PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Atsuko Hikikoshi Iwane

Publications and source records attributed to Atsuko Hikikoshi Iwane.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

A unique mechanism for the processive movement of single-headed myosin-IX.

It has been puzzled that in spite of its single-headed structure, myosin-IX shows the typical character of processive motor in multi-molecule in vitro motility assay, because this cannot be explained by hand-over-hand mechanism of the two-headed processive myosins. Here, we show direct evidence of the processive movement of myosin-IX using two different single molecule techniques. Using optical trap nanometry, we found that myosin-IX takes several large ( approximately 20nm) steps before detaching from an actin filament. Furthermore, we directly visualized the single myosin-IX molecules moving on actin filaments for several hundred nanometers without dissociating from actin filament. Since myosin-IX processively moves without anchoring the neck domain, the result suggests that the neck tilting is not involved for the processive movement of myosin-IX. We propose that the myosin-IX head moves processively along an actin filament like an inchworm via a unique long and positively charged insertion in the loop 2 region of the head.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

Grafting of poly(ethylene glycol) onto poly(acrylic acid)-coated glass for a protein-resistant surface.

The surface of solid glass supports for samples in optical microscopy and for biosensors needs to be protein-resistant. A coating of a poly(ethylene glycol) monomethyl ether (mPEG) on the surface of the glass is one promising method for preventing the nonspecific adsorption of proteins. In this study, we have developed a novel technique for achieving an optimal coverage of a glass surface with mPEG to prevent protein adhesion. A clean glass substrate previously treated with (3-aminopropyl)dimethylethoxysilane (APDMES) was treated sequentially with poly(acrylic acid) and subsequently a primary amine derivative of mPEG in the presence of 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide. The resultant glass surface was demonstrated to be highly protein-resistant, and the adsorption of bovine serum albumin decreased to only a few percentage points of that on a glass surface treated with APDMES alone. Furthermore, to extend the present method, we also prepared a glass substrate on which biotinylated poly(ethylene glycol) was cografted with mPEG, and biotinylated myosin subfragment-1 (biotin-S1) was subsequently immobilized on this substrate by biotin/avidin chemistry. Actin filaments were observed to glide on the biotin-S1-coated glass surface in the presence of ATP, and thus, the method is capable of immobilizing the protein specifically without any loss in its biological function.

Acrylic Resins↗

Dynamic polymorphism of Ras observed by single molecule FRET is the basis for molecular recognition.

Ras regulates signal transduction pathway function by dynamically interacting with various effectors. To understand the basis for Ras function, its conformational dynamics were measured in the absence and presence of effectors using single molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between probes located on the Switch II region and GTP. The time trajectories of FRET efficiency from GTP-bound Ras showed that this conformation spontaneously varies among multiple states. Among them, a low FRET state was identified as an inactive state. The transition involving the inactive conformational state occurred in the time range of seconds. In contrast, fluctuation occurring most probably between multiple active high FRET conformational states lasted approximately 30 ms but converged to a specific conformational state upon binding to an effector. Thus, Ras conformation spontaneously fluctuates to readily interact with various effectors.

Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer↗

Cargo-binding makes a wild-type single-headed myosin-VI move processively.

Class VI myosin is an intracellular vesicle and organelle transporter that moves along actin filaments in a direction opposite to most other known myosin classes. The myosin-VI was expected to form a dimer to move processively along actin filaments with a hand-over-hand mechanism like other myosin organelle transporters. Recently, however, wild-type myosin-VI was demonstrated to be monomer and single-headed, casting a doubt on its processivity. By using single molecule techniques, we show that green-fluorescent-protein-tagged single-headed, wild-type myosin-VI does not move processively. However, when coupled to 200-nm polystyrene beads (comparable to intracellular vesicles in size) at a ratio of one head per bead, single-headed myosin-VI moves processively with large (40-nm) steps. The characteristics of this monomer-driven movement were different to that of artificial dimer-driven movement: Compared to the artificial dimer, the monomer-bead complex had a reduced stall force (1 pN compared to 2 pN), an average run length 2.5-fold shorter (91 nm compared to 220 nm) and load-dependent step size. Furthermore, we found that a monomer-bead complex moved more processively in a high viscous solution (40-fold higher than water) similar to cellular environment. Because the diffusion constant of the bead is 60-fold lower than myosin-VI heads alone in water, we propose a model in which the bead acts as a diffusional anchor for the myosin-VI, enhancing its rebinding following detachment and supporting processive movement of the bead-monomer complexes. Although a single-headed myosin-VI was able to move processively with a large cargo, the travel distance was rather short. Multiple molecules may be involved in the cargo transport for a long travel distance in cells.

Actins↗

The neck domain of myosin II primarily regulates the actomyosin kinetics, not the stepsize.

In order to study the role of the neck domain of myosin in muscle contraction, we measured the steps of individual myosin II molecules engineered to have no neck domain (light chain-binding domain) by optical trapping nanometry. The actin filament and myosin cofilaments interacted on a glass surface to minimize the angle between them, and to minimize the interaction between myosin and the glass surface. The results showed that the average myosin stepsize did not change much when the neck domain was removed, but the sliding velocity decreased approximately fivefold. Furthermore, the duration of steps for neckless myosin was several times longer at saturated ATP concentration, indicating that the slower velocity was due to a slower dissociation rate of myosin heads from actin. From these data, we conclude that the neck domain of myosin-II primarily regulates the actomyosin kinetics, not the mechanics.

Actins↗

A one-headed class V myosin molecule develops multiple large (approximately 32-nm) steps successively.

Class V myosin (myosin-V) was first found as a processive motor that moves along an actin filament with large ( approximately 36-nm) successive steps and plays an important role in cargo transport in cells. Subsequently, several other myosins have also been found to move processively. Because myosin-V has two heads with ATP- and actin-binding sites, the mechanism of successive movement has been generally explained based on the two-headed structure. However, the fundamental problem of whether the two-headed structure is essential for the successive movement has not been solved. Here, we measure motility of engineered myosin-V having only one head by optical trapping nanometry. The results show that a single one-headed myosin-V undergoes multiple successive large (approximately 32-nm) steps, suggesting that a novel mechanism is operating for successive myosin movement.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

Unconstrained steps of myosin VI appear longest among known molecular motors.

Myosin VI is a two-headed molecular motor that moves along an actin filament in the direction opposite to most other myosins. Previously, a single myosin VI molecule has been shown to proceed with steps that are large compared to its neck size: either it walks by somehow extending its neck or one head slides along actin for a long distance before the other head lands. To inquire into these and other possible mechanism of motility, we suspended an actin filament between two plastic beads, and let a single myosin VI molecule carrying a bead duplex move along the actin. This configuration, unlike previous studies, allows unconstrained rotation of myosin VI around the right-handed double helix of actin. Myosin VI moved almost straight or as a right-handed spiral with a pitch of several micrometers, indicating that the molecule walks with strides slightly longer than the actin helical repeat of 36 nm. The large steps without much rotation suggest kinesin-type walking with extended and flexible necks, but how to move forward with flexible necks, even under a backward load, is not clear. As an answer, we propose that a conformational change in the lifted head would facilitate landing on a forward, rather than backward, site. This mechanism may underlie stepping of all two-headed molecular motors including kinesin and myosin V.

Actins↗

Class VI myosin moves processively along actin filaments backward with large steps.

Among a superfamily of myosin, class VI myosin moves actin filaments backwards. Here we show that myosin VI moves processively on actin filaments backwards with large ( approximately 36 nm) steps, nevertheless it has an extremely short neck domain. Myosin V also moves processively with large ( approximately 36 nm) steps and it is believed that myosin V strides along the actin helical repeat with its elongated neck domain that is critical for its processive movement with large steps. Myosin VI having a short neck cannot take this scenario. We found by electron microscopy that myosin VI cooperatively binds to an actin filament at approximately 36 nm intervals in the presence of ATP, raising a hypothesis that the binding of myosin VI evokes "hot spots" on actin filaments that attract myosin heads. Myosin VI may step on these "hot spots" on actin filaments in every helical pitch, thus producing processive movement with 36 nm steps.

Actins↗

The motor domain determines the large step of myosin-V.

Class-V myosin proceeds along actin filaments with large ( approximately 36 nm) steps. Myosin-V has two heads, each of which consists of a motor domain and a long (23 nm) neck domain. In accordance with the widely accepted lever-arm model, it was suggested that myosin-V steps to successive (36 nm) target zones along the actin helical repeat by tilting its long neck (lever-arm). To test this hypothesis, we measured the mechanical properties of single molecules of myosin-V truncation mutants with neck domains only one-sixth of the native length. Our results show that the processivity and step distance along actin are both similar to those of full-length myosin-V. Thus, the long neck domain is not essential for either the large steps or processivity of myosin-V. These results challenge the lever-arm model. We propose that the motor domain and/or the actomyosin interface enable myosin-V to produce large processive steps during translocation along actin.

Actins↗