PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B E Bleske

Publications and source records attributed to B E Bleske.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Effects of different dosages and modes of sodium bicarbonate administration during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Systemic acidosis occurs during cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The present study investigated the effect of different modes of sodium bicarbonate administration on blood gas parameters during CPR. Arterial and venous blood gases were obtained during 10 minutes of CPR which was preceded by 3 minutes of unassisted ventricular fibrillation in 36 dogs. Following 1 minute of CPR, the animals received one of four treatments in a randomized and blinded manner: normal saline (NS), sodium bicarbonate bolus dose 1 mEq/kg (B), sodium bicarbonate continuous infusion 0.1 mEq/kg/min (I), and sodium bicarbonate bolus dose (0.5 mEq/kg) plus continuous infusion 0.1 mEq/kg/min (L+I). Eleven dogs completed NS, 8 B, 8 I, and 9 L+I protocol. Following NS infusion, both arterial and venous pH declined consistently over time. Significant differences compared with NS treatment in venous pH were observed at 12 minutes of ventricular fibrillation (L+I, 7.27 +/- 0.05; NS, 7.15 +/- 0.05; B, 7.20 +/- 0.05; I, 7.24 +/- 0.04, each bicarbonate treatment versus NS, and L+I versus B, (P < .05). The B group had an elevated venous PCO2 (mm Hg) concentration following 6 minutes of ventricular fibrillation compared with NS, L+I, and I groups (81 +/- 14 versus 69 +/- 10 versus 68 +/- 10 versus 71 +/- 8, respectively, (P = .07). Arterial pH and PCO2 values showed a similar trend as the venous data with the L+I group demonstrating arterial alkalosis (pH > 7.45) at 12 minutes of ventricular fibrillation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acidosis↗
PubMed1992

Comparison of intravenous and intranasal administration of epinephrine during CPR in a canine model.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Epinephrine improves coronary perfusion pressure during CPR. However, administration of epinephrine during CPR may be delayed or omitted if IV or endotracheal access is not established. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine if intranasal administration of epinephrine during CPR would provide an alternate route of drug administration that is readily accessible and requires no special technical skills. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized blinded study performed in a controlled laboratory environment. TYPE OF PARTICIPANTS: Twenty mongrel dogs weighing 19.5 +/- 4.6 kg. INTERVENTIONS: All dogs received either IV epinephrine 0.015 mg/kg or intranasal epinephrine 14 mg per nostril. Phentolamine (5 mg per nostril) was administered intranasally one minute before nasal administration of epinephrine to improve absorption. Each dog underwent three minutes of ventricular fibrillation followed by seven minutes of CPR with a pneumatic chest compression device. Epinephrine was administered at two minutes into CPR. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Seven dogs were excluded because of inadequate baseline coronary perfusion pressure or compression device displacement, leaving a total of 13 dogs for analysis (six IV epinephrine, seven intranasal epinephrine). Baseline coronary perfusion pressure (mean +/- SD) was similar for IV epinephrine and intranasal epinephrine (16.9 +/- 7.1 mm Hg versus 18.2 +/- 13.8 mm Hg, respectively, P = .84). For IV and intranasal epinephrine, coronary perfusion pressure increased to 21.4 +/- 9.2 mm Hg and 24.4 +/- 18.7 mm Hg one minute after epinephrine, respectively (P = .73). Five minutes after epinephrine coronary perfusion pressure was 18.2 +/- 8.7 mm Hg and 24.3 +/- 13.9 mm Hg for IV epinephrine and intranasal epinephrine, respectively (P = .38). The rate of successful resuscitation was similar for both groups, five of seven dogs for intranasal epinephrine and four of six dogs for IV epinephrine (P = .66). CONCLUSION: Intranasal epinephrine has similar effects on coronary perfusion pressure and resuscitation compared with standard-dose IV epinephrine. Therefore, the nasal route for administration of epinephrine appears to be an acceptable alternate method of drug delivery during CPR and compares favorably with standard IV therapy in the canine model. Because of the obvious benefits to human patients, these observations suggest further investigation.

Administration, Intranasal↗
PubMed1990

The effect of ciprofloxacin on the pharmacokinetic and ECG parameters of quinidine.

Ciprofloxacin decreases the clearance of antipyrine and other drugs which, in part, undergo oxidative metabolism. Based on these findings, the authors hypothesized that ciprofloxacin may decrease the clearance of quinidine, a drug which also undergoes oxidative metabolism. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of ciprofloxacin on the pharmacokinetic and ECG parameters of quinidine in seven healthy men. Oral quinidine sulfate 400 mg was administered alone (Phase A) and after oral ciprofloxacin pretreatment (Phase B) in a randomized crossover fashion with a 2-week washout period between each phase. During Phase B, ciprofloxacin pretreatment (750 mg every 12 hours) was administered for 5 days before and 24 hours after quinidine administration. Quinidine serum samples were obtained over a 24-hour period. QRS and QTc intervals were measured over a 12-hour period. There were no significant differences in clearance (20.3 +/- 3.3 L/hr vs 20.1 +/- 2.3 L/hr, P = .836), half-life (7.9 +/- 1 hr vs 7.8 +/- 0.8 hr, P = 0.8), maximum concentration (1.4 +/- 0.6 mg/L vs 1.5 +/- 0.6 mg/L, P = 0.613), or time to maximum concentration (1.5 +/- 0.2 hr vs 1.5 +/- 0.1 hr, P = 0.571) for quinidine between Phase A and Phase B, respectively. The largest decrease in clearance observed for Phase B compared to Phase A was 10%. There was also no significant difference in the degree of QRS and QTc prolongation between Phase A and Phase B. From these results, it appears that ciprofloxacin in the dose given does not alter the pharmacokinetic or ECG parameters of quinidine. Therefore, no adjustment in the dose of quinidine is needed when coadministered with ciprofloxacin.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Current concepts of silent myocardial ischemia.

The definition, pathogenesis, incidence and characteristics, detection, treatment, and prognosis of silent myocardial ischemia (SMI) are reviewed. SMI is the occurrence of myocardial ischemia for which there is objective evidence (electrophysiological, hemodynamic, and metabolic changes) but no angina. Patients with SMI are classified as type 1 (completely asymptomatic), type 2 (SMI after myocardial infarction), and type 3 (both symptomatic and silent ischemia). Episodes of SMI are true ischemic events. The absence of pain may be due to defects in pain perception, an altered physiological response to ischemia, or a lesser degree of ischemia. The incidence of SMI is 2-5% in totally asymptomatic patients, 20-30% in patients who have suffered myocardial infarction, and 44-84% in patients who have symptomatic ischemia. SMI can be detected by exercise testing, portable electrocardiographic monitoring, or imaging techniques. Patients with SMI have more frequent adverse cardiac events (except death) than patients without SMI. The frequency of adverse cardiac events is similar in patients with angina and patients with SMI. SMI has been treated with nitrates, calcium-channel blockers, and beta blockers. Beta blockers appear to be the most consistent in reducing the number and duration of episodes. Combination therapy with beta blockers and nifedipine may be more effective than therapy with either agent alone. Because of the limited number of studies and the possible contribution to the results of spontaneous variability in the occurrence of SMI, no definite conclusions can be drawn about drug efficacy. There is no evidence that the prognosis of patients with SMI is altered by drug therapy; routine treatment with anti-ischemic drugs cannot be recommended. Patients must be evaluated individually, with aggressive management being reserved for those at high risk for myocardial infarction or other serious cardiac events.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1989

Acute effects of combination of IB and IC antiarrhythmics for the treatment of ventricular tachycardia.

There are limited data on the effects of Class IB and IC antiarrhythmic drug combination for the treatment of ventricular tachycardia. The present study evaluated this combination in 12 patients who had sustained ventricular tachycardia (SuVT) during programmed electrical stimulation (PES) and failed IC antiarrhythmic therapy. Following combination of lidocaine and a IC agent (7 with encainide and 5 with flecainide), two had no inducible ventricular tachycardia (VT) and one had nonsustained VT (NSVT). In seven of nine patients who still had SuVT, the mean VT cycle length increased 40 +/- 25 msec post combination compared to IC antiarrhythmic therapy. Seven patients who had a favorable response to the initial combination (less than 10 beats of NSVT, or greater than or equal to 10 beats of VT with a greater than 100 msec increase in cycle length compared to baseline and no hemodynamic compromise) were then placed on IC + oral IB agent (5 with mexiletine, 2 with tocainide). Similar effects on VT inducibility and cycle length were observed following the oral combination. In conclusion, the addition of lidocaine to IC therapy produced favorable effects on induced ventricular tachycardia in 58% of patients compared to IC agent alone. Also, a positive PES response to lidocaine and IC therapy corresponded to a similar positive response when either mexiletine or tocainide was substituted for lidocaine.

Anilides↗
PubMed1989

Epinephrine versus methoxamine in survival postventricular fibrillation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation in dogs.

Previous studies have indicated that methoxamine (an alpha adrenergic receptor agonist) may provide an advantage compared to epinephrine (a mixed alpha and beta adrenergic agonist) during cardiac arrest and CPR. To test this theory, we compared the effects of bolus injections of epinephrine vs. methoxamine on survival, hemodynamic variables, blood gases, and blood lactate concentrations during ventricular fibrillation and CPR in 12 dogs. Each dog underwent a 3-min fibrillatory arrest followed by 10 min of fibrillation and CPR, at which time the animals were defibrillated. Epinephrine (0.05 mg/kg, n = 6) or methoxamine (2 mg/kg, n = 6) was administered at the start of CPR. Both epinephrine and methoxamine produced identical survival rates (5/6) with no differences in coronary perfusion pressure gradients or blood gases (aortic, venous, or great cardiac venous pH, PaO2, or PaCO2) during CPR. Also, there were no differences between the two study groups in myocardial lactate or oxygen extraction ratios during CPR. We conclude that in the dosages tested in our experimental model, epinephrine and methoxamine produce similar results in the variables which we measured.

Animals↗
PubMed1987

Observed differences in amikacin pharmacokinetic parameters and dosage recommendations determined by enzyme immunoassay and fluorescence polarization immunoassay.

Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) methods are commercially available for quantitation of serum amikacin concentration. The purpose of this study was to determine if the two assay methods were comparable and would provide the same estimates for pharmacokinetic parameters and dosage recommendations. A total of 73 amikacin serum samples were used to evaluate the two assay techniques. Forty-four of these samples, obtained from 10 patients, were used to evaluate the comparability of pharmacokinetic parameters and dosage regimens. The correlation coefficient between the two assay methods was 0.98 (y = 1.03x + 0.64). There were substantial differences in assay performance noted in samples less than 10 mg/L, 10-20 mg/L, and greater than 20 mg/L, typical concentration ranges for serum sampling used in pharmacokinetic analysis. A difference of approximately 10% was observed in the determination of amikacin half-life, total body clearance, and dosage calculation. A 7% difference was noted in the volume of distribution. A significant difference (p less than 0.05) in volume of distribution and dosage recommendations was noted. Although the two methods for determining amikacin serum concentrations appear to be interchangeable on the basis of the in vitro comparison, significant differences were observed between the two assays in pharmacokinetic parameters and dosage recommendations.

Amikacin↗
PubMed1987

Esmolol.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗