Management of missing maxillary anterior teeth with emphasis on autotransplantation.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Arild Stenvik.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The objectives of the present prospective longitudinal study were to establish the survival and success rates for premolars with partly developed roots transplanted according to a set protocol, and to analyze the effect of varying pre-surgery root development on final root length. Standardized periapical radiographs of 132 consecutively transplanted premolars were obtained at predetermined intervals over a 4-year follow-up period. Survival and success rates were calculated on the basis of presence of teeth and recording of defined radiological variables, respectively. Final root length was compared to normative metric data for root morphology. From the total sample, 54 patients with 68 transplanted premolars suitable for analysis of root growth relative to initial root length were identified, and divided into subsamples according to root length pre-transplantation. Survival rates were 100% after 1, 2, and 3 years, and 98.6% 4 years post-transplantation. The success rates were 92.9%, 92.8%, 89%, and 90.5% in subsamples collected 1, 2, 3, and 4 years after transplantation, respectively. The transplants obtained on average 78% of normative root length, and by dichotomizing the transplanted teeth in subsamples with 'short' and 'long' roots pre-surgery, similar final root lengths were observed even if 'short' roots had the greatest increase. Very early transplantation (roots < 7 mm), however, tended to result in short final root length. It is concluded that the success and survival rates were comparable to results obtained in similar studies. Initial root length was a significant predictor of root length increase. Transplanting teeth with short roots is to risk short final root length.
Orthodontic space closure is one of the treatment alternatives when a maxillary central incisor is missing. Because no systematic analysis of such treatment results is available, a sample of 20 consecutively treated patients was examined in a follow-up study. All patients had received orthodontic treatment with the objective of closing the space for the missing central incisor. Biologic features and the clinical appearance of the recontoured lateral incisor (test tooth) replacing the missing tooth were compared with the neighboring intact central incisor, which served as control tooth. The patients' opinions regarding the treatment and the result were recorded in a questionnaire. The position of the examined teeth and the appearance of the surrounding soft tissues were similar in the test and control teeth. However, in some patients (25%), certain aspects of the recontoured incisor crown (such as the width at the gingival margin) mismatched the appearance of the controls. A somewhat increased mobility and probing pocket depth on the mesial aspect was recorded for some test teeth. No obvious detrimental effects were observed on the radiographs. Most patients expressed satisfaction with the treatment result. It is concluded that orthodontic mesialization of the lateral incisor to replace a missing central incisor is a valid treatment modality, if the indications for such treatment are present and careful attention to detail in orthodontic and restorative treatment is exercised.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Universities now exist in an environment of increasing accountability for their academic performance, both in teaching and research. Dental schools are expected to meet the academic expectations of their parent university and, in addition, to contribute to the health-care needs of the community. Individual staff members must achieve collectively the performance targets required of their school and individually must develop skills and expertise in their academic and clinical activities to merit tenure and promotion. This discussion examines the issues which impact on current problems of recruitment and retention of academic staff in dental schools internationally. The essential issue is career development in a manner which maintains the values that will ensure the credibility of dentistry as a scientifically based discipline and profession, while balancing the achievable academic needs with the added demands of achieving specialist clinical skills. Central to this balance is recognition that scholarship, which provides the bridge between research and teaching, can be broadly defined and that different individuals can be scholarly in a range of ways. Increasingly, schools are recognizing the importance of providing structured opportunities and guidance for career development of younger staff and of the need for flexibility in their criteria for tenure and promotion, recognizing that a diversity of individual strengths and teamworking are necessary both for the collective performance of the institution and the morale and development of the individual.
Autotransplantation of developing premolars to replace maxillary incisors has been documented to provide physiologically sound results, but comprehensive studies of the esthetic outcome have not been made previously. In order to assess the applicability of this approach and to identify factors important for planning of treatment, 22 autotransplanted premolars reshaped to incisor morphology were compared to their natural, contralateral maxillary incisors by scoring of features considered important for esthetics (color, soft tissue appearance, tooth morphology, and position). The sum of scores for each feature was used to place the reshaped transplant in one of three categories - Match, Deviate, Mismatch. The 22 patients were asked to fill in a questionnaire which addressed the same features that were examined professionally, and the responses were categorized as either Satisfied, Acceptable, or Dissatisfied. Eleven of the 22 patients had received orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances following the transplantation. Most of the transplanted premolars matched the contralateral incisor, and the majority of patients were satisfied with the appearance of the transplant. Fourteen percentage of the transplants were categorized as Mismatch and 18% of patients reported dissatisfaction. The distribution in categories assessed professionally and by the patients was not significantly different. The color and gingival width of the transplanted tooth were scored as different from the natural incisor in about half of the bilateral comparisons. For those teeth categorized professionally as Mismatch and by patients as Dissatisfied, a potential for esthetic improvement could be identified, as allocation to these categories was primarily due to suboptimal positioning and restorative build-up of the transplant. Inter-disciplinary planning is important for successful esthetic results.
The literature contains no follow-up studies of transplanted teeth with mean observation times exceeding 10 years. This article describes long-term outcomes, including gingival and periodontal conditions, and the patients' attitudes about treatment and outcome. The material comprised all accessible patients in the files of the Department of Orthodontics, University of Oslo, Norway, on whom treatment had been performed at least 17 years ago (n = 28). Established clinical criteria were used to assess tooth mobility, plaque and gingival indexes, and probing pocket depth. Standardized radiography was used to evaluate the presence of pathology, pulp obliteration, and root length. Similar recordings were obtained from the in situ tooth contralateral to the initial position of the grafted tooth. Criteria for determining treatment success were established. All patients responded to questions about their treatment using visual analogue scales. The mean age at surgery was 11.5 years, and the mean observation period was 26.4 years (range, 17-41 years). Of the 33 teeth transplanted in the 28 patients, 3 teeth were lost after 9, 10, and 29 years, respectively. Therefore, the 30 teeth in the 25 patients we examined yielded a survival rate of 90%. The success rate was 79% because 2 transplants had ankylosed, and 2 others failed to fulfill the proposed criteria. The patients generally responded very favorably regarding their perception of the treatment. Their only hesitation was related to some discomfort during surgery. It was concluded that survival and success rates for teeth autotransplanted when the root is partly developed compare favorably in a long-term perspective with other treatment modalities for substituting missing teeth.
A treatment combining autotransplantation of developing premolars and orthodontic space closure is described as an alternative to prosthodontics in the management of patients with alveolar clefts when 2 cleft-side incisors are missing. We report on 5 consecutive patients with unilateral clefts in whom 2 cleft-side incisors were congenitally missing, severely malformed, ectopically erupting, or lost because of trauma. In each instance, a mandibular premolar with a partly developed root was transplanted to the central incisor region (3 patients had previously undergone alveolar bone grafting). Root growth continued in all transplants. After an observation period of 2 years 6 months to 7 years 8 months, all transplanted teeth were present and fulfilled the established success criteria. The physiologic status of the transplanted premolars compared favorably with that of the central incisor on the noncleft side. The appearance of the reshaped transplants was found to match the noncleft incisor in 3 patients and deviated somewhat in 2. We concluded that an acceptable clinical outcome can be obtained by tooth transplantation combined with orthodontic space closure in patients with alveolar clefts and 2 missing cleft-side incisors.