PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Astrid Vellinga

Publications and source records attributed to Astrid Vellinga.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Instruments to assess decision-making capacity: an overview.

OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this article is to evaluate and describe instruments for assessing decision-making capacity in psychiatry and psychogeriatrics, and to evaluate them for use in daily practice. METHODS: The instruments were selected in Medline articles. We focus on the relationship between these instruments and the concept of competence, represented in the following elements: context in which an instrument is developed, disclosure of information, standards to assess decision-making capacity, the scale or threshold model, and validity and reliability. RESULTS: The developmental context influences how information is provided and standards defined. Although it is not clear how decision-making capacity relates to competency judgments, most instruments provide good reliability. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of the different instruments opens directions for future research. Although instruments can never replace a physician's judgment, they may provide a clear starting point for a discussion on competence. In daily practice assessments, attention should be given to information disclosure, the influence of our own normative values in evaluating standards of decision-making capacity, and the relation between decision-making capacity and competence.

Aged↗

[The assessment of competence in cognitively impaired elderly persons: a closer look at the vignette method].

This article focuses on the assessment of competence of elderly persons both with and without cognitive impairment. In total 113 patients of a geriatric clinic were interviewed. Competence was assessed by using two clinical vignettes, representing respectively a hypothetical treatment situation with mild consequences (endoscopy) and one with severe consequences (operation for colon cancer). Competence was evaluated using the following standards: the ability to evidence a choice, the ability to understand a situation, the ability to reason about a choice, and the ability to appreciate a situation. In the vignette with mild consequences, elderly persons with cognitive impairment performed significantly worse on understanding, reasoning and appreciation than elderly persons without cognitive impairment. In the vignette with severe consequences, elderly persons with cognitive impairment performed significantly worse only on understanding as compared to elderly persons without cognitive impairment. No differences were found for reasoning and appreciation between the cognitively impaired and non-impaired elderly persons. We conclude that competence is less limited by cognitive impairment when assessed in a treatment situation with severe consequences. Therefore, the use of hypothetical vignettes should be carefully reconsidered.

Aged↗