PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

B E Lyn

Publications and source records attributed to B E Lyn.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Experience with dose escalation using CHARTWEL (continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy weekend less) in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Results from the multicentre randomized trial of CHART (continuous, hyperfractionated, accelerated radiotherapy) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) showed a significant increase in survival (P=0.004) compared with conventional radiotherapy and a therapeutic benefit relative to late radiation-induced morbidity. However, 60% of patients died because of failure to control locoregional disease. These findings have stimulated interest in assessing the feasibility of dose escalation using a modified CHART schedule. Acute and late morbidity with a CHARTWEL (CHART WeekEnd Less) schedule of 54 Gy in 16 days was compared with that observed with 60 Gy in 18 days in patients with locally advanced NSCLC. The incidence and severity of dysphagia and of analgesia were scored using a semiquantitative clinical scale. Late radiation-induced morbidity, namely pulmonary, spinal cord and oesophageal strictures, were monitored using clinical and/or radiological criteria. Acute dysphagia and the analgesia required to control the symptoms were more severe and lasted longer in patients treated with CHARTWEL 60 Gy (P< or = 0.02). However, at 12 weeks, oesophagitis was similar to that seen with 54 Gy and did not lead to consequential damage. Early radiation pneumonitis was not increased but, after 6 months, there was a higher incidence of mild pulmonary toxicity compared with CHARTWEL 54 Gy. No cases of radiation myelitis, oesophageal strictures or of grade 2 or 3 lung morbidity have been encountered. CHARTWEL 60 Gy resulted in an enhancement of oesophagitis and grade 1 lung toxicity compared with CHARTWEL 54 Gy. These were of no clinical significance, but may be important if CHARTWEL is used with concomitant chemotherapy. These results provide a basis for further dose escalation or the introduction of concurrent chemotherapy.

Aged

Chest radiography or computed tomography in the assessment of lung cancer prior to radiography.

A series of 93 patients with lung cancer were considered for intensive radiotherapy, and investigated by chest radiography and computed tomographic (CT) scan. Spread of tumour was detected radiologically to lymph nodes, pleura or chest wall on 98 occasions. Of these, 16 were shown by both investigations, but in 82 the spread was revealed only by CT examination. Clear visualization of the tumour prior to radiotherapy is important to select those patients who would benefit from radical radiotherapy, to allow accurate treatment planning, and to allow, in subsequent follow-up, monitoring of the response to radiotherapy. In this study tumour was clearly visualized in 59 patients treated, but in 31 (53%) of these only by the use of computed tomography.

Aged

Chest radiography or computed tomography to assess the response of lung cancer to radiotherapy.

In 58 patients with lung cancer the response of the primary tumour to treatment with CHART was followed by both chest radiograph and computed tomographic (CT) scan. Clear evidence of complete response was seen by chest radiograph in 11 patients and by CT scan in 20. If all studies showing no definite tumour, regardless of the quality of the study, were included then complete response was considered to have occurred in 25 as indicated by chest radiograph and in 22 by CT scan. The validity of the observations was tested by life table analysis comparing the survival of those showing complete regression with those whose response was incomplete. Comparison based on the CT scan findings showed the greatest significance (P = 0.0001), while that based on the chest radiograph findings showed the least (P = 0.044).

Aged