mg(-1) protein). A significant correlation between 5-FU AUC and 5-FDHU AUC was found (r = 0.5492, P < .0001), whereas a weaker correlation between PBMC DPD activity and both 5-FDHU AUC (r = 0.328, P = .0121) and 5-FDHU Cmax (r = 0.369, P = .0044) was found. Interestingly, no relationships between PBMC DPD activity and common toxicities were found, whereas 5-FDHU t max values greater than 30 minutes were associated with the risk of moderate to severe neutropenia and diarrhea (P = .0323 and P = .0138, respectively; chi-square test). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a successful approach for preventing severe or life-threatening toxicities in gastrointestinal cancer patients who are candidates for standard 5-FU treatment by analyzing the 5-FU and 5-FDHU pharmacokinetic parameters after the administration of a reduced 5-FU test dose.

Adult↗

Thymidylate synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidine phosphorylase expression in colorectal cancer and normal mucosa in patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) and thymidine phosphorylase (TP) gene polymorphism and expression in colorectal cancer (CRC), and normal mucosa in chemotherapy-naïve patients. METHODS: TS, DPD and TP mRNA expression was analysed by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction in primary CRC and adjacent normal tissues from 53 patients with glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase as housekeeping gene. TS promoter (TSER and C/G SNP) and DPD IVS14+1G>A genotypes were determined by polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism assays. Moreover, the correlation between TS, DPD and TP expression and cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil was evaluated in Colo 320, HT-29, CaCo-2 and SW620 human CRC cell lines. RESULTS: TP and DPD mRNA expression was significantly different in tumour and normal tissue (7.51+/-13.50 vs. 1.10+/-0.57, P<0.05 and 0.60+/-0.63 vs. 1.17+/-0.55, P<0.0001, respectively), whereas no differences were observed in TS mRNA levels. High-grade, undifferentiated tumours (WHO grade 3) had significantly higher mRNA levels of TS with respect to moderately differentiated (WHO grade 2) carcinomas (0.38+/-0.37 vs. 0.00+/-0.44, respectively; P<0.05). Noteworthy, TS mRNA expression was significantly decreased (P<0.05) in homozygous TSER*3G/3G (-0.35+/-0.35) with respect to pooled homozygous TSER*2/2 and heterozygous TSER*2/3 genotypes (0.14+/-0.41). In-vitro results showed a higher sensitivity to 5-FU of cell lines with the lowest TS expression. CONCLUSIONS: The present results demonstrated significant differences in DPD and TP gene expression between normal mucosa and tumour samples, while TSER*3G/3G and high-grade histology were associated with significant variation in TS gene expression in tumour samples.

Adult↗

Improved analysis of 5-Fluorouracil and 5,6-dihydro-5-Fluorouracil by HPLC with diode array detection for determination of cellular dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity and pharmacokinetic profiling.

Administration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) may be associated with severe toxicities in patients who are deficient of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity. For this reason, a sensitive HPLC method for the analysis of 5-FU and 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil (5-FDHU) was developed in the present study for the determination of DPD activity in nucleated cells of peripheral blood and pharmacokinetic analysis of 5-FU and 5-FDHU in humans. 5-FU and 5-FDHU were extracted from biologic matrices by adding sodium acetate, sodium sulfate, and diethyl ether/propanol. Dried samples were reconstituted in a mobile phase (KH2PO4 35 mmol/L, pH 4.0), isocratically eluted with a Hypersil C18 stationary phase (25 cm x 4.6 mm, 10 microm), and detected by a diode array detector (measurement and reference wavelengths, 215 and 360 nm, respectively). 5-Fluorocytosine (internal standard), 5-FDHU, and 5-FU were eluted within 13 minutes of the injection without interferences. Recoveries ranged between 81% to 85% for all compounds, and the method proved to be linear, with a coefficient of linearity of 0.999. The limits of detection and quantification were 3.2 and 16 ng/mL, respectively, and the within-day and between-day CV were less than 10% for both 5-FU and 5-FDHU. The present assay proved to be sufficiently sensitive and specific to evaluate cellular DPD activity and measure 5-FU and 5-FDHU plasma concentrations in cancer patients, thus allowing therapeutic 5-FU monitoring in patients and identification of DPD-deficient subjects at major risk of severe toxicities.

Aged↗

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan given as a 7-day continuous infusion in metastatic colorectal cancer patients pretreated with 5-fluorouracil or raltitrexed.

PURPOSE: The purpose is to determine the plasma pharmacokinetics, the maximum-tolerable dose and to preliminary evaluate the antitumor activity of irinotecan administered as a 7-day continuous infusion every 21 days in metastatic colorectal cancer patients pretreated with 5-fluorouracil or raltitrexed. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A total of 13 patients entered the study. Three received irinotecan at 20 mg/m(2)/day (dose level I), 6 at 25 mg/m(2)/day (dose level II), and 4 at 22.5 mg/m(2)/day (dose level III). In 8 patients, plasma levels of irinotecan and its metabolites SN-38 and SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38glu) were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography and main pharmacokinetic parameters, including steady-state concentration, area under the time-concentration curve, and clearance, were calculated and normalized to the dose level of 22.5 mg/m(2)/day. RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicity was grade 3-4 diarrhea, which occurred in 4 of 6 patients at dose level II and in 2 of 4 patients at dose level III. Therefore, we defined 22.5 mg/m(2)/day the maximum-tolerable dose and 20.0 mg/m(2)/day the recommended dose for Phase II studies. Hematological toxicity was rare. The pharmacokinetic data provided evidence that continuous infusion increased the metabolism of irinotecan to SN-38 with respect to standard 30/90-min administration. Indeed, the steady-state concentration of irinotecan, SN-38, and SN-38glu were 42.7 +/- 25.2, 14.9 +/- 1.9, and 31.7 +/- 3.5 nmol/liter, respectively, and the area under the time-concentration curves of irinotecan, SN-38, and SN-38glu were 6.94 +/- 0.41, 1.92 +/- 0.30, and 4.23 +/- 0.52 hx micro mol/liter, respectively. Twelve patients were evaluable for activity, and we observed 3 (25%) partial responses, 2 (17%) minor responses, and 4 (33%) disease stabilizations. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of irinotecan as a 7-day continuous infusion every 21 days is feasible with diarrhea being the dose-limiting toxicity; recommended dose for Phase II studies is 20.0 mg/m(2)/day. The comparison of the present data with those obtained after a standard 30-90 min. i.v. infusion of irinotecan demonstrates that continuous infusion improves the transformation of irinotecan to SN-38 and also results in increased glucuronidation of the active metabolite. Antitumor activity in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients is encouraging.

Aged↗

Pharmacogenetics of neoplastic diseases: new trends.

The study of the influence of genotype on drug activity and efficacy (pharmacogenetics) and the genome-wide approach to drug discovery and interpretation of complex pharmacological responses (pharmacogenomics) are gaining momentum in current molecular medicine. The reasons of the variable activity and tolerability of cancer chemotherapy are being unraveled by the discovery of genotypic alterations affecting pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs. Indeed, genetic variability may alter drug catabolism (i.e. dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase for 5-fluorouracil, thiopurine-S-methyl transferase for thiopurines, aldehyde dehydrogenase for cyclophosphamide) and anabolism (i.e. thymidine phosphorylase for capecitabine, deoxycitidine kinase for gemcitabine). Moreover, increased expression of transporter systems (i.e. the ATP binding cassette (ABC) superfamily) is associated with reduction of the cytoplasmic levels of drugs which may be unable to exert a cytotoxic effect. Additional systems could protect tumor cells from drug cytotoxicity, including the DNA repair machinery (nucleotide excision repair (NER) and DNA alkyltransferases) and antiapoptotic systems (i.e. bcl-2). Finally, alterations of drug targets may be associated with a decrease in the effectiveness of chemotherapy (i.e. mutations affecting tubulin and topoisomerase I for taxanes and irinotecan, respectively, and increased expression of thymidilate synthase for 5-fluorouracil). Therefore, genetic analysis has the potential to predict treatment efficacy and tolerability. However, major problems encountered in pharmacogenetic and pharmacogenomic studies are the need of extensive validation of available technology, the difficulties in obtaining a suitable amount of tissue from patients during the course of their disease and the extremely complex regulation of gene function. From this perspective, the evaluation of the cellular effect of drugs in relation to protein expression and function (pharmacoproteomics) may be able to overcome these obstacles, and allow the optimisation of cancer chemotherapy in association with a pharmacogenetic approach.

Animals↗

Drug therapeutic failures in emergency department patients. A university hospital experience.

Drug therapeutic failure (DTF) could be considered as an adverse drug reaction in which the expected drug effects do not occur following a prescribed pharmacological treatment, including any clinical event that could be related to a low prescribed dose or lack of compliance. DTFs are responsible for increasing disease length, hospitalisation time and social costs, with the worsening of patient quality of life. The aims of the present study are: (1) to estimate the frequency of DTFs among cases of adverse drug events referred to the emergency department; (2) to identify drug classes implicated in DTFs; (3) to analyse the putative causes underlying DTFs. Data presented in this paper were obtained from the Pronto Soccorso and Adverse Drug Events (PSADE) study carried out to analyse drug-related emergency department admissions in several Italian hospitals. Patients, admitted to the emergency department throughout two periods of 10 days each, were interviewed to gain information on their medical status and drug intake during the last two weeks. The present study analysed the patient questionnaires collected in the emergency department of Pisa University Hospital. Among 123 recorded cases of adverse drug event, 41 cases (19:22 male:female ratio; age range: 17-98 years, median age: 75 years) were identified as suspect DTF, resulting in a frequency of 33.33%. A statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of two variables, class of patient age and number of drugs assumed, on DTFs. In accordance with the present findings, showing that the number of drugs assumed by a patient may increase the risk of DTF more than advanced age (odds ratio: 1.371, P<0.02; 1.295, P<0.03, respectively), the prescription of pharmacological combinations might be proposed as a main risk factor for DTF occurrence. In conclusion, our results suggest that DTFs represent an important cause of emergency department admission, particularly in elderly subjects treated with pharmacological associations.

Adolescent↗

Pharmacokinetic interactions between omeprazole/pantoprazole and clarithromycin in health volunteers.

The association omeprazole/clarithromycin is of current wide use in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori associated gastroduodenal ulcer. This combination may result in increased levels of omeprazole with potential interactions with commonly associated drugs. Kinetic/metabolic changes occurring after omeprazole/clarithromycin were compared to those occurring after pantoprazole/clarithromycin in healthy volunteers. Eight healthy volunteers, all males, age 25-34 years, all EM for CYP2C19, participated in a randomized, double blind crossover study in two periods of 7 days, separated by a 14-day washout. In each treatment period, subjects took either omeprazole 20mg b.i.d. together with clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d., or pantoprazole 40 mg b.i.d. with the same dose of the antibiotic. The pharmacokinetic parameters of omeprazole and pantoprazole were compared to those after intake of both agents alone. Kinetics of unchanged clarithromycin was evaluated at the end of the two periods. The mean value of the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) of unchanged omeprazole increased almost two-fold after concomitant administration of clarithromycin; the average 5-OH-omeprazole AUC was instead significantly reduced by 42%. Omeprazole clearance and volume of distribution were reduced significantly by 75 and 56%, respectively, after administration of the drug with clarithromicyn. No significant changes of the kinetic of pantoprazole and metabolites were observed. Kinetics of clarithromycin did not differ after the two associated treatments. The administration of clarithromycin with two different proton pump inhibitors indicates that the antibiotic can markedly increase omeprazole, not pantoprazole, levels. This observation may result in a better therapeutic response to omeprazole, but it may also potentially affect either the metabolism of CYP3A4 substrates or interfere with the absorption of drugs requiring an intact gastric digestion system.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

Pharmacogenetics of anticancer drug sensitivity in non-small cell lung cancer.

In mammalian cells, the process of malignant transformation is characterized by the loss or down-regulation of tumor-suppressor genes and/or the mutation or overexpression of proto-oncogenes, whose products promote dysregulated proliferation of cells and extend their life span. Deregulation in intracellular transduction pathways generates mitogenic signals that promote abnormal cell growth and the acquisition of an undifferentiated phenotype. Genetic abnormalities in cancer have been widely studied to identify those factors predictive of tumor progression, survival, and response to chemotherapeutic agents. Pharmacogenetics has been founded as a science to examine the genetic basis of interindividual variation in drug metabolism, drug targets, and transporters, which result in differences in the efficacy and safety of many therapeutic agents. The traditional pharmacogenetic approach relies on studying sequence variations in candidate genes suspected of affecting drug response. However, these studies have yielded contradictory results because of the small number of molecular determinants of drug response examined, and in several cases this approach was revealed to be reductionistic. This limitation is now being overcome by the use of novel techniques, i.e., high-density DNA and protein arrays, which allow genome- and proteome-wide tumor profiling. Pharmacogenomics represents the natural evolution of pharmacogenetics since it addresses, on a genome-wide basis, the effect of the sum of genetic variants on drug responses of individuals. Development of pharmacogenomics as a new field has accelerated the progress in drug discovery by the identification of novel therapeutic targets by expression profiling at the genomic or proteomic levels. In addition to this, pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics provide an important opportunity to select patients who may benefit from the administration of specific agents that best match the genetic profile of the disease, thus allowing maximum activity.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Biweekly chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, irinotecan, infusional Fluorouracil, and leucovorin: a pilot study in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility, recommended doses, plasma pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of a biweekly chemotherapy regimen with oxaliplatin (L-OHP), irinotecan (CPT-11), infusional fluorouracil (5-FU), and leucovorin (LV) in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received CPT-11 followed by L-OHP and LV 200 mg/m(2) and followed by 5-FU 3,800 mg/m(2) as a 48-hour infusion, repeated every 2 weeks. In the first part of the study, an escalation of CPT-11 dose and/or a decrease of the L-OHP dose were planned. Once the recommended doses of CPT-11 and L-OHP were determined, all subsequent patients were treated at the recommended doses. RESULTS: Forty-two patients entered the study. CPT-11 175 mg/m(2) and L-OHP 100 mg/m(2) in combination with LV 200 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 3,800 mg/m(2) could be administered with acceptable toxicities; 39 patients were treated at these dose levels. The pharmacokinetics parameters of the agents used and their metabolites did not seem to be influenced by the concomitant use of the other drugs. The most relevant toxicities were diarrhea and neutropenia, with 14% of patients experiencing one episode of febrile neutropenia. In five patients (11.9%) a complete and in 25 (59.5%) a partial response was demonstrated, for an objective response rate of 71.4% (95% confidence interval, 47% to 83%). In 11 patients (26%), a surgical resection of residual disease could be performed. Median progression-free and overall survival times were 10.4 and 26.5 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: This biweekly regimen is feasible and has acceptable and manageable toxicities and no apparent relevant pharmacokinetics interactions. This combination is associated with a promising antitumor activity, time to progression, and survival. A phase III randomized trial in Italy planned by the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest has just started.

Adult↗

Pharmacokinetics of azithromycin in lung tissue, bronchial washing, and plasma in patients given multiple oral doses of 500 and 1000 mg daily.

The present study compares the pharmacokinetics of azithromycin in plasma, lung tissue, and bronchial washing after oral administration of 500 mg (standard dose) versus 1000 mg daily for 3 days. Samples were taken during surgery for lung resection at various time points up to 204 h after the last drug dose, and azithromycin levels were analyzed by HPLC method. Azithromycin was widely distributed within the lower respiratory tract; sustained concentrations of the drug were detectable at the last sampling time (204 h) in lung tissue and bronchial washing, with long terminal half-lives of 132.86 and 74.32 h at 500 mg daily and 133.32 and 70.5 h at 1000 mg daily, respectively. Doubling the drug dose resulted in a remarkable increase in lung area under the curve (AUC, 1318 hx microg g(-1) vs 2502 hx microg g(-1)) and peak tissue concentration (9.13+/-0.53 microg g(-1) vs 17.85+/-2.4 microg g(-1)). In addition to this, enhanced azithromycin penetration from plasma into bronchial secretion and lung tissue was evidenced by the increase in the ratio of AUC(bronchial washing) versus AUC(plasma) (2.96 vs 5.27 at 500 and 1000 mg, respectively) and AUC(lung) versus AUC(plasma) (64.35 vs 97.73 at 500 and 1000 mg, respectively). In conclusion, the exposure of lung and bronchial washing to azithromycin is increased by doubling the dose, which results in favorable pharmacokinetic profile of the drug in the lower respiratory tract.

Administration, Oral↗