PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B A Sorofman

Publications and source records attributed to B A Sorofman.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Physician perceptions about administration of immunizations outside of physician offices.

BACKGROUND: Expanding nonphysician participation in the administration of immunizations has been suggested as a means of increasing immunization rates. However, there is little information about physician interest in collaborating with nonphysicians to provide out-of-office immunizations. METHODS: All active members of the Iowa Academy of Family Physicians were surveyed by mail. Physicians reported on their collaboration histories, their willingness to collaborate in the future, their concerns with collaboration, and whether they approved of their patients' using nonphysicians for immunizations. RESULTS: Of 898 eligible physicians, 476 (53%) returned questionnaires that were analyzed. Seventy-five percent (n = 357) of the physicians reported that they had voluntarily collaborated with a person outside their office to provide immunizations. Ninety-five percent (n = 452) of physicians indicated a willingness to collaborate in some form in the future. However, physicians had concerns about (a) being able to be kept informed about immunizations their patients receive outside of their offices, (b) adequate training of the nonphysician to administer immunizations and respond to complications of immunization, and (c) loss of preventive health opportunities if patients ceased coming to physicians for routine immunizations. CONCLUSION: The majority of family physicians have collaborated to deliver immunizations and indicate support for nonphysician participation. Almost all physicians would consider future collaborative arrangements although they have concerns about record keeping and the safety of out-of-office immunization programs.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Market factors and the availability of community pharmacies.

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between the availability of community pharmacies and 4 types of market factors. A composite data set was created that linked, at the county level, data on: (1) type and number of pharmacies; (2) population characteristics; (3) payer variables; (4) health care system factors; and (5) competitive factors. In this exploratory study, secondary data were used to assess the association between the availability of community pharmacies and the influence of market factors. To assess the market influences on availability of community pharmacies, 2 regressions were performed. In 1 model, the number of community pharmacies per 10,000 population was the dependent variable, whereas the dependent variable in the other regression was the proportion of independently owned community pharmacies. The independent variables in each regression were the market factors--population characteristics, payer variables, health care system factors, and competitive variables. Squared terms were included for 8 of 15 market factors to account for nonlinearities in the relationships. Multiple market factors were correlated with both the number of community pharmacies and the proportion of independently owned pharmacies in an area. Several of the relationships were not linear and changed direction within the range of data. Counties with either a low or a high percentage of elderly people had fewer pharmacies and a lower proportion of independently owned pharmacies compared with counties with a moderate percentage of elderly people. Counties that were scarcely or highly rural had fewer community pharmacies but a higher proportion of independently owned pharmacies than counties that were moderately rural. Areas with a greater percentage of the population earning less than the poverty level had more pharmacies, especially independently owned ones. Fewer community pharmacies were found in areas with higher health maintenance organization penetration rates. The number of hospital admissions was positively associated with the number of pharmacies but negatively associated with the proportion of independently owned pharmacies. The availability of community pharmacies varies across the country. In light of the trend toward fewer independently owned pharmacies, potential problems in accessing pharmacy services could develop in certain areas, including those that are highly rural and those with a high percentage of people earning less than the poverty level. Future research and policy issues are identified.

Data Collection↗
PubMed1998

System for exchanging information among pharmacists in different practice environments.

A system for exchanging patient information among hospital, long-term-care (LTC), and ambulatory care pharmacies is described, and the influence of that system on pharmacist interventions is reported. Study sites consisted of three ambulatory care pharmacies, one LTC pharmacy, and one hospital in a small Midwestern city. Meetings were held by clinicians, the investigators, and hospital administrators to plan the information-exchange system. From January through June 1996, patients admitted to the hospital were checked to see if they came from a participating (source) pharmacy; if so, they were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. The hospital requested preadmission information from the source pharmacy for experimental group patients and did not do so for control patients. After the information arrived, the hospital pharmacists could use it to identify and document drug therapy problems. When an experimental group patient was discharged, the hospital sent information to the appropriate source pharmacy. A total of 156 patients were enrolled in the study. Complete information transfer occurred for 75% of experimental group patients. Significantly more experimental group patients than control patients had at least one in-hospital pharmacist intervention recorded. Similarly, in the ambulatory care pharmacies (but not the LTC pharmacy) significantly more interventions per patient were documented for the experimental group. Hospital and ambulatory care pharmacists documented more interventions for patients about whom information had been supplied than for patients for whom that information had not been supplied. No difference in intervention rates was observed for LTC pharmacists, who were already being supplied information by the LTC facilities about patients discharged from the hospital.

Ambulatory Care Facilities↗
PubMed1989

Prescription drug advertising trends: a study of oral hypoglycemics.

A content analysis of oral hypoglycemic drug advertisements was performed in selected medical journals published in the United States from 1963 to 1986. The 665 advertisements subsequently examined were studied for certain predetermined parameters in order to indicate trends. The trend results may be summarized as follows. As an extension of prescription drug advertising trends in general, oral hypoglycemic drug advertising showed an increasing length along with a subsequent decrease in the amount of space devoted to the copy portion of the advertisement. They also showed a decrease in the use of statistical information and rarely made references to competitors. Nongender specific, colored advertisements with product and use related appeals have become more common with the passage of time. Although the rationale and purpose behind advertising is unchanged, the format has changed considerably. These changes are primarily due to the enhancement of print technology and to some extent, the changing social environment.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Prescription medication costs: a study of physician familiarity.

BACKGROUND: Studies in the past 25 years have suggested that physicians are not familiar with the costs of common prescription medications. OBJECTIVES: To determine physician familiarity with the cost of common prescription medications and to determine the value physicians place on knowing information regarding the cost of medications. DESIGN: Survey. SETTING: Seven community-based family medicine residency teaching clinics in Iowa. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred five practicing resident and faculty physicians. INTERVENTIONS: From a series of $10 price intervals (range, $0.01-$80.00), physicians were asked to select the interval containing the cash price of the medication to an uninsured patient for 50 medications commonly prescribed in outpatient family medicine clinics. Physicians were also questioned about the value of medication cost information to their practice. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The percentage of correct responses and the mean pricing scores were calculated for each respondent and for all medications. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-eight physicians responded (86.8%). Only 22.9% of the responses correctly identified the cost of the medication. More than two thirds (68.3%) of the responses underestimated the correct price interval. Branded drugs were underestimated in 89.9% of responses, while generic drugs were overestimated in 90.2% of responses. Overall, 64.4% of physicians believed they did not receive sufficient information in their practices regarding prescription drug costs, and nearly all (93.6%) reported that regular information on prescription medication costs would help them prescribe more cost-effectively. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians are unfamiliar with the costs of medications they commonly prescribe, and they report that regular access to information on prescription medication costs would help them prescribe more cost-effectively. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1002-1007

Humans↗
PubMedDate not supplied

System for exchanging information among pharmacists in different practice environments.

OBJECTIVES: A system for exchanging patient information among hospital, long-term-care (LTC), and ambulatory care pharmacies is described, and the influence of that system on pharmacist interventions is reported. METHODS: Study sites consisted of three ambulatory care pharmacies, one LTC pharmacy, and one hospital in a small Midwestern city. Meetings were held by clinicians, the investigators, and hospital administrators to plan the information-exchange system. From January through June 1996, patients admitted to the hospital were checked to see if they came from a participating (source) pharmacy; if so, they were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. The hospital requested preadmission information from the source pharmacy for experimental group patients and did not do so for control patients. After the information arrived, the hospital pharmacists could use it to identify and document drug therapy problems. When an experimental group patient was discharged, the hospital sent information to the appropriate source pharmacy. A total of 156 patients were enrolled in the study. RESULTS: Complete information transfer occurred for 75% of experimental group patients. Significantly more experimental group patients than control patients had at least one in-hospital pharmacist intervention recorded. Similarly, in the ambulatory care pharmacies (but not the LTC pharmacy) significantly more interventions per patient were documented for the experimental group. CONCLUSION: Hospital and ambulatory care pharmacists documented more interventions for patients about whom information had been supplied than for patients for whom that information had not been supplied. No difference in intervention rates was observed for LTC pharmacists, who were already being supplied information by the LTC facilities about patients discharged from the hospital.

Continuity of Patient Care↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Patients' acceptance of traditional and nontraditional immunization providers.

OBJECTIVE: To examine patients' acceptance and reported use of traditional and nontraditional immunization providers and settings. DESIGN: Survey. SETTING: Stratified sample of private family physician clinics, family medicine residency training programs, community pharmacies that provide immunizations under standing order protocols, and nonimmunizing community pharmacies, all located in Iowa. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Individuals presenting for medical care or pharmacy services. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sources of past immunizations, 'access to immunizations, importance of immunization records, and future use of different health care providers and settings for immunizations. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to examine the relationships between patient demographics and recruitment site on the question responses. RESULTS: 420 surveys were returned (67% response rate). Respondents frequently received immunizations at sites other than physician offices. Younger patients and those living in smaller towns were more likely to report receiving an immunization from a nonphysician. Patients recruited in immunizing pharmacies more often reported previous immunization by a pharmacist (P < .001), most often for influenza. Respondents often reported that it was more convenient to receive an immunization outside a physician office. Greater support was noted for receiving adult immunizations from nonphysicians and in nontraditional settings, whereas traditional settings and providers (physician offices, community health departments) were preferred for childhood immunizations. CONCLUSION: Iowans report accessing different health care providers and settings for their routine immunizations. In general, they are more likely to support using traditional immunization providers and settings for childhood immunizations but are less exclusive about where they receive adult immunizations. Pharmacists should consider focusing initial efforts on administering adult immunizations, due to greater patient acceptance of nontraditional immunizers for adult immunizations.

Adult↗