PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Bannwarth

Publications and source records attributed to B Bannwarth.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Chiral resolution of flurbiprofen and ketoprofen enantiomers by HPLC on a glycopeptide-type column chiral stationary phase.

Vancomycin is an amphoteric, glycopeptide, macrocyclic antibiotic. When attached to 5 microspherical silica gel, vancomycin proved to be an effective chromatographic chiral stationary phase that could be used in the reversed-phase mode. In this study, a bonded vancomycin chiral stationary phase (Chirobiotic Vtrade mark) was investigated for the chiral liquid chromatography analysis of ketoprofen and flurbiprofen. The selectivity factor (alpha) and the chiral resolution factor (RS) of Chirobiotic Vtrade mark were evaluated first as a function of the buffer pH and molarity, and second as a function of organic modifier type and composition of the mobile phase. Four organic modifiers (tetrahydrofuran, 2-propanol, 1,4-dioxane and methanol) have been tested for their selectivity. Optimized conditions using 20% of tetrahydrofuran in ammonium nitrate (100 mM, pH 5) were selected for the enantioseparation of flurbiprofen and ketoprofen from their racemic forms. At pH 5, these acidic compounds are almost negatively charged, while the chiral selector possesses a positive charge allowing it to interact electrostatistically with the analytes. Using these chromatographic conditions, the column stability was excellent over several months of experiments.

Buffers↗

In vitro distribution of ketoprofen enantiomers in articular tissues of osteoarthritic patients.

The distribution of ketoprofen enantiomers in joint tissues was studied as a function of their relative tissular affinities using the multi-chamber distribution dialysis system described by Bickel et al. Selected off-cuts of synovial membrane, joint capsule, cartilage and ligament were obtained from ten patients suffering from osteoarthritis of the knee (n=3) or hip (n=7). Sörensen solution (4 ml) spiked with racemic ketoprofen (2 microg ml(-1)) was dialysed against 1 ml of the four solutions of tissue homogenates (0.4 g ml(-1)). Ketoprofen enantiomers were quantified in buffer and tissue solutions by high-performance liquid chromatography. The distribution of ketoprofen enantiomers in the Bickel's multi-compartment model indicated that there was a non-stereoselective affinity of ketoprofen enantiomers for their potential target tissues. Despite the interindividual variability in articular tissues, the concentrations (+/-S.D.) of R- and S-ketoprofen were significantly higher in synovial membrane (8.69 (4.76) microg g(-1) for S, 9.14 (5.57) microg g(-1) for R), joint capsule (5.71 (2.49) microg g(-1) for S, 5.49 (2.62) microg g(-1) for R) and ligament (6.28 (3.61) microg g(-1) for S, 6.40 (3.64) microg g(-1) for R) than in articular cartilage (3.67 (1.75) microg g(-1) for S, 3.70 (1.67) microg g(-1) for R). There were no significant differences in the distribution of R- and S-ketoprofen between the solutions of joint capsule, synovium and ligament tissues. These data may be related to differences in ketoprofen affinity for the different constituents of joints. This in vitro distribution profile is similar to that reported in vivo for other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Adult↗

EULAR recommendations for the management of knee osteoarthritis. Report of a task force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials.

UNLABELLED: A task force for the EULAR standing committee for clinical trials determined the methodological and logistical approach required for the development of evidence-based guidelines for treatment of knee osteoarthirits (OA). METHODS: The first stage was the selection of treatment modalities to be considered. The second stage comprised a search of the databases of all European-language publications. All of the relevant studies were quality scored. The third stage involved determination of key clinical propositions by expert consensus employing a Delphi approach. The final stage involved ranking of these propositions according to the available evidence. A second set of propositions relating to a future research agenda was determined by expert consensus. RESULTS: Seven hundred and forty-four studies presented outcome data of the effects of specific treatments on knee OA. Quantitative analysis of treatment effect was possible in only 61 studies. Recommendations for the management of knee OA based on currently available data and expert opinion are presented. Proposals for a future research agenda are highlighted. CONCLUSIONS: These are the first clinical guidelines on knee OA to combine an evidence-based approach and a consensus approach across a wide range of treatment modalities. It is apparent that only certain clinical propositions are supported by substantial research-based evidence. There is thus an urgent need for future well-designed trials to address key clinical questions.

Adult↗

Single and multiple dose pharmacokinetics of acetaminophen (paracetamol) in polymedicated very old patients with rheumatic pain.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether multiple dosing of acetaminophen would result in drug accumulation in polymedicated elderly patients with rheumatic pain. METHODS: Twelve inpatients (11 women), aged 89 +/- 4 years, weight 59 +/- 10 kg, receiving 3 to 8 concomitant medications, entered the study. Their creatinine clearance according to the Cockroft-Gault formula was 42 +/- 12 ml/min. The pharmacokinetics of 1 g acetaminophen was evaluated after the first dose (D1) and after the last dose (D7) during a 3 times daily regimen of 1 g for 5 consecutive days. RESULTS: The plasma pharmacokinetic profile of acetaminophen did not change significantly at D7 compared to D1. No significant within-patient differences were observed, especially with respect to plasma elimination half-life (2.74 +/- 0.48 and 2.77 +/- 0.32 hours, respectively), area under the concentration-time curve (82.5 +/- 21.1 and 90.1 +/- 15.2 microg x h/ml, respectively), and apparent oral clearance (3.68 +/- 0.85 and 3.28 +/- 0.52 ml/min/kg, respectively). CONCLUSION: No drug accumulation occurred during multiple dosing with acetaminophen in these very old subjects. On the basis of pharmacokinetic data alone, a dose regimen of acetaminophen 1 g tid seems to be appropriate in such patients.

Acetaminophen↗

Binding of ketoprofen enantiomers in various human albumin preparations.

Published data conflict with respect to the enantioselective protein binding parameters of R(-) and S(+) ketoprofen. We studied whether differences in experimental conditions used and/or presence of interfering compounds could provide a possible explanation for these discrepancies. Equilibrium dialysis, supported by ultrafiltration (67 mM Sörensen phosphate buffer pH 7.4, 580 microM HSA, 37 degrees C) allowed the characteristics of the binding sites to be determined according to Scatchard's analysis. (R) and (S)-ketoprofen concentrations were measured by HPLC. The free (R)-ketoprofen/free (S)-ketoprofen (F(R)/F(S)) concentration ratio was calculated. The effect of octanoic acid (OA) found in currently marketed intravenous HSA solutions, and hippuric acid (HA), on F(R)/F(S) concentration ratio was considered. Two classes of binding sites were characterized for both enantiomers. The free (S)-ketoprofen concentrations remained equal to those of the (R)-antipode at low concentrations of racemate (2-35 microg ml(-1)) indicating non-stereoselective albumin binding over the therapeutic range. From 35 microg ml(-1), the free (S)-ketoprofen concentrations were slighty greater than those of its antipode. Both OA and HA induced an increase of the free fraction of the enantiomers by a two-fold to a 15-fold order of magnitude. OA, but not HA, showed a more pronounced effect for the (S)-form leading to a marked decrease in F(R)/F(S) concentration ratio (0.61). Differences in HSA preparations used and/or the presence of interfering compounds may explain the variability in the reported protein binding characteristics of ketoprofen enantiomers.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

EULAR recommendations for the management of knee osteoarthritis: report of a task force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials (ESCISIT).

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disease encountered throughout Europe. A task force for the EULAR Standing Committee for Clinical Trials met in 1998 to determine the methodological and logistical approach required for the development of evidence based guidelines for treatment of knee OA. The guidelines were restricted to cover all currently available treatments for knee OA diagnosed either clinically and/or radiographically affecting any compartment of the knee. METHODS: The first stage was the selection of treatment modalities to be considered. The second stage comprised a search of the electronic databases Medline and Embase using a combination of subject headings and keywords. All European language publications in the form of systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials, controlled trials, and observational studies were included. During stage three all the relevant studies were quality scored. The summary statistics for validated outcome measures, when available, were recorded and, where practical, the numbers needed to treat and the effect size for each treatment were calculated. In the fourth stage key clinical propositions were determined by expert consensus employing a Delphi approach. The final stage ranked these propositions according to the available evidence. A second set of propositions relating to a future research agenda was determined by expert consensus using a Delphi approach. RESULTS: Over 2400 English language publications and 400 non-English language publications were identified. Seven hundred and forty four studies presented outcome data of the effects of specific treatments on knee OA. Quantitative analysis of treatment effect was possible in only 61 studies. Recommendations for the management of knee OA based on currently available data and expert opinion are presented. Proposals for a future research agenda are highlighted. CONCLUSIONS: These are the first clinical guidelines on knee OA to combine an evidence based approach and a consensus approach across a wide range of treatment modalities. It is apparent that certain clinical propositions are supported by substantial research based evidence, while others are not. There is thus an urgent need for future well designed trials to consider key clinical questions.

Combined Modality Therapy↗

[Gastrointestinal tolerance of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents].

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are effective antipyretic, analgesic and anti-inflammatory agents. One of the major concerns regarding the use of these compounds is the incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) adverse effects, ranging from dyspepsia to the serious and potentially life threatening complications of ulcers, haemorrhages, and perforations. Thus, the prevention and/or treatment of upper GI damage is estimated to increase the overall cost of NSAID therapy by at least 40%. The pathogenesis of NSAID-induced gastroduodenal mucosal injury appears to involve both topical and systemic mechanisms. The former is related to the acidic nature of most NSAIDs, which promotes the accumulation of ionised molecules (ion trapping) within the mucosal cells. Topical mucosal injury may also occur as a result of biliary excretion of active NSAID metabolites. The systemic effect has, however, the predominant role. It is mediated through cyclo-oxygenase (COX) inhibition and a subsequent decrease in gastroprotective prostaglandins. Fortunately, 2 forms of COX enzymes, designated COX-1 and COX-2, have been recognised. COX-1 appears to function as a house-keeping enzyme, whereas COX-2 is primarily induced by inflammatory stimuli and mitogens in various cells, including macrophages and synovial cells. Accordingly, the inhibition of COX-2 would result in anti-inflammatory effects, whereas gastroduodenal ulceration is thought to be related to the inhibition of COX-1. Animal data have suggested that nabumetone has a low ulcerogenic potential in comparison with other available NSAIDs. This feature was further supported by controlled clinical trials as well as epidemiological studies. The relative GI safety of nabumetone may be attributed to its lack of direct and indirect topical effects because of its nonacidic nature and absence of enterohepatic recirculation. Furthermore, the active metabolite [6-methoxy-2-naphthylacetic acid (6-MNA)] may be gastro-sparing as a result of its property of COX-2 preferential inhibition.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

[New nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents: nitric oxide donors and selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors].

The use of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as analgesic or anti-inflammatory agents is primarily limited by their toxicity to the gastrointestinal tract. Two strategies have been developed recently in order to improve the safety of these drugs. The first approach is the linking of a nitric oxide-releasing moiety to the available compounds. The rationale is that nitric oxide may prevent non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs-induced ulcerations by preventing mucosal ischemia. The second approach is based on the discovery of two isoforms (COX-1 and COX-2) of the cyclo-oxygenase enzyme. It was hypothesized that the constitutively expressed COX-1 isoenzyme leads to the synthesis of prostaglandins with homeostatic functions whereas COX-2 is merely responsible for the production of prostaglandins mediating pain, fever and inflammation. Accordingly, selective COX-2 inhibitors have been developed. Clinical trials indicate that these compounds are roughly as effective as the available non steroidal anti-inflammatory agents without causing acute gastrointestinal damage. There is some evidence that both COX-1 and COX-2 isoforms are involved in the production of prostaglandins associated with inflammation and homeostatic functions. Finally, the true benefit/risk ratio of these new non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs remains to be assessed.

Analgesics↗

Influence of molecular lipophilicity on the diffusion of arylpropionate non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs into the cerebrospinal fluid.

The diffusion of seven arylpropionic acid non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has been investigated in male Wistar rats by means of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) study. After intraperitoneal administration of each drug (5 mg/kg), blood and CSF samples were collected at different times (0.5, 1, 3, and 6 h). The fraction bound to plasma proteins (fb) was determined using ultracentrifugation. The total (CT) and free (CF) plasma concentrations and the concentrations in CSF (CCSF) were measured by a reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatographic (RP-HPLC) method. The areas under the curve of the free plasma (AUCF) and CSF (AUCCSF) concentrations were calculated according to the trapezoidal rule. The overall drug transit into CSF was estimated by the ratio RAUC (AUCCSF: AUCF). The lipophilicity of the compounds was expressed as their polycratic capacity factors (log k'w) measured in a RP-HPLC system. The RAUC ranged from 0.24 to 6.58 and fb from 91.4 to 99.8%. The compounds with an intermediate lipophilicity value (3 < logk'w < 3.6) easily entered the CSF (RAUC > 1). A parabolic relationship was found between log k'w and log RAUC, emphasizing the role of molecular lipophilicity in the diffusion into CSF. Considering the fb value of each drug in regard to this non-linear relationship, it can be hypothesized that the diffusion rate of NSAIDs into the CSF depends primarily on the lipophilicity.

Animals↗

Risk-benefit assessment of opioids in chronic noncancer pain.

Opioids have been accepted as appropriate treatment for acute and cancer pain, but their role in the management of chronic nonmalignant pain is the subject of much debate, mainly due to concerns about waning efficacy, the potential for neuropsychological impairment and the development of drug addiction. Controlled clinical trials demonstrated that opioids may be effective in both nociceptive and neuropathic noncancer pain, although the former responded more consistently than the latter. Gastrointestinal and CNS adverse effects were frequent in most studies. Observational studies have generated contradictory findings regarding efficacy and safety as well as the risk of drug addiction in patients with chronic noncancer pain receiving long term opioid therapy. However, they suggest that opioids may be effective in individual cases, whichever the pathophysiological mechanism of pain. Taken together, the available data indicate that the outcomes associated with opioid therapy vary markedly across patients experiencing chronic nonmalignant pain. The main consensus is that a subset of these patients may gain substantial benefit from opioid analgesics without requiring rapidly escalating doses or developing intolerable adverse effects or drug addiction. Prescribing guidelines have been developed to assist practitioners in selecting the appropriate patients and ensuring an acceptable risk : benefit ratio of opioid therapy. Finally, it must be emphasised that chronic pain is a complex entity wherein analgesics, including opioids, are only part of the treatment.

Analgesics, Non-Narcotic↗