PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Arlene A Forastiere

Publications and source records attributed to Arlene A Forastiere.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline for the use of larynx-preservation strategies in the treatment of laryngeal cancer.

PURPOSE: To develop a clinical practice guideline for treatment of laryngeal cancer with the intent of preserving the larynx (either the organ itself or its function). This guideline is intended for use by oncologists in the care of patients outside of clinical trials. METHODS: A multidisciplinary Expert Panel determined the clinical management questions to be addressed and reviewed the literature available through November 2005, with emphasis given to randomized controlled trials of site-specific disease. Survival, rate of larynx preservation, and toxicities were the principal outcomes assessed. The guideline underwent internal review and approval by the Panel, as well as external review by additional experts, members of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Health Services Committee, and the ASCO Board of Directors. RESULTS: Evidence supports the use of larynx-preservation approaches for appropriately selected patients without a compromise in survival; however, no larynx-preservation approach offers a survival advantage compared with total laryngectomy and adjuvant therapy with rehabilitation as indicated. RECOMMENDATIONS: All patients with T1 or T2 laryngeal cancer, with rare exception, should be treated initially with intent to preserve the larynx. For most patients with T3 or T4 disease without tumor invasion through cartilage into soft tissues, a larynx-preservation approach is an appropriate, standard treatment option, and concurrent chemoradiotherapy therapy is the most widely applicable approach. To ensure an optimum outcome, special expertise and a multidisciplinary team are necessary, and the team should fully discuss with the patient the advantages and disadvantages of larynx-preservation options compared with treatments that include total laryngectomy.

Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic↗
PubMed2006

Phase II trial of taxol in salivary gland malignancies (E1394): a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: Malignant tumors of the salivary glands make up approximately 5% of head and neck cancers. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) initiated a phase II evaluation of paclitaxel in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic salivary gland malignancies. METHODS: Chemo-naive patients with histologically confirmed recurrent or metastatic carcinoma of salivary gland origin (mucoepidermoid, adenocarcinoma, or adenoid cystic) were eligible. Patients were treated with paclitaxel, 200 mg/m(2) IV, every 21 days for a minimum of four cycles. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were treated. Eight partial responses were seen among the 31 patients with mucoepidermoid or adenocarcinoma histologic findings for a response rate of 26%. No responses were seen in the adenoid cystic carcinoma group. No significant difference in overall survival was found among these three histologic subgroups. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel demonstrates moderate activity in salivary gland tumors of mucoepidermoid and adenocarcinoma histology. The poor response rate in adenoid cystic carcinoma is consistent with prior reports in this chemoresistant histologic subtype.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2006

Phase II, parallel-design study of preoperative combined modality therapy and the matrix metalloprotease (mmp) inhibitor prinomastat in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase II, parallel-design study evaluated preoperative combined modality therapy and the matrix metalloprotease (MMP) inhibitor prinomastat in patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the esophagus that were stage II or greater. The objectives of the trial were to determine pathologic complete response rate (pCR), overall response rate, progression-free survival, pattern of disease relapse, and two-year and overall survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Preoperative staging included computed tomography, endoscopic ultrasound, and, when feasible, laparoscopy. Eligible patients were randomized to preoperative prinomastat or placebo, plus continuous infusion 5-FU, cisplatin, paclitaxel, and concurrent radiotherapy. Esophagectomy was performed on day 71. Adjuvant paclitaxel and prinomastat were available to all study patients. RESULTS: Between August 2000 and June 2001, 15 of a planned 78 patients were randomized into the trial. One patient after randomization withdrew consent. Fourteen patients, 7 in each arm, completed preoperative treatment and surgery. pCR was achieved in 5 patients; 1/ 7 prinomastat and 4/ 7 placebo. Disease improvement was achieved in 7 patients; 5 /7 prinomastat and 2 /7 placebo. At a median follow-up of 28 months, 7 patients (2 prinomastat, 5 placebo) are alive with no evidence of disease. The primary prinomastat related toxicity was moderate to severe musculoskeletal toxicity interfering with daily function. This toxicity was managed with treatment rest, dose reduction, or discontinuation. Five patients (3 prinomastat and 2 placebo) had life-threatening thrombo-embolic events, which led to early evaluation of safety and efficacy, and subsequent termination of the study. CONCLUSIONS: All patients, regardless of treatment arm, were able to successfully undergo neoadjuvant combined modality therapy and esophagectomy. However, early closure of the study due to unexpected thrombo-embolic events precluded any conclusions regarding clinical activity of prinomastat in locally advanced esophageal cancer patients.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2006

Reassessment of the role of induction chemotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Head and neck cancers are a complex group of diseases defined by variations in histological features, anatomical location, and cause. Once the realm of surgeons and radiation oncologists, the treatment of locally advanced disease now involves medical oncologists. Major developments include primary chemoradiotherapy for unresectable disease and organ preservation, the addition of chemotherapy to adjuvant radiotherapy, improvement in surgical and radiation techniques, and biological therapies. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy consistently improves locoregional control. However, control of distant metastases is poor, resulting in an increasing proportion of deaths from systemic recurrence. Given this shift in site of recurrence, therapeutic strategies to suppress distant metastases may be the next goal for further improvement of survival. One approach that merits reassessment is the use of induction chemotherapy in the setting of locally advanced disease--both resectable and unresectable. In this review we summarise data for the use of induction chemotherapy to define better which patients will likely benefit from this approach now and which questions are important in the design of future clinical trials.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2005

Phase III randomized trial of cisplatin plus placebo compared with cisplatin plus cetuximab in metastatic/recurrent head and neck cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: Therapy of recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck results in median progression-free survival (PFS) of 2 months. These cancers are rich in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). We wished to determine whether the addition of cetuximab, which inhibits activation of EGFR, would improve PFS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin every 4 weeks, with weekly cetuximab (arm A) or placebo (arm B). Tumor tissue was assayed for EGFR expression by immunohistochemistry. The primary end point was PFS. Secondary end points of interest were response rate, toxicity, overall survival, and correlation of EGFR with clinical end points. RESULTS: There were 117 analyzable patients enrolled. Median PFS was 2.7 months for arm B and 4.2 months for arm A. The hazard ratio for progression of arm A to arm B was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.54 to 1.12). Median overall survival was 8.0 months for arm B and 9.2 months for arm A (P = .21). The hazard ratio for survival by skin toxicity in cetuximab-treated patients was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.21 to 0.86). Objective response rate was 26% [corrected] for arm A and 10% [corrected] for arm B (P = .03). Enhancement of response was greater for patients with EGFR staining present in less than 80% of cells. CONCLUSION: Addition of cetuximab to cisplatin significantly improves response rate. There was a survival advantage for the development of rash. Progression-free and overall survival were not significantly improved by the addition of cetuximab in this study.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Randomized phase III evaluation of cisplatin plus fluorouracil versus cisplatin plus paclitaxel in advanced head and neck cancer (E1395): an intergroup trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: To determine the response rate, survival and toxicity of infusional cisplatin plus fluorouracil (CF) versus cisplatin plus paclitaxel (CP) in patients with incurable squamous cell cancer of the head and neck, with the hypothesis that CP is superior. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred eighteen patients with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic disease were randomly assigned to CF (cisplatin 100 mg/m2 day 1 and fluorouracil 1,000 mg/m2/24 hours by continuous intravenous infusion day 1 through 4) or CP (cisplatin 75 mg/m2 day 1 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 over 3 hours on day 1). Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks until progression or a minimum of 6 cycles with complete response or stable disease. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included response rate and toxicity. RESULTS: No significant difference in overall survival or response rate was seen. Estimated median survival was 8.7 months in the CF group and 8.1 month in the CP group. Objective response rate (complete response plus partial response) was 27% in the CF group and 26% in the CP group. Toxicity was similar between groups, with the most frequent including myelosuppression, thrombocytopenia, anemia, nausea, vomiting, and stomatitis. A total of 12 deaths occurred (CF, seven; CP, five) during treatment; eight from infection, two from hemorrhage, one from cardiac causes and one from unknown causes. Gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicities were more common in the CF group, whereas neurotoxicity was equivalent between groups. CONCLUSION: This phase III, randomized, multicenter trial showed no difference in survival between patients treated with CF or CP.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Neck dissection followed by radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for small primary oropharynx carcinoma with cervical metastasis.

OBJECTIVES: A cohort of patients with small primary (T1-T2) squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx and advanced cervical nodal metastasis were treated with initial neck dissection(s) followed by definitive radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy. Our rationale for this algorithm and our results are examined. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. METHODS: Pathology records and medical records from 1996 to 2003 from the Johns Hopkins Hospital were examined for patients meeting the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Sixteen patients meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. Follow-up periods ranged from 6 to 75 months. Mean and median follow-up periods were 38 and 33 months, respectively. One (6.25%) patient developed a metastasis and was alive with disease at last follow-up. Fifteen (93.75%) patients were alive without evidence of disease at last follow-up. Overall survival was 100%. Disease free survival was 93.75%. CONCLUSION: Initial neck dissection followed by primary radiation therapy to the primary site and neck with or without chemotherapy is an effective therapy for small primary oropharynx cancers with N2 or greater cervical metastases.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Concordant loss of MTAP and p16/CDKN2A expression in gastroesophageal carcinogenesis: evidence of homozygous deletion in esophageal noninvasive precursor lesions and therapeutic implications.

The gene that encodes methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP), an enzyme involved in adenine and methionine salvage pathways, is located on chromosome 9p21 telomeric to the p16INK4A/CDKN2A tumor suppressor gene. Inactivation of the p16INK4A/CDKN2A gene occurs by three different mechanisms: hypermethylation of the gene promoter, intragenic mutation coupled with loss of the second allele, and homozygous deletion. Immunohistochemical labeling for the p16INK4A/CDKN2A gene product parallels gene status but does not elucidate the mechanism of gene inactivation. Since the MTAP gene is often co-deleted with p16INK4A/CDKN2A, concurrent immunolabeling for both proteins can identify cases with homozygous p16INK4A/CDKN2A gene deletion. MTAP loss itself has therapeutic implications since it may confer selective sensitivity to inhibitors of de novo purine biosynthesis, such as L-alanosine. Twelve tissue microarrays were constructed from 92 cases of Barrett-associated adenocarcinomas and precursor lesions and 112 cases of gastric adenocarcinoma and precursor lesions comprising 1161 individual cores. Multiple cores were arrayed from any given case, and when available, included the entire histologic spectrum of intestinal metaplasia-dysplasia-carcinoma. Tissue microarrays were labeled with monoclonal antibodies against MTAP protein (clone 6.9, Salmedix, Inc) and p16 (clone 16P07, Neomarkers). Complete loss of labeling was considered negative, while any labeling (p16: nuclear; MTAP: cytoplasmic and nuclear) was considered positive. Loss of MTAP labeling occurred exclusively in conjunction with loss of p16 labeling, confirming that the previous findings from this group that concurrent loss of MTAP and p16 labeling is a surrogate marker of 9p21 homozygous deletions. Complete loss of MTAP and p16 was seen in 4 of 25 (16%) patients with Barrett's esophagus, 4 of 18 (22%) with low-grade dysplasia, 5 of 39 (13%) with high-grade dysplasia, 17 of 78 (22%) with invasive adenocarcinoma, and 8 of 36 (22%) of metastases. There were 7 cases of esophageal adenocarcinoma with loss of both MTAP and p16 for which precursor lesions were available. In 6 on these 7 cases (85%), the precursor lesion(s) had loss of both MTAP and p16. Lack of MTAP and p16 expression was seen in 11 of 106 (10%) cases of gastric adenocarcinoma. All metaplastic (30 biopsies from 20 cases) and dysplastic (15 biopsies from 13 cases) gastric tissues had both intact MTAP and p16INK4A/CDKN2A gene products. No precursor lesions were available from the gastric cancers that had loss of both MTAP and p16. Two benign gastric hyperplastic polyps also had intact p16 and MTAP. Concurrent MTAP and p16 loss detected by immunohistochemistry can serve as a convenient surrogate for p16INK4A/CDKN2A gene homozygous deletion in archival tissues. Inactivation of p16INK4A/CDKN2A by homozygous deletion appears to be an early event in Barrett carcinogenesis, occurring in noninvasive precursor lesions, including nondysplastic Barrett mucosa, in subsets of cases. In the absence of MTAP, cells depend exclusively on the de novo synthesis pathway for production of adenosine. This loss of MTAP during 9p21 homozygous deletion might be exploited therapeutically using de novo purine synthesis antimetabolites to treat a subset of invasive gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas and esophageal precursor lesions.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2004

Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, gastro-esophageal junction, and cardia: phase II trial (E8296) of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of postoperative paclitaxel and cisplatin on 2-year survival in patients with completely resected adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus, gastro-esophageal (GE) junction, and cardia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter phase II trial. Patients had pathologically staged T2 node-positive to T3-4, any node status adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus, GE junction, or gastric cardia with negative margins (R0). Treatment consisted of four cycles of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) over 3 hours followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. every 21 days. A positive outcome was considered to be an improvement in 2-year survival rate by > or = 20% compared to historic controls. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were recruited from 20 centers. Of 55 eligible patients, 49 (89%) had lymph node involvement. Forty-six patients (84%) completed all four cycles. Of the total 59 patients, 31 (56%) developed grade 3 or 4 toxicity with leukopenia/neutropenia, nausea/vomiting, and metabolic toxicities were most common. The median follow-up for surviving patients was 4 years. At 2 years, 33 patients were alive and 22 were dead, with a survival rate of 60% (95% CI, 46% to 73%; one-sided P = .0008 compared with the historic controls). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that adjuvant paclitaxel and cisplatin may improve survival in R0 resected patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus, GE junction, and cardia. These results warrant further testing in randomized trials.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2004

Postoperative concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high-risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: Despite the use of resection and postoperative radiotherapy, high-risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck frequently recurs in the original tumor bed. We tested the hypothesis that concurrent postoperative administration of cisplatin and radiotherapy would improve the rate of local and regional control. METHODS: Between September 9, 1995, and April 28, 2000, 459 patients were enrolled. After undergoing total resection of all visible and palpable disease, 231 patients were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy alone (60 to 66 Gy in 30 to 33 fractions over a period of 6 to 6.6 weeks) and 228 patients to receive the identical treatment plus concurrent cisplatin (100 mg per square meter of body-surface area intravenously on days 1, 22, and 43). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 45.9 months, the rate of local and regional control was significantly higher in the combined-therapy group than in the group given radiotherapy alone (hazard ratio for local or regional recurrence, 0.61; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.91; P=0.01). The estimated two-year rate of local and regional control was 82 percent in the combined-therapy group, as compared with 72 percent in the radiotherapy group. Disease-free survival was significantly longer in the combined-therapy group than in the radiotherapy group (hazard ratio for disease or death, 0.78; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.61 to 0.99; P=0.04), but overall survival was not (hazard ratio for death, 0.84; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.65 to 1.09; P=0.19). The incidence of acute adverse effects of grade 3 or greater was 34 percent in the radiotherapy group and 77 percent in the combined-therapy group (P<0.001). Four patients who received combined therapy died as a direct result of the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Among high-risk patients with resected head and neck cancer, concurrent postoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy significantly improve the rates of local and regional control and disease-free survival. However, the combined treatment is associated with a substantial increase in adverse effects.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Outcome of elderly patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of elderly patients with head and neck cancer undergoing palliative chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed combined data from two mature phase III randomized trials conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG; trial E1393, which compared cisplatin plus paclitaxel at two dose levels, and trial E1395, which compared cisplatin plus fluorouracil to cisplatin plus paclitaxel) to evaluate the toxicity, objective response rates, and survival of patients 70 years or older versus their younger counterparts. All patients had previously untreated recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and ECOG performance status 0 or 1. RESULTS: Fifty-three elderly patients were enrolled from a total of 399 eligible participants (13%). Elderly patients had similar objective response rates (28% v 33%) and median time to progression (5.25 v 4.8 months) compared with younger patients. The median survival was 5.3 v 8 months (Wilcoxon P =.06; log-rank P =.17) and the 1-year survival 26% v 33% for elderly and younger patients, respectively. Elderly patients had a significantly higher incidence of severe nephrotoxicity, diarrhea, and thrombocytopenia. A higher rate of toxic deaths was noted in the elderly but did not reach statistical significance (13% v 8%; P =.29). CONCLUSION: Elderly patients were underrepresented in these studies. Fit elderly patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer sustained increased toxicities with cisplatin-based doublets but had comparable survival outcomes compared with younger patients. Strategies to ameliorate toxicities should be pursued in the elderly.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Organ preservation for cancer of the larynx: current indications and future directions.

The optimal regimen for organ preservation for laryngeal cancer remains an area of active investigation. Multiple organ-preservation strategies have been explored, including radiation therapy alone, induction chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy, and concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Until recently, induction chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy was the standard of care for organ preservation in the United States. However, recent data from the Intergroup Trial, R 91-11 has placed concomitant chemoradiotherapy in the forefront as the standard of care for organ preservation. Newer strategies are being investigated and include the use of induction chemotherapy before concomitant chemoradiotherapy and the integration of novel biological agents. It remains to be seen whether such interventions can improve on the excellent locoregional control shown in the landmark Intergroup trial.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗
PubMed2004

Phase II evaluation of 96-hour paclitaxel infusion in advanced (recurrent or metastatic) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (E3395): a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel (24-hour infusion) has yielded activity in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Protracted exposure to paclitaxel may overcome resistance observed by using shorter infusions. Therefore we sought to evaluate paclitaxel by 96-hour infusion in both treatment-naïve and previously treated patients with SCCHN. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligibility stipulated bi-dimensionally measurable, biopsy-documented, incurable SCCHN, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) 0-1, and adequate physiological indices. Patients were divided into three cohorts: 1) chemotherapy-naïve; 2) chemotherapy-exposed, paclitaxel-naïve; and 3) chemotherapy and paclitaxel exposed. Paclitaxel was dosed at 140 mg/m2 (96-hour infusion) every 3 weeks in treatment-naïve patients and at 120 mg/m2 (96 hours) every 3 weeks in previously treated patients. RESULTS: Fifty patients were accrued between February 1997 and July 2000. The study was terminated because of low response rate. Eighty percent of patients were male, 75% PS 1. Nearly half the patients had oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal primary sites. There was one treatment-related death due to neutropenic fever/pneumonia. Grade 4 toxicities included granulocytopenia in eight patients (20%), thrombocytopenia, and stomatitis in one patient each. Grade 3 or greater anemia occurred in 10 patients. There was no grade 2 or 3 peripheral sensory neuropathy. In 15 chemotherapy-naïve patients, two responses (13%) were observed. There were no responses in treatment-exposed patients. The overall median survival was 5.5 months, and 1-year survival rate 10%. Treatment-naïve patients had a median survival of 8.2 months and 1-year survival rate of 20%. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel by 96-hour infusion at a dose of 120-140 mg/m2/96 hours is only marginally active in the treatment of SCCHN. This dose and schedule cannot be recommended for further evaluation.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Multidisciplinary approaches in the management of advanced head and neck tumors: state of the art.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Head and neck cancer remains a significant cause of morbidity worldwide, with approximately 400,000 new cases per year. Ongoing advances in multidisciplinary management of this complex and multivaried disease process are resulting in improved function, quality of life, and survival. This review presents selected advances in primary research in head and neck cancer during the year 2003. RECENT FINDINGS: Successful management of head and neck cancer now requires a cooperative approach among a broad group of medical disciplines that includes head and neck surgery, radiation oncology, medical oncology, medical imaging, clinical pathology and lab medicine, social work, nutrition, and others. Translation of continued advances in these fields by cooperative work will continue to yield incremental advances in diagnosis, staging, treatment, follow-up, supportive care, and quality of life. Accordingly, this review aims to include facets of each individual field. Diagnosis and staging continue to evolve with the inclusion of nuclear medicine and in vivo molecular imaging based on the technology of positron emission tomography and single photon emission computed tomographic scanning. Multimodality approaches remain the forefront of intervention for patients with advanced disease. Facets that continue to be defined and studied include the best treatment order of the three disciplines of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy; the refinement of radiation by altering fraction dose, sequence, and time course; radiosensitization by chemo- and biologic therapy; and the addition of novel, biologically targeted agents to these disciplines. Following from the side effects of these intensive treatments to a functionally critical part of the body are ongoing advances in supportive care and quality of life. SUMMARY: Head and neck cancer represents a collection of diseases that, although seemingly united by location and histology, on closer inspection represent a diverse collection of subcategories that often differ in pathogenesis, tumor biology, sublocation within the head and neck region, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, and effect on quality of life. Given this complexity, it is not surprising that clinical management is also complicated and requires a cooperative effort among multiple subspecialties. This review of the current standard of care for patients with head and neck cancer aims to assist this diverse group of practitioners in caring for this complex group of patients.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗
PubMed2003

Concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for organ preservation in advanced laryngeal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Induction chemotherapy with cisplatin plus fluorouracil followed by radiotherapy is the standard alternative to total laryngectomy for patients with locally advanced laryngeal cancer. The value of adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy and the optimal timing of chemotherapy are unknown. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with locally advanced cancer of the larynx to one of three treatments: induction cisplatin plus fluorouracil followed by radiotherapy, radiotherapy with concurrent administration of cisplatin, or radiotherapy alone. The primary end point was preservation of the larynx. RESULTS: A total of 547 patients were randomly assigned to one of the three study groups. The median follow-up period was 3.8 years. At two years, the proportion of patients who had an intact larynx after radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin (88 percent) differed significantly from the proportions in the groups given induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy (75 percent, P=0.005) or radiotherapy alone (70 percent, P<0.001). The rate of locoregional control was also significantly better with radiotherapy and concurrent cisplatin (78 percent, vs. 61 percent with induction cisplatin plus fluorouracil followed by radiotherapy and 56 percent with radiotherapy alone). Both of the chemotherapy-based regimens suppressed distant metastases and resulted in better disease-free survival than radiotherapy alone. However, overall survival rates were similar in all three groups. The rate of high-grade toxic effects was greater with the chemotherapy-based regimens (81 percent with induction cisplatin plus fluorouracil followed by radiotherapy and 82 percent with radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin, vs. 61 percent with radiotherapy alone). The mucosal toxicity of concurrent radiotherapy and cisplatin was nearly twice as frequent as the mucosal toxicity of the other two treatments during radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with laryngeal cancer, radiotherapy with concurrent administration of cisplatin is superior to induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy or radiotherapy alone for laryngeal preservation and locoregional control.

Adult↗