PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Bott

Publications and source records attributed to B Bott.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

Microleakage and SEM evaluation of fissure sealants placed by use of self-etching priming agents.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the microleakage and internal seal of fissure sealants placed by use of self-etching priming agents in comparison to phosphoric acid etching of enamel. METHODS: Seventy-two caries-free extracted human molars were divided into six groups with 12 teeth each. Occlusal surfaces were cleansed by either pumicing (Groups I, III, V) or by 15-s air-abrasion treatment with 25 microm aluminum oxide particles (Groups II, IV, VI). Fissures were sealed with the self-etching priming systems, Clearfil Liner Bond 2 (Groups I, II) or Resulcin AquaPrime (Groups III, IV). In Groups V and VI, sealants were placed after phosphoric acid etching. Half of the teeth in each group were thermocycled. After staining with 0.5% methylene blue, the teeth were sectioned for evaluation of microleakage. Internal adaptation of the fissure sealants was analyzed by SEM on replicas of cross sections. RESULTS: Independent of the methods used for cleansing of the occlusal surfaces, fissure sealants in Groups I and II showed significantly more microleakage and less sufficient internal seal as compared to sealants placed in Groups III to VI. Sealants placed by Resulcin AquaPrime (Groups III, IV) leaked significantly more than sealants applied after phosphoric acid etching (Groups V, VI) of the enamel. However, statistical analysis (H-test) did not reveal significant differences concerning the internal adaptation of sealants placed in Groups III, IV, V and VI. CONCLUSIONS: Concerning the microleakage data, use of the self-etching bonding systems, Clearfil Liner Bond 2 and Resulcin AquaPrime, cannot be recommended for fissure sealing, since the sealing ability is less effective as compared to the conventional acid-etching technique.

Acid Etching, Dental↗
PubMed2003

Effect of different luting materials on the marginal adaptation of Class I ceramic inlay restorations in vitro.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this in vitro study was to assess the marginal adaptation of prefabricated Class I ceramic inlay restorations placed with various luting materials. METHODS: Forty-two standardized occlusal cavities were prepared in extracted human molars with diamond burs exactly corresponding to the dimensions of prefabricated glass ceramic inlays. The prepared teeth were randomly assigned to seven groups of six teeth each and restored using (1). the composite resin Tetric Ceram in increment technique [Group I] or (2). ceramic inlays (Cerana) luted with: the composite based materials Dual Cement [Gr. II] and Panavia 21 [Gr. III], the compomer material Dyract Cem [Gr. IV], Dyract Cem with additional use of Prime & Bond 2.1 [Gr. V], the silicophosphate cement Trans-Lit [Gr. VI], or the ethylcyanoacrylate Cyano-Veneer [Gr. VII]. Marginal adaptation was evaluated by SEM-analyses before and after thermal cycling (2500 cycles; 5-55 degrees C) and mechanical loading (100N; 500000 cycles) using replica models. Kruskal-Wallis H-test and Mann-Whitney U-test were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Group I (increment technique) as well as Groups II-V (inlay technique) revealed high percentages of perfect marginal adaptation in over 95% of the analyzed margins, both before and after thermo-mechanical loading. Statistical significant differences could not be detected within these groups. All inlays luted with silicophosphate cement (Group VI) and four of six inlays applied with Cyano-Veneer (Group VII) fractured under occlusal load. SIGNIFICANCE: A stable bonding to the enamel and to the ceramic inlay was achievable with the composite luting resins Dual Cement and Panavia 21 as well as with the compomer based luting material Dyract Cem but not with the use of the silicophosphate cement Trans-Lit or the ethylcyanoacrylate Cyano-Veneer.

Compomers↗
PubMed1999

In-vitro pulp chamber temperature rise during composite resin polymerization with various light-curing sources.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this in vitro study was to measure the pulp chamber temperature increase induced during composite resin polymerization with various visible light-curing units. METHODS: A Class II cavity was prepared in an extracted molar tooth, leaving a dentin layer 1 mm thick between pulp chamber and proximal cavity wall. A 2 mm composite resin layer was applied to the proximal box and light-cured with the selected curing units: Heliolux II (H; 320 mW/cm2), QHL 75 (Q; 505 mW/cm2), Astralis 5 (A; 515 mW/cm2), Optilux 500 (O; 670 mW/cm2), Elipar Highlight (EH; 730 mW/cm2), ADT 1000 PAC (P; 1196 mW/cm2). Light-curing took place for 40 s (H, A, Q, O, EH), 5 and 10 s (P). Measurement of pulp chamber temperature changes (starting temperature: 37.0 +/- 0.1 degrees C) during polymerization was performed with a K-type thermocouple positioned at the pulp-dentin junction. Mean values were calculated from 10 measurements with each light-curing unit. ANOVA and Dunnett t-test were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Maximum temperature changes varied significantly depending on the light-curing unit used: 2.9 +/- 0.3 degrees C (H), 4.7 +/- 0.5 degrees C (A), 5.4 +/- 0.3 degrees C (P, 5 s), 5.6 +/- 0.4 degrees C (Q), 6.1 +/- 0.2 degrees C (EH, 2-step mode: 100 mW/cm2 over 10 s, 730 mW/cm2 over 30 s), 6.9 +/- 0.4 degrees C (EH), 7.3 +/- 0.3 degrees C (O), 7.8 +/- 0.9 degrees C (P, 10 s). SIGNIFICANCE: It is concluded that light-polymerization with curing units characterized by high energy output (A,EH,O,P,Q) causes significantly higher pulp chamber temperature changes as compared to the conventional curing light (H). Therefore, clinicians should be aware of the potential thermal hazard to the pulp which might result from visible-light curing of composite resins.

Body Temperature↗
PubMed1993

Neural network classification of mutagens using structural fragment data.

A neural network was applied to a large, structurally heterogeneous data set of mutagens and non-mutagens to investigate structure-property relationships. Substructural data comprising a total of 1280 fragments were used as inputs. The training of the back-propagation networks was directed by an algorithm which selected an optimal subset of fragments in order to maximize their discriminating power, and a good predictive network. The system comprised three programs: the first used a keyfile of 100 fragments to generate training and test files, the second was the network itself and a procedure for ranking the effectiveness of these fragments and the third randomly replaced the lowest fragments. This cycle was then repeated. After running on a 386/33 PC several networks produced approximately 11% failures in the test set and 6% in the training set. By simplifying the output of the hidden layer it was possible to describe the hidden layer states in terms of clusters of mutagens and non-mutagens. Some of these clusters were structurally homogeneous and contained known mutagenic and non-mutagenic structural classes. This analysis provided a useful means of demonstrating how the network was classifying the data.

Cluster Analysis↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding.

The purpose of this in vitro study was (1) to investigate the composite-to-enamel bond strength and (2) to analyze the marginal adaptation of resin composite restorations in class 2 cavities using three self-etching priming agents in comparison to conventional phosphoric acid etching and bonding application. In the first part of the study 24 extracted bovine incisors were embedded in acrylic resin and ground flat with 800-grit paper. The following three self-etching priming agents/composite resins were applied to the enamel surfaces of six teeth each: Clearfil Liner Bond 2/Clearfil AP-X (Group I), Etch & Prime 3.0/Degufill mineral (Group II), Resulcin AquaPrime + MonoBond/Ecusit (Group III). In Group IV Ecusit-Mono/Ecusit was used after enamel etching with phosphoric acid (37%). Shear bond strength values measured on a T22 K testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min were: 24.2 +/- 3.0 MPa (Group I), 21.9 +/- 1.4 MPa (II), 34.0 +/- 3.6 MPa (III), and 26.3 +/- 1.8 MPa (IV). ANOVA revealed significant (P < 0.05) differences in shear bond strength between groups, except comparison of Group I and II, and Group I and IV. In the second part of the study 24 standardized class 2 cavity preparations with the approximal box extending 1 mm above the CEJ were prepared in extracted human molars. Enamel margins were beveled and the teeth were divided into four groups of six teeth each. Cavities were restored using the self-etching priming agents Clearfil Liner Bond 2 (Group I), Etch & Prime 3.0 (Group II), and Resulcin AquaPrime + MonoBond (Group III). In Group IV composite resin restorations were placed after 37% phosphoric acid etching and bonding application (Ecusit-Mono). Quantitative SEM analysis of the marginal adaptation of the restorations after thermocycling (5-55 degrees C, 2500 cycles) and mechanical loading (100 N, 500,000 cycles) revealed excellent, gap-free margins in 91.2% (Group I), 93.0% (Group II), 92.0% (Group III), and 92.5% (Group IV) of the restorations' approximal area. There were no statistically significant differences between the four groups (P < 0.05). In conclusion, results of the present in vitro study indicate that use of self-etching primers may be an alternative to conventional phosphoric acid pre-treatment in composite-to-enamel bonding restorative techniques.

Acid Etching, Dental↗