PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B D Hale

Publications and source records attributed to B D Hale.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Measurement of exercise dependence in bodybuilders.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore exercise dependence in bodybuilders, and undertake preliminary validation of a measurement instrument. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A comparative analysis of self-report indices between groups. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-seven bodybuilders, 31 individuals who weight trained for general fitness purposes and 24 weightlifters participated in the study. MEASURES: Each subject completed the following: demographic information, bodybuilding-specific versions of the social identity and exclusivity scales of the Athletic Identity Measurement Scale, the physical strength and body attractiveness subscales of the Physical Self-Perception Profile, a short form of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale, and a 9-item Bodybuilding Dependence Scale. RESULTS: Factor analysis on the BDS revealed 3 subscales (social dependency, training dependency and mastery) which accounted for 68.4% of the variance. Internal consistency was satisfactory for each subscale (Chronbach's alpha = 0.76, 0.75 and 0.78 respectively). The BDS social dependency and PSPP body attractiveness scores of the bodybuilders were higher than those of the weightlifters, whose scores were higher than those of the fitness trainers. The bodybuilders scored higher on both AIMS subscales than the other groups. The bodybuilders and weightlifters scored higher on PSPP physical strength than the fitness trainers. BDS social dependency correlated with both AIMS and both PSPP subscales, and BDS training dependency correlated with AIMS exclusivity. All three BDS subscales correlated with training frequency. Discriminant analysis found the combination of AIMS social identity, BDS social dependency and years training experience enabled correct classification of 92% of the respondents. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the construct and concurrent validity of the BDS social dependency subscale, but do not wholly support the validity of the other two subscales.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Calbindin-D28k immunoreactivity within the cholinergic and GABAergic projection neurons of the basal forebrain.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the calcium binding protein calbindin-D28k was present within the cortically projecting basal forebrain neurons of various rodent species not previously examined. Double-label immunocytochemistry was performed using antibodies against calbindin-D28k and choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) to detect the presence of the calcium binding protein within the cholinergic basal forebrain neurons of various species (i.e., humans, rats, mice, gerbils, guinea pigs). Antibodies against calbindin-D28k, ChAT, and glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) were also used in combination with a cortically injected retrograde tracer (Fluoro-Gold) to determine whether calbindin-D28k immunoreactive (IR) neurons within the basal forebrain projected to the frontoparietal cortex. The nucleus basalis of rats was examined for the presence of calbindin-D27k IR within the GABAergic basal forebrain neurons. All species examined had cholinergic, GABAergic, and calbindinergic neurons within the basal forebrain; however, only the cholinergic neurons within the human nucleus basalis of Meynert were also immunoreactive for calbindin-D28k. Although all rodent species had both cholinergic and GABAergic basal forebrain neurons that contained the Fluoro-Gold dye, none of the calbindin-D28k IR neurons, detected using monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies, were found to contain the retrograde tracer. These results indicate that the cortically projecting cholinergic and GABAergic basal forebrain neurons within these rodent species do not contain calbindin-D28k. Therefore, age- and disease-related loss of nucleus basalis projection neurons may not be mediated by alterations in calbindin-D28k.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1993

The self-efficacy-performance link in maximum strength performance.

To examine whether manipulating self-efficacy affects strength performance on a bench press, and to see if these situation-specific changes would affect levels of physical self-efficacy, 24 undergraduates untrained in weightlifting were randomly assigned to three groups: 'light', who lifted less weight than they believed; 'heavy', who lifted more weight than they believed; and control, for whom there was no manipulation. Self-efficacy measures were taken before and after the manipulation. Physical self-efficacy was measured using the Physical Self-Efficacy Scale (PSE). 'Light' subjects lifted significantly greater increases in weight than the other subjects. 'Heavy' subjects significantly decreased self-efficacy following the manipulation. Initial self-efficacy was found to be a significant predictor of baseline maximum, while manipulated self-efficacy was significant for performance change. The PSE scores did not change pre- to post-study. The results suggest that self-efficacy is a situation-specific construct which can be manipulated, and which relates to both past performance experience and future performance.

Adult↗
PubMed1980

Iris pigmentation and fractionated reaction and reflex time.

Recent investigations indicate that an iris pigmentation-motor behavior exists, but may be limited to the reaction time component of a motor task. The absence of differences in peripheral nervous conduction (Wolf and Landers, 1978) suggests that a central nervous system mechanism may be operating, possibly dependent on the characteristics of neuromelanin or catecholamine turnover. Experiment 1 tested this notion by fractionating simple reaction time into the premotor and motor components by electromyography. ANOVA revealed that dark-eyed subjects had faster total reaction times and premotor times, but only the premotor time component approached significance (p < 0.07). Experiment 2 fractionated patellar reflex time of light-eyed and dark-eyed subjects into reflex lagency and motor components. There were no eye color differences for any of the reflex time measures. The results of Experiments 1 and 2 support a central nervous system explanation for the iris pigmentation-reaction time phenomenon.

Brain↗