PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Horton

Publications and source records attributed to B Horton.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Quantitative heel ultrasound variables in powerlifters and controls.

OBJECTIVE: To compare by cross sectional study the quantitative heel ultrasound (QUS) variables broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and velocity of sound (VOS) in male powerlifters and controls. METHODS: Twenty four powerlifters and 21 sedentary male controls were recruited to the study. All the powerlifters were members of the British Drug Free Powerlifting Association and actively competing at the time of the study. A questionnaire was completed by all those entered into the study. This included a history of smoking and an estimation of daily intake of alcohol and calcium. For the powerlifters, the number of years spent training and time spent training each week was also recorded. The QUS variables of all powerlifters and controls were measured using a Cubaclinical II (McCue) ultrasound scanner. RESULTS: The powerlifters had been training for a mean (SEM) of 10.6 (1.6) years and they trained for 6.5 (0.4) hours a week. The powerlifters were non-significantly older and had a significantly higher body mass index (BMI) than the controls. Calcium intake and consumption of alcohol and tobacco were similar in the two groups. The mean BUA in the powerlifters was a significant 9.5% (95% confidence interval 0.7 to 18.3%) higher than the controls (105 v 96 dB/MHZ) and 15.6% (95% confidence interval 6.8 to 24.4%) higher after adjustment using analysis of covariance for age, BMI, and alcohol and tobacco consumption (108 v 93 dB/MHZ). The mean VOS was similar in the two groups, but after adjustment it was significantly higher in the powerlifters (1671 v 1651 m/s, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The study shows the ability of heel ultrasound to discriminate between QUS variables in powerlifters and controls. The results indicate that the QUS variables BUA and VOS are significantly higher for powerlifters than for controls.

Adult↗

Profile of nurse anesthesia programs.

Over time, the Council on Accreditation of Nurse Anesthesia Educational Programs (COA) and the AANA Education and Research Department have recognized the need to gather information significant to nurse anesthesia programs. The need to create a formalized mechanism to gather and analyze information has also been identified as the profession has grown. COA and the Education and Research Department have responded to this need by creating a database and a reporting mechanism in order to present information to the Assembly of School Faculty at its annual meeting. The information will be summarized in this article, which is the first formal vehicle of disseminating the data.

Certification↗

Outcome assessment in education programs.

This article describes the move toward outcome assessment as a tool to measure student achievement and overall program effectiveness. Methods are presented by which on-site accreditation reviewers can determine if nurse anesthesia faculty perform effective assessments and utilize the results of their findings to plan for improvement. Emphasis is placed on methods by which data from multiple sources are collected and analyzed by the faculty to enhance student learning.

Accreditation↗

Accreditation of regionalized and comprehensive nurse anesthesia programs.

Regionalized educational systems are becoming more common among nurse anesthesia programs and represented 41 out of 86 programs in a 1992 survey. Surveys were mailed to program directors of all nurse anesthesia programs accredited by the Council on Accreditation of Nurse Anesthesia Educational Programs to determine if the directors perceived a need for three separate categories of accreditation. Responses indicated that, although most directors saw no benefit in applying for separate academic and clinical accreditations for their own programs, they did believe the additional accreditation options should be available to all programs. Most directors also indicated that they preferred the Council to continue offering only one category of accreditation while 33 (38%) indicated they were interested in separate accreditation categories.

Accreditation↗