PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Krell

Publications and source records attributed to B Krell.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Pharmacokinetics of pravastatin in heart-transplant patients taking cyclosporin A.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation is an established tool for the treatment of terminal heart failure. Hyperlipidemia is a common problem following heart transplantation and has been implicated as an additional risk factor in the development of transplant coronary artery disease (TxCAD). Therefore, heart recipients are commonly treated with inhibitors of cholesterol synthesis (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors). However, these patients have an increased risk of developing rhabdomyolysis due to elevated concentrations of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors under co-administration with the immunosuppressive cyclosporin A (CsA). AIM OF THE STUDY: Aim of our study was to obtain pharmacokinetic data on pravastatin whilst monitoring the safety and efficiency of the lipid lowering therapy in heart-transplant recipients under immunosuppression with CsA and to compare these data to those of a healthy control group. SUBJECTS, MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven patients (30.2 +/- 12.3 months after transplantation) receiving immunosuppressive therapy consisting of cyclosporin A, prednisone and azathioprine with LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations exceeding 3.9 mmol/l and 8 control subjects were included into the study. In addition to the immunosuppressive therapy, the patients received a daily dose of 40 mg/day pravastatin for the first 8 days which was then reduced to 10 mg/day administered until Day 29. Blood was sampled for pharmacokinetic profiling (maximum concentration of the drug (Cmax), time to reach Cmax (tmax), area under the concentration vs. time curve (AUC(0-24h)), elimination half-life time (tcl)) and measurement of the parameters of clinical chemistry on Days 1, 8 and 29. The control group received a single dose of 60 mg pravastatin and the values of Cmax and AUC(0-24h) were normalized for a dose of 10 mg. RESULTS: Pravastatin 40 mg/day for 1 week in the patient group caused a significant reduction in total cholesterol (C) and LDL-C from 8.11 +/- 1.20 mmol/l and 5.88 +/- 1.15 mmol/l to 6.91 +/- 1.01 mmol/l and 4.72 +/- 1.05 mmol/l, respectively (p = 0.005 and p = 0.003). Triglycerides and HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) concentrations did not change significantly. Mean values for Cmax of pravastatin were 384.2 ng/ml, 392.0 ng/ml and 115.1 ng/ml in patients on Days 1, 8 and 29, respectively. After normalization for a dose of 10 mg, the corresponding values of C(max-DN10mg) and Cmax were 96.0 ng/ml, 98.0 ng/ml and 115.1 ng/ml on study Days 1, 8 and 29. These values were 7-8 times higher than the normalized value of C(max-DN10mg) for the control group (13.7 ng/ml). The corresponding values of AUC(0-24h) were 1228.2 ng/ml x h, 1214.1 ng/ml x h and 345.9 ng/ml x h in the patient group on study Days 1, 8 and 29 as well as 157.5 ng/ml x h in the control group prior to normalization. After normalization for a dose of 10 mg, the values of AUC(0-24h-DN10mg) in the patient group were approximately 12 times higher than those of the control group. However, no significant differences between the 2 groups were observed in tmax and tcl. Within the patient group, no significant increase in Cmax or AUC was found on Day 1 to Day 8. The results of creatine kinase (CK), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) and alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) showed also no significant increase during the observation period. CONCLUSION: Heart-transplant recipients treated with the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor pravastatin generally show higher plasma concentrations of this drug than control subjects. However, our data suggest that the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor pravastatin can be used effectively in these patients receiving the immunosuppressive cyclosporin A. The pharmacokinetic data obtained indicate that there is no significant cumulation of the drug following multiple dosages in spite of increased drug concentrations after a single oral dosage.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗

Burns of the lower extremity: surgical and nonsurgical considerations and treatment.

The treatment of burns is most often provided through the emergency room or burn center units. Nevertheless, the podiatric physician may be called upon to treat or advise others when a burn to the lower extremity is involved. This article presents a review of burn wound care with surgical and nonsurgical considerations in an attempt to identify current therapeutic management.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Exploration into the pathologic sinus tarsi.

Abnormalities involving the sinus tarsi are periodically discussed in the medical literature. Conservative treatment modalities are not always successful in completely remitting clinical symptoms. The present authors clinically review this anatomic region, as an aid for those doctors who find surgical intervention inevitable.

Ankle Injuries↗

Modifications of the distal metaphyseal osteotomy to better facilitate use of the Herbert bone screw for fixation.

The Herbert bone screw was initially developed for management of fractures of the carpal scaphoid. Due to its unique features, the applications of this rigid internal fixation device have been expanded. The most common use of the Herbert screw in podiatric surgery has been for fixation of the Austin osteotomy of the first metatarsal head, for correction of hallux abducto valgus. Technical difficulties encountered in this procedure may have discouraged its use or led to discontinuance. These problems are addressed, and modifications in technique are suggested. The most important modification involves a change in the angle and orientation of the osteotomy.

Bone Screws↗

CO2 laser techniques in destruction of verrucae plantaris: discussion of the blister technique, a more complete method of wart ablation.

The popular "Cross-hatch" method of CO2 laser surgery is compared with the "blister" technique of verrucae destruction. The blister technique provides greater reliability of wart tissue destruction through better visualization of normal skin lines and verrucoid tissue. The procedure can be performed quickly and easily, and is less painful to the patient than other conventional methods of wart destruction.

Foot Diseases↗