PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Birkner

Publications and source records attributed to B Birkner.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

A prospective randomized comparison of unsedated ultrathin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: does it work better through the nose?

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: In an outpatient gastroenterological practice setting, highly effective diagnostic procedures and patient satisfaction play an important role. Ultrathin endoscopy in unsedated patients has been shown to be more cost-effective and time-efficient in comparison with standard endoscopy. A prospective randomized study was carried out in unsedated patients to compare performance, feasibility, safety, and patient tolerance between ultrathin transnasal (UT), ultrathin oral (UO), and standard (SO) esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 200 of 600 eligible patients consented to participate in the study, and were randomly assigned to undergo UT, UO, or SO. Patients reported their tolerance of the procedure (anxiety, pain, gagging, and overall satisfaction; Likert scale 1-10), and the endoscopists reported the effectiveness of the procedure (handling, picture quality, and overall performance; Likert scale 1-10). Statistics were calculated using the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: After randomization, 65, 67, and 68 patients were allocated to the UT, UO, and SO groups, respectively. Failure to achieve complete EGD by the intended route occurred in 14 patients (22 %) in the UT group. Compared to the SO group, patients in the UT and UO groups rated anxiety before the procedure as being more intense - median score (10 % quantile estimate; 90 % quantile estimate): UT, 2.0 (1.0; 4.0); UO, 2.0 (1.0; 4.0); SO, 0.0 (0.0; 2.0); p < 0.0001), whereas SO patients experienced a higher level of anxiety during the procedure ( P < 0.0001). Pain during insertion of the endoscope was the least intense in the UO group: UT, 2.0 (1.0; 5.0); UO, 1.0 (1.0; 3.0); SO, 2.0 (1.0; 4.0); P < 0.001). Gagging during insertion was more pronounced in the UO group: UT, 2.0 (1.0; 4.0); UO, 3.0 (1.0; 7.0); SO, 2.0 (1.0; 5.0); P < 0.01). The patients' score for the overall assessment was better in the SO group ( P < 0.0001). The endoscopists' overall assessment for ultrathin EGD was poorer than for standard EGD: UT, 3.0 (2.0; 5.0); UO, 3.0 (2.0; 5.0); SO, 2.0 (1.0; 3.0); P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrathin endoscopy through both the transnasal and oral routes has limited use in routine outpatient practice. Techniques for reducing pain and gagging may improve patient tolerance. Further technical improvements are needed to allow routine implementation.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

[HYGEA (Hygiene in gastroenterology--endoscope reprocessing): Study on quality of reprocessing flexible endoscopes in hospitals and in the practice setting].

The quality of reprocessing gastroscopes, colonoscopes and duodenoscopes in daily routine of 25 endoscopy departments in hospitals and 30 doctors with their own practices was evaluated by microbiological testing in the HYGEA interventional study. In 2 test periods, endoscopes ready for use in patients were found contaminated at high rates (period 1: 49 % of 152 endoscopes; period 2: 39 % of 154 endoscopes). Culture of bacterial fecal flora (E. coli, coliform enterobacteriaceae, enterococci) was interpreted indicating failure of cleaning procedure and disinfection of endoscopes. Detection of Pseudomonas spp. (especially P. aeruginosa) and other non-fermenting rods - indicating microbially insufficient final rinsing and incomplete drying of the endoscope or a contaminated flushing equipment for the air/water-channel - pointed out endoscope recontamination during reprocessing or afterwards. Cause for complaint was found in more than 50 % of endoscopy facilities tested (period 2: 5 in hospitals, 25 practices). Reprocessing endoscopes in fully automatic chemo-thermally decontaminating washer-disinfectors with disinfection of final rinsing water led to much better results than manual or semi-automatic procedures (failure rate of endoscopy facilities in period 2 : 3 of 28 with fully automatic, 8 of 12 with manual, 9 of 15 with semi-automatic reprocessing). The study results give evidence for the following recommendations: 1. Manual brushing of all accessible endoscope channels has to be performed even before further automatic reprocessing; 2. For final endoscope rinsing, water or aqua dest. should only be used disinfected or sterile-filtered; 3. Endoscopes have to be dried thoroughly using compressed air prior to storage; 4. Bottle and tube for air/water-channel flushing have to be reprocessed daily by disinfection or sterilization, and in use, the bottle have to be filled exclusively with sterile water. The HYGEA study shows that microbiological testing of endoscopes is useful for detection of insufficient reprocessing and should be performed for quality assurance in doctors' practices, too. The study put recommendations for reprocessing procedures in more concrete terms.

Colony Count, Microbial↗
PubMed2001

[Compliance with terminology standards in reflux, ulcers, and gastritis: A study of 881 consecutive upper gastrointestinal endoscopy reports].

BACKGROUND: The German version of the Minimal Standard Terminology document for endoscopy was discussed in 1997 and 1998, and finally published at the end of 1999 as one of the German Gastroenterology Society guidelines. The diagnoses and descriptive terms included in this standard terminology are based on the consensus views of a large number of German endoscopists (20 endoscopists based in Munich and 20 elsewhere in Germany). The aim of the present study was to investigate how much spontaneous compliance there is with the descriptive terms included in the standard terminology - both among the members of the consensus discussions, and among colleagues not involved in this project. METHODS: A total of 881 endoscopy reports with the diagnoses of reflux, ulcer, and gastritis were collected from 11 centers (2 hospitals and 9 private offices, with a total of 26 examiners) over a one-month period. Nine of the 26 examiners were actively involved in the terminology consensus discussion. The rate of occurrence of the descriptive terms contained in the standard terminology was assessed for the diagnoses listed above. RESULTS: Compliance with the descriptive terms was high (> 90 %) only for basic parameters such as the Savary classification of reflux and the area in which gastroduodenal ulcers were located. Other important parameters, such as the extent (length) of Barrett's esophagus, ulcer size, and circumferential location, were reported in only three-quarters of cases or less. The descriptions of gastritis were inconsistent. There was no difference in the degree of compliance either between endoscopists using free dictation and those using computerized text blocks, or between members of the terminology group and those not involved in preparing the terminology. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to standard terminology and its descriptive parameters is poor even among specialized gastroenterologists who have been involved in terminology consensus discussions. Compliance needs to be improved by providing suitable software programs with automatic reporting functions.

Barrett Esophagus↗
PubMed2000

Are guidelines followed in Helicobacter pylori diagnosis and therapy? An inquiry among gastroenterologists, referring physicians and patients in Munich.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Attempts to standardize Helicobacter pylori (Hp) diagnosis and therapy have led to the publication of guidelines by various national gastroenterological societies in Europe and the USA. However, little information is available either regarding the compliance of gastroenterologists and referring physicians with these guidelines, or regarding the patients' perspective. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of all outpatient upper gastrointestinal endoscopy reports for a one-month period in eleven different centers (two university hospitals and nine private practice gastroenterology offices) with a total of 24 gastroenterologists. Endoscopy reports from patients wit the indications of reflux, diarrhea, and tumors were excluded. Diagnoses and treatment recommendations given by gastroenterologists were recorded. Questionnaires concerning Hp diagnosis, treatment indications and performance, and follow-up were sent to referring physicians and patients. RESULTS: A total of 772 endoscopy reports were included in the study; analyzable questionnaires were returned by 287 referring physicians (47%) and by 265 patients (59%). Gastroenterologists recommended Hp eradication in all ulcers and in 29% of gastritis/nonulcer dyspepsia (NUD) cases. Referring physicians thought that 94% of ulcers should be treated by Hp eradication, which was also considered to be an absolute and relative indication in NUD by 15% and 53% of the referring physicians, respectively. Among the patients who replied, 52% had received Hp eradication regimens; ulcers were found in 22% of the total patient group. Check-up examinations after Hp therapy were considered necessary by 75% of the referring physicians, but only 22% of the responding patients actually underwent some form of check-up (upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in 91%). CONCLUSIONS: Gastroenterologists and (to a somewhat lesser extent) referring physician appear to be following the current guidelines for Hp treatment. As expected, two thirds of referring physicians consider NUD to be absolute or relative indication for Hp eradication. Check-up examinations are apparently being performed less frequently than recommended.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

[Certification of an ambulatory gastroenterologic service fulfilling ISO Law 9001--criteria and national guidelines of the Gastroenterologic Association].

The objectives of certification and accreditation are the deployment and examination of quality improvement measures in health care services. The quality management system of the ISO 9001 is created to install measures and tools leading to assured and improved quality in health care. Only some experiences with certification fulfilling ISO 9001 criteria exist in the German health care system. Evidence-based clinical guidelines can serve as references for the development of standards in quality measurement. Only little data exists on the implementation strategy of guidelines and evaluation, respectively. A pilot quality management system in consistence with ISO 9001 criteria was developed for ambulatory, gastroenterological services. National guidelines of the German Society of Gastroenterology and Metabolism and the recommendations of the German Association of Physicians for quality assurance of gastrointestinal endoscopy were included in the documentation and internal auditing. This pilot quality management system is suitable for the first steps in the introduction of quality management in ambulatory health care. This system shows validity for accreditation and certification of gastrointestinal health care units as well.

Ambulatory Care↗
PubMed1997

Clinical response to dietary fiber treatment of chronic constipation.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical outcome of dietary fiber therapy in patients with chronic constipation. METHODS: One hundred, forty-nine patients with chronic constipation (age 53 yr, range 18-81 yr, 84% women) at two gastroenterology departments in Munich, Germany, were treated with Plantago ovata seeds, 15-30 g/day, for a period of at least 6 wk. Repeated symptom evaluation, oroanal transit time measurement (radiopaque markers), and functional rectoanal evaluation (proctoscopy, manometry, defecography) were performed. Patients were classified on the basis of the result of dietary fiber treatment: no effect, n = 84; improved, n = 33; and symptom free, n = 32. RESULTS: Eighty percent of patients with slow transit and 63% of patients with a disorder of defecation did not respond to dietary fiber treatment, whereas 85% of patients without a pathological finding improved or became symptom free. CONCLUSION: Slow GI transit and/or a disorder of defecation may explain a poor outcome of dietary fiber therapy in patients with chronic constipation. A dietary fiber trial should be conducted before technical investigations, which are indicated only if the dietary fiber trial fails.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

[Harmonization of the assessment of outcomes, predictors and costs as well as testing for gender-specific differences in rehabilitation research].

The scientific program "Rehabilitation Research in Germany" includes as a priority topic the evaluation of the effectiveness of rehabilitation regarding return to work. Controlled intervention studies with randomized allocation to treatment and a minimum follow-up of six to twelve months after rehabilitation are of primary importance. It is also recommended that the studies should include economic aspects and consider gender differences. Another request is harmonization of studies with respect to methods, assessment tools, and implementation to improve the relevance of the studies and to allow for combining the results. The authors respond to this request. They make proposals for harmonizing the assessment of outcomes, predictors, and costs as well as for testing gender differences in intervention studies. The proposals address the rehabilitation research networks and aim to provide a basis of discussion and to initiate the necessary consensus finding between the networks. Proposals include (1) a taxonomy of outcomes and predictors for rehabilitation and recommendations for generic assessment tools which allow for data-pooling of studies; (2) a concept for the pre-post and follow-up measurement and recommendations concerning the time interval on which evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency of rehabilitation or treatment modalities should be based; (3) descriptions of the content and interpretation of the self assessment instruments which are recommended for cross study comparisons; (4) a procedure to assess the direct and indirect costs, i.e. costs of treatments and costs of disease consequences, which considers especially the assessment of rehabilitative services and their monetary evaluation; (5) provisions for ensuring representativeness of women in intervention studies and procedures for testing differences in treatment outcomes between women and men; (6) a procedure to reach harmonization by establishing a coordination committee including representatives of the research networks, and by using well-established methods such as consensus conferences.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗
PubMed1996

[Quality assurance in coloscopy in private practice and the hospital. The Gastroenterology Quality Circle (GEQC) Munich].

OBJECTIVE: As quality control in medicine is part of a doctor's professional duty, the "Munich Quality Circle" conducted a prospective feasibility study in which ten, previously defined, quality indicators were to be assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six specialised private practice groups and three specialised hospitals centers took part. Data on 2928 consecutive patients were collected by questionnaire and ten quality indicators assessed: concordance with the indication list; intestinal cleansing; premedication; duration and completeness of the study; sensation of pain; use of radiology; complications; diagnosis; and therapeutic intervention. RESULTS: Concordance with the indication list was present in 97.8% (range 93-100), premedication was given to 94.6% (77-100), midazolam to 77%. The proportion of patients who recorded no or only moderate pain correlated with the dose but not with the duration of advancing the coloscope. Mean time of advancing the instrument to the caecum was 8.0 min, the duration directly depending on the experience of the examiner. A mean time of less than 10 minutes was achieved only after more than 1200 examinations. The more a centre used fluoroscopic control the shorter the time of coloscopy. The examination was completed in 97.6% (92-99). There was no correlation between experience (assuming supervision) and dose of midazolam or frequency of fluoroscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Nowadays total coloscopy is a primary diagnostic method, but it needs an intensive learning phase. In clinical centers consequent supervision of less experienced examiners achieved comparable results to those with experience. Informative quality indicators for coloscopy can be documented with little cost.

Anesthetics, Intravenous↗
PubMed1994

[Acceptance of electronic data processing supported documentation of ultrasound findings in routine clinical practice. A survey].

We carried out a survey to determine the acceptance of the ultrasound documentation software, CUBUS, in clinical practice. Since August 1, 1988, CUBUS, versions V1.01 to V2.02 has been employed in clinical routine. By October 1991 10,850 reports had been stored in version 2.02. The software is installed on a personal computer (Siemens PCD-2, 40MB, 640 KB RAM) to which a laserprinter is connected. The work of operating the system is shared between the nursing and medical staff. In order to investigate the acceptance of the printed reports produced with this system, we carried out a poll among the physicians working at the hospital. Among the 86 physicians who receive 95% of the US reports, 58% (n = 50) responded. On the basis of the categories good, satisfactory, adequate and poor, we requested an assessment of layout, presentation, comprehension, completeness and overall impression. The overall impression was assessed as good or satisfactory in 34% and 42%, respectively. In the case of the individual criteria (see above), the categories good and satisfactory scored 62% and 34%, 58% and 32%, 68% and 18% and 72% and 24%, respectively. The terminology used was accepted by 84%. Addition of, for example, image documentation, and endosonography, will expand the advantages of the input of findings and further improve the good overall impression made by the report printout in our survey, so that the relatively long input time requirement accounting for some 30% of the total examination time, is accordingly justified.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1993

Treatment of coumarin-induced skin necrosis with a monoclonal antibody purified protein C concentrate.

BACKGROUND AND DESIGN--Protein C is a vitamin K-dependent plasma protein that is converted to the serine protease activated protein C by the thrombin-thrombomodulin complex. Activated protein C functions as a natural anticoagulant by inactivating the cofactors of the coagulation cascade, factors Va and VIIIa. Coumarin (warfarin)-induced skin necrosis is thought to be due to a rapid elimination of protein C relative to other vitamin K-dependent factors during the initial phase of oral anticoagulation. We have used a highly purified protein C concentrate to treat a patient with acquired protein C deficiency who developed skin necrosis during the initial phase of oral anticoagulant therapy. OBSERVATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS--During protein C concentrate therapy, no further skin lesions appeared, and the healing process of necrotic areas was facilitated. Replacement therapy with protein C concentrate appears to be safe and effective as an adjunctive treatment for coumarin-induced skin necrosis.

Aged↗