Biomedical subjects

Artemio Mojón

Publications and source records attributed to Artemio Mojón.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

[Chronotherapy with torasemide in hypertensive patients: increased efficacy and therapeutic coverage with bedtime administration].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Torasemide is a high ceiling loop diuretic frequently used for treatment of heart failure, renal failure and hypertension, according to results mainly based on clinic blood pressure measurements, without proper evaluation of the 24-hour efficacy of the drug. Accordingly, we investigated the time-dependent antihypertensive efficacy of torasemide in hypertensive patients. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We studied 58 patients with grade 1-2 essential hypertension (25 men and 33 women), 48.7 (11.9) years of age, randomly assigned to receive torasemide (5 mg/day) either upon awakening or at bedtime. Blood pressure was measured by ambulatory monitoring for 48 consecutive hours before and after 6 weeks of therapy. RESULTS: Efficacy of torasemide was significantly higher with bedtime dosing (11.2 and 8.0 mmHg reduction in the 24-hour mean of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively) as compared to the administration of the drug on awakening (6.2 and 3.7 mmHg reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure). The percentage of patients with controlled ambulatory blood pressure after treatment was also higher after bedtime treatment (54% versus 27%). The time-response curves indicate a full 24-hour therapeutic duration only when torasemide was administered before bedtime. With regard to the safety profile, 2 patients presented secondary effects (abdominal pain, diarrhea) in morning dose, and 4 patients taking the drug at bedtime reported nicturia. CONCLUSIONS: A dose of 5 mg/day torasemide is effective for blood pressure reduction after bedtime administration. The differences in efficacy and therapeutic duration as a function of the circadian time of treatment with torasemide here documented should be taken into account when prescribing this loop diuretic for treatment of patients with essential hypertension.

Blood Pressure↗

PubMed2006

[Effects of time-dependent administration of antihypertensive treatment in patients with resistant hypertension].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients with resistant hypertension represent an important clinical problem due to their poor control, high prevalence of target organ damage, and the associated increase in cardiovascular risk. Therapeutic strategies in resistant hypertension currently include a sequential change of drugs or the synergic combination of new drugs. Most patients, however, receive all their drugs in a single morning dose. We have evaluated the impact on the circadian pattern of blood pressure (BP) of modifying the time of treatment without increasing the number of prescribed drugs. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We studied 123 patients with resistant hypertension (73 men and 50 women), 59.9 (11.9) years of age, who were receiving 3 antihypertensive drugs in a single morning dose. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups according to the modification in their treatment strategy: a) Changing one of the drugs, but keeping all 3 in the morning. b) The same approach but prescribing one of the drugs to be taken at bedtime. Blood pressure was measured at 20-minute intervals from 07:00 to 23:00 hours and at 30-minute intervals at night for 48 consecutive hours at baseline and after 3 months of treatment with the new therapeutic scheme. RESULTS: There was a small and non-significant BP reduction when all drugs were still taken on awakening (p > 0.374). On baseline, only 22% of the patients in this group were dippers, and this percentage was further reduced to 15% after 3 months of therapy with all drugs on awakening. The blood pressure reduction was statistically significant (8.6 and 5.9 mmHg for systolic and diastolic blood pressure; p < 0.001) with one drug at bedtime. This effect was markedly larger in the nocturnal mean of blood pressure. Thus, while only 13% of the patients in this group were dippers at baseline, 53% were already dippers after 3 months of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this prospective trial indicate that, in patients with resistant hypertension, time of treatment may be more important for patient control and for the proper modeling of the circadian blood pressure pattern than just changing the drug combination.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

Circadian rhythm of fasting and postprandial portal blood flow in cirrhosis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship of both the unstimulated and the postprandial portal blood flow (PVF) to the time of day and to determine its intra-individual reproducibility over time in patients with liver cirrhosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 24 cirrhotic patients, 27 PVF measurements were performed during 24 h on day 0 and day 7 using Doppler ultrasound. Three standard liquid meals were given orally. On day 7, the baseline hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) was also measured. RESULTS: Circadian area under the time curve of PVF was highly reproducible within individuals (r=0.959, p<0.001). It did not correlate with HVPG. Cosinor analysis showed a significant circadian rhythm of PVF (acrophase at 11:44 and amplitude of 9.44%). Maximal postprandial increase in PVF was significantly higher in the morning than at noon or in the evening. CONCLUSIONS: PVF is subject to a circadian rhythm and postprandial portal hyperemia shows a diurnal variability. Both are highly reproducible.

Circadian Rhythm↗

PubMed2005

Differing administration time-dependent effects of aspirin on blood pressure in dipper and non-dipper hypertensives.

Aspirin is a potent antioxidative agent that reduces vascular production of superoxide, prevents angiotensin II-induced hypertension, and induces NO release. Low-dose aspirin administered at bedtime, but not on awakening, has also been shown to reduce blood pressure, possibly enhancing the nocturnal trough in NO production. Because endothelium-dependent vasodilation is blunted through a decrease in NO release in non-dipper compared with dipper patients, we compared the administration time-dependent influence of aspirin on ambulatory blood pressure in dipper and non-dipper hypertensive subjects. We studied 257 patients with mild hypertension (98 men and 159 women), 44.6+/-12.5 years of age, randomly assigned to receive 100 mg per day of aspirin either on awakening or at bedtime. Ambulatory blood pressure was measured for 48 hours at baseline and after 3 months of intervention. Blood pressure was slightly elevated after aspirin on awakening (increase of 1.5/1.0 mm Hg in the 24-hour mean of systolic/diastolic blood pressure; P<0.028). A highly significant blood pressure reduction was observed in patients who received aspirin at bedtime (decrease of 7.2/4.9 mm Hg in systolic/diastolic blood pressure; P<0.001). The reduction in nocturnal blood pressure mean was double in non-dippers (11.0/7.1 mm Hg) compared with dippers (5.5/3.3 mm Hg; P<0.001). This prospective trial corroborates the significant administration time-dependent effect of low-dose aspirin on blood pressure, mainly in non-dipper hypertensive patients. The timed administration of low-dose aspirin could thus provide a valuable approach, beyond prevention of cardiovascular disease, in the blood pressure control of patients with mild hypertension.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Effects of time of day of treatment on ambulatory blood pressure pattern of patients with resistant hypertension.

Patients with resistant hypertension present high prevalence of a non-dipper blood pressure pattern. Recent results indicate that non-dipping is related partly to the absence of 24-hour therapeutic coverage in patients treated with single morning doses. Accordingly, we investigated the impact of treatment time on the blood pressure pattern in 700 patients with resistant hypertension on the basis of clinic measurements who were studied by 48-hour ambulatory monitoring. Among them, 299 patients received all their medication on awakening, and 401 were taking > or =1 antihypertensive drug at bedtime. The percentage of patients with controlled ambulatory blood pressure was double in patients taking 1 drug at bedtime (P=0.008). Among the 578 patients with true resistant hypertension, subjects receiving 1 drug at bedtime showed a significant reduction in the 24-hour mean of systolic and diastolic blood pressure (3.1 and 1.6 mm Hg, respectively; P<0.011). This reduction was much more prominent during nighttime (5.1 and 3.0 mm Hg; P<0.001). Accordingly, the diurnal/nocturnal blood pressure ratio was significantly increased by 2.7 and the prevalence on non-dipping reduced (56.9 versus 81.9%; P<0.001) in patients taking 1 drug at bedtime. Compared with patients receiving all drugs on awakening, subjects with 1 drug at bedtime also showed significant reductions in the average values of glucose, cholesterol, fibrinogen, and urinary albumin excretion (P<0.011). In patients with resistant hypertension, pharmacological therapy should take into account when to treat with respect to the rest-activity cycle of each patient to improve control and to avoid the non-dipper pattern associated to higher cardiovascular risk.

Activity Cycles↗

PubMed2005

Administration time-dependent effects of valsartan on ambulatory blood pressure in elderly hypertensive subjects.

Previous results have indicated that valsartan administration at bed-time, as opposed to upon wakening, improves the diurnal/nocturnal ratio of blood pressure (BP) toward a normal dipping pattern, without loss of 24 h efficacy. This ratio is characterized by a progressive decrease with aging. Accordingly, we investigated the administration time-dependent antihypertensive efficacy of valsartan, an angiotensin blocking agent, in elderly hypertensive patients. We studied 100 elderly patients with grade 1-2 essential hypertension (34 men and 66 women), 68.2+/-4.9 years of age, randomly assigned to receive valsartan (160 mg/d) as a monotherapy either upon awakening or at bed-time. BP was measured for 48 h by ambulatory monitoring, at 20 min intervals between 07:00 to 23:00 h and at 30 min intervals at night, before and after 3 months of therapy. Physical activity was simultaneously monitored every minute by wrist actigraphy to accurately determine the duration of sleep and wake spans to enable the accurate calculation of the diurnal and nocturnal means of BP for each subject. There was a highly significant BP reduction after 3 months of valsartan treatment (p < 0.001). The reduction was slightly larger with bed-time dosing (15.3 and 9.2 mm Hg reduction in the 24 h mean of systolic and diastolic BP, respectively) than with morning dosing (12.3 and 6.3 mm Hg reduction in the 24 h mean of systolic and diastolic BP, respectively). The diurnal/nocturnal ratio, measured as the nocturnal decline of BP relative to the diurnal mean, was unchanged in the group ingesting valsartan upon awakening (-1.0 and -0.3 for systolic and diastolic BP; p > 0.195). This ratio was significantly increased (6.6 and 5.4 for systolic and diastolic BP; p < 0.001) when valsartan was ingested at bed-time. The reduction of the nocturnal mean was doubled in the group ingesting valsartan at bed-time, as compared to the group ingesting it in the morning (p < 0.001). In elderly hypertensive patients, mainly characterized by a diminished nocturnal decline in BP, bed-time valsartan dosing is better than morning dosing since it improves efficacy during the nighttime sleep span, with the potential reduction in cardiovascular risk that has been associated with a normalized diurnal/nocturnal BP ratio.

Antihypertensive Agents↗

PubMed2005

Treatment of non-dipper hypertension with bedtime administration of valsartan.

BACKGROUND: Previous results have indicated that valsartan administration at bedtime, as opposed to upon wakening, may improve the diurnal: nocturnal ratio of blood pressure without loss in 24-h coverage and efficacy. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the administration time-dependent antihypertensive efficacy of valsartan in non-dipper patients. METHODS: We studied 148 non-dipper patients with grade 1-2 essential hypertension, aged 53.0+/-12.6 years, who were randomly assigned to receive valsartan (160 mg/day) as a monotherapy either on awakening or at bedtime. Blood pressure was measured every 20 min during the day and every 30 min at night for 48 consecutive hours before and after 3 months of treatment. Physical activity was simultaneously monitored every minute by wrist actigraphy to accurately calculate the diurnal and nocturnal means of blood pressure on a per subject basis. RESULTS: The significant blood pressure reduction after 3 months of valsartan (P<0.001) was similar for both treatment times (13.1 and 8.5 mmHg reduction in the 24-h mean of systolic and diastolic blood pressure with morning administration; 14.7 and 10.3 mmHg with bedtime administration; P>0.126 for treatment-time effect). The diurnal: nocturnal ratio of blood pressure was significantly increased only when valsartan was administered before bedtime, which resulted in 75% of the patients in this group reverting to dippers, a significant increase in the percentage of patients with controlled blood pressure over 24 h, and a reduction in urinary albumin excretion. CONCLUSIONS: In non-dipper hypertensive patients, dosing time with valsartan should be chosen at bedtime, for improved efficacy during the nocturnal resting hours, as well as the potential associated reduction in cardiovascular risk.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

[Prospective evaluation of the hyperbaric-tolerance test for the diagnosis of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have tried to overcome poor results from isolated blood pressure values in detecting hypertension in pregnancy by relying on ambulatory monitoring. Low sensitivity of the 24-hour mean has led many authors to conclude that ambulatory monitoring is not a valid approach in pregnancy. Against this background, we have evaluated prospectively the sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of gestational hypertension of the tolerance-hyperbaric test. This is a combined approach consisting of establishing tolerance intervals for the circadian variability of blood pressure as a function of gestational age, and then computing the hyperbaric index (area of blood pressure excess above the upper limit of the interval) by comparison of any patient's blood pressure profile with those limits. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We studied 328 women who provided a 2014 blood pressure series. They were sampled for 48 hours once every 4 weeks from the first obstetric visit (mostly within the first trimester of gestation) until delivery. The hyperbaric index of each blood pressure series was calculated by taking into account the reference circadian tolerance limits established from a 497 series previously sampled from an independent reference group of 189 normotensive pregnant women. RESULTS: Sensitivity of the tolerance-hyperbaric test was 91% for women sampled during the first trimester of gestation, and increased up to 99% in the third trimester. Specificity was above 99% in all trimesters. Positive and negative predictive values were above 96% in all trimesters. Moreover, the hyperbaric index provided an early identification of subsequent gestational hypertension and preeclampsia, on the average of 23 weeks prior to the clinical confirmation of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: The tolerance-hyperbaric test represents a reproducible, stable, noninvasive, and high sensitivity test for the very early identification of subsequent gestational hypertension and preeclampsia, which can also be used as a guide for establishing prophylactic or therapeutic interventions.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Circadian time-qualified tolerance intervals for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis of hypertension.

The large-amplitude circadian pattern in blood pressure of healthy subjects of both genders suggests that the constant threshold currently used to diagnose hypertension should be replaced by a time-specified reference limit reflecting the mostly predictable blood pressure variability during the 24 h. Accordingly, we derived circadian time-specified reference standards for blood pressure as a function of gender. We studied 743 normotensive Caucasian volunteers (400 men and 343 women), 45.7 +/- 16.5 (mean +/- SD) years of age. Blood pressure was measured by ambulatory monitoring at 20-min intervals during the day and at 30-min intervals at night for 48 consecutive hours. Data from each blood pressure series were synchronized according to the rest-activity cycle of each individual in order to avoid differences among subjects in actual times of daily activity. Data were then used to compute 90% circadian tolerance intervals for each gender separately. The method, derived on the basis of bootstrap techniques, does not need to assume normality or symmetry in the data and, therefore, it is highly appropriate to describe the circadian pattern of blood pressure variability. Results reflect expected changes in the tolerance limits as a function of gender and circadian sampling time, as well as upper blood pressure limits below the thresholds currently used for diagnosing hypertension, especially for women. The use of these time-dependent tolerance limits for the computation of a hyperbaric index as a measure of blood pressure excess has already been shown to provide a reproducible and high-sensitivity test for the diagnosis of hypertension, which can also be used to evaluate treatment efficacy.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Comparison of parameters from rhythmometric models with multiple components on hybrid data.

Population multiple components is a statistical tool useful for the analysis of time-dependent hybrid data. With a small number of parameters, it is possible to model and to predict the periodic behavior of a population. In this article, we propose two methods to compare among populations rhythmometric parameters obtained by multiple component analysis. The first is a parametric method based in the usual statistical techniques for comparison of mean vectors in multivariate normal populations. The method, through MANOVA analysis, allows comparison of the MESOR and amplitude-acrophase pair of each component among two or more populations. The second is a nonparametric method, based in bootstrap techniques, to compare parameters from two populations. This test allows one to compare the MESOR, the amplitude, and the acrophase of each fitted component, as well as the global amplitude, orthophase, and bathyphase estimated when all fitted components are harmonics of a fundamental period. The idea is to calculate a confidence interval for the difference of the parameters of interest. If this interval does not contain zero, it can be concluded that the parameters from the two models are different with high probability. An estimation of p-value for the corresponding test can also be calculated. Both methods are illustrated with an example, based on clinical data. The nonparametric test can also be applied to paired data, a special situation of great interest in practice. By the use of similar bootstrap techniques, we illustrate how to construct confidence intervals for any rhythmometric parameter estimated from population multiple components models, including the orthophase, bathyphase, and global amplitude. These tests for comparison of parameters among populations are a needed tool when modeling the nonsinusoidal rhythmic behavior of hybrid data by population multiple component analysis.

Chronobiology Phenomena↗

PubMed2004

Reproducibility of the tolerance-hyperbaric test for diagnosing hypertension in pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: The tolerance-hyperbaric test has been shown to provide a valuable approach for the prediction of the outcome of pregnancy. In this test, diagnosis of hypertension is based on the hyperbaric index (area of blood pressure excess above the upper limit of a reference threshold) calculated by comparison with a time-specified tolerance interval for the circadian variability of blood pressure. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prospectively the stability and reproducibility of the tolerance-hyperbaric test. METHODS: We studied 403 women who provided 2430 blood pressure series sampled for 48 consecutive hours once every 4 weeks from the first obstetric visit (mostly within the first trimester of gestation) until delivery. Circadian 90% tolerance limits for blood pressure were established as a function of trimester of gestation from 497 series previously sampled from an independent reference group of 189 normotensive pregnant women. Diagnosis of hypertension was established in this trial for each woman in the validation sample on the highly restricted basis of presenting at least one blood pressure profile with a hyperbaric index above the threshold for diagnosis after 20 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: Sensitivity of the tolerance-hyperbaric test was 93% for women sampled during the first trimester of gestation, and increased to 99% by the third trimester. Specificity was more than 99% in all trimesters. The positive and negative predictive values were greater than 96% in all trimesters. CONCLUSIONS: The tolerance-hyperbaric test represents a reproducible, stable, non-invasive and high-sensitivity test for the very early identification of subsequent hypertension in pregnancy.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Seasonal variation of fibrinogen in dipper and nondipper hypertensive patients.

BACKGROUND: A seasonal variation with higher values in winter has been previously reported in plasma fibrinogen, a recognized marker of the potential risk of myocardial infarction and stroke. The lack of nocturnal decline in blood pressure has also been associated with an increase in cardiovascular events. Accordingly, we have compared the yearly variation of plasma fibrinogen in dipper and nondipper hypertensive patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 1006 stage 1 to 2 hypertensive patients (482 men and 524 women, 53.0+/-13.4 years of age). Blood pressure was measured every 20 minutes during the day and every 30 minutes at night for 48 consecutive hours. Physical activity was simultaneously evaluated at 1-minute intervals with a wrist actigraph. A blood sample was collected on the same day before starting blood pressure monitoring. The circannual variation of fibrinogen was established for all patients as well as for subgroups of dippers and nondippers (n=513; nocturnal blood pressure decline <10%) by multiple-component analysis. For the whole group of patients, fibrinogen was characterized by a highly significant seasonal variation (P<0.001) with a mean value of 318 mg/dL, double circannual amplitude (extent of predictable change along the year) of 40 mg/dL, and time of peak value in February. Throughout the year, the nondippers showed higher plasma fibrinogen levels than did the dippers (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The elevated plasma fibrinogen levels in nondipper patients appear to be directly related to their increased risk in vascular events, which are more prominent during the late winter months.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Administration time-dependent effects of valsartan on ambulatory blood pressure in hypertensive subjects.

This study investigated the administration time-dependent antihypertensive efficacy of valsartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker. We studied 90 subjects (30 men and 60 women), 49.0+/-14.3 (mean+/-SD) years of age with stage 1 to 2 essential hypertension; they were randomly assigned to receive valsartan (160 mg/d) as a monotherapy either on awakening or at bedtime. Blood pressure was measured by ambulatory monitoring every 20 minutes during the day and every 30 minutes at night for 48 consecutive hours before and after 3 months of treatment. Physical activity was simultaneously monitored every minute by wrist actigraphy to accurately calculate the diurnal and nocturnal means of blood pressure on a per-subject basis. The highly significant blood pressure reduction after 3 months of treatment with valsartan (P<0.001) was similar for both treatment times (17.0 and 11.3 mm Hg reduction in the 24-hour mean of systolic and diastolic blood pressure with morning administration and 14.6 and 11.4 mm Hg reduction with bedtime administration; P>0.174 for treatment time effect). Valsartan administration at bedtime as opposed to on wakening resulted in a highly significant average increase by 6% (P<0.001) in the diurnal-nocturnal ratio of blood pressure; this corresponded to a 73% relative reduction in the number of nondipper patients. The findings confirm that valsartan efficiently reduces blood pressure throughout the entire 24 hours, independent of treatment time. They also suggest that time of treatment can be chosen according to the dipper status of a patient to optimize the effect of antihypertensive therapy, an issue that deserves further investigation.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

[Seasonal variation in plasma fibrinogen in dipper and non-dipper patients with mild-moderate essential hypertension].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Increased plasma fibrinogen is recognized as a significant parameter for assessing the potential risk of myocardial infarction and stroke. A seasonal variation has been reported for plasma fibrinogen, with highest values occurring in the coldest months of the year. On the other hand, the lack of nocturnal decline in blood pressure has been associated with an increase in cardiovascular events. Accordingly, we have quantified the yearly variation in plasma fibrinogen in hypertensive patients classified according to their nocturnal decline in blood pressure. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We studied 577 mild-to-moderate hypertensive patients (254 men), 53.8 13.8 years of age. Blood pressure was measured every 20 min during the day and every 30 min at night for 48 consecutive hours. Physical activity was simultaneously evaluated at 1-min intervals with a wrist actigraph. A complete blood test was performed on the same day before starting blood pressure monitoring. The circannual variation of plasma fibrinogen was established for all patients as well as for subgroups of dippers (n = 287) and non-dippers (n = 290; patients with a nocturnal blood pressure decline < 10% of the diurnal mean) by multiple-component analysis. RESULTS: For the whole group of hypertensive patients, plasma fibrinogen was characterized by a highly significant seasonal variation (p < 0.001), with a mean value of 324 mg/dl, double circannual amplitude (i.e, extent of predictable change along the year) of 75 mg/dl, and time of peak value on the first week of March. This circannual variation can be best represented by a model that includes components with periods of 12 and 6 months. The same model also characterized dippers as well as non-dippers, analyzed separately. Non-dippers showed higher plasma fibrinogen throughout the whole year as compared to dippers (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The elevation of plasma fibrinogen in non-dipper patients as compared to dippers could support the association between the lack of nocturnal decline in blood pressure with an increase in cardiovascular events, since the circannual variation in fibrinogen is timely correlated with the reported yearly variation in coronary events.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

[Administration-time dependent effects of acetyl-salicylic acid on blood pressure in patients with mild essential hypertension].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Previous studies on the potential influence of aspirin (AAS) on blood pressure have not taken in consideration the chronopharmacologic effects of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs. This pilot study investigated the effects of AAS on blood pressure in hypertensive patients under no antihypertensive treatment who received AAS at different day times according to their rest-activity cycle. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We studied 64 untreated patients with mild hypertension (24 men), 43.5 (12.0) (mean [SD]) years of age, randomly divided in 3 groups: group 1, non-pharmacological hygienic-dietetic recommendations; group 2, the same recommendations plus AAS (100 mg/day) on awakening, and group 3, the same recommendations plus AAS (100 mg/day) before bedtime. Blood pressure was measured every 20 min during the day and every 30 min at night for 48 consecutive hours before and after 3 months of intervention. The circadian pattern of blood pressure in each group was established by population multiple-component analysis. Circadian parameters obtained for each group of patients before and after the intervention were compared with a nonparametric paired test. RESULTS: After 3 months of non-pharmacological intervention, there was a small and non-significant reduction of blood pressure (< 1.5 mmHg; p = 0.28). There was no change in blood pressure when AAS was given on awakening (p = 0.21). A highly significant blood pressure reduction was, however, observed in patients who received AAS before bedtime (decrease of 7 and 5 mmHg in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively; p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate a statistically significant time-dependent administration effect of low-dose AAS on blood pressure in untreated patients with mild hypertension. This effect reinforces the need to quantify and control AAS effects in patients using this agent in combination with antihypertensive agents.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

PubMed2003

Administration time-dependent effects of aspirin on blood pressure in untreated hypertensive patients.

Previous studies on the potential influence of aspirin on blood pressure have not taken into consideration the chronopharmacological effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. This pilot study investigates the effects of aspirin on blood pressure in untreated hypertensive patients who received aspirin at different times of the day according to their rest-activity cycle. We studied 100 untreated patients with mild hypertension (34 men and 66 women), 42.5+/-11.6 (mean+/-SD) years of age, randomly divided into 3 groups: nonpharmacological hygienic-dietary recommendations; the same recommendations and aspirin (100 mg/d) on awakening; or the same recommendations and aspirin before bedtime. Blood pressure was measured every 20 minutes during the day and every 30 minutes at night for 48 consecutive hours before and after 3 months of intervention. The circadian pattern of blood pressure in each group was established by population multiple-component analysis. After 3 months of nonpharmacological intervention, there was a small, nonsignificant reduction of blood pressure (<1.1 mm Hg; P>0.341). There was no change in blood pressure when aspirin was given on awakening (P=0.229). A highly significant blood pressure reduction was, however, observed in the patients who received aspirin before bedtime (decrease of 6 and 4 mm Hg in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively; P<0.001). Results indicate a statistically significant administration time-dependent effect of low-dose aspirin on blood pressure in untreated patients with mild hypertension. The influence of aspirin on blood pressure demonstrated in this study indicates the need to quantify and control for aspirin effects in patients using this drug in combination with antihypertensive medication.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

[Circadian blood pressure variation in normal pregnancy, gestational hypertension, and preeclampsia].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Changes in circadian variation of blood pressure could be used either to predict preeclampsia or to assess its severity. With the objective of identifying potential differences in blood pressure at the early stages of pregnancy, we examined and compared the characteristics of circadian variability in blood pressure in healthy and complicated pregnant women who were systematically monitored throughout gestation. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: We analyzed 2,014 blood pressure series sampled through ambulatory monitoring for 48 hours once every 4 weeks from the first obstetric visit until delivery. The study included 205 women with uncomplicated pregnancy, 92 with gestational hypertension and 31 with preeclampsia. The circadian pattern of blood pressure variation for each group and trimester of gestation was established by means of a population multiple-components analysis. RESULTS: Differences in the 24-hour mean between healthy and complicated pregnancies were highly significant in all trimesters (p < 0.001), with values of 15.1 and 9.1 mmHg for systolic and diastolic blood presure, respectively, in the third trimester of pregnancy. The 24-hour mean of systolic/diastolic blood pressure for complicated pregnancies was always below 120/72 mmHg. Results further indicated similar circadian characteristics between gestational hypertension and preeclampsia in the first trimester of pregnancy. The difference between these two groups in the 24-hour mean was significant in the second trimester for systolic (3 mmHg; p = 0.002) but not diastolic blood pressure (0.9 mmHg; p = 0.230). In the third trimester, the difference between gestational hypertension and preeclampsia was significant for both variables (5.4 and 3.7 mmHg for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The differences in blood pressure between healthy and complicated pregnancies, which are observed as early as the first trimester of pregnancy, are detected when both systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements in women with a late diagnosis of gestational hypertension or preeclampsia fall within accepted ranges of normotension. These differences offer new end points that may lead to an early identification of hypertensive complications in pregnancy as well as to the establishment of prophylactic interventions.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Differences in circadian blood pressure variability during gestation between healthy and complicated pregnancies.

BACKGROUND: Changes in circadian variation of blood pressure (BP) could be used either to predict preeclampsia or to assess its severity. We examined and compared characteristics of circadian variability in BP in women with both healthy and complicated pregnancies who were systematically monitored throughout gestation. METHODS: We analyzed 2430 BP series sampled by ambulatory monitoring for 48 h once every 4 weeks from the first obstetric visit until delivery in 235 women with uncomplicated pregnancies, 128 with gestational hypertension, and 40 with preeclampsia. The circadian pattern of BP variation for each group and trimester of gestation was established by population multiple-components analysis. RESULTS: The differences in 24-h mean and amplitude between healthy and complicated pregnancies were highly significant in all trimesters (P < 0.001). Results further indicated similar circadian characteristics between gestational hypertension and preeclampsia in the first trimester of pregnancy. The difference between these two groups in 24-h mean was statistically significant for systolic (P =.002) and diastolic BP (P =.038) in the second trimester and, to a larger extent, in the third trimester (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The differences in BP between healthy and complicated pregnancies that can be observed as early as in the first trimester of pregnancy are found when both systolic and diastolic BP for women with a later diagnosis of gestational hypertension or preeclampsia are well within the accepted range of normotension. These differences offer new end points that may lead to an early identification of hypertensive complications in pregnancy as well as to the establishment of prophylactic intervention.

Adult↗