PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Arti Hurria

Publications and source records attributed to Arti Hurria.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Adjuvant treatment recommendations in older women with breast cancer: a survey of oncologists.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies demonstrate differing treatment patterns between older and younger patients with breast cancer. To explore the reasons for these disparities we conducted a survey of 28 oncologists specializing in breast cancer. DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty-eight medical oncologists from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and the University of California Los Angeles who specialize in the treatment of breast cancer were asked to provide adjuvant treatment recommendations in hypothetical scenarios featuring older patients with high-risk breast cancer. For each of these hypothetical patients, the patient's age was varied over four possible values (70, 75, 80, or 85 years of age) and health and functional status varied across three possible states (perfect health, average health, or major health problems). Survey data were compiled and analyzed to determine the impact of theoretical patient age, baseline health, and functional status on their treatment recommendations. RESULTS: The proportion of oncologists who recommended adjuvant chemotherapy decreased as the patient's age increased or as the patient's functional status and health status decreased. For 96% of physicians (95% CI, 82-100%), patient age influenced chemotherapy recommendations, controlling for health/functional status; the same proportion of respondents were influenced by health/functional status, controlling for patient age. There was increased variability in treatment recommendations as the patient's age increased or functional status and health status decreased. CONCLUSION: Among these medical oncologists who primarily treat breast cancer adjuvant treatment recommendations vary based on patient age, health, and functional status. Future studies are needed to correlate age, health, and functional status with the risks and benefits of adjuvant therapy so that consensus guidelines can be formed. A more comprehensive baseline assessment of the older patient, such as can be derived from a comprehensive geriatric assessment may be useful in this regard.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2006

Postmastectomy radiation and survival in older women with breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Clinical trials indicate that postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) improves survival for women age younger than 70 years with high-risk breast cancer. However, for women age 70 years or older, the benefits of PMRT are unknown. As recent evidence suggests that certain adjuvant treatments appropriate for younger women may only be marginally beneficial for older women, we sought to determine whether PMRT improves survival for older women with breast cancer. METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Medicare data spanning 1992 to 1999, we identified 11,594 women age 70 years or older treated with mastectomy for invasive breast cancer. A proportional hazards model adjusted for clinical-pathologic covariates tested whether PMRT was associated with improved overall survival for low-risk (T1/2 N0), intermediate-risk (T1/2 N1), and high-risk (T3/4 and/or N2/3) patients. RESULTS: A total of 502 (7%) of 7,416 low-risk, 242 (11%) of 2,145 intermediate-risk, and 785 (38%) of 2,053 high-risk patients received PMRT. Median follow-up was 6.2 years. For low- and intermediate-risk patients, PMRT was not associated with survival. For high-risk patients, PMRT was associated with a significant improvement in survival (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.97; P = .02). Five-year adjusted survival was 50% for patients not treated with PMRT or chemotherapy, 56% for patients treated with PMRT only, 57% for patients treated with chemotherapy only, and 59% for patients treated with both PMRT and chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: PMRT is associated with improved survival for older women with high-risk breast cancer. Randomized clinical trials are urgently needed to confirm this finding and define optimal treatment strategies for this patient group.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2006

Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of weekly docetaxel in older patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of weekly docetaxel in a cohort of older patients with metastatic cancer and to explore the relationship of pharmacokinetic variables, Erythromycin Breath Test results, age, geriatric assessment variables, and toxicity to therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Twenty patients ages > or = 65 years with metastatic breast, prostate, or lung cancer entered an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of weekly docetaxel administered at 35 mg/m2 i.v. for 3 weeks followed by a 1-week break. The Erythromycin Breath Test and geriatric assessment were done before the first dose. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis with the first dose of docetaxel. RESULTS: Of the 20 patients who entered the study, 19 were evaluable. There were no age-related differences in the pharmacokinetics of weekly docetaxel. Fifty-eight percent (11 of 19) experienced grade > or = 3 toxicity: 16% (3 of 19) grade > or = 3 hematologic toxicity, and 53% (10 of 19) grade > or = 3 nonhematologic toxicity. There was an association between the Erythromycin Breath Test results and docetaxel pharmacokinetic variables; however, there was no association between Erythromycin Breath Test results or docetaxel pharmacokinetics with frequency of grade > or = 3 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Despite no statistically significant age-related differences in weekly docetaxel pharmacokinetics, over half of these older patients experienced a grade > or = 3 toxicity at the 35 mg/m2 starting dose. We advocate a starting dose of 26 mg/m2 on this weekly schedule and dose escalating if no toxicity.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Do age and ethnicity predict breast cancer treatment received? A cross-sectional urban population based study. Breast cancer treatment: age and ethnicity.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the treatment patterns of women aged 55 years or older with newly diagnosed breast cancer and to examine the association between age and ethnicity/race on treatment selection. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey between January 1 and June 30, 2001 of 401 women was performed of Hispanic, black and non-Hispanic white women in Los Angeles County, aged 55 years or older with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Regression analysis examined the association between: (a) age and treatment selection and (b) ethnicity/race and treatment selection, adjusting for the effect of possible confounders. RESULTS: In this study of urban breast cancer patients (64.1% response rate), blacks were less likely to receive hormone (OR=0.36) or chemotherapy therapy (OR=0.50) while older patients were less likely to receive lymph node dissection after lumpectomy (OR=0.48) and chemotherapy (OR=0.22). CONCLUSION: Although there are racial and age disparities in breast cancer treatment, other factors such as education, income status, insurance plan, functional status, and comorbidity also play an important role.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2006

Geriatric assessment for oncologists: rationale and future directions.

Sixty percent of all cancer occurrences and seventy percent of cancer mortalities occur in people over the age of 65. As the population ages, there is an emerging need to develop a means for oncologists to characterize the "functional age" of older patients with cancer in order to tailor treatment decisions and stratify outcomes based on factors other than chronological age and to develop interventions to optimize cancer treatment. In this paper, we discuss the formulation of a geriatric assessment for older patients with cancer. The measures included in this assessment were chosen based on their validity, reliability, brevity, adaptability for self-administration, and ability to prognosticate risk for morbidity or mortality in an older patient. The proposed geriatric assessment covers the essential domains of assessment predictive of survival in the geriatric population, is primarily self-administered, and limited personnel time is required. Our eventual goal is to determine if this geriatric assessment measure can identify factors independent of age that predict cancer treatment morbidity and mortality and result in rationale interventions to optimize oncologic care.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in older women with hormone receptor-negative breast cancer: assessing outcome in a population-based, observational cohort.

PURPOSE: For older breast cancer patients, there is limited evidence of the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy from randomized clinical trials. Our goal was to assess the relationship between adjuvant chemotherapy use and survival in a large, population-based cohort of older women with hormone receptor (HR) -negative breast cancer. METHODS: We identified women age 66 and older diagnosed with HR-negative, nonmetastatic breast cancer from 1992 to 1999 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) cancer registries. Chemotherapy use was identified in Medicare claims linked to SEER records. Clinical and sociodemographic predictors of chemotherapy use were identified using logistic regression. The effect of chemotherapy on survival was evaluated using propensity score methods and multivariable proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: A total of 1,711 (34%) of 5,081 women with HR-negative breast cancer received chemotherapy within 6 months of cancer diagnosis. Chemotherapy use decreased with increasing age and comorbidity, and increased with year of diagnosis, tumor size, number of positive lymph nodes, and higher tumor grade. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a mortality reduction of approximately 15% whether analyzed using propensity scores or standard multivariable methods. The greatest overall survival benefit was observed in patients with node-positive disease and in the node-negative patients most likely to receive chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: This analysis suggests a survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in older women with HR-negative breast cancer. The benefit of chemotherapy is most pronounced in the patients most likely to be selected for treatment, including those with involved lymph nodes or other high-risk disease characteristics.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Effect of adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy on cognitive function from the older patient's perspective.

PURPOSE: This longitudinal prospective study describes the older breast cancer patient's perception of the cognitive impact of adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: A total of 50 patients > or =age 65 with stage I to III breast cancer enrolled in this IRB-approved prospective study. Of the 50, 3 refused postchemotherapy testing and 2 had a cerebrovascular accident (CVA) during therapy, leaving 45 evaluable patients. The Squire Memory Self-Rating Questionnaire, given before and 6 months after chemotherapy, measured patients' perceptions of the ability to learn new information, of working memory, and of remote learning capabilities. RESULTS: Mean age was 70 years (range 65-84). Breast cancer stages were: I (33%), II (64%), III (2%). A 51% (23/45) of study participants perceived a decline in memory from before to 6 months after completion of chemotherapy. Patients who perceived a poorer memory than average before chemotherapy were more likely to report further memory deterioration after chemotherapy (19/30, 63%) than patients who perceived that their memory was average or better than average prior to chemotherapy (4/15, 27%). The memory domain most likely to be perceived as affected was the ability to learn new information (22/45, 49%) compared to remote memory (9/45, 20%) or working memory (13/45, 29%) capabilities. CONCLUSION: Approximately half of these older women perceived a decline in cognitive function from before to 6 months after chemotherapy. This perceived decline in cognitive function was most pronounced in patients with preexisting memory complaints. Further prospective study is needed to confirm these observations, correlate perceived memory changes with objective findings, and identify subgroups at special risk.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Cognitive function of older patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a pilot prospective longitudinal study.

OBJECTIVES: To report on the longitudinal cognitive functioning of older women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. DESIGN: Neuropsychological and functional status testing were performed before chemotherapy and 6 months after chemotherapy. SETTING: Cancer center. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-one patients aged 65 and older with Stage I to III breast cancer. Of the 31 patients enrolled, three refused post-testing, and 28 were evaluable. MEASUREMENTS: The following domains of cognitive function were examined: attention; verbal memory; visual memory; and verbal, spatial, psychomotor, and executive functions. RESULTS: Participants had a mean age of 71 (range 65-84): 39% Stage I, 50% Stage II, and 11% Stage III. The number of scores 2 standard deviations (SDs) below the norm were calculated for each patient before and 6 months after chemotherapy; 14 (50%) had no change, 11 (39%) worsened, and three (11%) improved (P=.05). Seven patients (25%) experienced a decline in cognitive function, defined as a 1-SD decline from pre- to post-testing in two or more neuropsychological domains. Exploratory analyses revealed no significant difference between functional status, comorbidity, and depression scale scores and change in overall quality-of-life scores before and after chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of older women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, a subset experienced a decline in cognitive function from before chemotherapy to 6 months after chemotherapy. Further prospective study is needed to confirm these observations and to identify the subgroup at special risk.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2006

A prospective, longitudinal study of the functional status and quality of life of older patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the toxicity experienced by a cohort of older women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer and the longitudinal effect on their functional status and quality of life (QOL). DESIGN: A geriatric assessment measuring functional status, comorbidity, mood, nutritional status, and QOL was performed before chemotherapy, at the end of chemotherapy, and 6 months later. SETTING: This prospective longitudinal study was conducted at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty patients aged 65 and older with Stage I to III breast cancer receiving any adjuvant chemotherapy; 49 were evaluable. MEASUREMENTS: The chemotherapy regimen and the toxicity to chemotherapy were recorded. A geriatric assessment was performed before the start of chemotherapy, on completion of chemotherapy, and 6 months after completion of chemotherapy. QOL testing was performed at the same times. RESULTS: Patients (mean age 68, range 65-84) received an anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimen (n=15) or cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.), methotrexate 40 mg/m2 i.v., 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 i.v. every 3 weeks for eight cycles (n=34). Grade 3 or 4 toxicity occurred in 53% (n=26), hematological toxicity in 27% (n=13), and nonhematological toxicity in 31% (n=15). Despite toxicity, there was no significant longitudinal change in functional status or QOL. CONCLUSION: Despite toxicity from adjuvant chemotherapy, this cohort of relatively young older patients maintained their functional status and QOL from before chemotherapy to 6 months postchemotherapy. Subtle changes in higher-order functioning would require assessment using different geriatric assessment tools.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Developing a cancer-specific geriatric assessment: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: As the U.S. population ages, there is an emerging need to characterize the "functional age" of older patients with cancer to tailor treatment decisions and stratify outcomes based on factors other than chronologic age. The goals of the current study were to develop a brief, but comprehensive, primarily self-administered cancer-specific geriatric assessment measure and to determine its feasibility as measured by 1) the percentage of patients able to complete the measure on their own, 2) the length of time to complete, and 3) patient satisfaction with the measure. METHODS: The geriatric and oncology literature was reviewed to choose validated measures of geriatric assessment across the following domains: functional status, comorbidity, cognition, psychological status, social functioning and support, and nutritional status. Criteria applied to geriatric assessment measurements included reliability, validity, brevity, and ability to self-administer. The measure was administered to patients with breast carcinoma, lung carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, or lymphoma who were fluent in English and receiving chemotherapy at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY) or the University of Chicago (Chicago, IL). RESULTS: The instrument was completed by 43 patients (mean age, 74 yrs; range, 65-87 yrs). The majority had AJCC Stage IV disease (68%). The mean time to completion of the assessment was 27 minutes (range, 8-45 mins). Most patients were able to complete the self-administered portion of the assessment without assistance (78%) and were satisfied with the questionnaire length (90%). There was no association noted between age (P = 0.56) or educational level (P = 0.99) and the ability to complete the assessment without assistance. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, this brief but comprehensive geriatric assessment could be completed by the majority of patients without assistance. Prospective trials of its generalizability, reliability, and validity are justified.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2005

Patterns of toxicity in older patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively determine the relationship of age to toxicity from adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. DESIGN AND METHODS: We identified 1,405 consecutive patients age 65 or older with primary invasive breast cancer who were seen at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from January 1998 to December 2000. Patients selected from this cohort for analysis were aged 65 or older at diagnosis; received their follow-up care at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; had stage I, II, or III breast cancer; and received adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil), an anthracycline-based regimen (AC [doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide], or AC-T [AC and paclitaxel or docetaxel]). Exclusion criteria included prior chemotherapy or previous breast cancer. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-two patients were included in this study, with a mean age of 70 (range 65--79). Comorbidity measured by the Charlson comorbidity index was low: score 0 (83%), 1 (12%), 2 (5%); with stages: I(18%), IIA (41%), IIB (27%), IIIA (8%), IIIB (6%), T1Nx (1%). Patients receiving an anthracycline-based regimen were more likely to experience grade 3 or 4 toxicity (p=0. 01), require hospitalization (p<0.001), and/or develop febrile neutropenia (p<0.001). Treatment delays due to myelosuppression occurred more frequently in patients receiving CMF (p<0.001). The type of chemotherapy regimen (anthracycline compared to CMF) was a better predictor for toxicity than increased age or comorbidity score. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of older patients with breast cancer, the risk for toxicity from adjuvant chemotherapy depended more on the type of regimen (anthracycline vs. CMF) than the patient's chronological age.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2005

Change in cycle 1 to cycle 2 haematological counts predicts toxicity in older patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To determine the association between changes in complete blood counts and grade 3 or 4 toxicities from cycle 1 to cycle 2 during adjuvant chemotherapy in women > or =65 years of age with breast cancer. DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on 1405 patients > or =65 years of age who were treated for primary invasive breast cancer at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between January 1998 and December 2000. From this cohort, we identified patients with stage I-III breast cancer who received adjuvant chemotherapy: cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF) or the anthracycline-based regimens doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) or AC followed by paclitaxel (AC-T). Patients were excluded from the analysis if they had a prior history of breast cancer or chemotherapy, or if they had no baseline blood counts available for review. Toxicities, dose modification and causality were recorded. RESULTS: The 104 patients who met our criteria had received either CMF (n = 58; mean age 70.6 years, range 65-78) or an anthracycline-based regimen (n = 46; mean age 68.9 years, range 65-77). Of these patients, 50% experienced treatment delay or treatment-related grade 3 or 4 toxicity. A decrease in white blood cell count and absolute neutrophil count from cycle 1 to cycle 2 was associated with grade 3 or 4 haematological toxicity, febrile neutropenia, hospitalisation and initiation of filgrastim for secondary prophylaxis. A decrease in haemoglobin was associated with febrile neutropenia and hospitalisation. Advanced age was not associated with a significant change in complete blood counts, other than a decline in absolute neutrophil count in patients receiving CMF. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of older patients who received chemotherapy for breast cancer, changes in blood counts from cycle 1 to cycle 2 were associated with increased risk of treatment-related grade 3 or 4 toxicity.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Effect of creatinine clearance on patterns of toxicity in older patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: A number of age-related physiological changes contribute to an increased risk of toxicity of cancer chemotherapy in the elderly. One of the most important of these changes is the progressive decline in renal function with aging. We sought to determine the association between calculated creatinine clearance (CL(CR)) and grade 3 or 4 toxicities during adjuvant chemotherapy in women > or =65 years of age with breast cancer. DESIGN AND METHODS: We identified 1405 patients > or =65 years of age who had been treated for primary invasive breast cancer at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between January 1998 and December 2000. Patients were included in this analysis if they had stage I-III breast cancer and had received adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were excluded if they had a prior history of breast cancer or chemotherapy, or had no baseline creatinine value available for review. RESULTS: The 126 patients who met our criteria had received either cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF) [n = 65, mean age 71, range 65-78] or an anthracycline-based regimen (n = 61, mean age 69, range 65-79). The majority of patients (97%) had a normal creatinine. CL(CR), as calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault and Jeliffe formulas, decreased with increasing age (increased age associated with decreased Cockcroft-Gault [p = 0.02]; increased age associated with decreased Jeliffe [p < 0.01]). In multivariate analysis, after controlling for age and co-morbidity, a CL(CR) <50 mL/min by the Cockcroft-Gault formula was associated with an increased risk of fever and neutropenia (odds ratio [OR] 3.60; 95% CI 1.00, 12.94; p = 0.05) and a CL(CR) <50 mL/min by the Jeliffe formula was associated with a trend towards an increased risk of fever and neutropenia (OR 3.30; 95% CI 0.91, 12.33; p = 0.07), grade 3 or 4 haematological toxicity (OR 2.43; 95% CI 0.90, 6.55; p = 0.08), and need for erythropoietin (OR 4.15; 95% CI 0.81, 2.99; p = 0.09). An increase in creatinine (as a continuous variable) was associated with a trend towards an increased risk of grade 3 or 4 haematological toxicity (OR 5.81; 95% CI 0.96, 35.33; p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of older breast cancer patients, a decreased CL(CR) and increased creatinine was associated with an increased risk of fever and neutropenia or haematological toxicity. CL(CR) should be considered when determining chemotherapy dosage in the elderly.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2004

Phase II study of feasibility of dose-dense FEC followed by alternating weekly taxanes in high-risk, four or more node-positive breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To develop a potentially superior adjuvant chemotherapy regimen, we conducted a pilot study of dose-dense 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) followed by weekly alternating taxanes. The primary objective was to determine the feasibility of the regimen; the secondary objective was to estimate the disease-free and overall survival. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with >/=4 node-positive breast cancer were studied. Treatment consisted of FEC at 500/100/500 mg/m(2), respectively, x6 at two-week intervals with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, followed by weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) alternating with docetaxel (35 mg/m(2)) x18. RESULTS: Between November 2001 and January 2003, 44 patients were enrolled. Median age was 46 years (range, 26-63 years), median number of positive nodes was 9 (range, 4-32), and median tumor size was 2.5 cm (range, 0.6-11.0 cm). Because of unexpected toxicities, the study was stopped when 17 (39%) had fully completed all of the planned treatment. Two of 17 (12%) developed grade 4 pericardial/grade 3 bilateral pleural effusions at treatment completion; both required pericardial window. The remaining patients were treated with taxanes using one of several standard dose and schedule combinations. Furthermore, 4 of 44 (9%) developed pneumonitis attributed to the FEC regimen. Hospital admissions were required for 12 of 44 (27%); 3 of 44 (7%) required blood transfusions. There were no treatment related deaths. Median disease-free and overall survival will not be estimatable because of early closure of study. CONCLUSION: FEC x6 at 2-week intervals followed by 18 weeks of alternating taxanes is not feasible at the doses tested. Other strategies are needed to improve adjuvant systemic chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Factors influencing treatment patterns of breast cancer patients age 75 and older.

PURPOSES: To retrospectively determine the factors influencing treatment decisions in older breast cancer patients at a single center. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: 216 patients age > or = 75 seen in post-treatment follow-up between January, 1997 and June, 2000 were identified in the Memorial Sloan-Kettering breast cancer database. Eligible patients were > or = 75 years old at diagnosis, had a diagnosis of stage I, II, or III breast cancer, and received their follow-up care at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. A retrospective chart review was performed. Patients were stratified by: (1) prognostic factors (age (75-79 or > or = 80), Charlson comorbidity score, tumor size, nodal status, stage, ER, PR, creatinine, albumin, hemoglobin, and liver function tests), (2) local treatment (lumpectomy, axillary lymph node dissection (AxLND), radiation (XRT), modified radical mastectomy (MRM)) and (3) systemic treatment (tamoxifen, chemotherapy). Combined local treatment was defined as (a) lumpectomy, AxLND, XRT or (b) MRM, AxLND, XRT (if tumor > or = 5 cm or > or = 4+ lymph nodes). RESULTS: 96 patients were eligible for this study: 46 patients (75-79 years); 50 patients (> or = 80 years). The majority of patients (74%) were treated with lumpectomy but those > or = 80 were less likely to receive XRT (94% age 75-80; 45% age >80; P<0.01). Patients > or = 80 were also less likely to receive AxLND (94% age 75-79; 62% age > or = 80; P<0.01). A logistic regression model identified two independent prognostic variables for not receiving combined local treatment: increased age (P<0.01) and increased comorbidity score (P=0.01). Increased age did not correlate with increased comorbidity (P=0.48). 5.2% of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (all age <80). 83% of ER positive patients received tamoxifen (89% age 75-79; 79% age >80). CONCLUSION: We hypothesize that both comorbidity and age play a significant role in influencing treatment decisions in the older breast cancer patient but these two variables are not necessarily correlated. Prospective studies are needed to determine the relative impact of these variables.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2003

Follow-up care of breast cancer survivors.

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women, affecting thousands of people each year. The majority of women are diagnosed with early stage breast cancer, which is curable. The follow-up care of the breast cancer survivor requires an understanding of the goals of follow-up and the short and long term side effects of breast cancer treatment. In this article, we will discuss the principles of follow-up care of the breast cancer survivor.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Management of lung cancer in older adults.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the United States. At the time of diagnosis, most patients are older than 65 years and have Stage III or IV disease. More than 80% of patients have non-small cell lung cancer and the rest have small cell lung cancer. Age is not a significant prognostic factor for overall survival and response to treatment for patients with either type of lung cancer. Treatment options should be tailored to older patients based on the same selection process and benefits seen in the population as a whole. This article reviews the available data regarding surgery, radiation, and systemic treatment for older patients with lung cancer and considers the role of geriatric assessment in the evaluation of older patients.

Aged↗