PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Ashley Faulx

Publications and source records attributed to Ashley Faulx.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or cardia.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of endoscopic screening for chronic gastroesophageal reflux symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation in adult subjects depends on the sensitivity of this strategy for detecting Barrett esophagus in subjects before the development of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or cardia. The aim of the current study was to determine what proportion of patients with cancer of the esophagus or cardia would have been candidates for a screening endoscopy before their cancer diagnosis based on the presence and duration of preceding reflux symptoms. METHODS: All patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, adenocarcinoma of the cardia, or long-segment Barrett esophagus presenting for endoscopy at 4 tertiary care and 2 Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals were given a previously validated questionnaire to determine their recall of common gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. RESULTS: The study population of 375 subjects consisted primarily of 294 (78%) white men. Only 67 of 110 patients (61%) with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and 8 of 21 patients (38%) with adenocarcinoma of the cardia recalled symptoms of heartburn or regurgitation being present for >5 years before their diagnosis of cancer. Only 40 of 110 patients (36%) with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and 5 of 21 patients (24%) with adenocarcinoma of the cardia recalled weekly symptoms being present for >5 years before their cancer diagnosis. Of the 244 patients with Barrett esophagus, 170 (70%) recalled heartburn or regurgitation for >5 years and 89 patients (37%) recalled weekly symptoms for >5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Current practice, which uses a screening strategy of performing endoscopy in patients with >5 years of heartburn or regurgitation, can detect Barrett epithelium in only a limited proportion of those patients at risk for developing adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or adenocarcinoma of the cardia.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2006

Primary care physician attitudes toward endoscopic screening for GERD symptoms and unsedated esophagoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend consideration of screening patients with chronic GERD for Barrett's esophagus (BE). Unsedated esophagoscopy (UE) is a less costly alternative to standard EGD for identifying BE. The aim of this study was to determine the indications for EGD referral, the barriers to screening, and the interest in performing UE. METHODS: A one-page survey was mailed to a random sample of 500 family practitioners and 500 internists. This sample was obtained from the American Academy of Family Physicians and American Society of Internal Medicine (500 from each organization). RESULTS: The overall response rate was 54%. The majority (78%) refer more than 50% of their GERD patients for EGD; however, 34% also refer more than 10% of their patients for barium studies. Primary care physicians cited alarm symptoms, refractory symptoms, and chronicity and severity of symptoms as the major indications for referral for EGD. Gender, age, obesity, and tobacco use were cited less frequently. Cost of endoscopy, poor patient acceptance, and lack of evidence were the most common reasons cited for not referring for EGD. A majority of respondents (62%) indicated that the availability of UE would increase referral for the procedure, and 52% would be willing to perform UE in their office. CONCLUSIONS: Severe, refractory, and chronic symptoms are the primary reasons for endoscopic referral from primary care physicians who manage patients with GERD. Other risk factors for BE, such as gender and age, do not appear to be important determinants for endoscopic referral. Further evaluation of UE as a mechanism to increase screening for BE in primary care patients is merited.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2006

A primer on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: building a new paradigm.

Access to the abdominal cavity is required for diagnostic and therapeutic endeavors for a variety of medical and surgical diseases. Historically, abdominal access has required a formal laparotomy to provide adequate exposure. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is an emerging experimental alternative to conventional surgery that eliminates abdominal incisions and incision-related complications by combining endoscopic and laparoscopic techniques to diagnose and treat abdominal pathology. During NOTES, commercially available flexible video endoscopes are used to create a controlled transvisceral incision via natural orifice access to enter the peritoneal cavity. Common incision-related complications such as wound infections, incisional hernias, postoperative pain, aesthetic disdain, and adhesions could be minimized or eliminated by NOTES. NOTES has evolved from more than 2 centuries of technological innovations and continued growth in the field of surgical endoscopy. Innovative surgical endoscopists have slowly developed means to surpass the constraints of the gastrointestinal lumen by using a flexible endoscope. The future of surgical endoscopy may be the shared entity of NOTES, which further integrates endoscopy, gastroenterology, and minimally invasive and general surgery. Although the promise of NOTES is electrifying to surgeons and endoscopists, several key issues need to be characterized prior to the incorporation of NOTES into routine practice. This article reviews the status, contemporary body of literature, limitations, and potential future implications accompanying the development of NOTES.

Abdominal Cavity↗
PubMed2004

Identification of Barrett's esophagus in relatives by endoscopic screening.

AIM: Familial aggregation of Barrett's esophagus and its associated cancers has been termed familial Barrett's esophagus (FBE). The aim of the study was to determine whether endoscopic screening would identify Barrett's esophagus (BE) in relatives of probands with BE or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). METHODS: All living first-degree relatives of patients with long segment BE or EAC presenting to the endoscopy suite of two academic hospitals were sent validated questionnaires inquiring about gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and prior endoscopic evaluation. First-degree relatives of affected probands or affected relatives who reported no prior upper endoscopy were offered screening unsedated esophagoscopy. Relatives with chronic gastroesophageal reflux symptoms were also offered an alternative of conventional sedated upper endoscopy. The yield of screening endoscopy was measured. Screening endoscopy findings were then compared between family members of known FBE patients and those with "isolated" disease. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-eight relatives from 69 families, 23 known FBE probands and 46 probands with apparently "isolated" disease, were enrolled. Forty relatives (29 FBE relatives and 11 relatives of probands with "isolated" disease) reported prior upper endoscopy. Screening upper endoscopies performed on 62 (25 FBE and 37 "isolated" disease relatives) of the remaining 158 relatives identified Barrett's epithelium in 13 (21%). Compared to probands with apparently "isolated" disease, Barrett's epithelium (EAC, BE, or SSBE) was identified significantly more often in siblings and offspring of FBE probands, p</= 0.05. Endoscopic screening of relatives of FBE probands identified a multigeneration multiplex FBE pedigree consistent with an autosomally dominant inherited trait. Endoscopic screening of relatives of probands with reported "isolated" diseased did not identify any new FBE pedigrees. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopy identified EAC, long-segment BE, and short-segment BE in a substantial proportion of first-degree relatives of affected members of FBE families. A familial susceptibility to develop Barrett's epithelium appears to be present in a subset of patients with BE and EAC.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2003

Prospective evaluation of 4-mm diameter endoscopes for esophagoscopy in sedated and unsedated patients.

BACKGROUND: Unsedated esophagoscopy with small-diameter endoscopes is generally well tolerated but of limited sensitivity for the diagnosis of esophageal mucosal disease. This study evaluated the sensitivity of esophagoscopy performed with new 4-mm diameter prototype battery-powered and video endoscopes. Patient tolerance for an unsedated examination with the 4-mm endoscopes was assessed and the performance characteristics of the battery-powered and video 4-mm endoscopes were compared. METHODS: Patients referred for EGD were recruited to undergo an additional examination with a 4-mm endoscope. A prototype 60-cm long, 4-mm diameter battery-powered fiberoptic esophagoscope was used in the first 24 patients and a prototype 60-cm long, 4-mm diameter video esophagoscope in the next 27 patients. Examiners who were unaware of patient history and procedure indications recorded esophageal findings, ease of intubation, optical quality (5-point visual scale), and time for examination of the esophagus and then recorded esophageal findings after the standard EGD. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for identification of Barrett's esophagus was 100%; overall sensitivity, accuracy, and specificity for detecting esophageal lesions were, respectively, 91%, 98%, and 99%. Patient tolerance (assessed by symptom scores for choking, pain, and discomfort) and acceptability of unsedated esophagoscopy with the 4-mm diameter instruments were significantly better than in a historical group of patients examined with a 3-mm diameter endoscope. The optical quality of video endoscope was rated as superior to that of battery-powered endoscope, and esophageal examination was performed significantly quicker with the video versus the battery-powered endoscope (68 vs. 137 seconds; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Unsedated esophagoscopy with 4-mm diameter endoscopes may be an alternative to EGD for screening for Barrett's esophagus. Given the current state of endoscopic technology, a minimum diameter of 4 mm is required for satisfactory esophageal imaging.

Barrett Esophagus↗
PubMed2002

Accuracy of a narrow-diameter battery-powered endoscope in sedated and unsedated patients.

BACKGROUND: Esophagoscopy with a portable battery-powered endoscope could provide a safe, inexpensive, and minimally invasive way to screen for Barrett's esophagus or esophageal varices. The use of such an instrument in an unsedated fashion has not been previously evaluated. METHODS: Patients referred for an EGD were recruited to undergo an additional examination with the battery-powered endoscope before EGD. In phase 1, (n = 42) patients received conscious sedation before the battery-powered endoscopic examination. In phase 2, (n = 56) patients were not sedated and were given the option of a peroral (n = 43) or transnasal (n = 13) endoscopy. Examiners were blinded to patient history and procedure indications. Esophageal findings, ease of intubation, optical quality, and patient comfort for the battery-powered endoscope and standard EGD were recorded by the endoscopist. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients (60 men, 38 women, mean age 53 years) were recruited. The sensitivity for detecting Barrett's esophagus, esophageal tumors, and esophageal varices was 54.5%, 66.7%, and 80%, respectively. Ease of intubation and patient comfort as perceived by the endoscopist were not significantly different between the battery-powered endoscope and EGD. Optical quality was ranked as less than 4 (on a 5-point scale with 5 = standard EGD and 1 = poor) in 42% of battery-powered endoscopic examinations. There were no complications. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of esophageal examination with a 3.1-mm endoscope is substantially inferior to standard EGD. Thus, the battery-powered endoscope would not be useful for screening patients for Barrett's esophagus or varices unless improvements in optical quality and visualization are made.

Adult↗