Biomedical subjects

Antonio Domínguez Franco

Publications and source records attributed to Antonio Domínguez Franco.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

[Dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction induced by exercise].

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Dynamic left intraventricular outflow tract obstruction occurs occasionally in patients without hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. We hypothesized that dynamic intraventricular obstruction might occur during effort in patients with angina or dyspnea without evident disease. The objective of this prospective study was to investigate: a) whether it appears with effort; b) its incidence, magnitude and determining factors, and c) its clinical course. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We performed baseline and stress Doppler echocardiography in 211 patients with angina, dyspnea or both with exercise. Patients with previous myocardial infarction, valvular heart disease, ventricular dysfunction or ventricular hypertrophy without hypertension were excluded. Dynamic intraventricular obstruction was defined as intracavitary flow velocity > or =2.5 m/s. RESULTS: 134 patients (59 women) were included: mean age was 58 (9) years; history of hypertension was present in 69.7%, dyslipidemia in 35.8% and diabetes in 24.6%. Dynamic intraventricular obstruction appeared in 18 patients (13.4%), with gradients ranging between 25 and 53 mmHg (mean 32.19 [6.6]). Demographic variables, cardiovascular risk factors and exercise performed were similar in group A (with obstruction) and group B (without obstruction). No patient in group A had evidence of ischemia. Five patients in this group had symptoms during exercise; the gradients were greater in these patients (42.65 [10.5] vs 28.15 [2.37] mmHg; P<.0001) than in the remaining group A patients. Left ventricular outflow tract size was found to be the only independent predictive factor in the multivariate analysis. After 369.9 (133.5) days of follow-up, no cardiac events were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that some patients with angina or dyspnea without evidence of ischemia may develop dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction induced by effort.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

[Influence of diabetes mellitus on clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary revascularization].

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Diabetes mellitus modifies the natural history of patients with coronary artery disease. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcome of diabetic patients with successful coronary angioplasty in our environment and to identify the factors predictive of complications during follow-up. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was made of a series of 198 diabetics and who underwent angioplasty from September 1996 to January 2000 in our hospital. A group of 198 nondiabetic patients who subsequently underwent the same procedure was used as the control group. Death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina resulting in hospitalization and coronary revascularization were considered adverse events during a 1 year follow-up period. RESULTS: The overall frequency of coronary adverse events in a 1-year follow-up was higher in diabetics (37%) than in non-diabetics (24%; p = 0.03). Diabetics had a less favorable clinical and angiographic profile and more frequent incomplete revascularization (43 vs 30%). Diabetics with incomplete revascularization were older (66.5 vs 53.2 years), had previous angioplasty more often, anatomically more unfavorable lesions (70 vs 51% type B2-C), and a smaller ejection fraction (54.7 vs 59.4%). Diabetics had more complications at 1 year of follow-up (37 vs 24%; p = 0.03), mainly due to increased cardiovascular mortality in diabetics with incomplete revascularization (12 vs 2%). Multivariate analysis identified incomplete revascularization as the only correlate of clinical outcome. Diabetes per se was not predictive of complications during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetics who undergo successful coronary revascularization have a less favorable clinical outcome than non-diabetic patients undergoing the same procedure at 1 year of follow up. Incomplete revascularization is associated with a less favorable outcome.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

[Does abciximab improve the prognosis of diabetics after percutaneous coronary intervention?].

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: It is known that the outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention is worse in diabetics than in non-diabetics. The aim of our study was to determine whether abciximab therapy could improve clinical outcome in an unselected diabetic population that underwent percutaneous coronary interventions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed retrospectively 198 diabetic patients who underwent PTCA from January 1997 to January 2000. Seventy-three patients (36.7%) were treated with abciximab and the remaining 125 patients (63.3%) did not receive abciximab. The mean follow-up was 12.6 months. The events considered were death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, any revascularization procedure (including the target vessel), and hospital admission for unstable angina. RESULTS: Patients who received abciximab had more frequent previous myocardial infarction (67.1 vs. 52.8%; p = 0.04), worse left ventricular function (0.53 vs. 0.59%; p = 0.02), more frequent angiographic thrombus (67.1 vs. 36.8%; p < 0.001), more complex lesions (B2/C) (76.4 vs. 55.8%; p = 0.004), and less frequent location in left anterior descending artery (34.2 vs. 60.8%; p = 0.002). The indication for PTCA in patients who received abciximab was most often related to myocardial infarction. There were no differences between the groups in sex, age and distribution of diabetes treatment. Events were more frequent in diabetics not treated with abciximab than in those who were treated with abciximab (38 vs. 22%; p < 0.037). The patients not treated with abciximab suffered more frequently target vessel revascularization (22.7 vs. 7.2%; p < 0.007). There were no significant differences in the frequency of death or non-fatal myocardial infarction, but hospital readmissions for unstable angina were significantly more frequent in diabetics not treated with abciximab (29.1 vs. 15.9%; p = 0.045). Multivariate analysis identified abciximab as a predictor of the absence of complications during follow-up (OR: 0.45; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Abciximab treatment seems to reduce events in unselected diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, particularly target vessel revascularization.

Abciximab↗