PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B A Timmons

Publications and source records attributed to B A Timmons.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

Fat utilization enhanced by exercise in a cold environment.

To study substrate utilization during cold temperature exercise, seven men dressed in shorts, T-shirts, and light gloves performed 60 min of continuous cycle ergometer exercise at -10 degrees C and 22 degrees C. The workload at both temperatures represented 66% of the cycle-measured maximal heart rate. Oxygen consumption and respiratory exchange ratio (RER) were measured at rest and during 60 min of exercise. Rates of total and fat energy utilization (kJ X min-1) during exercise were calculated from VO2 and RER. A two-factor repeated measures analysis of variance indicated that at rest oxygen consumption averaged 56% higher and RER 5% lower at -10 degrees C. During exercise, oxygen consumption averaged 10% higher (P less than 0.05), and RER averaged 2% lower (P less than 0.05) at -10 degrees C. The rates of total energy use (mean +/- SD = 39.3 +/- 1.2 vs 35.7 +/- 1.3 kJ X min-1; P less than 0.05) were significantly higher at -10 degrees C than at 22 degrees C. In addition, the rate of fat use increased significantly in both groups after 30 min of exercise. The cumulative total energy expenditure for 60 min of exercise was 13% higher (2379 +/- 308 vs 2110 +/- 415 kJ; P less than 0.05 and the cumulative fat expenditure was 35% higher (979 +/- 209 vs 724 +/- 184 kJ: P less than 0.05) in the cold environment. These results indicate that a cold environment can significantly enhance fat utilization during endurance exercise.

Adipose Tissue↗

Twins' reactions to delayed auditory feedback.

10 pairs of identical and 10 pairs of fraternal twins, matched by age, spoke under conditions of 0.0-, 100-, 200-, 300-, 400-, and 500-msec. delayed auditory feedback. Length of spoken passages was controlled. Product-moment and intraclass correlations were calculated for speaking times and disfluencies. Significant Pearson rs for times were noted at 0.0 and 300 msec. for both groups and at 100, 200, and 400 msec. for identical twins, while fraternal twins' times were significantly correlated at 500 msec. Difference scores were significantly correlated at 100, 200, 300, and 400 msec. for identical twins. Disfluencies were significantly correlated for identical twins at 400 msec. Data were combined with those of Timmons' (1969) study, increasing subjects to 21 pairs per group. Intraclass correlations supported the contention that responses of identical twin pairs to delayed auditory feedback were more highly correlated than those for fraternal twin pairs.

Adolescent↗

Speech disfluencies under normal and delayed auditory feedback conditions.

20 male and 20 female adults, matched by age, read under conditions of normal and 113-, 152-, 200-, 253-, 307-, and 347-msec. delayed auditory feedback. Disfluency counts were correlated with delayed auditory feedback reactions which were changes in disfluencies under delay conditions. Pearson product-moment and Spearman's rbos were negative and significant for delay times of 113, 153, 200, and 253 msec. The Pearson product-moment correlation for 307 msec. was also negative and significant. Two groups of 11 adults were selected from the original sample on the basis of high and low initial disfluency counts. Their reactions to delayed auditory feedback were compared, using a 2-way analysis of variance with repeated measures (groups X delay times). Both main effects were significant but not their interaction.

Adult↗

Physiological factors related to delayed auditory feedback and stuttering: a review.

Delayed auditory feedback (DAF) generally produces speech disturbances in normal speakers and improved fluency in stutterers. Several theorists have proposed that the speech disruptions of normal persons under such delayed feedback are an analog of stuttering. Related research has linked delayed auditory feedback and stuttering to several physiological factors. A review of familial relationship, age, sex, stress, speech characteristics, and sound conduction is presented. A brief integration of the factors and directions for research is presented.

Age Factors↗

Delayed auditory feedback and the speech of stuttering and non-stuttering children.

25 male stutterers and 25 male non-stutterers matched by age and speaking task, read or recited under normal and 113-, 226-, 306-, 413-, 520-msec. delayed auditory feedback conditions. Changes in speaking rate and disfluency count from normal to each delayed auditory feedback condition were calculated as indicators of reaction to delayed auditory feedback. Using an analysis of variance of difference scores for speaking rate, no significant differences were found between stutterers and non-stutterers or among the delays. An analysis of variance of disfluency difference scores showed no differences between stutterers and non-stutterers. Significant differences in disfluency reaction among delay times were found.

Adolescent↗

Speech disfluencies and delayed auditory feedback reactions of stuttering and non-stuttering children.

25 male stutterers and 25 male non-stutterers matched by age and speaking task, read or recited under conditions of normal and 113-, 226-, 306-, 413-, and 520-msec. delayed auditory feedback. Disfluency counts were correlated with delayed auditory feedback reactions which were changes in disfluencies under delay conditions. Pearson product-moment correlations were negative and significant for the combined group of stutterers and non-stutterers under all delays used. Correlations for stutterers were negative and significant for 113, 226, 306, and 413 msec. delay. For the total group of non-stutterers, all correlations were negative and significant. Correlations for age groups within the stuttering and non-stuttering groups were also presented.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Age, sex, and delay time as factors affecting reaction to delayed auditory feedback.

Five groups of 10 males and 10 females each, aged 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13 yr., recited a nursery rhyme under normal delay and 113, 226, 306-m 403-, and 520-msec, delayed auditory-feedback conditions. Speaking rate and disfluency count changes from normal delay to each delayed auditory feedback condition were calculated as indicators of reaction to delayed auditory feedback. Analyses of variance and post hoc comparisons indicated that 5-yr.-olds reacted with greater change in rate at 520-msec. delayed auditory feedback than did older subjects. Five- and 7-yr.-olds were more disfluent at 413-and 520-msec. delayed auditory feedback than were older subjects. Sex differences were found in the 7-, 11-, and 13-yr.-old groups, using speaking rate as a measure of delayed auditory-feedback reaction. No significant sex differences were noted when disfluencies were used as indicators of delayed auditory-feedback reaction.

Adolescent↗