PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Antonio Ruíz

Publications and source records attributed to Antonio Ruíz.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

DAX-1 expression in human breast cancer: comparison with estrogen receptors ER-alpha, ER-beta and androgen receptor status.

BACKGROUND: So far there have been no reports on the expression pattern of DAX-1 (dosage-sensitive sex reversal, adrenal hypoplasia critical region, on chromosome X, gene 1) in human breast cells and its relationship to the estrogen receptors, ER-alpha and ER-beta, and the androgen receptor (AR). METHODS: In this study we evaluated, by immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis, the presence and distribution of DAX-1 in benign breast disease (BBD), in situ carcinoma (CIS), and ductal and lobular breast carcinomas. RESULTS: In BBD and breast carcinomas, DAX-1 was present in both the nuclei and the cytoplasm of epithelial cells, although in infiltrative carcinomas the percentage of nuclear immunoreaction was higher than in CIS. An important relation was observed between DAX-1 and AR expression and between this orphan receptor and nodal status. CONCLUSION: DAX-1 might modify the AR and ER-beta intracellular location, and because a direct positive relation between the expression of these three receptors was found it could be assumed that the presence of DAX-1 in neoplastic cells might indicate a possible failure of endocrine therapies.

Adult↗

Impairment of smooth muscle function of rat thoracic aorta in an endothelium-independent manner by long-term administration of N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester.

In this study, we aimed to elucidate whether the daily hypertensive dose of long-term N(G)-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME) treatment, could make a difference between endothelial and smooth muscle functions in rat thoracic aorta. We test the hypothesis that high-dose, long-term l-NAME treatment has a depressive effect on vascular smooth muscle contractile activity which is not related with nitric oxide (NO) synthesis inhibition. After 14 days of treatment, isometric tension and (45)Ca(2+) influx were measured in aortic tissues isolated from l-NAME(10) and l-NAME(100) hypertensive (10 and 100 mg/kg/day, systolic blood pressures 167 +/- 7 and 172 +/- 10 mmHg, respectively) and control normotensive rats (132 +/- 7 mmHg). In l-NAME(10)- and l-NAME(100)-treated rats, acetylcholine-induced relaxation in aortic rings was suppressed with no significant difference between the treatments. l-NAME(100) (but not l-NAME(10)) treatment, significantly inhibited contractile responses to phenylephrine, angiotensin II, and K(+) (80 mm) in endothelium-intact tissues. The effect of l-NAME(100) on phenylephrine-induced contractile responses was not observed after 3 days of treatment. In endothelium-denuded aortic tissues of l-NAME(100) (but not l-NAME(10))-treated rats, phenylephrine (1 x 10(-6) m)- and K(+) (80 mm)-induced contractions and (45)Ca(2+) influxes were significantly reduced. In Ca(2+)-free medium (0.1 mm EDTA), on the contrary, the transient contractions obtained by either phenylephrine (1 x 10(-6) m) or caffeine (1 x 10(-2) m), or the sustained contractions induced by 12-o-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (1 x 10(-6) m; a protein kinase C activator) in endothelium-denuded aortic rings, were not modified by both l-NAME treatments. These results indicate that in aortic rings from l-NAME hypertensive rats, low and high doses, long-term l-NAME administration may be associated with equivalent inhibition in NO-dependent vasodilator tone (corresponding to equivalent hypertension values); whereas only high-dose, long-term l-NAME administration produces an endothelium-independent decrease in vasocontrictor activity, at least partly explained by a reduction in extracellular Ca(2+) influx.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗

Contextual interference in learning precision skills.

This research studied the effect of different organisations of practice (blocked and random) on the learning of three different types of throwing. 35 male students practiced three precise throws for 3 wk. Initially the subjects were separated into two groups who trained under different conditions of practice (blocked and random). All subjects improved significantly from initial performance, with both blocked practice and random practice. At the end of acquisition no differences were found between the groups. No significant differences were found on retention tests carried out 48 hr., 4 wk., and 8 wk. after the training period.

Adult↗