PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Gail Macik

Publications and source records attributed to B Gail Macik.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Coagulation disorders and hemostasis in liver disease: pathophysiology and critical assessment of current management.

Normal coagulation has classically been conceptualized as a Y-shaped pathway, with distinct "intrinsic" and "extrinsic" components initiated by factor XII or factor VIIa/tissue factor, respectively, and converging in a "common" pathway at the level of the FXa/FVa (prothrombinase) complex. Until recently, the lack of an established alternative concept of hemostasis has meant that most physicians view the "cascade" as a model of physiology. This view has been reinforced by the fact that screening coagulation tests (APTT, prothrombin time--INR) are often used as though they are generally predictive of clinical bleeding. The shortcomings of this older model of normal coagulation are nowhere more apparent than in its clinical application to the complex coagulation disorders of acute and chronic liver disease. In this condition, the clotting cascade is heavily influenced by numerous currents and counter-currents resulting in a mixture of pro- and anticoagulant forces that are themselves further subject to change with altered physiological stress such as super-imposed infection or renal failure. This report represents a summary of a recent multidisciplinary symposium held in Charlottesville, VA. We present an overview of the coagulation system in liver disease with emphasis on the limitations of the current clinical paradigm and the need for a critical re-evaluation of the current tenets governing clinical practice. With the realization that there is often limited or conflicting data, we have attempted to represent diverse opinion and experience from the perspectives of both hepatology and hematology beginning with a brief update on the physiology of normal coagulation.

Blood Coagulation Disorders↗

Hematologic disorders in critically ill patients.

Hematologic disorders are frequently encountered in the intensive care unit. Thrombocytopenia, often defined as a platelet count below 100,000/microL, is common in critically ill patients and may be associated with adverse outcomes. A systematic evaluation of clinical and laboratory findings is necessary to ascertain the cause of the thrombocytopenia and to determine the correct therapy. Recognition of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is particularly important, given the risk of thrombosis associated with this condition. Prompt cessation of all heparin products is required, and anticoagulation with a direct thrombin inhibitor is recommended if HIT is strongly suspected. Coagulopathies are also common in the critically ill, and are often due to vitamin K deficiency or disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). A careful history and interpretation of clotting studies are useful in defining the coagulation defect. Advances in understanding the pathogenesis of DIC have generated new treatment approaches, such as the use of recombinant activated protein C. Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) is a novel drug approved for use in patients with congenital hemophilia and inhibitors. Although its use as a hemostatic agent is currently being evaluated in several off-label scenarios, including trauma, intracerebral hemorrhage, and liver disease, there are limited data to guide therapy in these conditions.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) as a hemostatic agent in liver disease: a break from convention in need of controlled trials.

The management of coagulopathy in patients with acute and chronic liver disease has undergone little change in many years despite advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of this problem. In general, deficiency of clotting factors as a result of poor hepatic synthetic function accounts for most of the coagulopathy. However, other processes such as disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), hyperfibrinolysis, dysfibrinogenemia, hemolysis, and a decrease in number or function of platelets may be present and thus add to the complexity of the problem. Coexisting portal hypertension and the associated risks of volume expansion, renal failure, and endothelial dysfunction add even more difficulty to the management of these patients. The clinician's despair is only exacerbated by uncertainty regarding the significance of laboratory indices of coagulation and the lack of agreement between health care providers regarding how to use these indices. Simple, conventional interventions such as vitamin K or plasma administration often produce only limited amelioration, and the latter carries the potential disadvantage of volume overexpansion as well as the risk of infection and transfusion reactions. Into this complex and uncertain clinical situation has arrived the antihemophilic agent recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa). Its development has led to a fundamental re-evaluation of the classic understanding of the normal clotting cascade. Moreover, use of this product in liver disease patients is increasing despite the lack of definitive studies or literature to guide therapy. Herein we review the mechanism of action of this agent, report the clinical applications in patients with liver disease, address the limitations and risks associated with the drug, and discuss the issue of its cost-effectiveness.

Blood Coagulation↗

Recombinant activated factor VII for coagulopathy in fulminant hepatic failure compared with conventional therapy.

Severe coagulopathy in fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) is difficult to correct by conventional means. Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is an antihemophilic factor that has shown promise in treating coagulopathy in liver disease. Our aim is to review our experience with rFVIIa in treating the coagulopathy of FHF and compare these results with those of conventional therapy. Fifteen patients with FHF who met King's College criteria for orthotopic liver transplantation were studied. All were ascertained from our liver disease registry. Eight consecutive patients were administered fresh frozen plasma (FFP) alone, whereas seven consecutive patients were administered FFP and rFVIIa (40 microg/kg intravenous bolus). The two groups, with similar demographic characteristics, were compared in terms of measured parameters of coagulopathy (prothrombin time and international normalized ratio), amount of plasma infused, development of anasarca, ability to undergo intracranial pressure (ICP) transducer placement, bleeding complications, ability to undergo transplantation, and survival. All patients administered rFVIIa (after a single dose) versus none administered FFP alone had temporary (2- to 6-hour) correction of coagulopathy (P <.0002). All patients administered rFVIIa versus 38% administered FFP alone were able to have an ICP transducer placed (P =.03). The rFVIIa group had less anasarca (P =.04). An equal number of patients underwent transplantation from each group, but overall survival was slightly better in the rFVIIa group (P =.04). Five of seven patients in the rFVIIa group were administered one or more subsequent doses of rFVIIa after placement of the ICP monitor (two patients, for additional procedures; three patients, prophylactically in the first 24 hours after ICP transducer placement) at the discretion of the attending physicians. We conclude that rFVIIa is effective in transiently correcting laboratory parameters of coagulopathy in patients with FHF. It facilitates the performance of invasive procedures and is associated with less frequent anasarca compared with conventional therapy. Our preliminary experience supports the need for further studies to define the optimal dosing, safety, and efficacy of rFVIIa in patients with FHF.

Adolescent↗

Improving the safety profile of warfarin.

Since warfarin remains the predominate drug administered for long-term anticoagulation, optimizing therapy for maximum antithrombotic effect with minimal bleeding risk continues to challenge clinicians. Genetic differences exist that affect an individual's response to warfarin. The clinician can use genetic information in the future, along with current approaches to improved monitoring and dose schedules, to maintain even more successfully the appropriate therapeutic range for anticoagulation. The international normalized ratio (INR) is a good indicator of warfarin effect and addressing a high INR result often prevents bleeding complications. However, even with a therapeutic INR, patients are still at risk for bleeding. This review will discuss optimizing warfarin dosing, reducing an elevated INR, and managing the anticoagulated patient who has a bleeding event.

Anticoagulants↗

The future of anticoagulation clinics.

Anticoagulation therapy is the foundation of treatment for thromboembolic disorders; and coumarin derivatives (warfarin in the United States) are the only orally administered anticoagulant medications currently available. Due to the expense and relative difficulties associated with this route of administration, parenteral drugs are not used routinely for long-term therapy, leaving warfarin as the anticoagulant of choice in the outpatient setting. The management of warfarin is problematic, however, due the nuances of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile and the requirement for frequent monitoring of blood levels. Although management by anticoagulation clinics is considered the gold standard for warfarin therapy, management by an anticoagulation clinic may not be the optimal option from a clinician's view and, in many cases, may not be an option at all. Anticoagulation clinics may impinge on the doctor-patient relationship. Difficulties of communication and reimbursement are not ameliorated by a specialty clinic. Innovations in warfarin management, including patient self-management and computerized dosing programs, are alternatives for improved care that are available with or without input by an anticoagulation service. New oral drugs on the horizon do not require the same intensity of monitoring and do not present the same pharmacodynamic problems associated with warfarin. Warfarin will become obsolete in the foreseeable future. If anticoagulation clinics continue, they must re-define their role as the major part of the workload, warfarin management, disappears. To adapt, clinics must strengthen and enhance their role as coordinators and educators, and less so, managers of anticoagulation therapy.

Ambulatory Care Facilities↗