PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

B Ginsberg

Publications and source records attributed to B Ginsberg.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Paediatric preoperative teaching: effects at induction and postoperatively.

In a randomized controlled trial at Duke University and University of North Carolina Hospitals, 143 two to six year old children undergoing elective ambulatory surgery were randomized into a control group who received routine preoperative teaching or an intervention group who received an interactive teaching book. Changes in behaviour were measured by a Vernon behavioural questionnaire preoperatively and again two weeks postoperatively. A Global Mood Score was assessed in the preoperative holding area, at arrival into the operating room, and at the time of mask induction. The children in the control group were significantly more aggressive postoperatively than the intervention group (P < 0.05). Children who received the interactive teaching book exhibited higher levels of anxiety on the day of surgery, but fewer behavioural changes two weeks following surgery. Parents in the intervention group reported that preoperative teaching helped their child (87%) and themselves (83%).

Affect

Monitoring practices following epidural analgesics for pain management: a follow-up survey.

Indwelling epidural catheters are commonly used in pain management. There is much literature on the risks and benefits of this therapy, but there is no consensus on a standard, cost-effective method of monitoring these patients, nor on the types of analgesics or methods of drug delivery. The purpose of this paper is to examine clinical practices of pain management nurses belonging to the American Society of Pain Management Nurses (ASPMN). A total of 202 members responded to a follow-up survey on their institutions' use of epidural catheters. Although there were numerous variations in practice, certain similarities and themes regarding drug choice, patient monitoring, and health care providers involved with the care of this patient population are evident.

Analgesia, Epidural

Drug interactions: volatile anesthetics and opioids.

Multiple drugs are used to provide anesthesia. Volatile anesthetics are commonly combined with opioids. Several studies have demonstrated that small doses of opioid (i.e., within the analgesic range) result in a marked reduction in minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of the volatile anesthetic that will prevent purposeful movement in 50% of patients at skin incision). Further increases in opioid dose provide only a further small reduction in MAC. Thus, a ceiling effect of the opioid is observed at a MAC value of the volatile anesthetic equal to its MAC awake. Recovery from anesthesia when an opioid is combined with a volatile anesthetic is dependent on the rate of decrease of both drugs to their respective concentrations that are associated with adequate spontaneous ventilation and awakening. Through an understanding of the pharmacodynamic interaction of volatile anesthetics with opioids and the pharmacokinetic processes responsible for the recovery from drug effect, optimal dosing schemes can thus be developed. A review of these pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic principles that will allow clinicians to administer drugs to provide a more optimal anesthetic is provided.

Alfentanil

The successful implementation of pharmaceutical practice guidelines. Analysis of associated outcomes and cost savings. SWiPE Group. Systematic Withdrawal of Perioperative Expenses.

BACKGROUND: Although approximately 2,000 medical practice guidelines have been proposed, few have been successfully implemented and sustained. We hypothesized that we could develop and institute practice guidelines to promote more appropriate use of costly anesthetics, to generate and sustain widespread compliance from a large physician group, and to decrease costs without adversely affecting clinical outcomes. METHODS: A prospective before and after comparison study was performed at a tertiary care medical center. Clinical outcomes data and times indicative of perioperative patient flow were collected on the first of two sets of patients 1 month before discussion of practice guidelines. Practice guidelines were developed by the physicians and their associated care team for the intraoperative use of anesthetic drugs. A drug distribution process was developed to aid compliance. Clinical outcomes data and times indicative of perioperative patient flow were collected on the second set of patients 1 month after institution of practice guidelines. Hospital drug costs and adherence to guidelines were noted throughout the study period and for each of the following 9 months by querying the database of an automated anesthesia record keeper. RESULTS: A total of 1,744 patients were studied. Drug costs decreased from 56 dollars per case to 32 dollars per case as a result of adherence to practice guidelines. Perioperative patient flow was minimally affected. Time (mean +/- SD) from end of surgery to arrival in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) increased from 11 +/- 7 min before the authors instituted practice guidelines to 14 +/- 8 min after practice guidelines (P < 0.0001). Admission of inpatients to the PACU receiving monitored anesthesia care increased from 6.5 to 12.9% (P < 0.02). Perioperative patient flow and clinical outcomes were not otherwise adversely affected. Compliance and cost savings have been sustained. CONCLUSIONS: This study is an example of a successful physician-directed program to promote more appropriate utilization of health care resources. Cost savings were obtained without any substantial changes in clinical outcomes. Institution of similar practice guidelines should result in pharmaceutical savings in the range of 50% at tertiary care centers around the country, with a slightly smaller degree of savings expected at institutions with more ambulatory surgery.

Anesthesiology

Using an anesthesia information management system as a cost containment tool. Description and validation.

BACKGROUND: Medical informatics provide a new way to evaluate the practice of medicine. Anesthesia automated record keepers have introduced anesthesiologists to computerized medical records. To derive useful information from the stored data requires programming that is not currently commercially available. The authors describe how they custom-programmed an automated record keeper's database to perform cost calculations, how they validated the programming, and how they used the data in a successful pharmaceutical cost-containment program. METHODS: The Arkive (San Diego, CA) automated record keeper database was programmed at Duke University Medical Center as an independent noncommercial project to calculate costs according to standard formulae and to follow adherence to Duke University Department of Anesthesiology's prescribing guidelines for anesthetic drugs. Validation of that programming (including analysis of discarded drugs) was accomplished by comparing database calculated costs with actual pharmacy distribution of drugs during a 1-month period. RESULTS: Validation data demonstrated a 99% accuracy rate for total costs of the drugs studied (atracurium, vecuronium, rocuronium, propofol, midazolam, fentanyl, and isoflurane). The study drugs represented approximately 67% of all drug costs for the period studied. CONCLUSIONS: Programming of an anesthesia automated record keeper's database yields essential information for management of an anesthetic practice. Accurate economic evaluation of anesthetic drug use is now possible. In the future, as definitive identification of best anesthetic practices that yield optimal patient outcomes and higher measures of patient satisfaction is pursued, large numbers of patients should be studied. This is only possible through database analysis and complete computerization of the perioperative medical record.

Anesthesiology

Determination of plasma concentrations of propofol associated with 50% reduction in postoperative nausea.

BACKGROUND: Subhypnotic doses of propofol possess direct antiemetic properties. The authors sought to determine the plasma concentration of propofol needed to effectively manage postoperative nausea and vomiting. METHODS: Patients aged 18-70 yr who were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 or 2 and had surgery during general anesthesia were approached for the study. Only patients who had nausea (verbal rating score > 5 on a 0- to 10-point scale), retching, or vomiting in the postanesthetic care unit participated. Propofol was administered to these patients to achieve target plasma concentrations of 100, 200, 400, and 800 ng/ml using a computer-assisted continuous infusion device. Target concentrations were increased every 15 min until patients described at least a 50% reduction in symptoms on the verbal rating score. An arterial blood sample was obtained at each step. The measured plasma propofol concentrations were used to analyze data. Blood pressure, heart and respiratory rates, arterial blood saturation, sedation score, and overall satisfaction with treatment were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 89 patients who consented to the study, 15 patients met entry criteria and were enrolled. Five of these patients also had retching or vomiting when they entered the study. Fourteen patients responded successfully to treatment. One patient did not achieve the required response at plasma concentrations of 830 ng/ml. Hence the success rate for the treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting was 93%. Among patients who responded, the median plasma concentration associated with an antiemetic response was 343 ng/ml. There was no difference in sedation scores from baseline and no episodes of desaturation. Hemodynamic parameters were stable during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol is generally efficacious in treating postoperative nausea and vomiting at plasma concentrations that do not produce increased sedation. Simulations indicate that to achieve antiemetic plasma propofol concentrations of 343 ng/ml, a bolus dose of 10 mg followed by an infusion of approximately 10 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) are necessary.

Adolescent

Opioid-sparing effects of a low-dose infusion of naloxone in patient-administered morphine sulfate.

BACKGROUND: A naloxone infusion is effective in reducing epidural and intrathecal opioid-related side effects. The use of naloxone infusion concomitant with intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) has not been evaluated, probably because of an expected direct antagonism of the systemic opioid effect. The authors compared the incidence of morphine-related side effects and the quality of analgesia from two small doses of naloxone infusion. METHODS: Sixty patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1, 2, or 3 who were scheduled for total abdominal hysterectomies were enrolled in the study. Patients received a standardized general anesthetic. In the postanesthetic care unit, patients received morphine as a PCA. They were randomized to receive either 0.25 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1) naloxone (low dose), 1 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1) (high dose), or saline (placebo) as a continuous infusion. Verbal rating scores for pain, nausea, vomiting, and pruritus; sedation scores; requests for antiemetic; and morphine use were recorded for 24 h. Blood pressure, respiratory rate, and oxyhemoglobin saturation were also monitored. RESULTS: Sixty patients completed the study. Both naloxone doses were equally effective in reducing the incidence of nausea, vomiting, and pruritus compared with placebo (P < 0.05 by the chi-squared test). There was no difference in the verbal rating scores for pain between the groups. The cumulative morphine use was the lowest in the low-dose group (42.3 +/- 24.1 mg; means +/- SD) compared with the placebo (59.1 +/- 27.4 mg) and high-dose groups (64.7 +/- 33.0 mg) at 24 h (P < 0.05 by analysis of variance). There was no incidence of respiratory depression (<8 breaths/min) and no difference in sedation scores, antiemetic use, respiratory rate, and hemodynamic parameters among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Naloxone is effective in preventing PCA opioid-related side effects. Naloxone infusion at 0.25 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1) not only attenuates these side effects but appears to reduce postoperative (beyond 4-8 h) opioid requirements. This dosing regimen can be prepared with 400 microg naloxone in 1,000 ml crystalloid given in 24 h to a patient weighing 70 kg.

Adult

How to manage drug interactions.

Multiple drugs are used to provide anaesthesia. On average, four to six drugs are used during anaesthesia and, therefore, drug interactions are common. These interactions are primarily either pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic. Due to the relatively short duration of drug administration for anaesthesia, pharmacokinetic drug interactions resulting from alterations in drug metabolism do not generally produce clinically significant effects. Pharmacodynamic-drug interactions between anaesthetic drugs, however, are potentially serious. This may reflect that anaesthesia is not a single entity, but a process provided by a combination of drugs; i.e. loss of consciousness, analgesia and neuromuscular blockade. An understanding of each drug's pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and drug interactions will allow clinicians to administer drugs to provide a more optimal anaesthetic.

Anesthesia

Patient-controlled analgesia for conscious sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Adequate comfort is essential to patients undergoing invasive procedures. This study was designed to evaluate whether patient-controlled analgesia could improve sedation for ERCP. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive standard sedation (n = 31) or patient-controlled analgesia (n = 31). The patients were blinded to the randomization. After the procedure the patient, physician, and nurse each rated their satisfaction with sedation using a verbal rating scale. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the patient's mean satisfaction score for the conventional and patient-controlled analgesia groups (9.3 and 9.6, respectively, p = 0.5). The physicians rated sedation higher in the conventional group compared with the patient-controlled analgesia group (8.6 and 8.2, respectively, p = 0.02). Physicians and nurses' scores correlated (r = 0.53, p = 0.0001), but there was no correlation between scores reported by either physicians or nurses and the patients' scores (r = 0.2 and r = 0.05, respectively). Oxygen saturation less than 90% occurred for more than 1 minute in three patients who received standard sedation but in none who used patient-controlled analgesia. CONCLUSION: This trial demonstrates that patient-controlled analgesia during ERCP is as effective as standard sedation with respect to patient satisfaction. Physicians and nurses, however, are not good proxies for assessing patient satisfaction.

Adolescent

Intravenous ondansetron in established postoperative emesis in children. S3A-381 Study Group.

BACKGROUND: In pediatric postsurgical patients, postoperative vomiting is a common occurrence that can delay recovery and result in unplanned hospital admissions after outpatient surgery. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ondansetron in the control of established postoperative emesis in outpatients aged 2-12 yr. METHODS: Screened for the study were 2,720 ASA physical status 1-3 children undergoing outpatient surgery during general anesthesia, which included nitrous oxide. Children experiencing two emetic episodes within 2 h of discontinuation of nitrous oxide were given intravenous ondansetron (n = 192; 0.1 mg/kg for children weighing < or = 40 kg; 4 mg for children weighing > 40 kg) or placebo (n = 183). RESULTS: The proportion of children with no emetic episodes and no use of rescue medication was significantly greater (P < 0.001) in the ondansetron group compared with placebo for both 2- and 24-h periods after study drug administration (78% of the ondansetron group and 34% of the placebo group for 2 h; 53% of the ondansetron group and 17% of the placebo group for 24 h). Among patients with at least one emetic episode or with rescue medication use, the median time to onset of emesis or rescue was 127 min in the ondansetron group compared with 58 min in the placebo group (P < 0.001). The median time from study drug administration until discharge was significantly shorter (P < 0.01) in the ondansetron group (153 min, range 44-593 min) compared with the placebo group (173 min, range 82-622 min). The incidence of potentially drug-related adverse events was similar in the ondansetron (3% of patients) and the placebo (4% of patients) groups. CONCLUSION: A single dose of ondansetron (0.1 mg/kg up to 4 mg) is effective and well tolerated in the prevention of further episodes of postoperative emesis in children after outpatient surgery. Administration of ondansetron also may result in a shorter time to discharge.

Antiemetics

Double-blind, randomized comparison of ondansetron and intraoperative propofol to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting.

BACKGROUND: Breast surgery is associated with a high incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Propofol and prophylactic administration of ondansetron are associated with a lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. To date no comparison of these two drugs has been reported. A randomized study was done to compare the efficacy of ondansetron and intraoperative propofol given in various regimens. METHODS: Study participants included 89 women classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 or 2 who were scheduled for major breast surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups. Group O received 4 mg ondansetron in 10 ml 0.9% saline and groups PI, PIP, and PP received 10 ml 0.9% saline before anesthesia induction. Group O received thiopental, isoflurane, nitrous oxide-oxygen, and fentanyl for anesthesia. Group PI received propofol, isoflurane, nitrous oxide-oxygen, and fentanyl. Group PIP received propofol, isoflurane, nitrous oxide-oxygen, and fentanyl. Thirty minutes before expected skin closure, isoflurane was discontinued and 50 to 150 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 propofol was given intravenously to maintain anesthesia. Group PP received propofol for induction and maintenance of anesthesia, nitrous oxide-oxygen, and fentanyl. Postoperative pain relief was provided with morphine administered by a patient-controlled analgesia pump. The incidence of nausea and vomiting, requests for rescue antiemetic and sedation, pain scores, and hemodynamic data were recorded for 24 h. RESULTS: Within 6 h of surgery, groups O and PP had a lower incidence of nausea compared with groups PI and PIP (P < 0.05). Fewer patients in group PP (19%) vomited during the 24-h period compared with groups O (48%), PI (64%), and PIP (52%) (P < 0.05). The incidence of antiemetic use was also less in group PP (P < 0.05). Patients in group PP had lower sedation scores at 30 min and at 1 h (P < 0.05). There were no differences among the groups in pain scores, blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and incidence of pruritus. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol administered to induce and maintain anesthesia is more effective than ondansetron (with thiopental-isoflurane anesthesia) in preventing postoperative vomiting and is associated with fewer requests for rescue antiemetic and sedation in the early phase of recovery. It is equally effective in preventing postoperative nausea as ondansetron in the first 6 h after operation. Propofol used only as an induction agent or for induction and at the end of surgery were not as protective against postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Adult

Pharmacokinetic model-driven infusion of fentanyl in children.

BACKGROUND: This study determined the accuracy of previously defined adult fentanyl pharmacokinetics in children having surgery; from this population, the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl were characterized in children when administered via a computerized assisted continuous-infusion device. METHODS: Twenty children between the ages of 2.7 and 11 y scheduled to undergo elective noncardiac surgery were studied. After induction, anesthesia was maintained with 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen supplemented with fentanyl (n = 10) or fentanyl plus isoflurane (n = 10). Fentanyl was administered via computerized assisted continuous-infusion to target concentrations determined by clinical requirements. Plasma fentanyl concentrations were measured and used to evaluate the performance of the fentanyl pharmacokinetics and then to determine a new set of pharmacokinetic parameters and the variance in the context-sensitive half-times simulated for these patients. RESULTS: The original adult fentanyl pharmacokinetics resulted in a positive bias (10.4%), indicating that measured concentrations were mostly greater than predicted. A two-compartment model with age and weight as covariates provided the optimal pharmacokinetic parameters. These resulted in a residual performance error of -1.1% and a median absolute performance error of 17.4%. The context-sensitive times determined from this pediatric population were considerably shorter than the context-sensitive times previously published for adults. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of fentanyl administered by computerized assisted continuous-infusion differ between adults and children. The newly derived parameters are probably more suitable to determine infusion schemes of up to 4 h in children between the ages of 2 and 11 y.

Anesthetics, Intravenous

Intensified diabetes management: lessons from the diabetes control and complications trial.

The results of the multicenter diabetes control and complications trial are examined and methods for the implementation of the findings for individuals with type I and type II diabetes are discussed. More than a decade ago the question was raised of whether tight glycemic control would prevent or slow the progression of microvascular complications. In 1993, having studied 1441 individuals with type I diabetes randomized to either intensive glycemic control (HbA1c < 7%) or conventional glycemic control (HbA1c > 9%), it was concluded that a reduction in risk of retinopathy, neuropathy and nephropathy could be realized if near normal glycemic control were achieved. Some questions remained, however. For example, could intensive treatment be achieved in routine practice under the auspices of primary care physicians? Are the findings in this study applicable to individuals with type II diabetes? These questions are addressed through the introduction of staged diabetes management (SDM), an innovative approach to the treatment of diabetes and the prevention of its complications. SDM is designed as a data-based systematic approach to diabetes treatment that targets blood glucose control. Studied in 40 clinical sites throughout the United States and evaluated in 30 sites worldwide, SDM promises to provide appropriate clinical guidance to both primary care and specialist physicians seeking to alter current practice patterns by adopting a systematic approach to diabetes management.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid

A survey on the clinical use of epidural catheters for acute pain management.

Indwelling epidural catheters are commonly used to provide analgesia in the postoperative setting. In an attempt to determine how epidurals are used in clinical practice, a survey was conducted at the 1992 annual meeting of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses (ASPMN). A total of 42 institutions were surveyed regarding epidural management practices and procedures. Although there were numerous variations in practice, certain similarities and themes regarding drug choice, patient monitoring, and levels of activity are evident. Technology has made possible continuous infusions of drugs on intermediate care floors, with most institutions relying upon nursing personnel for monitoring.

Acute Disease

Cockayne syndrome: a case report.

A 4-year-old female with Cockayne syndrome presented for cataract extraction under general anesthesia. She was thin and frail; her neck, epiglottis and larynx were stiff; she was deaf and blind; and she could not speak, sit unaided, or perspire. At the time of her admission, she weighed 5.5 kg. Cockayne syndrome is a disease of childhood characterized by mental retardation and premature aging. Although the underlying abnormality appears to be autosomal recessive inheritance or metabolic (possibly thymic) dysfunction, there is no consensus on etiology. The multiple organ involvement carries significant implications for the anesthetist. Intubation can be technically difficult, and care of the skin can be problematic. Essential hypertension, hepatic deficiencies, osteoporosis, deafness, blindness, and other effects of premature aging may be encountered making perioperative management a challenge.

Anesthesia, General

The esophageal temperature gradient in anesthetized children.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to study the effect of the temperature of the anesthetic gas mixture (AGM) on esophageal temperature measurements made in children whose tracheas had been intubated for anesthesia. We also sought to establish the optimal site for the temperature sensor in the esophagus and to find a way to accurately place the sensor. METHODS: Special esophageal temperature probes with thermistors located at 1-cm intervals were used for data collection on a multiplex system. Esophageal temperature measurements were made every 15 minutes for a period of 120 minutes in anesthetized children receiving heated (n = 30) and unheated (n = 30) anesthetic gases. RESULTS: The temperature of the AGM (p < 0.001), the site of measurement (p < 0.001), and the interaction between AGM temperature and site of measurement (p < 0.007) all had a significant effect on esophageal temperature measurements. This effect was greatest at a point 3 cm distal to the level of the tip of the endotracheal tube when AGMs were not heated. CONCLUSION: We conclude that best results are obtained when care is taken to place the thermistor in the lower quarter of the esophagus. (We provide a simple formula for calculating this placement in pediatric patients of varying ages.) Placing the probe by acoustic criteria cannot consistently be relied on to provide good thermometry.

Analysis of Variance

Evaluation of flumazenil for reversing the effects of midazolam-induced conscious sedation or general anesthesia.

To evaluate the effectiveness of flumazenil in reversing midazolam-induced conscious sedation and general anesthesia, we gave either flumazenil or placebo to 55 patients in a double-blind manner after surgery. Whether surgery was done under conscious sedation (CS group) or general anesthesia (GA group) depended on the procedure. Recovery was assessed by an Observer Assessment of Alertness and Sedation (OAAS) Scale, Finger-Nose (F-N) test, and picture recall and recognition. OAAS and F-N tests were done at baseline, 0 minutes (before the test drug administration), and at 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes. Picture recall and recognition were tested at 180 minutes and 24 hours, respectively, after test drug administration. Patients who were sedated during surgery (CS group) received a mean of 10.3 +/- 5.3 mg midazolam. The patients receiving general anesthesia (GA group) were given 21.0 +/- 8.2 mg midazolam. In the CS group, improvement in scores on the OAAS scale and F-N test was similar after administration of both flumazenil and placebo. In the GA group, flumazenil produced significantly greater improvement in the OAAS scores at 5 and 15 minutes, and in the F-N test scores at 15 minutes. In both groups, picture recall and recognition improved significantly immediately after flumazenil administration, but this improvement was generally not sustained for pictures shown at later times. These results imply that flumazenil is beneficial for reversing amnesia briefly after midazolam-induced sedation. However, flumazenil hastens recovery only when larger doses of midazolam are used for general anesthesia.

Adult