PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Arnold L Fenrich

Publications and source records attributed to Arnold L Fenrich.

14 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Atrial flutter in infants.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to characterize the clinical nature of atrial flutter (AFL) in a large cohort of infants. BACKGROUND: There are no large studies describing the natural history of AFL in infants. Previous studies vary in the therapy used and expected prognosis. METHODS: We reviewed the records of all children younger than 1 year of age who were diagnosed with AFL at our hospital during the past 25 years, excluding those with previous cardiac surgery. RESULTS: We identified 50 infants with AFL. Most, 36 (72%), presented within the first 48 h of life. Congestive heart failure was evident in 10 infants, with 6 presenting at 1 day of age, and 4 presenting beyond 1 month of age. The remainder were asymptomatic. A large atrial septal defect was the only structural heart disease. Spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 13 (26%) infants. Sinus rhythm was restored in 20 of 23 (87%) attempts at direct current cardioversion and 7 of 22 (32%) attempts at transesophegeal pacing; 7 required antiarrhythmic therapy. An additional arrhythmia, all supraventricular, appeared in 11 (22%) infants. The recurrence of AFL developed in 6 infants; 5 of 6 of these incidents occurred within 24 h of the first episode. All patients with recurrence had an additional arrhythmia. CONCLUSIONS: Infants with AFL usually present within the first 2 days of life. No association was found with structural heart disease. Direct current cardioversion appears to be most effective at establishing sinus rhythm. Chronic AFL has the potential to cause cardiovascular compromise. Atrial flutter in the absence of other arrhythmias has a low risk of recurrence. Once in sinus rhythm, infants with AFL have an excellent prognosis and may not require chronic antiarrhythmic therapy.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗
PubMed2006

Innovative techniques for placement of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads in patients with limited venous access to the heart.

BACKGROUND: Because of venous occlusion, intracardiac shunting, previous surgery, or small size placement of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads may not be possible using traditional methods. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and describe innovative methods of placing ICD leads. METHODS: The records of all patients undergoing ICD implantation at our institution were reviewed to identify patients with nontraditional lead placement. Indications for ICD, method of lead and coil placement, defibrillation thresholds, complications, and follow-up results were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Eight patients (aged 11 months to 29 years) were identified. Six patients with limited venous access to the heart (four extracardiac Fontan, one bidirectional Glenn, one 8 kg 11-month-old) underwent surgical placement of an ICD coil directly into the pericardial sac. A second bipolar lead was placed on the ventricle for sensing and pacing. Two patients with difficult venous access had a standard transvenous ICD lead inserted directly into the right atrium (transatrial approach) and then positioned into the ventricle. All patients had a defibrillation threshold of <20 J, although one patient required placement of a second coil due to an elevated threshold. There have been no complications and two successful appropriate ICD discharges at follow-up (median 22 months, range 5-42 months). CONCLUSIONS: Many factors may prohibit transvenous ICD lead placement. Nontraditional surgical placement of subcutaneous ICD leads on the pericardium or the use of a transatrial approach can be effective techniques in these patients. These procedures can be performed at low risk to the patient with excellent defibrillation thresholds.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Salvaging the failing Fontan: lateral tunnel versus extracardiac conduit.

BACKGROUND: Since Fontan revision has been demonstrated to provide hemodynamic and symptomatic improvement in select patients with failing Fontan circulations, we now believe it is important to determine if one type of revision (lateral tunnel [LT] or extracardiac conduit [ECC]) provides superior outcomes. METHODS: Thirty-five Fontan revisions were performed (Jun 1997 to Dec 2004): 19 ECC (54%) and 16 LT. Preoperative variables were similar: New York Heart Association (NYHA) IV (LT = 4 vs ECC = 2, p = not significant [NS]), preoperative arrhythmias (LT = 13 vs ECC = 16, p = NS) and systemic right ventricle (LT = 4 vs ECC = 2, p = NS). Twenty-eight patients (80%) underwent a modified maze procedure (LT = 12 vs ECC = 16, p = NS) and 29 (83%) had pacemaker placement (LT = 11 vs ECC = 18, p < 0.05). RESULTS: There were no hospital deaths and no arrhythmias at hospital discharge. There were no differences in mean duration of intubation (LT 0.6 vs ECC 0.9 days, p = NS), inotropic support (LT 1.5 vs ECC 2.1 days, p = NS), intensive care unit stay (LT 2.6 vs ECC 3.5 days, p = NS), hospital stay (LT 8.8 vs ECC 9.7 days, p = NS), or episodes of acute postoperative arrhythmias (LT = 2 vs ECC = 4, p = NS). On intermediate follow-up (29 +/- 22 months), the overall cohort had 94% survival, 97% of survivors in NYHA class I/II, 91% freedom from late arrhythmias requiring medication, and no patient required cardiac transplantation. Follow-up revealed no differences in NYHA I/II (LT = 14 vs ECC = 18, p = NS), mortality (LT = 2 vs ECC = 0, p = NS), or late arrhythmia (LT = 4 vs ECC = 4, p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Both the LT and ECC revisions provide symptomatic benefit for a failing Fontan connection and have equivalent early and intermediate results including arrhythmia recurrence.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Atrioventricular junction ablation and pacemaker therapy in patients with drug-resistant atrial tachyarrhythmias after the Fontan operation.

INTRODUCTION: Drug-resistant intraatrial reentrant tachycardia (IART) occurs frequently after the Fontan operation and is a major cause of morbidity and rarely mortality. We describe our experience with AV junction ablation after pacemaker implantation in postoperative Fontan patients with drug-resistant IART. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed retrospective analysis of Fontan patients with IART and attempted radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the AV junction. Seven patients (6 male) were identified, with a mean age at Fontan of 9.3 years (range 5.8-13.3) and a median age at RFA of 18 years (range 14.5-23.3). Mean follow-up prior to RFA was 764 +/- 235 days and after RFA 1,541 +/- 1,235 days. IART was refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs in all patients, and all had undergone pacemaker placement. Mean onset of IART was 44.1 months (range 0-142) after Fontan. Mean duration of atrial arrhythmia prior to RFA was 72 +/- 48 m (range 16-148). Ablation of the AV junction was successful or partially successful in all patients. Complete AV block occurred in 6 patients. Normal AV conduction was not seen during a mean follow-up of 1,541 days. The mean number of antiarrhythmic medications decreased from 2.8 +/- 1.5 to 0.7 +/- 0.8 (P <0.05). CONCLUSION: In Fontan patients with drug-resistant IART, RFA of the AV junction with prior pacemaker implant is an effective therapeutic option. Despite the introduction of pacemaker dependence, this option should be considered in patients who did not respond to RFA of IART or who are at high operative risk for Fontan conversion.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Atrial flutter following placement of an umbilical venous catheter.

Atrial flutter is a rare complication of the insertion of an umbilical venous catheter. We report a neonate who had an umbilical venous catheter placed within the first 24 hours of life and developed a hemodynamically stable tachyarrhythmia. The arrhythmia was successfully managed with synchronized cardioversion, with no further complications. The presentation and management are discussed. Physicians should be watchful for such potentially life-threatening complications from the placement of indwelling lines.

Catheterization↗
PubMed2004

Clinical course of atrial ectopic tachycardia is age-dependent: results and treatment in children < 3 or > or =3 years of age.

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the clinical presentation, natural history, and treatment response of atrial ectopic tachycardia (AET) in children <3 years of age (group 1) compared with those > or =3 years of age (group 2). BACKGROUND: Atrial ectopic tachycardia is a common cause of chronic supraventricular tachycardia in children and can be resistant to pharmacologic therapy. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) can eliminate AET arising from a single focus. METHODS: A retrospective review identified all children at Texas Children's Hospital diagnosed with AET from March 1991 to November 2000. Data obtained included clinical presentation, echocardiographic evaluation, response to antiarrhythmic therapy, spontaneous resolution, and outcomes of radiofrequency and surgical ablation. RESULTS: Sixty-eight children were identified (22 children <3 years and 46 children > or =3 years of age). Control of AET with antiarrhythmic therapy was achieved in 91% of the younger children but only 37% of the older children (p < 0.001). There was a higher rate of spontaneous resolution in the younger group (78%) compared with the older group (16%) (p < 0.001). Radiofrequency ablation was performed in 35 of the older children, with ultimate success in 74%. Surgical intervention was required for six children. CONCLUSIONS: Younger children respond to antiarrhythmic therapy and have a high incidence of AET resolution, thus warranting a trial of antiarrhythmic therapy. In children > or =3 years, AET is unlikely to resolve spontaneously, and antiarrhythmic medications are frequently ineffective. Thus, RFA should be considered early in the course of treatment for these children; however, surgical intervention may be necessary.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Improved early results with the Fontan operation in adults with functional single ventricle.

BACKGROUND: A growing number of adults with functional single ventricles are presenting as candidates for first-time and redo-Fontan operations. This study describes the clinical presentation and early operative results of adults who have undergone Fontan modifications. METHODS: Between July 1995 and April 2003, 23 patients (>18 years old) had Fontan operations. We retrospectively reviewed their perioperative courses. RESULTS: Twenty-three Fontan operations (first-time [n = 8] and redo [n = 15]) were performed with no early or late deaths. No patient has required reoperation. One patient has been listed for orthotopic heart transplantation. The overall mean age is 23 years (18 to 41 years); mean follow-up, 30 months; median postoperative hospital stay, 8 days (4 to 34 days); and median duration of chest tube drainage, 4 days (2 to 12 days). The postoperative New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class was improved in 22 of 23 patients. Eight first-time Fontan operations (7 of 8 nonfenestrated) were performed; lateral tunnel (n = 7) and extracardiac conduit (n = 1). Two patients had preoperative arrhythmias. New onset arrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia and sinus node dysfunction), requiring treatment, occurred in two patients. Fifteen redo-Fontan operations (all nonfenestrated) were performed; lateral tunnel (n = 5) and extracardiac conduit (n = 10). Fifteen patients had preoperative arrhythmias, thirteen of which had intraatrial reentry tachycardia (IART) and required antiarrhythmic medications. Concomitant intraoperative radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (n = 11) and cryoablation (n = 1) procedures were performed. In the immediate postoperative period, there was IART recurrence in five patients (post-RFA [n = 4] and postcryoablation [n = 1]). At latest follow-up, no patient is being treated with antiarrhythmic medications. Two patients had new onset atrial arrhythmias that required treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The Fontan operation can be performed in adults with minimal morbidity and improved NYHA functional class. New onset arrhythmias requiring treatment are sources of perioperative morbidity. Complete arrhythmia resolution of the preoperative arrhythmia may not be achieved in the immediate postoperative period in redo-Fontan patients. However, modification (intraoperative radiofrequency ablation-right atrial debulking) of the atrial tachycardia circuits in the redo-Fontan patients can result in complete resolution of preoperative atrial tachyarrhythmias at early follow-up.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Late pacemaker requirement after pediatric orthotopic heart transplantation may predict the presence of transplant coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Few data are available regarding pacemaker implantation after pediatric orthotopic heart transplantation. The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence, indications and associations with regard to pacemaker placement in children who have undergone orthotopic heart transplantation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of all patients undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation at our institution from October 1984 to March 2001. Data obtained included demographics, indications for pacemaker, presence of transplant coronary artery disease and long-term follow-up. Patients were divided into: Group 1, patients requiring a pacemaker within 3 months of transplantation; and Group 2, patients requiring a pacemaker beyond 3 months. RESULTS: Pacemakers were required in 7 of 106 (6.6%) transplant recipients. Pacing indications for patients in Group 1 (n = 2) were persistent bradycardia with pause-related ventricular arrhythmia and atrial flutter with resultant sinus pauses of up to 4 seconds. In Group 2 patients (n = 5), indications for pacing were high-grade atrioventricular (AV) block in 1 patient and episodic sinus pauses up to 3.3 seconds associated with syncope/dizziness in the remaining 4 patients. All patients in Group 2 had transplant coronary disease diagnosed within 1 year of pacemaker implantation. All had resolution of symptoms and no complications after implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Pacemakers are infrequently required after cardiac transplantation in children. Despite not meeting classic symptomatic sinus bradycardia criteria, pacemaker placement should be considered post-transplantation in patients with episodic sinus pauses and dizziness or syncope. Patients who present with the aforementioned symptoms or high-grade AV block should be evaluated closely for the presence or development of transplant coronary artery disease, as it may be their first symptom.

Bradycardia↗
PubMed2003

Frequency of recurrence among infants with supraventricular tachycardia and comparison of recurrence rates among those with and without preexcitation and among those with and without response to digoxin and/or propranolol therapy.

Approximately 60% of children with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) develop their initial episode by 1 year of age. Despite resolution in most of these patients by 1 year, approximately 30% of the SVT will recur. We performed a retrospective review of all patients <1 year of age with SVT between January 1984 and December 2000. Recurrence was defined as documented SVT at >1 year of age. Patients were divided into: (1) a first line (FL) group (controlled with digoxin and/or propranolol) and (2) a second line (SL) group (requiring additional antiarrhythmics). The groups were divided based on the presence of preexcitation. The FL group included 116 patients, 20 of whom (17%) had Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome. The SL group included 34 patients, 21 of whom (62%) had WPW (p <0.001). Recurrence of SVT occurred in 32 patients (28%) in the FL group and in 23 patients (68%) in the SL group (p <0.001). SVT recurred in 36 of 41 patients (88%) with WPW compared with 19 of 109 patients (17%) without WPW syndrome (p <0.001). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the presence of WPW syndrome was associated with a 29-fold higher odds of SVT recurrence (p <0.001), and that patients with WPW syndrome were more likely to require additional antiarrhythmic therapy (p <0.001). Thus, patients with WPW syndrome who had SVT at <1 year of age have 29-fold higher odds of recurrence at >1 year of age versus those patients with preexcitation. These patients are also more likely to require additional antiarrhythmic therapy to control SVT. Furthermore, children with WPW syndrome who are refractory to treatment with digoxin and/or propranolol are at increased risk of SVT recurrence.

Age of Onset↗
PubMed2003

The use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in pediatric patients awaiting heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: This multicenter study evaluated experience with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) as a bridge to orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) in children. METHODS: The application of ICD therapy continues to expand in pediatric populations, due in part to improved technology and new indications, including the prevention of sudden death while awaiting OHT. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of ICD databases at 9 pediatric transplant centers. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (16 males) underwent implantation or had a preexisting ICD while awaiting OHT between 1990 and 2002. The median age at implant was 14.3 years (11 months to 21 years) with a median weight of 49 kg (11.7-88 kg). Diagnoses included cardiomyopathy (n=22), and congenital heart disease (n=6). Indications for ICD implantation included ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (n=23), syncope (n=5), aborted sudden death with no documentation of rhythm disturbance (n=5), ventricular ectopy (n=1), and poor function (n=5). Of the 28 ICDs, 23 were implanted by a transvenous approach and 5 by epicardial route. There were 55 defibrillator discharges in 17 patients, 47 (85%) of which (in 13 patients) were appropriate. The 8 inappropriate discharges (in 6 patients) were triggered by sinus tachycardia, inappropriate sensing, and atrial flutter. The mean time from implantation to first appropriate shock was 6.9 months (1 day to 2.6 years). Twenty-one patients underwent transplantation during the study period, whereas 2 died while awaiting a donor. Morbidity included a lead fracture, 3 episodes of electromechanical dissociation, and 1 episode of electrical storm. CONCLUSIONS: ICD implantation represents an effective bridge to transplantation in pediatric patients. The complication rate is low, with inappropriate device discharge due primarily to sinus tachycardia or atrial flutter. There is a high incidence of appropriate ICD therapy for malignant ventricular arrhythmias in this highly selected group of patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Amiodarone-induced 2 to 1 atrioventricular block in association with prolongation of the QT interval.

The potential for development of 2 to 1 atrioventricular conduction in children with prolongation of the QT interval has been previously reported secondary to electrolytic disturbances. We report here a child who developed 2 to 1 atrioventricular conduction with prolongation of the QT interval following treatment with amiodarone for refractory supraventricular tachycardia. We highlight the importance of electrocardiographic monitoring to assess for those at risk of amiodarone toxicity, which may be manifested by prolongation of the QT interval and the simultaneous loss of atrioventricular conduction, and of equal importance the need for prompt conversion to an alternative anti-arrhythmic agent.

Amiodarone↗
PubMed2002

Flecainide and sotalol: a new combination therapy for refractory supraventricular tachycardia in children <1 year of age.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy of flecainide and sotalol for the treatment of refractory supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in children <1 year of age. BACKGROUND: Supraventricular tachycardia in infants can be refractory to single-drug as well as standard combination medical therapy. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the definitive treatment of refractory SVT; however, interventional therapy poses a high risk of morbidity and mortality in this age group. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed identifying infants who required flecainide and sotalol to control refractory SVT. Patient age, previous drug therapy, duration of treatment, flecainide levels and corrected QT intervals were recorded; 24 h Holter monitoring was utilized to gauge efficacy of treatment. Efficacy was defined as suppression of SVT to no more than rare nonsustained episodes or slowing of SVT to a clinically tolerable rate. RESULTS: Ten patients (median age: 29 days, range: 1 to 241 days) failed at least two antiarrhythmic agents including either flecainide or sotalol as single agents before initiating combination therapy. Efficacy was achieved in all patients. The failure rate for therapy was reduced from 100% to 0% (95% confidence interval: 0% to 26%). The median doses used were: flecainide 100 mg/m(2)/day (range: 40 to 150 mg/m(2)/day) and sotalol 175 mg/m(2)/day (range: 100 to 250 mg/m(2)/day). Median duration of therapy was 16 months (range: 5 to 35 months). No proarrhythmia occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of flecainide and sotalol can safely and effectively control refractory SVT and may obviate the need for RFA in children <1 year.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗