Biomedical subjects

B C Paria

Publications and source records attributed to B C Paria.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

Molecular cues to implantation.

Successful implantation is the result of reciprocal interactions between the implantation-competent blastocyst and receptive uterus. Although various cellular aspects and molecular pathways of this dialogue have been identified, a comprehensive understanding of the implantation process is still missing. The receptive state of the uterus, which lasts for a limited period, is defined as the time when the uterine environment is conducive to blastocyst acceptance and implantation. A better understanding of the molecular signals that regulate uterine receptivity and implantation competency of the blastocyst is of clinical relevance because unraveling the nature of these signals may lead to strategies to correct implantation failure and improve pregnancy rates. Gene expression studies and genetically engineered mouse models have provided valuable clues to the implantation process with respect to specific growth factors, cytokines, lipid mediators, adhesion molecules, and transcription factors. However, a staggering amount of information from microarray experiments is also being generated at a rapid pace. If properly annotated and explored, this information will expand our knowledge regarding yet-to-be-identified unique, complementary, and/or redundant molecular pathways in implantation. It is hoped that the forthcoming information will generate new ideas and concepts for a process that is essential for maintaining procreation and solving major reproductive health issues in women.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Endocannabinoid signaling in synchronizing embryo development and uterine receptivity for implantation.

There are reports of adverse effects of cannabinoids on pregnancy outcome including retarded embryo development and pregnancy failure. Thus, discoveries of endogenous cannabinoid-like lipid mediators and cannabinoid receptors raise questions about their pathophysiological roles during normal pregnancy. We previously reported that anandamide, an endogenously produced arachidonate derivative (endocannabinoid), is synthesized in the female reproductive tracts, and it acts on cannabinoid receptors expressed on the cell surface of the embryo to regulate the preimplantation embryo development and implantation in mice. This review presents genetic, molecular, physiological and pharmacological evidence that the levels of uterine anandamide and blastocyst CB1 cannabinoid receptors are coordinately regulated to synchronize preimplantation development and uterine receptivity for implantation in mice.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Deciphering the cross-talk of implantation: advances and challenges.

Implantation involves a series of steps leading to an effective reciprocal signaling between the blastocyst and the uterus. Except for a restricted period when ovarian hormones induce a uterine receptive phase, the uterus is an unfavorable environment for blastocyst implantation. Because species-specific variations in implantation strategies exist, these differences preclude the formulation of a unifying theme for the molecular basis of this event. However, an increased understanding of mammalian implantation has been gained through the use of the mouse model. This review summarizes recognized signaling cascades and new research in mammalian implantation, based primarily on available genetic and molecular evidence from implantation studies in the mouse. Although the identification of new molecules associated with implantation in various species provides valuable insight, important questions remain regarding the common molecular mechanisms that govern this process. Understanding the mechanisms of implantation promises to help alleviate infertility, enhance fetal health, and improve contraceptive design. The success of any species depends on its reproductive efficiency. For sexual reproduction, an egg and sperm must overcome many obstacles to fuse and co-mingle their genetic material at fertilization. The zygote develops into a blastocyst with two cell lineages (the inner cell mass and the trophectoderm), migrates within the reproductive tract, and ultimately implants into a transiently permissive host tissue, the uterus. However, the molecular basis of the road map connecting the blastocyst with the endometrium across species is diverse (1) and not fully understood. Recent advances have identified numerous molecules involved in implantation (1-4), yet new discoveries have not yielded a unifying scheme for the mechanisms of implantation.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Molecules in blastocyst implantation: uterine and embryonic perspectives.

Synchronized development of the embryo to the active stage of the blastocyst, differentiation of the uterus to the receptive state, and a "cross talk" between the blastocyst and uterine luminal epithelium are essential to the process of implantation. In spite of considerable accumulation of information and the present state of the knowledge, our understanding of the definitive mechanisms that regulate these events remains elusive. Although there are species variations in the process of implantation, many basic similarities do exist among various species. This review focuses on specific aspects of the implantation process in mice with the hope that many of the findings will be relevant to the process in humans. To establish signaling mechanisms of embryo-uterine interactions during implantation, studies on both embryonic and uterine consequences are required to generate more meaningful information. Due to ethical restriction and experimental limitation, it is difficult to generate such information in humans. This review has attempted to provide a comprehensive, but not complete, narration of a number of embryonic and uterine factors that are involved in the process of implantation in autocrine, paracrine, and/or juxtacrine manners in mice at the physiological, cellular, molecular, and genetic levels.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Inhibition of improgan antinociception by the cannabinoid (CB)(1) antagonist N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (SR141716A): lack of obligatory role for endocannabinoids acting at CB(1) receptors.

Improgan, a nonopioid antinociceptive agent, activates descending, pain-relieving mechanisms in the brain stem, but the receptor for this compound has not been identified. Because cannabinoids also activate nonopioid analgesia by a brain stem action, experiments were performed to assess the significance of cannabinoid mechanisms in improgan antinociception. The cannabinoid CB(1) antagonist N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chloro phenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (SR141716A) induced dose-dependent inhibition of improgan antinociception on the tail-flick test after i.c.v. administration in rats. The same treatments yielded comparable inhibition of cannabinoid [R-(+)-(2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(4-mor pholinyl)methyl]pyrol[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl)(1-naphthalenyl)methanone monomethanesulfonate, WIN 55,212-2] analgesia. Inhibition of improgan and WIN 55,212-2 antinociception by SR141716A was also observed in Swiss-Webster mice. Radioligand binding studies showed no appreciable affinity of improgan on rat brain, mouse brain, and human recombinant CB(1) receptors, ruling out a direct action at these sites. To test the hypothesis that CB(1) receptors indirectly participate in improgan signaling, the effects of improgan were assessed in mice with a null mutation of the CB(1) gene with and without SR141716A pretreatment. Surprisingly, improgan induced complete antinociception in both CB(1) (-/-) and wild-type control [CB(1) (+/+)] mice. Furthermore, SR141716A inhibited improgan antinociception in CB(1) (+/+) mice, but not in CB(1) (-/-) mice. Taken together, the results show that SR141716A reduces improgan antinociception, but neither cannabinoids nor CB(1) receptors seem to play an obligatory role in improgan signaling. Present and previous studies suggest that Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol may act at both CB(1) and other receptors to relieve pain, but no evidence was found indicating that improgan uses either of these mechanisms. SR141716A will facilitate the study of improgan-like analgesics.

Analgesics↗

PubMed2001

Global gene expression analysis to identify molecular markers of uterine receptivity and embryo implantation.

Infertility and spontaneous pregnancy losses are an enduring problem to women's health. The establishment of pregnancy depends on successful implantation, where a complex series of interactions occurs between the heterogeneous cell types of the uterus and blastocyst. Although a number of genes are implicated in embryo-uterine interactions during implantation, genetic evidence suggests that only a small number of them are critical to this process. To obtain a global view and identify novel pathways of implantation, we used a dual screening strategy to analyze the expression of nearly 10,000 mouse genes by microarray analysis. Comparison of implantation and interimplantation sites by a conservative statistical approach revealed 36 up-regulated genes and 27 down-regulated genes at the implantation site. We also compared the uterine gene expression profile of progesterone-treated, delayed implanting mice to that of mice in which delayed implantation was terminated by estrogen. The results show up-regulation of 128 genes and down-regulation of 101 genes after termination of the delayed implantation. A combined analysis of these experiments showed specific up-regulation of 27 genes both at the implantation site and during uterine activation, representing a broad diversity of molecular functions. In contrast, the majority of genes that were decreased in the combined analysis were related to host immunity or the immune response, suggesting the importance of these genes in regulating the uterine environment for the implanting blastocyst. Collectively, we identified genes with recognized roles in implantation, genes with potential roles in this process, and genes whose functions have yet to be defined in this event. The identification of unique genetic markers for the onset of implantation signifies that genome-wide analysis coupled with functional assays is a promising approach to resolve the molecular pathways required for successful implantation.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

Dysregulated cannabinoid signaling disrupts uterine receptivity for embryo implantation.

The mechanisms by which synchronized embryonic development to the blastocyst stage, preparation of the uterus for the receptive state, and reciprocal embryo-uterine interactions for implantation are coordinated are still unclear. We show in this study that preimplantation embryo development became asynchronous in mice that are deficient in brain-type (CB1) and/or spleen-type (CB2) cannabinoid receptor genes. Furthermore, whereas the levels of uterine anandamide (endocannabinoid) and blastocyst CB1 are coordinately down-regulated with the onset of uterine receptivity and blastocyst activation prior to implantation, these levels remained high in the nonreceptive uterus and in dormant blastocysts during delayed implantation and in pregnant, leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF)-deficient mice with implantation failure. These results suggest that a tight regulation of endocannabinoid signaling is important for synchronizing embryo development with uterine receptivity for implantation. Indeed this is consistent with our finding that while an experimentally induced, sustained level of an exogenously administered, natural cannabinoid inhibited implantation in wild-type mice, it failed to do so in CB1(-/-)/CB2(-/-) double mutant mice. The present study is clinically important because of the widely debated medicinal use of cannabinoids and their reported adverse effects on pregnancy.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2001

Cellular and molecular responses of the uterus to embryo implantation can be elicited by locally applied growth factors.

The implantation of a blastocyst into a receptive uterus is associated with a series of events, namely the attachment reaction followed by decidualization of the stroma. Previous studies established that the gene encoding heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF) is expressed in the luminal epithelium solely at the site of blastocyst apposition preceding the attachment reaction. We report here the expression during implantation of 21 genes encoding other signaling proteins, including those belonging to the Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), WNT, and Hedgehog (HH) pathways. We find that the attachment reaction is associated with a localized stromal induction of genes encoding BMP-2, FGF-2, and WNT-4. Despite efforts by many investigators, a simple in vitro model of implantation is not yet available to study either the hierarchy of the events triggered in the uterus by the embryo or the function of individual signaling proteins. We have therefore approached these questions by introducing beads loaded with purified factors into the receptive uterus. We show that beads soaked in HB-EGF or insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), but not other proteins, induce many of the same discrete local responses elicited by the blastocyst, including increased localized vascular permeability, decidualization, and expression of Bmp2 at the sites of the beads. By contrast, the expression domains of Indian hedgehog (Ihh), patched, and noggin become restricted as decidualization proceeds. Significantly, beads containing BMP-2 do not themselves elicit an implantation response but affect the spacing of implantation sites induced by blastocysts cotransferred with the beads.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

Implantation: molecular basis of embryo-uterine dialogue.

Implantation is a complex developmental process that involves an intimate "cross-talk" between the embryo and uterus. Synchronized development of the embryo to the blastocyst stage and differentiation of the uterus to the receptive state are essential to this process. Successful execution of the events of implantation involves participation of steroid hormones, locally derived growth factors, cytokines, transcription factors and lipid mediators. Using gene-targeted mice and a delayed implantation model, our laboratory has been exploring potential interactions among steroid hormones, growth factors, cytokines and prostaglandins in this process. This review article highlights some of our recent observations on the roles of estrogen, catecholestrogen, the EGF family of growth factors, leukemia inhibitory factor and cyclooxygenase-2 derived prostaglandins and their interactions in embryo-uterine "cross-talk" during implantation.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Estrogen targets genes involved in protein processing, calcium homeostasis, and Wnt signaling in the mouse uterus independent of estrogen receptor-alpha and -beta.

Estrogen actions in target organs are normally mediated via activation of nuclear estrogen receptors (ERs). By using mRNA differential display technique, we show, herein, that estradiol-17beta (E(2)) and its catechol metabolite 4-hydroxy-E(2) (4OHE(2)) can modulate uterine gene expression in ERalpha(-/-) mice. Whereas administration of E(2) or 4OHE(2) rapidly up-regulated (4-8-fold) the expression of immunoglobulin heavy chain binding protein (Bip), calpactin I (CalP), calmodulin (CalM), and Sik similar protein (Sik-SP) genes in ovariectomized wild-type or ERalpha(-/-) mice, the expression of secreted frizzled related protein-2 (SFRP-2) gene was down-regulated (4-fold). Bip, CalP, and CalM are calcium-binding proteins and implicated in calcium homeostasis, whereas SFRP-2 is a negative regulator of Wnt signaling. Bip and Sik-SP also possess chaperone-like functions. Administration of ICI-182,780 or cycloheximide failed to influence these estrogenic responses, demonstrating that these effects occur independent of ERalpha, ERbeta, or protein synthesis. In situ hybridization showed differential cell-specific expression of these genes in wild-type and ERalpha(-/-) uteri. Although progesterone can antagonize or synergize estrogen actions, it had minimal effects on these estrogenic responses. Collectively, the results demonstrate that estrogens have a unique ability to influence specific genes in the uterus not involving classical nuclear ERs.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Coordinated regulation of fetal and maternal prostaglandins directs successful birth and postnatal adaptation in the mouse.

Cyclooxygenase (COX)-derived prostaglandins (PGs) regulate numerous maternal-fetal interactions during pregnancy. PGs stimulate uterine contractions and prepare the cervix for parturition, whereas in the fetus, PGs maintain patency of the ductus arteriosus (DA), a vascular shunt that transmits oxygenated placental blood to the fetal systemic circulation. However, the origin and site of action of these PGs remain undefined. To address this, we analyzed mice lacking COX-1 (null mutation) or COX-2 (pharmacologic inhibition) or pups with a double null mutation. Our results show that COX-1 in the uterine epithelium is the major source of PGs during labor and that COX-1(-/-) females experience parturition failure that is reversible by exogenous PGs. Using embryo transfer experiments, we also show that successful delivery occurs in COX-1(-/-) recipient mothers carrying wild-type pups, establishing the sufficiency of fetal PGs for parturition. Although patency of the DA is PG dependent, neither COX-1 nor COX-2 expression was detected in the fetal or postnatal DA, and offspring with a double null mutation died shortly after birth with open DAs. These results suggest that DA patency depends on circulating PGs acting on specific PG receptors within the DA. Collectively, these findings demonstrate the coordinated regulation of fetal and maternal PGs at the time of birth but raise concern regarding the use of selective COX inhibitors for the management of preterm labor.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

PubMed2000

Molecular signaling in uterine receptivity for implantation.

Successful implantation is the result of an intimate 'cross-talk' between the blastocyst and uterus in a temporal and cell-specific manner. Thus, both the uterine and embryonic events must be examined to better understand this process. Although various aspects and molecules associated with these events have been explored, a comprehensive understanding of the implantation process is still very limited. In this review, we have highlighted the importance of the blastocyst's activity state and the receptive state of the uterus in determining the 'window' of implantation. In this context, we provide a testable scheme that signifies the important roles of various key molecules in embryo-uterine interactions during implantation.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Ligand-receptor signaling with endocannabinoids in preimplantation embryo development and implantation.

Although adverse effects of cannabinoids on pregnancy have been indicated for many years, the mechanisms by which they exert their actions were not clearly understood. Only recently, molecular and biochemical approaches have led to the identification of two types of cannabinoid receptors, brain-type receptors (CB1-R) and spleen-type receptors (CB2-R), which mediate cannabinoid effects. These findings were followed by the discovery of endocannabinoids, anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG). The natural cannabinoids and endocannabinoids exert their effects via cannabinoid receptors and share similar pharmacological and physiological properties. Recent demonstration of expression of functional CB1-R in the preimplantation embryo and synthesis of anandamide in the pregnant uterus of mice suggests that cannabinoid ligand-receptor signaling is operative in the regulation of preimplantation embryo development and implantation. This review describes recent observations and their significance in embryo-uterine interactions during implantation and future research directions in this emerging area of interest.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Trophinin expression in the mouse uterus coincides with implantation and is hormonally regulated but not induced by implanting blastocysts.

Trophinin mediates apical cell adhesion between two human cell lines, trophoblastic teratocarcinoma and endometrial adenocarcinoma. In humans, trophinin is specifically expressed in cells involved in implantation and early placentation. The present study was undertaken to establish trophinin expression by the mouse uterus. In the pregnant mouse uterus, trophinin transcripts are expressed during the time which coincides with the timing of blastocyst implantation. Trophinin is also expressed in the nonpregnant mouse uterus at estrus stage. Uteri from ovariectomized mice did not express trophinin, whereas strong expression was induced by estrogen but not by progesterone. Trophinin transcripts and protein were found in the pseudopregnant mouse uterus. No differences were detected in trophinin expression by the uteri in the pregnant, pseudopregnant, and pseudopregnant received blastocysts. In delayed implantation model, trophinin proteins were found in both luminal and glandular epithelium, whereas dormant blastocysts were negative for trophinin. Upon activation with estrogen, however, no significant changes were detected either in the blastocyst or in the uterus. These results indicate that ovarian hormones regulate trophinin expression by the mouse uterus, and that an implanting blastocyst has no effect on trophinin expression in the surrounding endometrial luminal epithelial cells.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Implantation and decidualization defects in prolactin receptor (PRLR)-deficient mice are mediated by ovarian but not uterine PRLR.

PRL and its homologs accomplish their biological effects through the PRL receptor (PRLR). We evaluated the expression and function of PRLR in the embryo and uterus during the periimplantation period because PRLR deficiency results in implantation failure. In wild-type mice, PRLR expression was localized to undecidualized stromal cells in the antimesometrial border on days 6-8 of pregnancy. A small population of PRLR-expressing cells was observed adjacent to the ectoplacental cone in the mesometrial stroma. Low levels of PRLR expression were also detected in the developing embryo on days 6-8. To determine the significance of PRLR expression in this distribution, we examined implantation and decidualization in PRLR-/- mice. Progesterone (P4) administration rescued infertility in PRLR-/- mice from the periimplantation period to midgestation. Artificially induced decidualization was absent in pseudopregnant PRLR-/- mice but was identical to wild-type in P4-treated PRLR-/- mice. Furthermore, wild-type and P4-treated PRLR-/- mice had similar expression of the implantation-specific genes, LIF, amphiregulin, HB-EGF, COX-1, COX-2, PPARdelta, Hoxa-10, cyclin-D3, VEGF, and its receptors, Flk-1 and neuropilin-1. Together, these results show that luteal P4 production via ovarian PRLR signaling is required for implantation and early pregnancy. The function of uterine PRLR remains unclear. However, the eventual loss of pregnancy in P4-treated PRLR-/- mice suggests that uterine PRLR may be essential for the support of late gestation.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Dysregulation of EGF family of growth factors and COX-2 in the uterus during the preattachment and attachment reactions of the blastocyst with the luminal epithelium correlates with implantation failure in LIF-deficient mice.

Various mediators, including cytokines, growth factors, homeotic gene products, and prostaglandins (PGs), participate in the implantation process in an autocrine, paracrine, or juxtacrine manner. However, interactions among these factors that result in successful implantation are not clearly understood. Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), a pleiotropic cytokine, was shown to be expressed in uterine glands on day 4 morning before implantation and is critical to this process in mice. However, the mechanism by which LIF executes its effects in implantation remains unknown. Moreover, interactions of LIF with other implantation-specific molecules have not yet been defined. Using normal and delayed implantation models, we herein show that LIF is not only expressed in progesterone (P4)-primed uterine glands before implantation in response to nidatory estrogen, it is also induced in stromal cells surrounding the active blastocyst at the time of the attachment reaction. This suggests that LIF has biphasic effects: first in the preparation of the receptive uterus and subsequently in the attachment reaction. The mechanism by which LIF participates in these events was addressed using LIF-deficient mice. We observed that while uterine cell-specific proliferation, steroid hormone responsiveness, and expression patterns of several genes are normal, specific members of the EGF family of growth factors, such as amphiregulin (Ar), heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF), and epiregulin, are not expressed in LIF(-/-) uteri before and during the anticipated time of implantation, although EGF receptor family members (erbBs) are expressed correctly. Furthermore, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), an inducible rate-limiting enzyme for PG synthesis and essential for implantation, is aberrantly expressed in the uterus surrounding the blastocyst in LIF(-/-) mice. These results suggest that dysregulation of specific EGF-like growth factors and COX-2 in the uterus contributes, at least partially, to implantation failure in LIF(-/-) mice. Since estrogen is essential for uterine receptivity, LIF induction, and blastocyst activation, it is possible that the nidatory estrogen effects in the P4-primed uterus for implantation are mediated via LIF signaling. However, we observed that LIF can only partially resume implantation in P4-primed, delayed implanting mice in the absence of estrogen, suggesting LIF induction is one of many functions that are executed by estrogen for implantation.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Blastocyst H(2) receptor is the target for uterine histamine in implantation in the mouse.

The process of implantation is a 'two-way' interaction between the blastocyst and uterus. It has long been suspected that histamine is an important mediator in embryo-uterine interactions during implantation, but its source, targets and mechanism of actions remained undefined. We have recently demonstrated that uterine epithelial cells are the source of histamine, which peaks on day 4 of pregnancy (the day of implantation) in the mouse. In searching for its target and site of action, we discovered that preimplantation blastocysts, which express histamine type 2 receptor (H(2)), is the target for histamine action. Using multiple approaches, we demonstrate herein that uterine-derived histamine interacts with embryonic H(2) receptors in a paracrine fashion to initiate the process of implantation.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Differential expression of VEGF isoforms and VEGF(164)-specific receptor neuropilin-1 in the mouse uterus suggests a role for VEGF(164) in vascular permeability and angiogenesis during implantation.

The mechanism(s) by which localized vascular permeability and angiogenesis occur at the sites of implantation is not clearly understood. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a key regulator of vasculogenesis during embryogenesis and angiogenesis in adult tissues. VEGF is also a vascular permeability factor. VEGF acts via two tyrosine kinase family receptors: VEGFR1 (Flt-1) and VEGFR2 (KDR/Flk-1). Recent evidence suggests that neuropilin-1 (NRP1), a receptor involved in neuronal cell guidance, is expressed in endothelial cells, binds to VEGF(165) and enhances the binding of VEGF(165) to VEGFR2. We examined the spatiotemporal expression of vegf isoforms, nrp1 and vegfr2 as well as their interactions in the periimplantation mouse uterus. We observed that vegf(164) is the predominant isoform in the mouse uterus. vegf(164) mRNA accumulation primarily occurred in epithelial cells on days 1 and 2 of pregnancy. On days 3 and 4, the subepithelial stroma in addition to epithelial cells exhibited accumulation of this mRNA. After the initial attachment reaction on day 5, luminal epithelial and stromal cells immediately surrounding the blastocyst exhibited distinct accumulation of vegf(164) mRNA. On days 6-8, the accumulation of this mRNA occurred in both mesometrial and antimesometrial decidual cells. These results suggest that VEGF(164) is available in mediating vascular changes and angiogenesis in the uterus during implantation and decidualization. This is consistent with coordinate expression of vegfr2, and nrp1, a VEGF(164)-specific receptor, in uterine endothelial cells. Their expression was low during the first 2 days of pregnancy followed by increases thereafter. With the initiation and progression of implantation (days 5-8), these genes were distinctly expressed in endothelial cells of the decidualizing stroma. Expression was more intense on days 6-8 at the mesometrial pole, the presumptive site of heightened angiogenesis and placentation. However, the expression was absent in the avascular primary decidual zone immediately surrounding the implanting embryo. Crosslinking experiments showed that (125)I-VEGF(165) binds to both NRP1 and VEGFR2 present in decidual endothelial cells. These results suggest that VEGF(164), NRP1 and VEGFR2 play a role in VEGF-induced vascular permeability and angiogenesis in the uterus required for implantation. genesis 26:213-224, 2000.

Animals↗