Biomedical subjects

B J Kröse

Publications and source records attributed to B J Kröse.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1989

The control and speed of shifts of attention.

We measured the detectability of a target pattern in a display consisting of 12 elements in a circle around the central fixation point. The display was presented briefly and followed after a variable amount of time by a mask. We found that presenting a pre-cue, designating the target position, facilitated target detectability. Attention is directed to the cued location. When the observer has to detect a (second) target among the non cued elements, performance for locations close to the cue is not significantly different from performance for locations further away. This suggests that there is no "scan-path" or proximity effect. We also found that the identification of the cued element delayed the detectability of the subsequent target by more than 160 msec. In another series of experiments we studied the control of attentional shifts. We found that, for short mask delays (100, 160, and 260 msec) the observer is unable to selectively process elements which are not physically cued but only verbally defined by their position relative to the cue. When we increase the positional uncertainty of the target by increasing the number of physical cues, performance drops until it reaches an asymptote with 5 elements. We infer that, even though the target is very similar to the background, a parallel mechanism, used for the extraction of stimulus features, designates prospective target locations which may be subsequently checked by a (slow) attentional process.

Attention↗

PubMed1989

Spatial interactions in rapid pattern discrimination.

We measured reaction times (RTs) for identification of a target among distracters under stabilized image conditions in which the positions of the target and the distracters were constant within a single experimental session. Under these conditions, the observer need not search for the target because its position is known. We nevertheless found that the presence of even a single distracter could elevate RTs. The magnitude of this effect depended on the distance of the distracter from the target and, for some observers, the distance of the distracter from the fovea. When we added not one but six background elements in a ring around the target, RT increased even more. If, apart from these neighboring distracters, the target was surrounded by more distracters located beyond the nearest neighbors, RT was, in general, not increased further. These findings suggest that adding background elements in a search task can elevate RTs in ways that are not dependent on the positional uncertainty of the target.

Female↗

PubMed1988

Form discrimination: features or invariants?

Does form discrimination rely on feature analysis, as the indirect theory of perception supposes, or on affordances (behavioural meanings specified by invariant patterns), as direct theory states. Subjects were to indicate the position of a target in a perspective rendering of a plane, displayed for 100 msec. in a large screen projection. In one of the conditions the target disrupted the plane, in the other it did not. Although targets of the two conditions shared the same features, the disruptive targets were discriminated more often than the nondisruptive targets. This result supports the direct approach to perception which states that a perceiver discriminates behaviourally relevant patterns rather than geometrical properties.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1987

Local structure analyzers as determinants of preattentive pattern discrimination.

Contemporary literature suggests that preattentive texture or pattern discrimination is induced by differences between local structure features or "textons." This paper presents a model for the description of such local structure features based on the computation of local autocorrelations within the image. By means of this structure model a measure of structure dissimilarity is introduced. Experiments have been carried out to test a hypothesized relation between the detectability of a target pattern in a field of background patterns and the value of the structure dissimilarity measure. The experimental results show that it seems justified to relate, in a quantitative way, the detectability of the target pattern to the value of the structure dissimilarity measure.

Form Perception↗