PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Bouche

Publications and source records attributed to B Bouche.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

Hepatic regenerating nodules: a mimic of recurrent cancer in children.

BACKGROUND: Pseudometastatic lesions of the liver may be discovered incidentally in children previously treated for malignant tumour. OBJECTIVE: To describe the radiological pattern of these lesions and to analyse their pathogenesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine children, 2-12 years' old at the time of diagnosis, are described in this retrospective multicentre report. The primary tumours were: nephroblastoma (n = 2), neuroblastoma (n = 2), Ewing's tumour/PNET (n = 2), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 1), and osteosarcoma (n = 2), treated by surgery (8/9), chemotherapy (9/9), intensive chemotherapy and bone-marrow transplantation (5/9), and radiotherapy (7/9). Three children suffered veno-occlusive disease (VOD) during treatment. The hepatic assessment was performed by sonography (8/9), Doppler (7/9), multiphase spiral CT (8/9) and MRI (7/9). RESULTS: Lesions were discovered 15 months to 16 years after completing treatment. CT was the most sensitive modality for diagnosis. Lesions were multiple in eight cases, measured 2-50 mm, and appeared hypervascular on the arterial phase of CT and/or MRI in every case. Metastases were excluded on the basis of histological verification (n = 2) and clinical and radiological follow-up. CONCLUSION: Pseudometastatic hypervascular hepatic nodules can appear after treatment of a malignant tumour in children. The hypothesis of benign regenerative lesions secondary to treatment and/or VOD is considered.

Child↗

Biofeedback for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Long-term clinical results.

UNLABELLED: Biofeedback therapy has been proposed as a treatment for fecal incontinence with good, short-term results. PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess long-term clinical results of biofeedback therapy compared with medical therapy alone and to assess manometric results in patients treated with biofeedback. METHODS: Two groups of incontinent patients were studied. Group 1 consisted of 16 patients (3 males and 13 females; mean age, 59.9 years). Etiologies treated by biofeedback included descending perineum syndrome (7), postfistula or hemorroidectomy (4), and miscellaneous (5). Group 2 consisted of eight patients (two males, six females; mean age, 62.2 years). Etiologies treated with medical treatment alone (including enema and antidiarrheal therapy) included descending perineum syndrome (3), postfistula or hemorroidectomy (2), and miscellaneous (3). The incontinence score was initially 17.81 +/- 3.27 (standard deviation) in Group 1 and 17.0 +/- 2.77 in Group 2. Resting pressure of the upper and lower anal sphincter, maximum squeezing pressure, and duration of contraction were not initially different in Groups 1 and 2 but were significantly lower than in the control group of patients without incontinence (n = 12; 8 males, 4 females; mean age, 66.4 years) (P < 0.05). Follow-up duration was 30 months, with intermediate clinical score at 6 months for Group 1. RESULTS: After biofeedback therapy, the incontinence score at 30 months was lower in Group 1 (14.43 +/- 6.35 vs. 17.81 +/- 3.27; P < 0.035) and unchanged in Group 2 (18.0 +/- 2.72 vs. 17.0 +/- 2.77). However, in Group 1 the score at 6 months was much lower than at 30 months (6.31 +/- 7.81 vs. 14.43 +/- 6.35; P < 0.001). Only the amplitude of voluntary contraction and upper anal pressure (51.1 (range, 27-90) vs 36.7 (range, 20-80) mmHg) were significantly increased (81.5 (range, 55-120) vs. 62.1 (range, 30-90) mmHg; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Biofeedback improved continence at 6 months and at 30 months. However, the score at 6 months was much better, suggesting that the initial good results may deteriorate over a long time. These data suggest that it could be useful to reinitiate biofeedback therapy in some patients.

Adult↗