PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B L A M Weusten

Publications and source records attributed to B L A M Weusten.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

Diagnostic value of the proton pump inhibitor test for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care.

AIM: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of the proton pump inhibitor test in a primary care population as well as its additional value over reflux history, using the symptom association probability outcome during 24-h oesophageal pH recording as reference test for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. METHODS: Subjects with symptoms suggestive of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease were recruited from primary care. After a 24-h pH recording with calculation of the symptom association probability, subjects started using 40 mg esomeprazole once daily for 13 days. The proton pump inhibitor test was considered positive when the subjects reported adequate symptom suppression. Data are presented as means with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Successful 24-h pH recording was accomplished in 84 of the 90 subjects, while the symptom association probability was calculable in 74. The symptom association probability was positive in 70% of the subjects. The sensitivity of the proton pump inhibitor test was 0.91 (CI 0.78-0.96) and the specificity was 0.26 (CI 0.10-0.49). The mean likelihood ratio was 1.2 (CI 0.9-1.6) with little variation over the 13 consecutive proton pump inhibitor test days. The likelihood ratios of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms were comparable, ranging around 1. CONCLUSIONS: In primary care patients with reflux symptoms gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is highly prevalent. Under these conditions the additional value of short-term treatment with a proton pump inhibitor for diagnosing gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is limited.

Adult↗

[Belching (ructus)].

Accumulation of air in the stomach increases the gastric volume, which activates receptors in the gastric wall. This results in a reflex that relaxes the lower oesophageal sphincter, whereby the intragastric air can escape through the oesophagus. Ventilation of the stomach via the oesophagus is known as belching (ructus). Belching often occurs in combination with reflux symptoms and dyspepsia. In these cases, other symptoms are often more predominant, and it is advisable to treat these first. In patients with aerophagia, belching is the most common reason for medical consultation. These patients belch frequently, up to 20 times per minute, and often during consultation. Aerophagia results from air being sucked into the oesophagus or injected by pharyngeal contraction, after which it is expelled immediately. In contrast to the described gastric belching, aerophagia is therefore a form of supragastric belching. Aerophagia is a behavioural disorder, and behavioural therapy or logopedics appears to be most common therapeutic approach.

Aerophagy↗

Gastro-oesophageal reflux of liquids and gas during transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations.

Some transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations (TLOSRs) are accompanied by gastro-oesophageal reflux and others are not. We aimed to investigate what factors determine the occurrence and type of reflux during TLOSRs. In 12 healthy subjects prolonged high-resolution manometry was performed. Reflux was detected using pH-impedance monitoring. A total of 219 TLOSRs were detected; no differences were observed between the duration of TLOSRs with liquid-containing reflux (20.2 +/- 1.0 s), gas reflux (17.0 +/- 1.0 s) and no reflux (19.0 +/- 1.0 s). Trans-sphincteric pressure gradient was similar in TLOSRs with liquid reflux (1.6 +/- 0.1 kPa), gas reflux (1.5 +/- 0.1 kPa) and no reflux (1.7 +/- 0.3 kPa). Prevalence, duration and amplitude of oesophageal pre-contractions and sphincteric after-contractions were not different for TLOSRs with and without reflux. The total number of TLOSRs decreased significantly from 8.2 +/- 0.8 in the first to 5.7 +/- 0.5 in the second and 4.4 +/- 0.6 in the third 70-min recording period. The number of TLOSRs accompanied by liquid-containing reflux decreased from 4.7 +/- 0.9 to 3.0 +/- 0.4 to 1.6 +/- 0.4, while the numbers of TLOSRs with gas reflux remained unchanged (2.1 +/- 0.6-2.1 +/- 0.7-2.2 +/- 0.6). Besides, time after the meal, no differences were observed in the characteristics of TLOSRs with and without gastro-oesophageal reflux. We conclude that factors, other than TLOSR characteristics, are important of whether or not a TLOSR is reflux-related.

Adult↗

Determinants of perception of heartburn and regurgitation.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: It is not known why some reflux episodes evoke symptoms and others do not. We investigated the determinants of perception of gastro-oesophageal reflux. METHODS: In 32 patients with symptoms suggestive of gastro-oesophageal reflux, 24 hour ambulatory pH and impedance monitoring was performed after cessation of acid suppressive therapy. In the 20 patients who had at least one symptomatic reflux episode, characteristics of symptomatic and asymptomatic reflux episodes were compared. RESULTS: A total of 1807 reflux episodes were detected, 203 of which were symptomatic. Compared with asymptomatic episodes, symptomatic episodes were associated with a larger pH drop (p<0.001), lower nadir pH (p<0.05), and higher proximal extent (p<0.005). Symptomatic reflux episodes had a longer volume and acid clearance time (p<0.05 and p<0.002). Symptomatic episodes were preceded by a higher oesophageal cumulative acid exposure time (p<0.05). The proximal extent of episodes preceding regurgitation was larger than those preceding heartburn; 14.8% of the symptomatic reflux episodes were weakly acidic. In total, 426 pure gas reflux episodes occurred, of which 12 were symptomatic. Symptomatic pure gas reflux was more frequently accompanied by a pH drop than asymptomatic gas reflux (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Heartburn and regurgitation are more likely to be evoked when the pH drop is large, proximal extent of the refluxate is high, and volume and acid clearance is delayed. Sensitisation of the oesophagus occurs by preceding acid exposure. Weakly acidic reflux is responsible for only a minority of symptoms in patients off therapy. Pure gas reflux associated with a pH drop ("acid vapour") can be perceived as heartburn and regurgitation.

Adult↗

Sleeve sensor versus high-resolution manometry for the detection of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations.

Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) are the most important mechanism by which gastroesophageal reflux occurs, and sleeve sensor manometry is the gold standard for detection of TLESRs. The aim of this study was to evaluate manometry with closely spaced sideholes (high-resolution manometry) for the detection of TLESRs as an alternative. In 12 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, a 90-min postprandial manometry was performed by using a catheter incorporating both a sleeve sensor and closely spaced sideholes in the esophagogastric junction. TLESRs recorded with both techniques were scored. Reflux during TLESRs was detected by using manometry (common cavity), intraluminal impedance, and pH monitoring. A total of 145 TLESRs were detected by using both techniques, 117 with high-resolution manometry and 108 with sleeve sensor manometry [not significant (NS)]. Manometric signs of reflux during TLESRs detected with high-resolution and sleeve sensor manometry were found in 62.4 and 56.5%, NS, respectively, versus 38.5 and 35.2%, NS on pH-metry and 70.1 and 60.2%, NS on impedance monitoring. TLESRs recognized only with high-resolution manometry were more often accompanied by reflux, as detected with manometry (59.5%) and impedance monitoring (67.6%), than TLESRs recognized only with sleeve sensor manometry (32.1 and 28.6%). High-resolution manometry is at least as accurate as sleeve sensor manometry for the detection of TLESRs.

Adolescent↗

Relationships between air swallowing, intragastric air, belching and gastro-oesophageal reflux.

BACKGROUND: With each swallow a certain amount of air is transported to the stomach. The stomach protects itself against excessive distention by swallowed air through belching (gas reflux). The mechanism of belching (transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation) is also one of the mechanisms underlying gastro-oesophageal reflux. AIM: To investigate whether swallowing of air leads to an increase in size of the intragastric air bubble and to gastro-oesophageal reflux. METHODS: Multichannel intraluminal impedance measurement was used to quantify the incidence of swallowing of air in 20 healthy volunteers before and after a meal. Radiography was used to measure the size of the intragastric air bubble. Gastro-oesophageal reflux was assessed by concurrent impedance and pH measurement. RESULTS: The rate of air swallowing was correlated to the size of the intragastric air bubble postprandially and to the rate of gaseous gastro-oesophageal reflux. The number of air swallows and the size of the intragastric air bubble did not correlate with the number of liquid acid and non-acid reflux episodes. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy subjects, air swallowing promotes belching but does not facilitate acid reflux.

Adult↗

Double-peaked high-pressure zone at the esophagogastric junction in controls and in patients with a hiatal hernia: a study using high-resolution manometry.

The lower esophageal high-pressure zone (HPZ) consists of the intrinsic lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and the diaphragmatic sphincter. In patients with a hiatal hernia these constituents are separated. We performed high-resolution manometry of the esophagogastric HPZ in six controls, six patients with a small hernia, and six patients with a large hernia. Prevalence of a double-peak pressure profile of the HPZ was noted. Pressures and distances between the peaks were assessed. Prevalence of the double-peak profile was similar between patients with a small hernia and controls, but patients with a large hernia showed a higher prevalence with inspiration (P < 0.05) than the others. The distance between the two peaks was larger in patients with a large hernia (P < 0.05). In conclusion, high-resolution manometry makes it possible to distinguish the diaphragmatic pressure component from the LES. Two pressure peaks can be found both in hernia patients and in healthy volunteers.

Adult↗

Minimum sample frequency for multichannel intraluminal impedance measurement of the oesophagus.

In all systems for impedance monitoring signals are stored in digital format after analog-to-digital conversion at a predefined rate, the sample frequency. We aimed to find the minimum sample frequency required to evaluate oesophageal transit and gastro-oesophageal reflux studies using impedance monitoring. In 10 healthy subjects and five patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease impedance signals were acquired during a 90-min postprandial period, using a sample frequency of 1000 Hz. Additionally, 10 liquid swallows were recorded in the healthy subjects. A dedicated computer program was used to derive, from the original 1000-Hz files, series of new data files with sample frequencies of 500, 200, 100, 50, 20, 10, 8, 5 and 4 Hz. In all of these files, liquid and gas reflux events were identified. In the analysis of the swallows, bolus head advance time (BHAT) and total bolus transit time were measured. Reflux events were detectable down to a sample frequency of 50 Hz. In transit analysis errors for BHAT at frequencies below 8 Hz errors exceeded 2.5%. Therefore, in impedance monitoring the minimum sample frequency is 50 Hz for the detection of reflux and 8 Hz for the evaluation of oesophageal transit.

Adult↗

Aerophagia, gastric, and supragastric belching: a study using intraluminal electrical impedance monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Patients with aerophagia are believed to have excessive belches due to air swallowing. Intraluminal impedance monitoring has made it possible to investigate the validity of this concept. METHODS: The authors measured oesophageal pH and electrical impedance before and after a meal in 14 patients with excessive belching and 14 healthy controls and identified patterns of air transport through the oesophagus. The size of the gastric air bubble was measured radiographically. In four patients prolonged oesophageal manometry was performed simultaneously. RESULTS: In all subjects, impedance tracings showed that a significant amount of air is propulsed in front of about a third of the swallow induced peristaltic waves. Two types of retrograde gas flow through the oesophagus (belch) were observed. In the first type air flowed from the stomach through the oesophagus in oral direction ("gastric belch"). In the second type air entered the oesophagus rapidly from proximal and was expulsed almost immediately in oral direction ("supragastric belch"). The incidence of air-containing swallows and gastric belches was similar in patients and controls but supragastric belches occurred exclusively in patients. There was no evidence of lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation during supragastric belches. Gastric air bubble size was not different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with excessive belching the incidence of gaseous reflux from stomach to oesophagus is similar to that in healthy subjects. Their excess belching activity follows a distinct pattern, characterised by rapid antegrade and retrograde flow of air in the oesophagus that does not reach the stomach.

Adult↗

The gastro-oesophageal pressure inversion point revisited.

BACKGROUND: The pressure inversion point (PIP) is defined as the point at which, during stationary pull-through manometry of the oesophago-gastric junction, the polarity of the respiratory-associated pressure variations changes. Traditionally, the PIP is ascribed to transition of the pressure sensor from the abdominal to the thoracic cavity. We used high-resolution manometry to investigate the validity of this concept in six healthy volunteers and six patients with a sliding hiatus hernia. METHODS: In the analysis, the position of the PIP was identified. When there was a second, more distal, PIP, its position was also noted. The amplitude of the respiratory-associated pressure variations, defined as the difference between end-expiratory and end-inspiratory pressure, was measured. RESULTS: Double PIPs were found both in healthy controls (23 +/- 8% of time) and in patients (38 +/- 9% of time). Amplitudes of the respiratory-associated pressure variations were significantly higher at the proximal and distal border of the PIP (3.36 +/- 0.2 kPa and 2.29 +/- 0.2 kPa) than in the oesophageal body (0.54 +/- 0.03 kPa, P < 0.001) and in the stomach (0.54 +/- 0.03 kPa, P < 0.001). We also observed a relationship between the localization of the highest end-expiratory pressure and the position of the PIP. During TLOSRs respiratory variation amplitudes at the proximal and distal border of the PIP decreased to 0.61 +/- 0.02 kPa and 0.29 +/- 0.01 kPa, approximating respiratory pressure variation in oesophagus and stomach. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the PIP is caused by sliding of the high-pressure zone along pressure sensors rather than by the transition from the thoracic to the abdominal compartment.

Adult↗