Biomedical subjects

B Hollands-Thorn

Publications and source records attributed to B Hollands-Thorn.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1990

[Imaging diagnosis of parotid diseases--a comparison of methods].

Thirty-five patients with parotid gland disorders were ultrasonographically examined with a "small parts" scanner, as well as with high-resolution computed tomography, and conventional and digital subtracted sialography. The results were compared with clinical, surgical, and pathomorphological data. In cases of parotid gland masses, the sensitivity of sonography, CT, and sialography was 100%, 81%, and 70% respectively, while in cases of sialadenitis, sensitivity was 38%, 50%, and 75%. The image-quality of digital subtracted sialography was superior to conventional sialography in 94% of cases, the same in 6%, and inferior in none of the cases. It is concluded that in all cases of parotid gland diseases ultrasound should be the first imaging method. If a tumor is confirmed, no further pretherapeutic imaging will be necessary in most cases. If a tumor is not confirmed, digital subtracted sialography should be employed to visualize inflammatory changes.

Adenoma↗

PubMed1989

Digital subtraction sialography, conventional sialography, high-resolution ultrasonography and computed tomography in the diagnosis of salivary gland diseases.

Forty-one patients with salivary gland disorders have been evaluated by digital subtraction sialography, conventional sialography, high-resolution ultrasonography and computed tomography, and the results compared with clinical, surgical and pathomorphological data. In the case of salivary gland masses, the sensitivity of ultrasonography, CT and digital subtraction sialography was 100%, 82% and 71%, respectively, while in the case of sialadenitis, the respective figures were 54%, 69% and 85%. The image quality of digital subtraction sialography was superior to that of conventional sialography in 80%, equal in 16%, and inferior in 3% of the examinations. We conclude that in all cases of salivary gland diseases ultrasound should be the first imaging procedure. If a tumour is not confirmed, digital subtraction sialography should be employed to visualise inflammatory changes, while in most cases of salivary gland masses no further imaging will be necessary.

Humans↗

PubMed1987

[Digital subtraction dacryocystography and sialography].

Fourteen examinations of the tear ducts and 21 sialograms were performed using digital subtraction and conventional techniques. In nine of the former and 15 of the latter, digital subtraction produced better results, in the remainder conventional technique was equally good. The advantages of digital subtraction are due to the removal of superimposed structures of the skull. Dose measurements at the level of the lens of the eye showed a greatly reduced radiation dose when using digital subtraction, as compared with conventional dacryocystography. Digital subtraction techniques with pulsed radiation and the ability to perform pixel shift is an optimal method for performing radiological examinations of the tear ducts and salivary glands.

Humans↗

PubMed1987

[Digital subtraction sialography].

In 22 patients we performed 33 sialographies of salivary glands using digital subtraction technique as well as conventional technique (100 mm camera). In the majority of cases the digital subtraction technique was superior to the conventional technique regarding diagnostic image quality. Additionally, digital subtraction technique generally needs a lower number of contrast media application. Hence we recommend digital subtraction technique for radiological imaging of salivary glands and ducts.

Humans↗