PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Esteban

Publications and source records attributed to B Esteban.

15 recordsLinked to original sources

Fluorescence investigation of the recombinant cyanobacterial phytochrome (Cph1) and its C-terminally truncated monomeric species (Cph1Delta2): implication for holoprotein assembly, chromophore-apoprotein interaction and photochemistry.

Recombinant dimeric full-length Cph1 holophytochrome and its C-terminally-truncated monomeric species [Cph1Delta2, comprising the chromophore-bearing N-terminal sensory module (residues 1 to 514)] from the cyanobacterium Synechocystis expressed in E. coli and reconstituted in vitro with phycocyanobilin (PCB) were investigated with the use of fluorescence spectroscopy and photochemistry in the temperature range from 85 to 293 K. Holoprotein assembly in Cph1 apparently proceeds via intermediate states with the emission maximum at 680-690 nm (I685) and 700 nm (I700) and a half-life time, at room temperature, of < or =5 s. Conversion of the putative I685 into mature Cph1 involves relaxation of the chromophore into a more flexible conformation. Cph1 and Cph1Delta2 were closely similar in their spectroscopic and photochemical characteristics (position of the emission band and its width, character of the temperature dependence of the fluorescence and activation energy of the fluorescence decay, kinetics and extent of the Pr conversion at low and ambient temperatures), suggesting that there is no immediate effect of the C-terminus on the photochemical properties of the chromophore in Cph1 and that chromophore-chromophore interactions in the dimer are not significant. The latter is also supported by the lack of energy transfer from the phycoerythrobilin (PEB) to PCB in the mixed PEB/PCB adduct of Cph1. At the same time, certain variations in the fluorescence and photochemical parameters of Cph1 with temperature of the sample and intensity of the excitation light and dependence of the emission spectra on excitation wavelength were observed. These variations are interpreted as a manifestation of the Cph1 heterogeneity which may be due to the existence of different conformers of the chromophore and photoproduct formation under excitation light.

Apoproteins↗

3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine induces monoamine release, but not toxicity, when administered centrally at a concentration occurring following a peripherally injected neurotoxic dose.

RATIONALE: There is good evidence that 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-induced neurotoxicity results from free radical formation. However, it is unclear whether it is the presence of MDMA or a metabolite in the brain that initiates this process. OBJECTIVE: We wished to measure the concentration of MDMA in the brain following peripheral administration of neurotoxic doses and examine the effect on acute monoamine release and the subsequent neurotoxic loss in 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) content when a high concentration of MDMA was infused into cerebral tissue. METHODS: Selectively placed microdialysis probes were used to determine both the concentration of MDMA in the brain following peripheral injection and the degree of 5-HT release. Monoamines in dialysate and tissue were measured with standard HPLC techniques. RESULTS: MDMA, administered intraperitoneally, at doses of 10 and 15 mg/kg, which produce neurodegeneration, resulted in an estimated cerebral extracellular concentration of MDMA of 11 and 20 microM, respectively. When MDMA (100-400 microM) was perfused through a selectively placed microdialysis probe it dose-dependently increased 5-HT release in the hippocampus and dopamine release in the striatum. Seven days after perfusion of MDMA the concentration of 5-HT and its metabolite, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid was unchanged in the ipsilateral side of the brain of normothermic rats and also in the brains of animals made hyperthermic to mimic the acute effect of MDMA given peripherally. In contrast, perfusion with 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine (400 microM) markedly decreased the cerebral 5-HT content. A second probe, also placed in the hippocampus at a distance of 1 mm from the main probe, revealed that during the perfusion of MDMA (400 microM) the estimated extracellular concentration of MDMA in the hippocampus was between 10.4 and 19.5 microM, i.e. in the range of concentrations observed after systemic injection of neurotoxic doses of MDMA. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that MDMA when injected directly into the brain produces 5-HT release but no neurotoxicity, suggesting that it must be metabolised peripherally in order to produce compounds that induce free radical formation and neurotoxicity in the brain.

3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic Acid↗

Studies on the neuroprotective effect of the enantiomers of AR-A008055, a compound structurally related to clomethiazole, on MDMA ("ecstasy")-induced neurodegeneration in rat brain.

RATIONALE: 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, "ecstasy") administration produces neurotoxic degeneration of 5-HT nerve endings in several regions of rat brain. Administration of the GABAmimetic drug clomethiazole protects against this damage. OBJECTIVE: We wished to see whether the enantiomers of AR-A008055 (1-4-methyl-5-thiazolyl-1-phenyl-methylamine), a compound structurally related to clomethiazole, were also neuroprotective against MDMA-induced degeneration. METHODS: (R)-(+)-AR-A008055 or (S)-(-)-AR-A008055 (100 mg/kg IP) was injected 5 min prior to and 55 min after MDMA (15 mg/kg IP) administration to Dark Agouti rats. Rectal temperature was measured during this time and the concentration of 5-HT and 5-HIAA measured in hippocampus, cortex and striatum 7 days later. [3H]-Paroxetine binding was also measured in cortex. RESULTS: Both enantiomers abolished the acute MDMA-induced hyperthermia and attenuated the subsequent neurotoxic loss of 5-HT, 5-HIAA and [3H]-paroxetine binding. When rats given the enantiomer plus MDMA were warmed to keep their rectal temperature elevated to near that of animals given only MDMA, the neuroprotective effect of (S)-(-)-AR-A008055 was still seen, while the effect of (R)-(+)-AR-A008055 was abolished. Protection was also seen when (S)-(-)-AR-A008055 (50 mg/kg) was given, a dose which produced only a modest attenuation of MDMA-induced hyperthermia. CONCLUSIONS: The current data suggest that a major proportion of the neuroprotective action of (S)-(-)-AR-A008055 did not involve an attenuating effect on MDMA-induced hyperthermia. The protection afforded by (R)-(+)-AR-A008055, which is not a GABA agonist, appears to be solely due to its action on body temperature, strengthening the contention that abolishing the acute MDMA-induced hypothermia can produce neuroprotection. Since (S)-(-)-AR-A008055 has a similar pharmacology to clomethiazole, these data suggest that drugs which increase GABAA receptor channel opening are neuroprotective against MDMA-induced damage.

Animals↗

Effect of GBR 12909 and fluoxetine on the acute and long term changes induced by MDMA ('ecstasy') on the 5-HT and dopamine concentrations in mouse brain.

We examined the long term effect of 3,4 methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, 10, 20 and 30 mg/kg, i.p.) on the cerebral 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and dopamine content in Swiss Webster mice. Three injections of MDMA (20 or 30 mg/kg, i.p.) given 3 h apart produced a marked depletion in the striatal content of dopamine and its metabolites 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and homovanillic acid (HVA) 7 days later. None of the doses administered altered the concentration of 5-HT or its metabolite 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) in several brain areas. Pre-treatment with the dopamine uptake inhibitor GBR 12909 (10 mg/kg, i.p.), 30 min before each of the three MDMA (30 mg/kg, i.p.) injections, completely prevented the long term loss in the striatal catechol concentrations. However, GBR 12909 (10 mg/kg, i.p.) not only failed to prevent the acute effects induced by MDMA (30 mg/kg x 3, i.p.) on dopamine metabolism 30 min later, but in fact potentiated them. The 5-HT uptake inhibitor, fluoxetine (10 mg/kg, i. p.) failed to prevent both the acute and long term dopaminergic deficits. MDMA (30 mg/kg x 3) altered the body temperature of the mice biphasically, producing a rapid hyperthermia followed by prolonged hypothermia. In contrast, MDMA (20 mg/kg x 3) produced an initial hypothermia followed by hyperthermia. The present experiments therefore appear to rule out any direct relationship between the neurotoxic effects of MDMA and its acute effects on body temperature in mice. Fluoxetine administered 30 min before each MDMA (30 mg/kg) injection prevented these temperature changes, while GBR 12909 was without effect. This suggests that the neuroprotective effect of GBR 12909 against MDMA-induced neurotoxicity is not directly related to its ability to inhibit the MDMA-induced acute effects on dopamine metabolism or alter the MDMA-induced temperature change. The data illustrate major differences in the neurotoxic profile of MDMA in mice and rats.

3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic Acid↗

The mechanisms involved in the long-lasting neuroprotective effect of fluoxetine against MDMA ('ecstasy')-induced degeneration of 5-HT nerve endings in rat brain.

1. It has been reported that co-administration of fluoxetine with 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, 'ecstasy') prevents MDMA-induced degeneration of 5-HT nerve endings in rat brain. The mechanisms involved have now been investigated. 2. MDMA (15 mg kg(-1), i.p.) administration produced a neurotoxic loss of 5-HT and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) in cortex, hippocampus and striatum and a reduction in cortical [3H]-paroxetine binding 7 days later. 3. Fluoxetine (10 mg kg(-1), i.p., x2, 60 min apart) administered concurrently with MDMA or given 2 and 4 days earlier provided complete protection, and significant protection when given 7 days earlier. Fluvoxamine (15 mg kg(-1), i.p., x2, 60 min apart) only produced neuroprotection when administered concurrently. Fluoxetine (10 mg kg(-1), x2) markedly increased the K(D) and reduced the B(max) of cortical [3H]-paroxetine binding 2 and 4 days later. The B(max) was still decreased 7 days later, but the K(D) was unchanged. [3H]-Paroxetine binding characteristics were unchanged 24 h after fluvoxamine (15 mg kg(-1), x2). 4. A significant cerebral concentration of fluoxetine plus norfluoxetine was detected over the 7 days following fluoxetine administration. The fluvoxamine concentration had decreased markedly by 24 h. 5. Pretreatment with fluoxetine (10 mg kg(-1), x2) failed to alter cerebral MDMA accumulation compared to saline pretreated controls. 6. Neither fluoxetine or fluvoxamine altered MDMA-induced acute hyperthermia. 7. These data demonstrate that fluoxetine produces long-lasting protection against MDMA-induced neurodegeneration, an effect apparently related to the presence of the drug and its active metabolite inhibiting the 5-HT transporter. Fluoxetine does not alter the metabolism of MDMA or its rate of cerebral accumulation.

Animals↗

A study of the mechanisms involved in the neurotoxic action of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, 'ecstasy') on dopamine neurones in mouse brain.

1. Administration of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, 'ecstasy') to mice produces acute hyperthermia and long-term degeneration of striatal dopamine nerve terminals. Attenuation of the hyperthermia decreases the neurodegeneration. We have investigated the mechanisms involved in producing the neurotoxic loss of striatal dopamine. 2. MDMA produced a dose-dependent loss in striatal dopamine concentration 7 days later with 3 doses of 25 mg kg(-1) (3 h apart) producing a 70% loss. 3. Pretreatment 30 min before each MDMA dose with either of the N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists AR-R15896AR (20, 5, 5 mg kg(-1)) or MK-801 (0.5 mg kg(-1)x3) failed to provide neuroprotection. 4. Pretreatment with clomethiazole (50 mg kg(-1)x3) was similarly ineffective in protecting against MDMA-induced dopamine loss. 5. The free radical trapping compound PBN (150 mg kg(-1)x3) was neuroprotective, but it proved impossible to separate neuroprotection from a hypothermic effect on body temperature. 6. Pretreatment with the nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor 7-NI (50 mg kg(-1)x3) produced neuroprotection, but also significant hypothermia. Two other NOS inhibitors, S-methyl-L-thiocitrulline (10 mg kg(-1)x3) and AR-R17477AR (5 mg kg(-1)x3), provided significant neuroprotection and had little effect on MDMA-induced hyperthermia. 7. MDMA (20 mg kg(-1)) increased 2,3-dihydroxybenzoic acid formation from salicylic acid perfused through a microdialysis tube implanted in the striatum, indicating increased free radical formation. This increase was prevented by AR-R17477AR administration. Since AR-R17477AR was also found to have no radical trapping activity this result suggests that MDMA-induced neurotoxicity results from MDMA or dopamine metabolites producing radicals that combine with NO to form tissue-damaging peroxynitrites.

Animals↗

Phytochrome Cph1 from the cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC6803. Purification, assembly, and quaternary structure.

The phytochrome Cph1 from the cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC6803 forms holoprotein adducts with close spectral similarity to plant phytochromes when autoassembled in vitro with bilin chromophores. Cph1 is a 85-kDa protein that acts as a light-regulated histidine kinase seemingly involved in 'two-component' signalling. This paper describes the improvement of Cph1 purification, estimation of the extinction coefficient of holo-Cph1, spectral analyses of the assembly procedure and studies on quaternary structure. During assembly with the natural chromophore phycocyanobilin (PCB), a red-shifted intermediate is observed. A similar result was obtained when phycoerythrobilin was used as chromophore. As shown by SDS/PAGE and Zn2+ fluorescence, the covalent attachment of PCB is blocked by 1 mM iodoacetamide, a cysteine-derivatizing agent. When PCB was incubated with blocked apo-Cph1, again a shoulder at longer wavelengths appeared. It is therefore proposed that the long-wavelength-absorbing form represents the protonated, noncovalently bound bilin. Biliverdin, which is neither protonated nor covalently attached, undergoes spectral changes in its blue-absorbing band upon incubation with apo-Cph1. On the basis of these data we therefore propose a three-step model for phytochrome autoassembly. Size-exclusion chromatography revealed different mobilities for the apoprotein, red-absorbing Cph1-PCB and far-red-absorbing Cph1-PCB. The major peaks of both holoprotein adducts had apparent molecular masses approximately 200 kDa, a result in agreement with the notion that autophosphorylation in sensory histidine kinases requires dimerization. When Cph1-PCB was further purified by preparative native electrophoresis, the mobility on size-exclusion chromatography was approximately 100 kDa, and it was found to have lost its kinase activity, results implying that the material had lost its capacity to dimerize.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Studies on the neuroprotective effect of pentobarbitone on MDMA-induced neurodegeneration.

Administration of a dose of 15 mg/kg of the recreationally used drug 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA or "ecstasy") to Dark Agouti rats resulted in an acute hyperthermic response which was followed 7 days later by a marked (approximately 45%) loss of 5-HT and its metabolite 5-HIAA in cortex, hippocampus and striatum and a similar loss of [3H]-paroxetine binding in cortex. These losses reflect the MDMA-induced neurotoxic degeneration of 5-HT nerve endings. Administration of pentobarbitone (40 mg/kg) concurrently with MDMA produced a significant attenuation of the neurotoxic damage, but also acute hypothermia. When the temperature of the MDMA plus pentobarbitone-treated group was kept elevated to that of the MDMA-treated group by the use of a homeothermic blanket, the neuroprotective effect of pentobarbitone was lost. These data demonstrate that pentobarbitone appears to possess no intrinsic neuroprotective activity and the previously reported activity is due to a hypothermic action of the drug.

Animals↗

In vivo evidence against clomethiazole being neuroprotective against MDMA ('ecstasy')-induced degeneration of rat brain 5-HT nerve terminals by a free radical scavenging mechanism.

Clomethiazole is an effective neuroprotective agent against the degeneration of 5-HT neurones that follows administration of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA or 'ecstasy'). Since there is good evidence that free radical formation resulting from auto-oxidation of MDMA metabolites is responsible for the degeneration we have examined whether clomethiazole is a free radical scavenger. MDMA (15 mg/kg i.p.) increased the formation of 2,3- and 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acids (2,3-DHBA and 2,5-DHBA) from salicylic acid perfused through a microdialysis tube implanted in the hippocampus, indicating increased free radical formation. Clomethiazole (50 mg/kg i.p.) administered 5 min prior and 55 min post MDMA prevented both the acute MDMA-induced hyperthermia and the rise in 2,3- and 2,5-DHBA. However, when the temperature of the MDMA + clomethiazole treated rats was kept elevated to that of the MDMA treated rats with a homeothermic blanket there was no inhibition of the MDMA-induced increase in 2,3-DHBA or 2,5-DHBA. These data suggest firstly that free radical formation is inhibited when the acute MDMA-induced hyperthermia is prevented. Secondly the data further indicate that clomethiazole has no free radical scavenging activity since the drug produces substantial neuroprotection when MDMA + clomethiazole treated rats are kept hyperthermic. This conclusion was strengthened by our observation that clomethiazole is a weak inhibitor (IC50 > 1 mM) of lipid peroxidation in synaptosomes when it had been induced by addition of FeCl2 + ascorbic acid.

Animals↗

Studies on the role of dopamine in the degeneration of 5-HT nerve endings in the brain of Dark Agouti rats following 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA or 'ecstasy') administration.

1. We investigated whether dopamine plays a role in the neurodegeneration of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) nerve endings occurring in Dark Agouti rat brain after 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA or 'ecstasy') administration. 2. Haloperidol (2 mg kg(-1) i.p.) injected 5 min prior and 55 min post MDMA (15 mg kg(-1) i.p.) abolished the acute MDMA-induced hyperthermia and attenuated the neurotoxic loss of 5-HT 7 days later. When the rectal temperature of MDMA + haloperidol treated rats was kept elevated, this protective effect was marginal. 3. MDMA (15 mg kg(-1)) increased the dopamine concentration in the dialysate from a striatal microdialysis probe by 800%. L-DOPA (25 mg kg(-1) i.p., plus benserazide, 6.25 mg kg(-1) i.p.) injected 2 h after MDMA (15 mg kg(-1)) enhanced the increase in dopamine in the dialysate, but subsequent neurodegeneration was unaltered. L-DOPA (25 mg kg(-1)) injected before a sub-toxic dose of MDMA (5 mg kg(-1)) failed to induce neurodegeneration. 4. The MDMA-induced increase in free radical formation in the hippocampus (indicated by increased 2,3- and 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid in a microdialysis probe perfused with salicylic acid) was unaltered by L-DOPA. 5. The neuroprotective drug clomethiazole (50 mg kg(-1) i.p.) did not influence the MDMA-induced increase in extracellular dopamine. 6. These data suggest that previous observations on the protective effect of haloperidol and potentiating effect of L-DOPA on MDMA-induced neurodegeneration may have resulted from effects on MDMA-induced hyperthermia. 7. The increased extracellular dopamine concentration following MDMA may result from effects of MDMA on dopamine re-uptake, monoamine oxidase and 5-HT release rather than an 'amphetamine-like' action on dopamine release, thus explaining why the drug does not induce degeneration of dopamine nerve endings.

Animals↗

The acute effect in rats of 3,4-methylenedioxyethamphetamine (MDEA, "eve") on body temperature and long term degeneration of 5-HT neurones in brain: a comparison with MDMA ("ecstasy").

Administration of a single dose of the recreationally used drug 3,4-methylenedioxyethamphetamine (MDEA or "eve") to Dark Agouti rats resulted in an acute dose-dependent hyperthermic response. The peak effect and duration of hyperthermia of a dose of MDEA of 35 mg/kg intraperitoneally was similar to a dose of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA or "ecstasy") of 15 mg/kg intraperitoneally. Seven days later this dose of MDMA produced a marked (approximately 50%) loss of 5-HT and its metabolite 5-HIAA in cortex, hippocampus and striatum and a similar loss of [3H]-paroxetine binding in cortex: these losses reflecting the MDMA-induced neurotoxic degeneration of 5-HT nerve endings. In contrast, administration of MDEA (15, 25 or 35 mg/kg), even at the highest dose, produced only a 20% loss in cortex and hippocampus and no decrease in striatum. The neurotoxic effect of MDEA was only weakly dose-dependent. Neither MDEA (35 mg/kg) nor MDMA (15 mg/kg) altered striatal dopamine content 7 days later. MDEA appeared to have about half the potency of MDMA in inducing acute hyperthermia and 25% of the potency in inducing degeneration of cerebral 5-HT neurones. However since higher doses of MDEA (compared to MDMA) are probably necessary to induce mood changing effects, these data do not support any contention that this compound is a "safer" recreational drug than MDMA in terms of either acute toxicity or long term neurodegeneration.

3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine↗

The relationship between the degree of neurodegeneration of rat brain 5-HT nerve terminals and the dose and frequency of administration of MDMA ('ecstasy').

The effect of varying the dose and frequency of administration of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA or 'ecstasy') on both the acute hyperthermic response and the long term neurodegeneration of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) nerve terminals in the brain has been studied in Dark Agouti rats. A single injection (4-15 mg/kg i.p.) of MDMA produced immediate dose-related hyperthermia and a dose-related decrease in 5-HT, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) and [3H]paroxetine binding in regions of the brain 7 days later, with a dose of 4 mg/kg having no degenerative effect. This dose was also without effect when given once daily for 4 days, but produced a marked loss of [3H]paroxetine binding and indole concentration ( approximately 55%) when given twice daily for 4 days. When a dose of 4 mg/kg was given twice weekly for 8 weeks it had no effect on these serotoninergic markers, despite a clear anorectic effect of the drug being seen. These data demonstrate that MDMA-induced neurodegeneration is related to both the dose and frequency of administration and indicate that damage to 5-HT neurones can occur in the absence of a hyperthermic response to the drug. We suggest that damage occurs when endogenous free radical scavenging mechanisms become overwhelmed or exhausted.

Animals↗

Role of hyperthermia in the protective action of clomethiazole against MDMA ('ecstasy')-induced neurodegeneration, comparison with the novel NMDA channel blocker AR-R15896AR.

1. The immediate effect of administration of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA or 'ecstasy') on rectal temperature and the effect of putative neuroprotective agents on this change has been examined in rats. The influence of the temperature changes on the long term MDMA-induced neurodegeneration of cerebral 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) nerve terminals was also examined. 2. The novel low affinity N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor channel blocker AR-R15896AR (20 mg kg(-1), i.p.) given 5 min before and 55 min after MDMA (15 mg kg(-1), i.p.) did not prevent the MDMA-induced hyperthermia and did not alter either the MDMA-induced neurodegenerative loss of 5-HT and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) in cortex, striatum and hippocampus or loss of [3H]-paroxetine binding in cortex 7 days later. 3. The neuroprotective agent clomethiazole (50 mg kg(-1), i.p.) given 5 min before and 55 min after MDMA (15 mg kg(-1)) abolished the MDMA-induced hyperthermic response and markedly attenuated the loss of 5-HT, 5-HIAA and [3H]-paroxetine binding in the brain regions examined 7 days later. 4. When rats treated with MDMA plus clomethiazole were kept at high ambient temperature for 5 h post-MDMA, thereby keeping their body temperature elevated to near that seen in rats given MDMA alone, the MDMA-induced loss of 5-HT, 5-HIAA and [3H]-paroxetine was still attenuated. However, the protection (39%) afforded by the clomethiazole administration was less than seen in rats kept at normal ambient temperature (75%). 5. These data support the proposals of others that NMDA receptor antagonists are neuroprotective against MDMA-induced degeneration only if they induce hypothermia and further suggest that increased glutamate activity may not be involved in the neurotoxic action of MDMA. 6. These data further demonstrate that a proportion of the neuroprotective action of clomethiazole is due to an effect on body temperature but that, in addition, the compound protects against MDMA-induced damage by an unrelated mechanism.

Animals↗