PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Foleno

Publications and source records attributed to B Foleno.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Antibacterial agents that inhibit two-component signal transduction systems.

A class of antibacterials has been discovered that inhibits the growth of Gram-positive pathogenic bacteria. RWJ-49815, a representative of a family of hydrophobic tyramines, in addition to being a potent bactericidal Gram-positive antibacterial, inhibits the autophosphorylation of kinase A of the KinA::Spo0F two-component signal transduction system in vitro. Analogs of RWJ-49815 vary greatly in their ability to inhibit growth of bacteria and this ability correlates directly with their activity as kinase A inhibitors. Compared with the potent quinolone, ciprofloxacin, RWJ-49815 exhibits reduced resistance emergence in a laboratory passage experiment. Inhibition of the histidine protein kinase::response regulator two-component signal transduction pathways may present an opportunity to depress chromosomal resistance emergence by targeting multiple proteins with a single inhibitor in a single bacterium. Such inhibitors may represent a class of antibacterials that potentially may represent a breakthrough in antibacterial therapy.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1992

In vitro activity of l-ofloxacin against norfloxacin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci.

The in vitro activity of l-ofloxacin was determined against coagulase-negative staphylococci that were induced to norfloxacin resistance. l-Ofloxacin was the most active agent tested with an MIC90 of 4 micrograms/ml compared with greater than 128, 32, and 128 micrograms/ml for norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and enoxacin, respectively. Rifampin-resistant, coagulase-negative staphylococci were not cross-resistant to the quinolones tested. Among the rifampin-resistant organisms tested, l-ofloxacin was also the most active agent with an MIC90 of 0.25 micrograms/ml.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1992

In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of levofloxacin (l-ofloxacin), an optically active ofloxacin.

The antibacterial activity of levofloxacin was compared with those of ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and other antibiotics. In general, levofloxacin was equally active or up to fourfold more active than ofloxacin against all 801 organisms tested. Levofloxacin was twofold [corrected] more active than ciprofloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae and 2- to 4-fold more active than ciprofloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus, Xanthomonas maltophilia, and Bacteroides fragilis. Levofloxacin was two- to eightfold more active than ciprofloxacin against coagulase-negative staphylococci and Acinetobacter spp., although these improvements in potency may not be clinically relevant. Levofloxacin inhibited 90% of streptococci when it was used at concentrations of 1 to 2 micrograms/ml. Levofloxacin was two- to fourfold less active than ciprofloxacin against most members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, such as Escherichia coli; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Citrobacter, Proteus, Providencia, Salmonella, and Yersinia spp.; and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Both compounds were equally active against Pseudomonas cepacia. The in vitro DNA gyrase inhibitory activity of levofloxacin was as potent as that of ciprofloxacin, with a 50% inhibitory concentration of 0.65 micrograms/ml against an E. coli enzyme. In vivo, oral treatment with levofloxacin was as efficacious or more efficacious than that with ciprofloxacin in systemic as well as pyelonephritis infections in mice. Levofloxacin achieved higher concentrations in the serum and tissue of mice than did ciprofloxacin. This study presents some potential advantages of the pure L isomer of ofloxacin over ciprofloxacin and other quinolones.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Saperconazole: in vitro and in vivo anticandidal activity.

The in vitro activity of saperconazole against eight candidal species (81 strains) was determined and compared with fluconazole, Sch 39304 and amphotericin B. Using brain heart infusion broth with an inoculum of 10(4) CFU/ml, the MIC ranges (micrograms/ml) of saperconazole were: less than or equal to 0.015- greater than 32 for Candida albicans, less than or equal to 0.015-16 for C. tropicalis, less than or equal to 0.015-32 for C. glabrata, less than or equal to 0.015-32 for C. parapsilosis, less than or equal to 0.015-0.12 for C. guilliermondii and less than or equal to 0.015-0.06 for C. krusei. Saperconazole was the most active agent tested against Candida species. Saperconazole and 5-fluorocytosine combinations showed synergistic interactions against Candida species, and no antagonistic interaction was demonstrated. In a rat vaginal candidiasis infection model, saperconazole and fluconazole were equipotent producing 75-100% cures at levels of 0.016-0.25%, respectively, when dosed intravaginally. After single oral dosing, saperconazole was 5-fold more potent than fluconazole with an ED50 value of 0.53 mg/kg. These data demonstrate that saperconazole is effective in a rat vaginal candidiasis infection either with a single oral dose or by intravaginal treatment.

Amphotericin B↗
PubMed1992

In vitro and in vivo antidermatophytic activity of saperconazole, a new fluorinated triazole.

The in vitro activity of saperconazole against selected isolates of dermatophytes and its in vivo efficacy in a guinea pig dermatophytic infection model using Trichophyton mentagrophytes were evaluated. Susceptibility testing was determined with an agar dilution method in three media: yeast nitrogen base agar (YNBA), brain heart infusion agar (BHIA) and Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA). An inoculum of 1 x 10(5) CFU of T. mentagrophytes spores was placed onto the surface of these agars. Incubation was at 32 degrees C for 72 h. The MIC of saperconazole against all isolates was less than 1 microgram/ml, whereas the MIC ranged from 0.1 to > 128 micrograms/ml for fluconazole. The MIC range of saperconazole against Trichophyton species was < or = 0.002 to 0.25 micrograms/ml; against Microsporum species it was < 0.001 to 0.1 microgram/ml; and against Epidemophyton species was < or = 0.002 to 0.25 micrograms/ml. These data showed that saperconazole was the most active compound tested against these selected dermatophytes. The activities of saperconazole against T. mentagrophytes, T. rubrum and M. canis were not affected by the medium. The MICs against these organisms were < or = 0.008 micrograms/ml in SDA, YNBA or BHIA. There were 2- to 4-fold decreases in activity for fluconazole at the same conditions. In vivo, topical treatment with saperconazole at concentrations of 0.125% and 0.25% resulted in 50% and 75% microbiological cure rates, respectively, in the guinea pig topically infected with T. mentagrophytes.

Animals↗
PubMed1980

Direct-current bactericidal effect on intact skin.

Positive carbon-containing electrodes conveying 5 or more microA of constant direct current per cm2 showed bactericidal activity on intact back skin of 13 human subjects. This effect increased with the duration of stimulation up to a total surface bacterial kill at 20 h. When total current and current density were varied independently on 16 sites on the backs of eight subjects, the effect was dependent on current density, not on total current. Electrodes driven by similar voltages but which removed the electrochemical reaction from inoculated sites on the backs of three subjects failed to reduce the numbers of colony-forming units as compared with those sampled from control sites. This showed the bactericidal effect to be electrochemical in origin, probably mediated by local acidity generated at the surface of the positive carbon-containing electrodes. With an adhesive tape stripping technique on three sites on each of six subjects, it was determined that the effect extended into the epidermis of the human back. No effect was observed beneath negative or control electrodes under the same conditions.

Bacterial Infections↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The postantibiotic suppressive effect of L-ofloxacin, an optically active isomer of ofloxacin.

The postantibiotic suppressive effect (PAE) of L-ofloxacin was studied and compared with those of ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin. The PAE of L-ofloxacin was observed against all Gram-positive organisms tested: Staphylococcus aureus, S. epidermidis, and Enterococcus faecalis. At the achievable serum concentrations L-ofloxacin showed a longer PAE than ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin. Exposure of organisms to 4 micrograms/ml of L-ofloxacin for 2 hr produced a 3.1 and 4.2 hr PAE for methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant staphylococci, respectively. Against E. faecalis and S. epidermidis, the PAEs of L-ofloxacin were 1.9 and 1.6 hr, respectively.

Ciprofloxacin↗