PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Ava Willoughby

Publications and source records attributed to Ava Willoughby.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Genetic Determinants of Early Heart Failure in Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome: A Prospective NC-DEFINE Study.

BACKGROUND: Survivors of hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS), the most severe form of congenital heart disease, are at high risk for heart failure (HF). HF in early life is a major contributor to mortality in this vulnerable population. However, reliable approaches to identify infants at highest risk for early HF are currently lacking. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether ultra-rare variants in cardiomyopathy-associated genes are associated with HF risk in HLHS. METHODS: Neonates with HLHS were prospectively enrolled within the first 21 days of life at Duke University Health System. Children and adults with HLHS who were older than 21 days were enrolled from Duke University Health System and the University of North Carolina into an ambispective cohort. External HLHS cohorts from Nationwide Children's Hospital and Vanderbilt University Medical Center were evaluated to assess for reproducibility across institutions. Participants underwent genome sequencing, and ultra-rare variants in dilated cardiomyopathy-associated genes (minor allele frequency &#x2264;0.01%) were evaluated. The primary outcome was HF, categorized as severe (ventricular assist device implantation, heart transplantation, or death) or medically managed (reduced systemic ventricular ejection fraction and/or HF diagnosis requiring initiation or escalation of HF therapy). Associations between variant status and HF risk were assessed using Cox regression. RESULTS: Among 35 neonates in the prospective cohort, 7 (20.0%) developed severe HF, 10 (28.6%) developed medically managed HF, and 18 (51.4%) remained HF free. The presence of a likely pathogenic/pathogenic variant was associated with a marked 9-fold increased risk of severe HF compared with genotype-negative individuals (P = 0.02). Most severe HF events occurred within the first month of life (67%). Similar associations between likely pathogenic/pathogenic variants and severe HF were observed in the Nationwide Children's Hospital and Vanderbilt University Medical Center cohorts (11- and 3-fold increased risk, respectively; all P < 0.05). Associations were attenuated in the ambispective cohort (all P > 0.05), which consisted of individuals significantly older than the prospective cohort (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first prospective evidence linking dilated cardiomyopathy-associated variants to early-onset HF in HLHS. These findings suggest that genetic variation may contribute to myocardial vulnerability in HLHS, highlighting the potential for genetic screening to enable early risk stratification and guide precision medicine approaches in this high-risk population.

Humans

The Clinical Application of Refined Risk Estimates Study in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variant Carriers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

UNLABELLED: Individuals with germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants (PV) may struggle with risk management decision-making. Advancements in technology could provide more specific risk information to patients, but the impact of this information is unknown. The Clinical Application of Refined Risk Estimates Study is a two-arm randomized controlled trial in women with a BRCA1/BRCA2 PV. The primary objective was to determine whether genotype-informed personalized cancer risk estimates (GRE) compared with standard lifetime cancer risk estimates (SRE) decreased decisional conflict related to cancer risk management decision-making. Women were recruited following the disclosure of their PV results. Participants completed a baseline survey and were randomized 1:1 to receive a GRE or SRE. After receiving their results, participants completed a follow-up survey. Likert and continuous data measures were analyzed using linear regression. There were no differences in decisional conflict between study arms at follow-up. However, individuals in the SRE arm showed an increased need for personal structure compared with those in the GRE arm (P = 0.02). Compared with baseline, individuals within the SRE arm showed decreased decisional conflict (P = 0.003) and increased perceived stress (P = 0.02) at follow-up. A more personalized cancer risk estimate did not decrease decisional conflict in women with BRCA1/BRCA2 PVs. Future studies will determine whether a GRE affects actual decision-making behaviors. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: Women with a germline PV in BRCA1 or BRCA2 have significantly elevated risks of developing breast and ovarian cancers. This randomized controlled trial evaluates the impact of polygenic risk scores on decisional conflict related to breast and ovarian cancer prevention and risk management in those with BRCA1/BRCA2 PVs.

Humans