PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Ferrell

Publications and source records attributed to B Ferrell.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Pain and quality assessment/improvement.

Pain is a common symptom of acute and chronic illness and has been targeted as an area of improvement across settings and populations. Advances in the treatment of pain have created a standard of care by which quality can be assessed. The article describes the process of quality assessment and improvement (QA/I) in pain management. QA/I tools and case examples from two institutions are provided. QA/I activities based on current knowledge of pain management can improve the care provided to patients in pain.

Humans↗

Survey of the provision of supportive care services at National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this survey was to determine the scope of supportive care services (SCS) designed to promote quality of life during cancer therapies at National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated cancer centers. METHODS: A survey was mailed to the medical directors and nursing directors of 52 NCI-designated comprehensive (n = 26), clinical (n = 11), and planning cancer centers (n = 15) in the United States. Only one survey was completed from each institution. Survey questions identified services provided such as pain management, terminal care, psychosocial programs, and spiritual care. RESULTS: Thirty-nine questionnaires were received for a total response rate of 75%. Of the respondents, 45% were comprehensive cancer centers, 24% clinical cancer centers, and 29% planning centers. One center did not identify their NCI designation. Sixty-one percent of the centers reported research programs in supportive care. Outside funding was reported in 51% of the respondents, with 39% having American Cancer Society (ACS) or National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding and 28% having private industry funding. Overall SCS self-ratings improved from a 21% rating of excellent to very good 5 years ago to the current 54% rating. CONCLUSION: Survey results provide data on SCS across a representative sample of NCI cancer centers and can be used to develop standards for future cancer control programs.

Cancer Care Facilities↗

Continuous extrapleural intercostal nerve block with continuous infusion of lidocaine after thoracotomy. A descriptive pilot study.

Continuous extrapleural intercostal block (EPIB) with bupivacaine has been reported to be an effective analgesic technique in patients after thoracotomy. We report a retrospective study of EPIB using a continuous infusion of 1% lidocaine hydrochloride at a dose of 1 mg/kg/h. A posterior parietal pleural pocket was created and cannulated with a 16-g polyethylene catheter. Lidocaine was perfused over a 3-day period following surgery. Patients also had access to morphine sulfate via patient-controlled analgesia. Eighteen consecutive posterolateral thoracotomies (in 17 patients) performed during a 6-month period were reviewed. Serum lidocaine exceeded the toxic level of 5 microgram/mL in only one patient, a 104.5-kg man who had a level of 5.9 micrograms/mL on postoperative day 2 but experienced no clinical toxicity. Pain was evaluated by verbal analog scores (0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain), which averaged 3.02, 3.14, and 2.8 in the 3 days following surgery. Mean total daily MS doses were 24.3, 37.75, and 34.32 mg (range, 0 to 94 mg). Sedation was scored on a 1 to 5 scale. Mean scores were 2.78, 2.56, and 2.6. No patient died or had a major respiratory complication. Continuous EPIB with lidocaine appears to be a promising adjuvant technique in the management of postthoracotomy pain. Effectiveness needs to be confirmed in a prospective randomized study.

Adult↗

Nursing research into quality of life.

This report describes the scope of nursing research in the area of quality of life. The strategy used to identify research reports relied heavily on nursing publications included in the Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) from 1983 (when the database first included the subject, quality of life) to December, 1991. During this period, over 1,000 references concerning quality of life can be identified through a key-word search of the data set. Nursing investigators defined quality of life in terms of psychological, physical, social/interpersonal, and financial/material well-being. Nursing instruments have been developed to measure one or more of these dimensions of the concept. Nursing journals like Advances in Nursing Science (1985), Seminars in Oncology Nursing (1990), and Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing (1992) dedicated whole issues to the topic. Major nursing associations have supported conferences/talks (American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, Santa Fe, NM, 1991; Oncology Nursing Society, Fall Institute, Annual Quality of Life Lectureship) and provided awards on the subject (Oncology Nursing Society Annual Quality of Life Research Award). The National Center for Nursing Research is launching an intramural programme to address quality of life questions.

Chronic Disease↗

Measurement of quality of life in bone marrow transplantation survivors.

This study was designed to assess the reliability and validity of a Quality of Life (QOL) instrument on a sample of 179 allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT) survivors. The QOL-BMT tool was developed specifically for this population and was based on the investigators' prior research and a conceptual model of Quality of Life. Patients who were at least 100 days post BMT completed the 30 item visual analogue questionnaire. The instrument measured physical symptoms (e.g., weight loss, frequent colds, skin changes, cataracts, sexual problems), psychological symptoms (e.g., worry about recurrence, adjustment to illness), social concerns (e.g., relationship adjustment, return to work), and spiritual well-being (e.g., sense of control, future goals). Psychometric analysis of the instrument included measures of reliability and validity. The study findings demonstrate the unique aspects of QOL dimensions in BMT survivors and the value of QOL assessment in clinical practice and research.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

The meaning of quality of life for bone marrow transplant survivors. Part 2. Improving quality of life for bone marrow transplant survivors.

Surviving bone marrow transplant (BMT) represents a major victory against malignant disease but also creates challenges of survivorship for patients and the professionals who care for them. Part 2 of this report presents the findings of a qualitative study (N = 119) related to improving quality of life (QOL) for BMT survivors. Results are shared based on BMT survivors' perceptions of (a) what makes QOL better, (b) what makes QOL worse, and (c) what doctors or nurses could do to enhance QOL. The findings of the study have been useful in constructing a quantitative instrument to measure QOL in BMT and in understanding the conceptual basis of QOL for the BMT population. Nursing interventions can improve the QOL for the BMT patient across all phases of the transplant process and long-term issues related to survival.

Bone Marrow Transplantation↗

The meaning of quality of life for bone marrow transplant survivors. Part 1. The impact of bone marrow transplant on quality of life.

Quality of life (QOL) is an important concept in cancer nursing and has particular significance for bone marrow transplant (BMT). BMT survivors are faced with the demands of acute transplant symptoms as well as chronic illness demands posttransplant. The purpose of this study was to explore the concept of QOL for BMT survivors and to gain understanding of nursing interventions that may improve QOL in this population. The conceptual framework for this study was derived from the model of QOL developed by Ferrell, Grant, and Padilla (1989) that depicts the QOL domains of physical well-being, psychological well-being, social concerns, and spiritual well-being. This qualitative study consisted of a one-time interview of 119 BMT survivors using six open-ended questions. The items were based on previous research of the authors and content validity was established by a panel of BMT experts. Content analysis was performed on verbatim written responses to six questions regarding BMT and QOL. Part one of this two-part report provides analysis based on the questions regarding the meaning of QOL to BMT survivors and the impact of BMT on QOL.

Adult↗

The experience of pain and perceptions of quality of life: validation of a conceptual model.

Pain is a common symptom of terminally ill cancer patients and a major challenge for hospice care. This paper presents a conceptual model of the relationship between pain and quality of life that was derived from the authors' previous research. The model should prove useful to hospice clinicians and researchers in evaluating the impact of palliative care on the quality of life.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗

Nurses' knowledge of opioid analgesic drugs and psychological dependence.

Inadequate knowledge of opioid analgesic drugs and the incidence of psychological dependence are major barriers to nursing management of patients in pain. This study analyzed data obtained from 27 workshops on pain across 14 states (2,459 nurses) to determine current nursing knowledge of pharmacological management of pain. Results indicate that nurses lack knowledge in classification of opioids ranging from 23 to 98% correct response across seven analgesic drugs. Less than 25% of nurses correctly identified the frequency of psychological dependence. Further analysis revealed significant differences in basic versus advanced learners and geographical differences in knowledge. Implications are made for nursing education and practice.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Defining the content domain of quality of life for cancer patients with pain.

This study identified attributes that define the content domain of quality of life in a sample of 41 cancer patients with chronic pain. Patients were asked four open-ended questions about the meaning of quality of life, what contributes to a good or poor quality of life, and how pain influences quality of life. Content analysis of responses revealed three categories of attributes that embrace the quality-of-life content domain. The first category is physical well-being. It includes general functioning and disease/treatment-specific attributes. The second is psychological well-being. It includes affective-cognitive attributes, coping ability, meaning of pain and cancer, and accomplishment attributes of quality of life. The third is interpersonal well-being. It incorporates social support and social/role functioning attributes. Replications of the current study in other groups of patients may yield data to support a two-part, multidimensional quality-of-life instrument. A norm-referenced measure can be used to evaluate quality of life in terms of attributes that are salient regardless of the disease or treatment. A domain-referenced measure may be used to evaluate attributes whose salience is dependent on specific disease, treatment, or life events.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

Analysis of content regarding death and bereavement in nursing texts.

Information contained in textbooks provides the foundation for undergraduate education and entry into clinical practice. Inadequate knowledge of health care professionals in end of life (EOL) has been documented and efforts are in progress to improve this care. This paper reports on a project to strengthen nursing education in EOL care. One of the three project goals was the evaluation of EOL content in 50 nursing textbooks. This paper reports findings in two of the nine areas of the analysis framework which are Death and Bereavement. Findings indicate significant deficiencies in the content within these texts. Improvement in text content will require collaboration of palliative care professionals and textbook publishers and can result in increased ability of nurses to improve EOL care.

Attitude to Death↗

Influence of culture on cancer pain management in Hispanic patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this pilot study was to describe the influence of culture on cancer pain management in Hispanic (Mexican and Central American) patients. DESCRIPTION OF STUDY: This qualitative study is guided by the conceptual framework of the Pain and Quality of Life model and the Biocultural Model of Pain. It was developed as a companion study to a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-funded project to disseminate a pain education program for adult patients with cancer and their family care givers in community home-care agencies. After completing the NCI study, Hispanic subjects were invited to participate in the qualitative companion study. A total of 17 subjects, the majority of whom were women, were interviewed. The Hispanic Pain Experience Questionnaire (HPEQ) was used to elicit answers to open-ended questions regarding the perception and management of cancer pain. RESULTS: Themes that emerged from the questionnaire were Influence of Culture, Expressions of Pain, Managing Pain/Medications, and Use of Nondrug Interventions. Responses suggest that culture, family beliefs, and religion contribute significantly to management and expression of pain by the patient and care giver. In addition, this group showed that pain may be approached with stoicism; therefore, lack of verbal or behavioral expression of pain does not indicate a lack of pain itself. These patients also demonstrated a reliance on folk beliefs and nondrug interventions. The most common reason cited for noncompliance with pharmacologic treatment was an inability to understand instructions. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: When providing care to Hispanic patients, it is imperative to be nonjudgmental, sensitive, and respectful. To improve compliance, the multidisciplinary cancer team should 1) incorporate the patients' folk healthcare practices and beliefs into the plan of care when possible; 2) involve family members and friends in the patient's care, identifying one key family contact; and 3) ensure that instructions for medications are available in Spanish and understood by the patient and care giver. When patients' overall beliefs and values are respected, compliance with pharmacological and other interventions may increase accordingly.

Adult↗