PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Gulyás

Publications and source records attributed to B Gulyás.

18 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1996

Activation by attention of the human reticular formation and thalamic intralaminar nuclei.

It has been known for over 45 years that electrical stimulation of the midbrain reticular formation and of the thalamic intralaminar nuclei of the brain alerts animals. However, lesions of these sectors fail to impair arousal and vigilance in some cases, making the role of the ascending activating reticular system controversial. Here, a positron emission tomographic study showed activation of the midbrain reticular formation and of thalamic intralaminar nuclei when human participants went from a relaxed awake state to an attention-demanding reaction-time task. These results confirm the role of these areas of the brain and brainstem in arousal and vigilance.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Processing and analysis of form, colour and binocular disparity in the human brain: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography.

With the purpose of mapping those anatomical structures participating in the processing and analysis of form, colour and disparity information, we have measured, with positron emission tomography and [15O]butanol, regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) as an indicator of regional cerebral metabolic activity in 13 right-handed male volunteers during visual discrimination of colour, form and disparity information. The brain images were anatomically standardized using a computerized brain atlas and statistically significant changes were localized by cluster analysis. The changes in rCBF between specific activation and reference states were measured and the volumes of changes were determined, as were the loci and volumes of areas commonly activated by two or three different tasks. Each of the tasks activated over a dozen distinct and separate fields in the cortex--in the occipital, parietal, temporal and frontal lobes as well as the cerebellum. A number of overlapping fields were commonly activated in two tasks (four in the form and colour tasks, five in the form and disparity tasks, and eleven in the colour and disparity tasks), and two field overlaps were present in all three tasks (in the right superior frontal and left lingual gyri). These findings indicate that, in a visual discrimination task, the processing and analysis of single visual submodalities take place in a number of cortical fields in the human brain. As the same visual submodality is processed and analysed by numerous fields and the same field may participate in the processing of different submodalities, a divergence-convergence pattern of information processing is present in the human brain. This observation supports a hypothesis based on earlier studies in primates, namely that information processing in the visual system requires the concerted activation of a relatively large number of fields of functional networks in the brain.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Visual form discrimination from luminance or disparity cues: functional anatomy by PET.

With the purpose of elucidating the functional fields involved in the discrimination of visual form based either on luminance or binocular disparity cues, we used PET to measure changes in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in ten volunteers while they performed visual discrimination tasks. The averaged standardized subtraction images (delta rCBF) were analysed for statistically significant changes between the form tasks and their reference tasks. Twenty cortical fields in the visual association areas and the prefrontal cortex were engaged by the discrimination of visual form based upon disparity cues, whereas only four fields showed increased activity during the discrimination of visual form created by luminance cues. The only functional field activated in both conditions was in the left fusiform gyrus. The present findings extend our earlier observations, namely that disparate functional networks of activated fields in the human brain can perform the discrimination of visual form perceptually defined by different visual cues.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Visual form discrimination from color or motion cues: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography.

To explore the extent to which various cortical functional pathways are involved in processing and analyzing different types of information that yield the same perceptual entity, we mapped anatomical structures in the human brain participating in the discrimination of visual forms mediated either by motion or color cues. Changes in regional cerebral blood flow were measured in 10 young male volunteers with positron emission tomography and with [15O]butanol. During the measurements, the subjects performed four visual discrimination tasks (form-from-motion, motion alone, form-from-color, and color alone discrimination). The individual regional cerebral blood flow images were standardized in shape and size with the help of a computerized brain atlas. Subtraction images were determined and averaged across data from all subjects. The resulting images were analyzed for statistically significant changes between specific and reference tasks. The discrimination of form by means of motion cues activated functional fields bilaterally in the inferior and lateral occipital gyri, in the lingual, anterior cingulate, middle frontal and orbitofrontal gyri, and in the left fusiform and right inferior temporal gyri. Form discrimination by color cues resulted in activation bilaterally in the inferior temporal, lateral occipital, and orbitofrontal gyri, the left precuneus and intraparietal sulcus, and the right precentral gyrus. The regions engaged in the two kinds of form discrimination did not overlap, demonstrating that differences in visual forms mediated by color or motion cues are processed and analyzed by disparate networks of functional fields in human cerebral cortex.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Binocular disparity discrimination in human cerebral cortex: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography.

Neurobiological studies in higher primates indicate that the processing of stereoscopic information takes place at early levels in the visual cortex. To map the anatomical structures in the human brain participating in pure stereopsis based upon binocular disparity, we measured with positron emission tomography the changes in regional cerebral blood flow as an indicator of metabolic activity in 10 healthy young men during visual discrimination of binocular disparity. The data demonstrate that the discrimination of pure stereo-optic disparity information takes place in the polar striate cortex and the neighboring peri-striate cortices, as well as in the parietal lobe, the prefrontal cortex, and the cerebellum. The discrimination of stereoscopic depth is dependent on a network composed of multiple functional fields localized in occipital- and parietal-lobe visual areas as well as in the dorsolateral and mesial prefrontal cortex. The findings support the importance of coactivated occipitoparietal visual areas in the processing and analysis of binocular depth information in humans.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Visual imagery and visual representation.

Among many controversies in visual neuroscience is whether visual imagery of objects, scenes and living beings is based upon contributions of the early visual areas or depends on hierarchical higher visual areas only, and whether the cortical areas subserving visual imagery are identical to those underlying visual perception. These questions are important for furthering our understanding of vision, since areas active in visual imagery might tell us how the visual cortex represents objects, scenes and living beings. Here, P.E. Roland and B. Gulyás present their hypothesis, based on experimental evidence in man and primates, that the visual areas subserving visual imagery are parieto-occipital and temporo-occipital visual association areas, and that these areas form only a subset of the visual areas engaged in perception. This hypothesis is consistent with the view that objects, scenes and living beings are represented, stored and re-evoked outside the domain of the primary visual cortex and its immediate neighbours.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Preparation for reaching: a PET study of the participating structures in the human brain.

The regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) was measured as an indicator of regional metabolic activity with positron emission tomography (PET) in eight subjects who, after seeing a screen with seven targets prepared themselves with their eyes closed to reach these targets. The preparation phase was associated with increases of rCBF in the prefrontal cortex, several remote visual association areas in the parietal lobe, the supramarginal gyrus, the ventrolateral thalamus and the cerebellar vermis. During the course of learning the activations in the parietal visual areas, the supramarginal gyrus and the prefrontal cortex prevailed as a sign of the visual spatial information; its transformation being kept in working memory. The other activations vanished. No activations were seen in the motor cortices, indicating that reaching is a task which does not require substantial preparatory activity of motor cortices prior to the go signal.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Temporal integration in cat visual cortex: a test of Bloch's law.

Some units in the cat visual cortex fail to respond to a briefly flashed bar and it has been suggested that such neurons function as visual integrators with a long time constant. To test this integrator hypothesis, a study was made using presentations of a bar, flashed over the receptive field for various durations and at different luminances. Some cortical cells indeed showed an increase in the time to peak latency and in the response amplitude when stimulus duration was prolonged up to 320 msec. Such units obeyed Bloch's law for durations over 100 msec.

Animals↗
PubMed1991

Cortical fields participating in form and colour discrimination in the human brain.

In order to map the anatomical structures participating in the analysis and processing of visual information related to discrimination of form and colour, we measured with positron emission tomography (PET) regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) as an indicator of metabolic activity in ten right-handed volunteers during visual discrimination tasks, namely reference, form and colour tasks. Form discrimination specifically increased rCBF bilaterally in the inferior temporal and cingulate gyri, and in the left superior temporal, left occipital lateral, and left angular gyri, whereas colour discrimination did so in the left occipital superior and lateral, left parahippocampal, left occipito-temporal medial (lingual), and left superior parietal gyri, and the right precuneus.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Corticofugal feedback influences the responses of geniculate neurons to moving stimuli.

Geniculate cell responses to moving bars and moving texture were compared in normal cats and in cats in which the corticofugal feedback was removed by cortical ablation. In experimental animals the response strength and the velocity upper cutoff assessed with a moving bar was reduced compared to control animals. The strength of response to texture decreased even more after cortical ablation, which also changed the response pattern of X cells to moving texture. These data suggest that corticofugal feedback contributes to the geniculate responses to moving stimuli and in particular to moving texture.

Animals↗
PubMed1990

Functional anatomy of storage, recall, and recognition of a visual pattern in man.

With the purpose of mapping the anatomical structures participating in memory of visual patterns, we measured regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) as an indicator of synaptic metabolism in eleven volunteers during four conditions: rest, visual learning of colored geometrical patterns, recall with the eyes closed, and recognition of the patterns. Learning changed rCBF in the primary visual cortex, visual association areas, temporal pole, anterior hippocampus, dorsal thalamus, caudate nucleus, putamen, and the anterior cingulate cortex. Recall and recognition changed rCBF in other limbic, thalamic, and striatal sectors. Only the highest order parieto-occipital visual areas were activated during recall. These areas were assumed to be the storage sites. It was inferred that the limbic and striatal circuits participating in learning were replaced by other limbic and thalamic circuits to recall and recognize the learned patterns.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Modulation by a moving texture of cat area 18 neuron responses to moving bars.

1. The influence of a moving texture on neuronal responses to a moving bar was tested in 103 area 18 neurons of anesthetized and paralyzed cats. The texture was a two-dimensional noise pattern, the bar moved at optimal speed, and its contrast was adjusted to yield 50% of the maximum response. 2. The moving texture exerted two different but related effects: it suppressed the response of area 18 neurons to the moving bar, and it modulated the direction selectivity of parastriate neurons. These effects were strongest when the texture moved at the same speed or faster than the bar. 3. Genuine suppressive effects of the moving texture were distinguished from lack of summation between bar and texture responses. Suppressive effects of either type were observed in 75% of the area 18 cells and occurred more frequently among C family cells, velocity tuned cells, and in layer 5 than in other groups of cells. 4. The modulation of direction selectivity was distinguished from pseudomodulation because of lack of summation of bar and texture responses. The direction selectivity of 35% of the area 18 cells was modulated by the moving texture. Six different relative direction selectivity (RDS) types were observed in area 18. 5. The neurons of which direction selectivity was modulated by the moving texture occurred predominantly in layers 2-3 and 6, suggesting that they represent a further stage of processing within area 18. 6. Many (75%) area 18 cells responded to the texture moving on its own. Most of these cells respond to isolated features ("grains") in the patterns rather than to the movement of the whole pattern. Cells responding to the movement of the whole pattern were generally C family cells, and their direction selectivity was not modulated by the moving texture. 7. These results are compared with those obtained under identical experimental conditions in area 17. Although suppressive effects are similar in both areas, RDS types are differently distributed in the two areas. 8. The possible origins of the interactions and their functional significance are discussed.

Animals↗
PubMed1990

Selectivity of cat area 18 neurons for direction and speed in depth.

1. Fifty-eight area 18 cells recorded in anesthetized and paralyzed cats were tested for selectivity for direction in depth after their monocular velocity characteristics and static disparity profile were determined. 2. Direction in depth was produced by changing the speed and direction in the two eyes, but keeping the speed along axes in depth constant. 3. Forty-two cells were completely investigated, which means that direction in depth selectivity was tested at least at two different position disparities and two different bar speeds. Seven out of the 42 cells were accepted as direction in depth selective. 4. The 16 remaining cells were incompletely tested. Only one of them was direction in depth selective at the disparity and speed tested and shared all the properties of the seven completely tested direction in depth selective cells. Therefore we estimated that 8/58, i.e., 14% of the area 18 cells are direction in depth selective. 5. The direction in depth selective cells are a very homogeneous class: they all belong to the S family, are velocity tuned, monocular, prefer orientations close to vertical, and have a broad inhibitory or an unmodulated position disparity profile. 6. Direction in depth selectivity arises both from monocular properties and binocular interactions. These binocular interaction profiles can be symmetric or asymmetric. The change of these interaction profiles with changes in base speed can be summarized as changes in level of inhibition for the axes corresponding to equal speed in the two eyes on one hand and changes in the slope of the inhibition gradient centered on these axes of equal speed on the other hand. 7. Nineteen of the 58 cells were tested for selectivity for speed along trajectories in depth. All five direction in depth selective cells tested were also tuned to speed in depth. This suggests that area 18 contributes to the elaboration of a 3D velocity map. 8. A wiring diagram that accounts for the binocular interactions underlying direction selectivity in depth is presented.

Animals↗
PubMed1987

The suppressive influence of moving textured backgrounds on responses of cat striate neurons to moving bars.

The suppressive action of a moving textured background on responses to moving bars was investigated in 118 striate neurons, 19 dorsal lateral geniculate neurons, and 5 perigeniculate neurons in paralyzed and anesthetized cats. In standard conditions the background was a two-dimensional (2D) noise pattern, the bar moved at optimal speed, and its contrast level was adjusted to yield 50% of the maximum response. Neuronal responses to the moving bar were suppressed when the background moved at the same speed or faster than the bar. The direction of motion of the bar had little influence. This suppressive effect was equally strong in all three experimental samples. The suppressive effect of the moving background was uniformly distributed among the cortical population, being equally strong in all layers, in all parts of the visual field representation, and for different categories of cortical cells. The suppressive effect of the moving background depended little on the structure of the background or on the speed of the bar. The suppression increased with decreasing contrast of the bar. Many (80%) cortical cells and all geniculate neurons responded to the movement of the 2D noise on its own. Most of these cells responded to isolated features ("grains") in the pattern rather than to movement of the whole pattern. There was no difference in strength of suppression between cortical neurons responsive and unresponsive to the moving 2D noise. The possible origins of this suppressive influence of moving backgrounds and its significance for the processing of visual scenes, more complicated than a single stimulus, are discussed.

Animals↗
PubMed1987

Influence of a moving textured background on direction selectivity of cat striate neurons.

The influence of a moving textured background on direction selectivity for a moving bar was tested in 118 striate neurons and in 19 dorsal lateral geniculate neurons of anesthetized and paralyzed cats. In the standard conditions the background was a two-dimensional noise pattern, the bar moved at optimal speed, and its contrast was adjusted to the level producing 50% of the maximum response. These experiments revealed a new typology of cortical cells based on relative direction selectivity. Six different relative-direction-selectivity types are described. Two types of cells were found to have opposite kinds of relative direction selectivity: antiphase direction-selective cells (5% of the cortical sample) preferred the direction of the bar opposite to the direction of background motion, and absolutely direction-selective cells (20% of the cortical sample) kept their direction selectivity for bar motion independently of the background motion. Three types of cortical cells were direction selective for bar motion only in restricted background motion conditions: conditionally direction-selective cells (20% of cortical sample) only expressed their direction selectivity when the bar and the background moved in antiphase, differencing direction-selective cells (5% of the cortical sample) only expressed their direction selectivity when the bar and the background differed in speed, and limited direction-selective cells (20% of the cortical sample) only expressed their direction selectivity for near zero background speeds. The sixth type, relative nondirection-selective cells (30% of the cortical sample and all of the geniculate cells) were direction selective for none of the background motion conditions. These different relative-direction-selectivity types differed in RF organization, in ocular dominance, velocity sensitivity, in laminar distribution, and in distribution in the visual field. The relative-direction-selectivity types were invariant for changes in the contrast and bar speed. The construction of these relative-direction-selectivity types from the geniculate input requires some inhibitory, but mainly facilitatory, intracortical interactions. These experimental findings suggest that area 17 in the cat has the neuronal machinery to extract depth from motion (limited direction-selective cells) and to segregate visual scenes by motion cues (antiphase, conditionally and differencing direction-selective cells).

Animals↗
PubMed1987

Responses of cat striate neurons to moving light and dark bars: changes with eccentricity.

Responses of area-17 neurons to light and dark bars moving over a wide range of speeds were measured over a range of receptive-field locations in anesthetized and paralyzed cats. For both light bars and dark bars, velocity sensitivity shifted to higher speeds with increasing eccentricity, whereas response strength and direction selectivity hardly changed. The good correlation between response strength and velocity sensitivity for light and dark bars suggests that ON and OFF inputs converge upon most area-17 cells. The correlation between direction selectivities for light and dark bars was not better than that between velocity sensitivities for light and dark bars. Only cells with strong direction selectivity were equally direction selective for light bars and dark bars. Comparison with previous studies done with high-contrast stimuli shows that the shift in sensitivity to higher speeds with increasing eccentricity is contrast dependent.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Visual memory, visual imagery, and visual recognition of large field patterns by the human brain: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography.

We measured the regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in 11 healthy volunteers with PET (positron emission tomography). The main purpose was to map the areas of the human brain that changed rCBF during (1) the storage, (2) retrieval from long-term memory, and (3) recognition of complex visual geometrical patterns. A control measurement was done with subjects at rest. Perception and learning of the patterns increased rCBF in V1 and 17 cortical fields located in the cuneus, the lingual, fusiform, inferior temporal, occipital, and angular gyri, the precuneus, and the posterior part of superior parietal lobules. In addition, rCBF increased in the anterior hippocampus, anterior cingulate gyrus, and in several fields in the prefrontal cortex. Recognition of the patterns increased rCBF in 18 identically located fields overlapping those activated in learning. In addition, recognition provoked differentially localized increases in the pulvinar, posterior hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex. Learning and recognition of the patterns thus activated identical visual regions, but different extravisual regions. A surprising finding was that the hippocampus was also active in recognition. Recall of the patterns from long-term memory was associated with rCBF increases in yet different fields in the prefrontal cortex, and the anterior cingulate cortex. In addition, the posterior inferior temporal lobe, the precuneus, the angular gyrus, and the posterior superior parietal lobule were activated, but not any spot within the occipital cortex. Activation of V1 or immediate visual association areas is not a prerequisite for visual imagery for the patterns. The only four fields activated in storage recall and recognition were those in the posterior inferior temporal lobe, the precuneus, the angular gyrus, and the posterior superior parietal lobule. These might be the storage sites for such visual patterns. If this is true, storage, retrieval, and recognition of complex visual patterns are mediated by higher-level visual areas. Thus, visual learning and recognition of the same patterns make use of identical visual areas, whereas retrieval of this material from the storage sites activates only a subset of the visual areas. The extravisual networks mediating storage, retrieval, and recognition differ, indicating that the ways by which the brain accesses the storage sites are different.

Adult↗