PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Ivey

Publications and source records attributed to B Ivey.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

A randomized, controlled trial of a simple emergency department intervention to improve the rate of primary care follow-up for patients with acute asthma exacerbations.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We determined whether a simple emergency department intervention improves the likelihood of primary care provider (PCP) follow-up after ED discharge for an acute asthma exacerbation. METHODS: This randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted in an urban university-based ED. Participants were patients with asthma between the ages of 16 and 45 years who were treated and discharged from the ED. The study intervention was usual care or an intervention that consisted of a free 5-day course of prednisone, vouchers for transportation to and from their PCP, and a 48-hour telephone reminder to make an appointment with their PCP. The main outcome was whether the patient received follow-up care as determined by PCP contact at 4 weeks. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-two patients with asthma were enrolled over 8 months; 178 (93%) had complete follow-up. The intervention and control groups were similar with regard to age, sex, ethnicity, or years of education. The 2 groups were also comparable with respect to multiple measures of baseline access/barriers to care and severity of ED exacerbation. Patients receiving the intervention were significantly more likely to follow up with their PCP than control patients (relative risk 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1, 2.4). When adjusted for other factors influencing PCP follow-up care (ethnicity, prior PCP relationship, insurance status, regular car access), intervention patients were more likely to follow up with their PCP (odds ratio 3.1; 95% CI 1.5, 6.3). CONCLUSION: Providing medication, transportation vouchers, and a telephone reminder to make an appointment increased the likelihood that discharged patients with asthma obtained PCP follow-up.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Changes in protein C and protein S levels in normal pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the normal changes in the plasma concentrations of protein C and protein S that occur during each trimester of pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: The study was a prospective cross-sectional study of 91 normal pregnant women who had plasma concentrations of protein C and protein S measured during the first, second, and third trimesters. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant change in antigenic or functional protein C levels during normal pregnancy. Total protein S levels also remained unchanged. Free protein S levels fell significantly from first to second trimesters (0.45 U/ml mean to 0.26 U/ml mean, p < 0.001), but no further fall occurred during the third trimester. CONCLUSIONS: The second-trimester fall in free protein S levels is a physiologic pregnancy adaptation. Women with a thromboembolic event appearing for the first time during pregnancy should have investigations for protein S deficiency delayed until the postpartum period, to avoid misdiagnosis and treatment.

Cross-Sectional Studies↗
PubMed1988

Maternal sex chromosome mosaicism diagnosed by amniocentesis and percutaneous umbilical cord sampling.

We present a remarkable chain of events in which percutaneous umbilical cord sampling was performed in an attempt to clarify a situation of possible fetal sex chromosome mosaicism in an amniotic fluid culture and led to the discovery that the mother herself had a 45,X/46,XX/47,XXX chromosome constitution. This may have simply represented the chance concurrence of pseudo-mosaicism in the amniotic fluid culture of a woman with an abnormal sex chromosome constitution, but it is also possible that the 45,X colony was maternal in origin. Although clearly a most unusual circumstance, the possibility should be kept in mind when termination of a pregnancy is being considered because of apparent mosaicism in a prenatal diagnostic study.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Difficulties encountered in a randomization trial of CVS versus amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis.

In April 1985, having completed a study of the short-term complications of chorionic villus sampling (CVS), we began a randomized comparison of CVS versus amniocentesis. Our study continued over a 15-month period, and during that time we had difficulty recruiting patients, with only 10.6% of 1254 women referred for prenatal diagnosis fully participating in this study. However, 30.2% of those eligible by dates and indication chose to enter the study. CVS was available in our province only through this study, and the two most common reasons for such a low rate of recruitment were reporting too late in pregnancy and the concern about the potential risks of CVS. Patients continued to seek counselling too late for CVS despite direct and continuous contact with regional physicians. Our patients' concern about risk might well vary with the attitude of their physicians towards CVS, and with the information provided at the time of pre-test counselling. The small number of patients actually enrolled did not permit any meaningful comparison of amniocentesis to CVS. However, our experience with pregnancies lost post-CVS suggests that a pregnancy with an apparent low implantation at the time of sampling may be at a higher risk of loss.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Assessment of the early risks of chorionic villus sampling.

A study was carried out to develop proficiency in performing chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and to determine whether the risk for miscarriage was so high as to preclude a randomized clinical trial comparing CVS with amniocentesis. A total of 202 women who had decided to have induced abortions volunteered to either undergo CVS (101 women) or be a control (101). There were no differences between the two groups in factors that may affect the rate of miscarriage. CVS was performed an average of 9.8 days before abortion. The rate of fetal loss was significantly higher in the CVS group (p = 0.009). An analysis of the results as a function of the physician's experience over time showed that there were distinct learning phases. It may take longer than is generally recognized to acquire the expertise necessary to perform CVS with the lowest risk possible. Caution should be exercised before diagnostic CVS is offered to women who plan to continue their pregnancies.

Abortion, Spontaneous↗
PubMed1978

Labour: when to worry.

To ensure an optimum result in pregnancy it is essential that the physician be alert in the antenatal period to recognize those women and their babies who are at risk during labour. Premature labour, with its attendant risk of respiratory distress syndrome in the newborn, continues to be an important factor in perinatal morbidity and mortality. Early recognition of predisposing factors and the judicious use of myometrial inhibiting agents have helped to reduce the incidence of fetal prematurity in these cases. A long interval between rupture of the membranes and delivery continues to be a danger to both mother and fetus. Delivery is recommended when gestation is beyond 36 weeks or when there are signs of incipient infection, and once labour has begun antibiotics should be used prophylactically. Failure of labour to progress should be recognized and managed aggressively in its early stages. Amniotomy and oxytocin infusion have reduced considerably the incidence of prolonged labour and its risks to both mother and fetus. The role of intrapartum monitoring of the fetal heart rate, measurement of the pH in the fetus's scalp blood and assessment of amniotic fluid is discussed, as is the monitoring of maternal well-being.

Amniotic Fluid↗