PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Kimmerle

Publications and source records attributed to B Kimmerle.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Physiological and morphological characterization of honeybee olfactory neurons combining electrophysiology, calcium imaging and confocal microscopy.

The insect antennal lobe is the first brain structure to process olfactory information. Like the vertebrate olfactory bulb the antennal lobe is substructured in olfactory glomeruli. In insects, glomeruli can be morphologically identified, and have characteristic olfactory response profiles. Local neurons interconnect glomeruli, and output (projection) neurons project to higher-order brain centres. The relationship between their elaborate morphology and their physiology is not understood. We recorded electrophysiologically from antennal lobe neurons, and iontophoretically injected a calcium-sensitive dye. We then measured their spatio-temporal calcium responses to a variety of odours. Finally, we confocally reconstructed the neurons, and identified the innervated glomeruli. An increase or decrease in spiking frequency corresponded to an intracellular calcium increase or decrease in the cell. While intracellular recordings generally lasted between 10 and 30 min, calcium imaging was stable for up to 2 h, allowing a more detailed physiological analysis. The responses indicate that heterogeneous local neurons get input in the glomerulus in which they branch most strongly. In many cases, the physiological response properties of the cells corresponded to the known response profile of the innervated glomerulus. In other words, the large variety of response profiles generally found when comparing antennal lobe neurons is reduced to a more predictable response profile when the innervated glomerulus is known.

Action Potentials↗

Performance of fly visual interneurons during object fixation.

Neurons involved in the processing of optic flow are usually analyzed using stimuli designed by the experimenter. However, in real life optic flow depends on locomotive behavior. We characterized the performance of motion-sensitive neurons in the visual system of the fly using optic flow as occurring in behavioral situations during object fixation. Optic flow generated by tethered flying flies in a flight simulator was subsequently replayed while recording the responses of two cell types in the fly's motion pathway presumably involved in the detection of objects and of deviations from a straight flight course, respectively. FD1b cells, which are representatives of the so-called figure-detection cells, responded very specifically to object motion. Although object selectivity of these cells is attributable to inhibition during large-field motion, the influence of background motion during object fixation was almost negligible. In contrast, the cells of the so-called horizontal system (HS cells) are most sensitive to background motion, as elicited during deviations of the animal from its course. During object fixation, the responses of HS cells depended on both object and background motion. The simulated distance of the background to the fly did not have a strong influence on the responses of either cell type. The specificity for detecting deviations from a straight course is enhanced by subtraction of the signals of HS cells in both halves of the brain. In contrast, the FD1b cells in the two halves of the brain need to interact in a nonlinear way to ensure efficient detection of objects.

Action Potentials↗

Detection of object motion by a fly neuron during simulated flight.

Object detection on the basis of relative motion was investigated in the fly at the neuronal level. A representative of the figure detection cells (FD-cells), the FD1b-cell, was characterized with respect to its responses to optic flow which simulated the presence of an object during translatory flight. The figure detection cells reside in the fly's third visual neuropil and are believed to play a central role in mediating object-directed turning behaviour. The dynamical response properties as well as the mean response amplitudes of the FD1b-cell depend on the temporal frequency of object motion and on the presence or absence of background motion. The responses of the FD1b-cell to object motion during simulated translatory flight were compared to behavioural responses of the fly as obtained with identical stimuli in a previous study. The behavioural responses could only partly be explained on the basis of the FD1b-cell's responses. Further processing between the third visual neuropil and the final motor output has to be assumed which involves (1) facilitation of the object-induced responses during translatory background motion at moderate temporal frequencies, and (2) inhibition of the object-induced turning responses during translatory background motion at high temporal frequencies.

Animals↗

Object fixation by the blowfly during tethered flight in a simulated three-dimensional environment.

The ability of flies to detect and fixate objects moving relative to their background was investigated in a flight simulator during translational tethered flight. The fly experienced optic flow that depended on its own actions and reactions in a similar way as in free-flight (closed-loop) conditions. Fixation of an object required turning responses towards it. The simulated distances between the fly, object and background were varied systematically by changing the velocities with which the object and the background pattern moved from the frontal to the back part of the fly's visual field. Fixation responses were only elicited when the object was simulated to be closer than the background. The fly's fixation performance was better with close than with more distant objects. Since, under many stimulus conditions, fixation responses were either elicited or entirely failed to be elicited, it is concluded that object fixation behaviour is gated in the visuo-motor pathway.

Animals↗