Biomedical subjects

Ariel G Gildengers

Publications and source records attributed to Ariel G Gildengers.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

What is the optimal duration of a short-term antidepressant trial when treating geriatric depression?

BACKGROUND: To determine the optimal duration of an antidepressant trial in elderly patients, the authors examined the probability of eventually responding to treatment based on early improvement. METHODS: Four hundred seventy-two elderly patients with major depression (nonpsychotic, nonbipolar) were treated under protocolized conditions for up to 12 weeks and assessed weekly with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. The probability of full response after 12 weeks of treatment was calculated in patients who had not fully responded after periods of treatment that lasted for 4 to 10 weeks. RESULTS: Most of the patients who had shown a partial improvement after 4 weeks of treatment became full responders after 4 or more additional weeks of treatment. By contrast, only a few of those who were nonresponders became full responders even after up to 8 additional weeks of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: After 4 weeks of treatment, it is possible to reliably identify a subgroup of elderly patients with depression who are more likely to benefit from a change in their treatment than from a few additional weeks of treatment with the same agent.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Trajectories of treatment response in late-life depression: psychosocial and clinical correlates.

The authors examined the effect of psychosocial and clinical variables on treatment response trajectory in elderly patients with major depressive disorder. Three studies provided data on treatment response in 360 elderly depressed subjects who participated in protocols using either nortriptyline or paroxetine as monotherapy or, in 2 studies, combined with interpersonal psychotherapy. Treatment response was assessed with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 Item (HRSD-17) score over 12 weeks of acute treatment in each study. The mixture-modeling method of trajectory analysis was used to identify different subpopulations of response, and to determine whether baseline HRSD-17 score, depressive illness course (single or recurrent), current episode duration, Interpersonal Self Evaluation List-Self-esteem factor, age at study entry, and medical burden were risk factor covariates associated with response trajectory. As a contrast, logistic regression was used to assess the association between the same covariates and the probability of response (defined as HRSD-17 < or =10 and 50% reduction from baseline). In each study, there were 2 response trajectories with similar course, but with different speed. We classified the trajectories as "rapid response" and "slower response." Baseline HRSD-17 score was a significant predictor of response trajectory, with higher initial score related to slower response trajectory. Higher self-esteem was associated with more rapid response trajectory. In the logistic regression analysis, in two of the studies, higher baseline HRSD-17 score was a significant risk factor for nonresponse. In the study without psychotherapy, higher self-esteem was associated with responding to treatment. Thus, trajectory analysis can identify different trajectories of responders and determine psychosocial and clinical variables associated with response trajectory in the acute treatment of geriatric depression. Further study focusing on risk factors associated with slower response may help optimize treatment in elderly patients who do not respond quickly to first-line therapies.

Age Factors↗

PubMed2005

A pilot study of standardized treatment in geriatric bipolar disorder.

OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to determine the feasibility of treating elderly adults with bipolar disorder under standardized-treatment conditions. METHODS: Thirty-one patients age 60 and older with bipolar disorder were treated in standardized pathways. Mood state was checked at each study visit with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 item (Ham-D-17) and the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). RESULTS: Defining "well days" as both Ham-D and YMRS scores of <or=10, the mean percentage of well days was 72.5 (range: 0%-100%) over study participation. CONCLUSIONS: Treating older adults with bipolar disorder under standardized treatment is feasible and is associated with low symptom levels. However, most older adults with bipolar disorder do not experience sustained recovery.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Cognitive functioning in late-life bipolar disorder.

OBJECTIVE: This study characterized cognitive functioning in elderly patients with bipolar disorder. METHOD: The cognitive functioning of 18 euthymic patients with a history of bipolar disorder I or II, ages 60 years and older, was tested with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale, and the Executive Interview. Cognitive functioning in these subjects was compared with that of an age- and education-matched group of 45 comparison subjects without mood disorders. RESULTS: Approximately half of the bipolar subjects scored one or more standard deviations below the mean of the comparison subjects on the MMSE (N=8, 44%) and the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale total (N=10, 56%). On the Executive Interview, three subjects (17%) scored between one and two standard deviations below the mean of the comparison subjects. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of older bipolar subjects exhibited neuropsychological deficits when they were clinically euthymic.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Course and rate of antidepressant response in the very old.

OBJECTIVE: The authors examined elderly patients with major depression to determine the relationship of current age to treatment response course and success rate. METHODS: Three studies of elderly depressed patients provided data on antidepressant treatment response in 323 subjects, treated in protocols using either nortriptyline or paroxetine. We grouped the subjects by current age: 'young-old' (59-69, N=163), 'middle-old' (70-75, N=80), and 'older-old' (76-99, N=80). We employed mixed-effect random regression analyses to examine Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression scores over 12 weeks of acute treatment. RESULTS: Older-old patients responded as quickly and successfully as the young- and middle-old. CONCLUSIONS: Major depression in the very old can be treated as successfully as in early old age.

Age Factors↗