Biomedical subjects

B Baracat

Publications and source records attributed to B Baracat.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Job stress and occupational status in a French cohort.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to examine a large, varied occupational French cohort for possible relationships between various dimensions of occupational stress, on the one hand, and the occupational status and socio-demographic characteristics of workers on the other. METHODS: Data was taken from the first, cross-sectional phase of the VISAT study (aging, health, and work), which took place in 1996. Participants were randomly drawn from the patient lists of about one hundred occupational physicians in three regions of southern France. The current study concerned 2,768 wage earners born in 1944, 1954, or 1964. The material consisted of 59 questions aimed at assessing a broad set of working conditions, some of which were proxy measures of the dimensions described in the Karasek and Siegrist models. RESULTS: From a principal component analysis, three main factors were extracted that accounted for 40% of the total variance. The first factor (a=0.79) included items that referred to the decision latitude in the Karasek model and items that referred to the reward dimension in the Siegrist model. The second factor (a=0.77) was made up of items tapping physical stressors, while the third factor (a=0.71) pooled items that corresponded fairly well to psychological demands in the Karasek model. Highly significant relationships (p<10(-4)) were found between the mean factor scores and both occupational status and educational level, with a lower occupational status and educational level being associated with greater lack of job control and rewards, higher physical stress, but lower psychological demands. Less job control and fewer rewards were also found to be greater in older workers (p<10(-3)) and females (p<10(-4)). CONCLUSION: Our results thus confirm the existence of a strong association, in a French cohort, between occupational status and dimensions of job stress known to be associated with adverse health outcomes.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Effects of age, education, and sex on response bias in a recognition task.

This study examined age-related differences in decision criteria and the extent to which inconsistencies in earlier findings could be due to sampling artifacts, especially the underlying effects of educational level and sex. Male and female participants (N = 3,059) from 4 age groups (32, 42, 52, and 62 years) and a wide range of educational levels performed a word recognition task. Response bias was assessed with a nonparametric index derived from signal detection theory. The analyses revealed no age differences except for the most educated subjects, for whom increased age was associated with stricter decision criteria. Lower levels of education and men as compared with women were associated with a more conservative bias. Controlling for the level of sensitivity did not significantly change this pattern of results. This finding stresses the need for caution in generalizing age differences obtained from samples that are only partly representative or imbalanced with respect to education and sex.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Age influence on attitudes of office workers faced with new computerized technologies: a questionnaire analysis.

The study of Bue and Gollac (1988) provided evidence that a significantly lower proportion of workers aged 45 years and over make use of computer technology compared with younger ones. The aim of the present survey was to explain this fact by a more intensive analysis of the older workers' attitude with respect to the computerization of work situations in relation to other individual and organizational factors. Six hundred and twenty office workers from 18 to 70 years old, either users or non-users of computerized devices, were asked to complete a questionnaire. The questions allowed the assessment of various aspects of the workers' current situation, such as the computer training they had received, the degree of consultation they were subjected to during the computerization process, their representation of the effects of these new technologies on working conditions and employment, the rate of use of new technologies outside the work context, and the perceived usefulness of computers for their own work. The analysis of the questionnaire revealed that as long as the step towards using computer tools, even minimally, has not been taken, then attitudes with respect to computerization are on the whole not very positive and are a source of anxiety for many workers. Age, and even more, seniority in the department, increase such negative representations. The effects of age and seniority were also found among users, as well as the effects of other factors such as qualification, education level, type and rate of computer use, and size of the firm. For the older workers, the expectation of less positive consequences for their career, or even the fear that computerization might be accompanied by threats to their own employment and the less clear knowledge of how computers operate, appeared to account for a significant part of the observed age and seniority differences in attitudes. Although the difference in the amount of computer training between age groups was smaller than expected, the study revealed that one third of the users never received any specific training, and that many of those who benefited from it were trained for only a few days. Consultation of the staff during the computerization process also appeared to be poor, to apply mostly to the best trained and qualified workers, and to be more highly developed in small companies. The results are discussed in the light of more qualitative data recorded during the survey. They suggest the need to increase information, training and involvement of all personnel from the very first stages of computerization (or other technical changes) in order to lessen fears and the feeling of disruption, which are particularly obvious among the oldest workers.

Journal Article↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Age differences in sensitivity, response bias, and reaction time on a visual discrimination task.

Twelve young adults (age 21-25 years) and twelve older adults (age 57-65 years) performed a visual discrimination task (parallel lines) in which the following factors were manipulated: the difference in the length of the lines (3% and 9%), signal exposure duration (150, 750, and 2000 ms), and presentation modality (simultaneous and successive). The effect of repeating the task over three blocks was also controlled. Reaction time, sensitivity (d'), the decision criterion (beta), and the level of confidence the subjects had in their responses were measured and analyzed. The reaction time of the older subjects was longer than for younger ones. The difference remained constant across conditions. Signal detection analysis indicated that the ability to discriminate, as measured by d', was the same, on the whole, in the two age groups, but the sensitivity of the older was more affected by signal exposure duration than that of their younger counterparts. Contrary to what might have been expected, the older subjects used a more risky decision criterion than the younger subjects (preferring false alarms to omissions) and did not have significantly less confidence in their responses. Task repetition led to reduced reaction times and to a slightly higher level of confidence, but no age-related effects were found. The findings suggest that, in addition to a perceptual compensatory component, the longer reaction times of the older subjects include a decision-making component not necessary for their level of discrimination accuracy. The outcome of a lower criterion in the older group supports other findings according to which a more conservative decision strategy is not a general, systematic feature of the aged.

Adult↗