PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Arthur E Li

Publications and source records attributed to Arthur E Li.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Using MRI to assess aortic wall thickness in the multiethnic study of atherosclerosis: distribution by race, sex, and age.

OBJECTIVE: Understanding the determinants of subclinical atherosclerosis may aid in elucidating the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and guide prevention strategies. In this pilot study, we investigated the role of aortic wall thickness as a measure of subclinical atherosclerosis, assessed a method by which to measure aortic wall thickness using MRI, and attempted to define differences in aortic wall thickness by patient race, sex, and age. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. In this prospective study, 196 participants (99 black, 97 white; 98 men, 98 women) were selected from the Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, which consists of participants 45-84 years old without clinical cardiovascular disease, who were recruited from six study centers in the United States. We performed fast spin-echo double inversion recovery MRI to measure thoracic aortic wall thickness. We tested interobserver agreement using the intraclass correlation coefficient, for sex and race differences in wall thickness using the Mann-Whitney test, and for associations between age and wall thickness using linear regression. RESULTS: Reproducibility was excellent for measurements of average and maximal wall thickness on MRI. Average and maximal wall thickness increased with age (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). Men had greater mean average wall thickness (2.32 vs 2.11 mm, p = 0.028) and mean maximal wall thickness (3.85 vs 3.31 mm, p = 0.010) than women. Blacks had greater mean maximal wall thickness than whites (3.74 vs 3.42 mm, p = 0.023). CONCLUSION: MRI is a feasible method to measure aortic wall thickness with high interobserver agreement. Aortic wall thickness increases with age and also varies by race and sex.

Aged↗

Cervical spine trauma: evaluation by multidetector CT and three-dimensional volume rendering.

Multidetector-row computed tomography (CT) offers important advantages over conventional imaging modalities in the evaluation of the post-trauma cervical spine. It allows for faster scanning times, critical for triaging post-trauma patients as well as for eliminating motion artifacts, and allows for thinner collimation and the ability to achieve an isotropic data set which can be reformatted in any plane without loss of spatial resolution. In addition, three-dimensional volume-rendered reconstructions of images obtained using multidetector scanners can provide additional information in defining extent of injury, allowing neurosurgeons to see the fractures in any plane, simulating intraoperative views. 3D multidetector-row CT represents an advance in CT technology and can help ensure rapid, accurate evaluation of cervical spine injuries.

Journal Article↗