PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B C Moore

Publications and source records attributed to B C Moore.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Modulation discrimination interference and auditory grouping.

The detection of a change in the modulation pattern of a (target) carrier frequency, fc (for example a change in the depth of amplitude or frequency modulation, AM or FM) can be adversely affected by the presence of other modulated sounds (maskers) at frequencies remote from fc, an effect called modulation discrimination interference (MDI). MDI cannot be explained in terms of interaction of the sounds in the peripheral auditory system. It may result partly from a tendency for sounds which are modulated in a similar way to be perceptually 'grouped', i.e. heard as a single sound. To test this idea, MDI for the detection of a change in AM depth was measured as a function of stimulus variables known to affect perceptual grouping, namely overall duration and onset and offset asynchrony between the masking and target sounds. In parallel experiments, subjects were presented with a series of pairs of sounds, the target alone and the target with maskers, and were asked to rate how clearly the modulation of the target could be heard in the complex mixture. The results suggest that two factors contribute to MDI. One factor is difficulty in hearing a pitch corresponding to the target frequency. This factor appears to be strongly affected by perceptual grouping. Its effects can be reduced or abolished by asynchronous gating of the target and masker. The second factor is a specific difficulty in hearing the modulation of the target, or in distinguishing that modulation from the modulation of other sounds that are present. This factor has effects even under conditions promoting perceptual segregation of the target and masker.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1992

Effects of envelope fluctuations on gap detection.

The inherent fluctuations present in narrowbands of noise may limit the ability to detect gaps in the noise; 'dips' in the noise may be confused with the gap to be detected. For subjects with cochlear hearing loss, loudness recruitment may effectively magnify the fluctuations and this could partly account for the reduced ability to detect gaps in noise bands that is usually found in subjects with cochlear hearing loss. In the present experiments we tested these ideas by processing noise bands to alter the amount of envelope fluctuation. The envelopes of the noise bands were raised to a power, N. Powers greater than 1 result in expansion of the envelope (magnified fluctuations, simulating loudness recruitment), while powers less than 1 result in compression of the envelope (decreased fluctuations). Thresholds for detecting gaps in processed noise bands centered at 1 kHz were measured as a function of noise bandwidth and of N. To prevent the detection of spectral changes introduced by the gap or by the processing, stimuli were either presented in background noise, or at a low sensation level (20 dB). Three normally hearing subjects, two subjects with unilateral cochlear hearing loss and two subjects with bilateral cochlear hearing loss were tested. Gap thresholds generally increased with increasing N. This effect was large for small noise bandwidths (50 Hz or less) and smaller for larger noise bandwidths (200 Hz or more). For both the normal and impaired ears, gap thresholds at narrow bandwidths were improved relative to those for unprocessed noise bands (N = 1) by compressing the envelope fluctuations (N < 1). The results support the idea that fluctuations in narrowband noises affect gap detection, and that loudness recruitment may adversely affect the ability to detect gaps in noise bands. They also show that compression of the fluctuations in the noise can improve gap detection.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1992

Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss.

This article describes an evaluation of an in the ear hearing aid, which applies fast-acting full dynamic range compression independently in two frequency bands. This can compensate for the loudness recruitment typically associated with sensorineural hearing loss. The crossover frequency between the two bands and the gain and compression ratio in each band are programmable to suit the individual patient. Twenty subjects with moderate sensorineural hearing loss were tested in a counterbalanced order using the aid programmed as a linear amplifier (condition L) and as a two-band compressor (condition C). All subjects were fitted binaurally. Subjects were also tested without hearing aids (condition U) and using the hearing aids that they normally wore (condition Own). Speech intelligibility was measured in quiet at three sound levels (50, 65, and 80 dB SPL), and speech reception thresholds (SRTs) in 12-talker babble were measured under monaurally and binaurally aided conditions, with the speech and babble both coincident and spatially separated. In condition C, speech intelligibility in quiet was high at all sound levels. Speech intelligibility at the two lower levels decreased in condition L, and decreased still further in conditions Own and U. Condition C gave, on average, better speech intelligibility in babble (lower SRTs) than conditions L, Own, or U. The advantage of condition C over condition L varied across subjects and was correlated with the dynamic range for tones at high frequencies; small dynamic ranges were associated with greater benefit from compression. A significant advantage for binaural aiding was found both when the speech and noise were spatially separated and when they were coincident. The binaural advantage was similar for the C and L conditions, indicating that the independent compression at the two ears did not adversely affect the use of binaural cues. Questionnaires on the subjects' experiences with the aids in everyday life indicated that they generally preferred condition C over condition L.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Auditory filter shapes at low center frequencies in young and elderly hearing-impaired subjects.

Auditory filter shapes were measured for two groups of hearing-impaired subjects, young and elderly, matched for audiometric loss, for center frequencies (fc) of 100, 200, 400, and 800 Hz using a modified notched-noise method [B. R. Glasberg and B. C. J. Moore, Hear. Res. 47, 103-138 (1990)]. Two noise bands, each 0.4fc wide, were used; they were placed both symmetrically and asymmetrically about the signal frequency to allow the measurement of filter asymmetry. The overall noise level was either 77 or 87 dB SPL. Stimuli were delivered monaurally using Sennheiser HD424 earphones. Although auditory filters for the hearing-impaired subjects were generally broader than for normally hearing subjects [Moore et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 132-140 (1990)], some hearing-impaired subjects with mild losses had normal filters. The filters tended to broaden with increasing hearing loss. There were not any clear differences in filter characteristics between young and elderly hearing-impaired subjects. The signal-to-noise ratios at the outputs of the auditory filters required for threshold (K) tended to be lower than normal for the young hearing-impaired subjects, but were not significantly different from normal for the elderly hearing-impaired subjects. The lower K values for the young hearing-impaired subjects may occur because broadened auditory filters reduce the deleterious effects on signal detection of fluctuations in the noise.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Evaluation of a method of simulating reduced frequency selectivity.

The accuracy of a method of simulating reduced frequency selectivity by the spectral smearing of complex stimuli has been evaluated. First an excitation pattern that would be evoked by a given nonsmeared stimulus in an impaired ear with broad auditory filters was estimated. Then the spectral smearing of the stimulus that would be necessary to create the same excitation pattern in a normal ear was calculated. The smearing was based on the shapes of simulated broad auditory filters; both symmetric and asymmetric broad filters were simulated. The method was used to process notched noise, and tones in notched noise, and the processed stimuli were used in a series of experiments with normally hearing subjects measuring the threshold for the tone in notched noise. The resulting data were used to derive auditory filter shapes. The derived filter shapes were generally similar to the expected shapes (based on the type of spectral smearing used), but there were some systematic discrepancies and some individual differences. The discrepancies do not seem to be due to the use of information derived from phase locking, since they were observed both at 1 kHz (where phase locking occurs) and at 6 kHz (where phase locking probably does not occurs). The discrepancies also do not seem to be due to the transmission characteristics of the outer/middle ear, since they occurred both when these characteristics were taken into account in the fitting procedure, and when the stimuli were preshaped to compensate for these characteristics. The influence of the subjects' own auditory filters probably can explain some of the discrepancies; the excitation pattern evoked by the spectrally smeared stimuli can be significantly influenced by the subjects' own filters when those filters are not much sharper than the simulated filters used to produce the smeared stimuli. Finally, some of the discrepancies can probably be explained by subjects combining information across auditory filters, rather than just using the single 'best' filter in each condition; this represents a limitation of the fitting procedure rather than of the simulation itself. Overall, the simulation worked reasonably well, especially when the smearing was based on symmetric filters.

Attention↗
PubMed1992

Accuracy of pitch matching for pure tones and for complex tones with overlapping or nonoverlapping harmonics.

The discrimination of the fundamental frequency (fo) of pairs of complex tones with no common harmonics is worse than the discrimination of fo for tones with all harmonics in common. These experiments were conducted to assess whether this effect is a result of pitch shifts between pairs of tones without common harmonics or whether it reflects influences of spectral differences (timbre) on the accuracy of pitch perception. In experiment 1, pitch matches were obtained between sounds drawn from the following types: (1) pure tones (P) with frequencies 100, 200, or 400 Hz; (2) a multiple-component complex tone, designated A, with harmonics 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 14, 15, and fo = 100, 200, or 400 Hz; (3) A multiple-component complex tone, designated B, with harmonics 5, 6, 7, 11, 12, 13, 16, and with fo = 100, 200 or 400 Hz. The following matches were made; A vs A, B vs B, A vs P, B vs P and P vs P. Pitch shifts were found between the pure tones and the complex tones (A vs P and B vs P), but not between the A and B tones (A vs B). However, the variability of the A vs B matches was significantly greater than that of the A vs A or B vs B matches. Also, the variability of the A vs P and B vs P matches was greater than that for the A vs B matches. In a second experiment, frequency difference limens (DLCs) were measured for the A vs A, B vs B, and A vs B pairs of sounds. The DLCs were larger for the A vs B pair than for A vs A or B vs B. The results suggest that the poor frequency discrimination of tones with no common harmonics does not result from pitch shifts between the tones. Rather, it seems that spectral differences between tones interfere with judgements of their relative pitch.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Pitch discrimination and phase sensitivity in young and elderly subjects and its relationship to frequency selectivity.

Frequency difference limens for pure tones (DLFs) and for complex tones (DLCs) were measured for four groups of subjects: young normal hearing, young hearing impaired, elderly with near-normal hearing, and elderly hearing impaired. The auditory filters of the subjects had been measured in earlier experiments using the notched-noise method, for center frequencies (fc) of 100, 200, 400, and 800 Hz. The DLFs for both impaired groups were higher than for the young normal group at all fc's (50-4000 Hz). The DLFs at a given fc were generally only weakly correlated with the sharpness of the auditory filter at that fc, and some subjects with broad filters had near-normal DLFs at low frequencies. Some subjects in the elderly normal group had very large DLFs at low frequencies in spite of near-normal auditory filters. These results suggest a partial dissociation of frequency selectivity and frequency discrimination of pure tones. The DLCs for the two impaired groups were higher than those for the young normal group at all fundamental frequencies (fo) tested (50, 100, 200, and 400 Hz); the DLCs for the elderly normal group were intermediate. At fo = 50 Hz, DLCs for a complex tone containing only low harmonics (1-5) were markedly higher than for complex tones containing higher harmonics, for all subject groups, suggesting that pitch was conveyed largely by the higher, unresolved harmonics. For the elderly impaired group, and some subjects in the elderly normal group, DLCs were larger for a complex tone with lower harmonics (1-12) than for tones without lower harmonics (4-12 and 6-12) for fo's up to 200 Hz. Some elderly normal subjects had markedly larger-than-normal DLCs in spite of near-normal auditory filters. The DLCs tended to be larger for complexes with components added in alternating sine/cosine phase than for complexes with components added in cosine phase. Phase effects were significant for all groups, but were small for the young normal group. The results are not consistent with place-based models of the pitch perception of complex tones; rather, they suggest that pitch is at least partly determined by temporal mechanisms.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Speech pattern hearing aids for the profoundly hearing impaired: speech perception and auditory abilities.

A family of prototype speech pattern hearing aids for the profoundly hearing impaired has been compared to amplification. These aids are designed to extract acoustic speech patterns that convey essential phonetic contrasts, and to match this information to residual receptive abilities. In the first study, the presentation of voice fundamental frequency information from a wearable SiVo (sinusoidal voice) aid was compared to amplification in 11 profoundly deafened adults. Intonation reception was often better, and never worse, with fundamental frequency information. Four subjects scored more highly in audio-visual consonant identification with fundamental frequency information, five performed better with amplified speech, and two performed similarly under these two conditions. Five of the 11 subjects continued use of the SiVo aid after the tests were complete. A second study examined a laboratory prototype compound speech pattern aid, which encoded voice fundamental frequency, amplitude envelope, and the presence of voiceless excitation. In five profoundly deafened adults, performance was better in consonant identification when additional speech patterns were present than with fundamental frequency alone; the main advantage was derived from amplitude information. In both consonant identification and connected discourse tracking, performance with appropriately matched compound speech pattern signals was better than with amplified speech in three subjects, and similar to performance with amplified speech in the other two. In nine subjects, frequency discrimination, gap detection, and frequency selectivity were measured, and were compared to speech receptive abilities with both amplification and fundamental frequency presentation. The subjects who showed the greatest advantage from fundamental frequency presentation showed the greatest average hearing losses, and the least degree of frequency selectivity. Compound speech pattern aids appear to be more effective for some profoundly hearing-impaired listeners than conventional amplifying aids, and may be a valuable alternative to cochlear implants.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Consonant recognition by some of the better cochlear-implant patients.

Fifty-four of the better cochlear-implant patients from Europe and the United States were tested on two consonant recognition tests using nonsense syllables. One was produced in an accent appropriate for their own language by a male and a female talker. Recorded tokens of /ibi, idi, igi, ipi, iti, iki, ifi, ivi, ifi, isi, izi, imi, ini/ were presented. With the French syllables, six patients with the Chorimac device averaged 18% correct (6%-29%). With the German syllables, nine patients with the 3M/Vienna device averaged 34% correct (17%-44%), ten patients with the Nucleus device (tested in Hannover) averaged 31% correct (19%-42%), and ten patients with the Duren/Cologne device averaged 27% correct (10%-56%). With the English syllables, ten patients with the Nucleus device (tested in the United States) averaged 42% correct (29%-62%), and nine patients with the Symbion device averaged 46% correct (31%-69%). An information-transmission analysis and sequential information-transfer analysis of the confusions suggested that different implants provided differing amounts of feature information. The place of articulation feature was typically the most difficult to code for all implants. In the second test a male and a female talker recorded the stimuli /ibi, idi, igi, imi, ini, ifi, isi, izi/ in a single manner that was appropriate for all three languages. Six patients with the Chorimac device averaged 27% (13%-48%), ten patients with the Duren/Cologne implant averaged 29% (15%-75%), ten patients with the Nucleus device (tested in Hannover) averaged 40% (25%-58%), ten patients with the Nucleus device (tested in the United States) averaged 49% (40%-60%), nine patients with the Symbion device averaged 61% (40%-75%), and nine patients with the 3M/Vienna device averaged 41% (29%-52%) correct.

Cochlear Implants↗
PubMed1992

Detection of combined frequency and amplitude modulation.

This article is concerned with the detection of mixed modulation (MM), i.e., simultaneously occurring amplitude modulation (AM) and frequency modulation (FM). In experiment 1, an adaptive two-alternative forced-choice task was used to determine thresholds for detecting AM alone. Then, thresholds for detecting FM were determined for stimuli which had a fixed amount of AM in the signal interval only. The amount of AM was always less than the threshold for detecting AM alone. The FM thresholds depended significantly on the magnitude of the coexisting AM. For low modulation rates (4, 16, and 64 Hz), the FM thresholds did not depend significantly on the relative phase of modulation for the FM and AM. For a high modulation rate (256 Hz) strong effects of modulator phase were observed. These phase effects are as predicted by the model proposed by Hartmann and Hnath [Acustica 50, 297-312 (1982)], which assumes that detection of modulation at modulation frequencies higher than the critical modulation frequency is based on detection of the lower sideband in the modulated signal's spectrum. In the second experiment, psychometric functions were measured for the detection of AM alone and FM alone, using modulation rates of 4 and 16 Hz. Results showed that, for each type of modulation, d' is approximately a linear function of the square of the modulation index. Application of this finding to the results of experiment 1 suggested that, at low modulation rates, FM and AM are not detected by completely independent mechanisms. In the third experiment, psychometric functions were again measured for the detection of AM alone and FM alone, using a 10-Hz modulation rate. Detectability was then measured for combined AM and FM, with modulation depths selected so that each type of modulation would be equally detectable if presented alone. Significant effects of relative modulator phase were found when detectability was relatively high. These effects were not correctly predicted by either a single-band excitation-pattern model or a multiple-band excitation-pattern model. However, the detectability of the combined AM and FM was better than would be predicted if the two types of modulation were coded completely independently.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Detection of temporal gaps in sinusoids by elderly subjects with and without hearing loss.

Thresholds for the detection of temporal gaps in sinusoidal signals were measured as a function of frequency (100-2000 Hz) and level in 15 elderly hearing-impaired subjects and 11 elderly subjects with near-normal hearing at frequencies below 2000 Hz. The sinusoids were presented in a background noise intended to mask spectral splatter associated with the gap. In a separate experiment, auditory filter shapes and detection efficiency were estimated for the same subjects using the notched-noise method, at center frequencies of 100, 200, 400, and 800 Hz. The gap thresholds at higher signal levels were similar for the two groups of subjects at all center frequencies tested. The mean gap thresholds were slightly higher than those obtained previously from young normally hearing subjects, but this was mainly due to the results of a few subjects with large gap thresholds; the majority of the elderly subjects had gap thresholds within the normal range. Thus reduced temporal resolution does not seem to be an inevitable consequence of aging. Gap thresholds at low center frequencies tended to be positively correlated with the equivalent rectangular bandwidth (ERB) of the auditory filter, the opposite of what would be expected if the auditory filter played a role in limiting gap detection. Detection efficiency, as estimated from the notched-noise experiment, was poorer for both groups of elderly subjects than for young normal listeners, but detection efficiency was not significantly correlated with gap thresholds.

Aged↗
PubMed1992

Spectral feature enhancement for people with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on speech intelligibility and quality.

People with sensorineural hearing loss often have difficulty understanding speech in background noise at speech-to-noise ratios (0 to +6 dB) for which normally hearing people have little difficulty. Spectral analysis of speech in noise at these ratios typically shows that the major spectral prominences in the speech (formants) are well represented, but the spectral valleys between the formants are filled with noise. Hearing impaired people have a reduced ability to pick out the spectral prominences, and are more affected by the noise filling in the valleys, partly because of their reduced frequency selectivity. This paper describes a 16-channel bandpass filter bank, implemented in analog electronics, that attempts to enhance spectral features of speech in noise to improve intelligibility for the hearing impaired. Each channel generates an 'activity function' that is proportional to the magnitude of the signal envelope in that channel, averaged over a short period of time. A positively weighted activity function from the nth channel is combined with negatively weighted functions from channels n-2, n-1, n+1, and n+2, giving a correction signal used to control the gain of the bandpass signal in the nth channel. Recombining the bandpass signals results in an enhancement of spectral features of the speech in noise. Two different experiments are described here, one using the activity function as described, and the other using a non-linear transform of the activity function. In both experiments, several different weighting patterns were used in calculating the correction signal. The intelligibility of speech in noise processed by the system was measured for subjects with moderate sensorineural hearing loss. In both experiments, no improvement in intelligibility was found. However, subjective ratings of the stimuli used in Experiment 2 indicated that some subjects judged the processed stimuli to have both higher quality and higher intelligibility than unprocessed stimuli.

Electronics↗
PubMed1992

Temporal modulation transfer functions for band-limited noise in subjects with cochlear hearing loss.

The modulation depth required for the detection of sinusoidal amplitude modulation was measured as a function of modulation rate, giving temporal modulation transfer functions (TMTFs). The carrier was a one-octave wide noise centred at 2 kHz, and it was presented in an unmodulated background noise lowpass filtered at 5 kHz. Three subjects with unilateral cochlear hearing loss were tested. For each subject, the normal ear was tested both at the same sound pressure level (SPL) and at the same sensation level (SL) as the impaired ear. The TMTFs were essentially the same for the normal and impaired ears, both at equal SPL and at equal SL. The better ears of three subjects with bilateral cochlear losses were also tested. Again, TMTFs were essentially the same as obtained for normal ears. These results suggest that temporal resolution is not necessarily adversely affected by cochlear hearing loss, at least as measured by this task.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Simplified measurement of auditory filter shapes using the notched-noise method.

The shape of the auditory filter at a given centre frequency can be estimated by measuring the threshold for detecting a sinusoid presented in a spectral notch in a noise masker, as a function of notch width. Laboratory studies using this method have typically been based on threshold measurements for between 13 and 19 notch widths. In this note, we describe how both the overall sharpness and asymmetry of the auditory filter in hearing-impaired subjects can be estimated with reasonable accuracy using only five notch widths. This considerably reduces the testing time needed, making it possible to apply the method in clinical testing.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1992

Syllabic compression: effective compression ratios for signals modulated at different rates.

Compression circuits are being used increasingly in hearing aids to reduce the dynamic range of signals. Their performance is usually characterized by: (1) the threshold sound level above which the compression starts to operate; (2) the compression ratio, which is the change in input level (in dB) required to achieve a 1 dB change in output level; and (3) the attack and release times over which the signal is integrated to determine the necessary gain change. In many practical situations, the effective compression ratio obtained with dynamically varying signals such as speech is less than the compression ratio obtained using standard test signals (slow square-wave modulation with large modulation depth). This article describes the effective compression ratios achieved with sinusoidal modulation, as a function of modulation rate, level relative to the compression threshold, compression ratio and time constants. The effects of compression on a typical speech signal are also discussed.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1992

Effects of the fitting parameters of a two-channel compression system on the intelligibility of speech in quiet and in noise.

These experiments were carried out to assess how accurately the gains and compression ratios in a two-channel compression system needed to be set. We used as a research tool a laboratory version of a two-channel full-dynamic-range compression system. The system was initially adjusted to suit each hearing-impaired subject according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Then, further adjustments were made to ensure that speech stimuli were both audible and comfortable over a wide range of sound levels. Finally, the settings of the gains and compression ratios were systematically varied from the adjusted values and the effects of this on the intelligibility of speech in quiet and in noise (12-talker babble, levels of 65 and 75 dB SPL) were measured. The results indicated that speech reception thresholds (SRTs) in quiet were significantly adversely affected by decreases in low-level gain. However, SRTs in noise were relatively unaffected by changes in low-level gain. An exception occurred at the higher noise level used, where increases in the low-level gains (with corresponding increases in compression ratios) had a significant adverse effect on the SRTs. It is concluded that, provided excessive low-level gains (associated with high compression ratios) are avoided, the main criteria for fitting such a system should be listening comfort (i.e. achieving an acceptable tonal balance, and avoiding uncomfortably loud sounds) and an appropriate value of the threshold for detecting speech in quiet (which should be a little below 50 dB SPL).

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1991

Across-channel masking of changes in modulation depth for amplitude- and frequency-modulated signals.

This study examines a form of masking that can take place when the signal and masker are widely separated in frequency and cannot be explained in terms of the traditional concept of the auditory filter or critical band. We refer to this as across-channel masking. The task of the subject was to detect an increment in modulation depth of a 1000-Hz sinusoidal carrier. The carrier could either be sinusoidally amplitude modulated or sinusoidally frequency modulated at a 10-Hz rate. Modulation increment thresholds of this "target" signal were measured for the target alone, and in the presence of two interfering sounds with carrier frequencies of 230 and 3300 Hz. When the interfering sounds were unmodulated, they had no effect on modulation increment thresholds. When the interfering sounds were either amplitude or frequency modulated, thresholds increased. Amplitude modulation (AM) increment thresholds were affected by both amplitude-modulated and frequency-modulated interference. Similarly, frequency modulation (FM) increment thresholds were affected by both amplitude-modulated and frequency-modulated interference. For both types of signal, the interference was tuned for modulation rate; across-channel masking was greatest when the interfering sounds were modulated at rates close to 10 Hz, and declined for higher or lower rates. However, the tuning was rather broad. When the target and interfering sounds were modulated at the same rate, there was no effect of the relative phase of the modulators. Two possible explanations for the results are discussed. One is based on the idea that carriers that are modulated in a similar way tend to be perceptually "grouped". The other is based on the idea that there are "channels" in the auditory system tuned for AM and FM rate. Neither explanation appears completely satisfactory.

Adult↗