PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B L Leighton

Publications and source records attributed to B L Leighton.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1994

The incidence of herpes simplex virus labialis after cesarean delivery.

Epidural and subarachnoid opioids have been associated with the development of oral herpes simplex lesions. Because of this risk, some anesthesiologists avoid neuraxial morphine in parturients with a history of herpes simplex virus labialis. When we began using neuraxial opioids for analgesia after cesarean delivery, we did not see any increased incidence of facial lesions. To confirm this impression, we studied 357 consecutive parturients presenting for elective or emergent cesarean delivery between 1 December 1989 and 27 June 1990. The women received spinal, epidural, or general anesthesia. Two hundred and one women received either spinal or epidural morphine, the remaining 156 parturients received only systemic opioids for postoperative analgesia. An investigator saw each patient daily until discharge. Only 11 patients (3%) developed oral lesions while hospitalized. None of these women had severe lesions. Neuraxial morphine did not increase the risk of labial lesions significantly (3.5% vs. 2.6%). Despite published data to the contrary, we found no correlation between neuraxial morphine and the risk of facial herpes virus lesions in women after cesarean delivery. We offer patients the option of neuraxial morphine for analgesia after cesarean delivery despite any history of oral herpes lesions.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1994

Complications of labor analgesia: epidural versus combined spinal epidural techniques.

Both epidural and combined spinal epidural (CSE) analgesia can provide maternal pain relief during labor. Currently, there are few data comparing the risks and complications of these two techniques. We recorded the incidence and severity of anesthetic-related complications in 1022 laboring parturients. Ninety-eight women opted for either no or parenteral analgesia, 388 chose epidural, and 536 requested CSE analgesia. Women choosing CSE analgesia most often received an intrathecal injection of sufentanil 10 micrograms at the time of epidural catheter insertion. The epidural catheters were then dosed as needed as the intrathecal analgesia waned. Women who received CSE analgesia were more likely to itch (41.4% vs 1.3%) or complain of nausea (2.4% vs 1.0%) or vomiting (3.2% vs 1.0%) than those receiving solely epidural analgesia. Patients who requested only epidural analgesia were more likely to suffer an unintended dural puncture (4.2% vs 1.7%). Fewer than 10% developed hypotension with either technique. The risk of headache was the same with both anesthetics (4%-10%) and did not differ from the incidence of headache in women not receiving neuraxial analgesia (10%-14%). Six patients required epidural blood patch for moderate to severe postural headache. Four of these women suffered a dural puncture with the 18-gauge Hustead epidural needle. The other two women had reportedly uncomplicated epidural and CSE analgesia. These data suggest either neuraxial analgesic technique can safely relieve the pain of labor. CSE analgesia is a safe alternative to epidural analgesia for labor and delivery.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Intrathecal sufentanil labor analgesia: the effects of adding morphine or epinephrine.

Intrathecal opioids can provide labor analgesia. We attempted to prolong the duration of intrathecal sufentanil analgesia by adding epinephrine or morphine. Forty-one healthy, term nulliparae with cervical dilation < 5 cm participated in this double-blind, randomized protocol. Using a combined spinal and epidural technique, we gave intrathecal injections of either sufentanil 10 micrograms, sufentanil 10 micrograms plus epinephrine 200 micrograms, or sufentanil 10 micrograms plus morphine 250 micrograms. At baseline and every 5 min for 30 min thereafter, we recorded arterial blood pressure and asked the patients to rate their pain, nausea, and pruritus on visual analog scales. The women continued to rate these variables every 30 min until they requested additional analgesia. They then received 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine via the epidural catheter, and rated the above variables every 30 min until they requested additional epidural drug injection. Both morphine and epinephrine prolonged the duration of sufentanil analgesia. Only morphine prolonged analgesia after the first dose of epidural bupivacaine. However, because women in the morphine group experienced significantly more side effects throughout the study period, we do not recommend intrathecal morphine for labor analgesia.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Intrathecal meperidine for labor analgesia: preliminary communication.

The authors administered intrathecal meperidine 10 mg to 10 healthy laboring women to determine its analgesic quality, onset, duration, and side-effect profile. When patients requested pain relief, we injected 10 mg preservative-free meperidine in 1 ml normal saline through a 32 gauge spinal catheter. We administered a second dose of meperidine 10 mg if analgesia was inadequate at 10 min. Additional doses of intrathecal meperidine or bupivacaine were administered on request. All patients received local anesthetic intrathecally or by infiltration for delivery. Eight patients were pain-free following meperidine 10 mg, the other 2 patients were comfortable after the second 10 mg meperidine dose. Three patients did not request further labor analgesics and delivered 58, 66 and 244 min following their initial injection of intrathecal meperidine. The mean duration of analgesia in the other 7 patients was 136 +/- 58 (mean +/-SD) min. Six of the 10 women in the study delivered vaginally; 3 spontaneously and 3 with vacuum or forceps assistance. Four patients delivered by cesarean section for failure to progress. Side-effects (which were easily treated) consisted of: pruritus (n = 1), vomiting (n = 2), hypotension (n = 2) and changes in fetal heart rate pattern (n = 5). All infants were vigorous and had good Apgar scores at birth. In conclusion, intrathecal meperidine is a promising labor analgesic, but the effect of meperidine on maternal blood pressure, fetal heart rate pattern, and the progress of labor need to be determined.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1992

Comparison among intrathecal fentanyl, meperidine, and sufentanil for labor analgesia.

This study compared the analgesic efficacy of intermittent injections of intrathecal fentanyl (10 micrograms), meperidine (10 mg), or sufentanil (5 micrograms) administered to 65 parturients during the first stage of labor. The groups did not differ in onset or duration of effective analgesia. The meperidine group, however, had significantly lower pain scores once cervical dilation progressed beyond 6 cm. Side effects included mild pruritus and nausea. After intrathecal drug injection, variable decelerations of the fetal heart rate increased in the fentanyl and meperidine groups. All neonates had a 5-min Apgar score of 7 or more. We conclude that intermittent intrathecal injections of fentanyl, meperidine, or sufentanil can provide adequate first-stage labor analgesia. Meperidine appears to provide more reliable analgesia as the first stage of labor progresses.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

The air test as a clinically useful indicator of intravenously placed epidural catheters.

The authors performed a clinical trial in 313 patients in labor to determine the safety and efficacy of an air test for unintentional intravenous placement of epidural catheters. Following routine aspiration for blood and cerebrospinal fluid, 1 ml of air was injected through each epidural catheter while heart tones were continually monitored with a Doppler ultrasound probe placed over the maternal precordium. In 281 patients, Doppler heart tones did not change following air injection (negative air test). All but eight of these patients developed an adequate level of analgesia following anesthetic administration, and no patients with negative air tests developed signs or symptoms of local anesthetic toxicity (false-negative rate, 0%; 95% confidence limits, 0.0-1.1%). Doppler heart tone changes followed air injection in 22 cases (positive air test). In 16 of these, intravenous catheter position was subsequently shown by aspiration of blood from the catheter or by the use of test doses consisting of local anesthetics with or without epinephrine. In six cases, adequate levels of analgesia developed despite a positive air test (false-positive rate, 2%; 95% confidence limit, 0.7-4.3%). None of the 303 patients receiving the air test developed any complications attributable to the injection of air (95% confidence limits, 0.0-1.0%). The authors conclude that air, with precordial Doppler detection, is a safe and effective test for identifying intravenously located epidural catheters.

Air↗
PubMed1990

Incidence of electrocardiographic changes during cesarean delivery under regional anesthesia.

Serial electrocardiograms were obtained on 93 healthy ASA physical status I and II term parturients during nonemergent cesarean delivery under regional anesthesia. Electrocardiographic changes occurred in 44 of the 93 patients (47.3%); in 35 of these 44 patients, the changes were characteristic, or suggestive, of myocardial ischemia. Symptoms of chest pain, pressure, and dyspnea occurred in 15 of the 44 patients with electrocardiographic changes; no patient without electrocardiographic change developed symptoms of chest pain, pressure, or dyspnea. Small but statistically significant differences were noted in heart rate, diastolic and systolic arterial pressures, and rate-pressure product between the patients with electrocardiographic changes and those without. The authors speculate that myocardial ischemia is a likely cause of both the electrocardiographic changes seen in these patients and of the symptoms of chest pain and dyspnea that they sometimes experience.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Evaluation of a continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitor in obstetric patients undergoing spinal anesthesia.

A noninvasive blood pressure monitor (Finapres) that continuously displays the arterial waveform using the Penaz methodology has recently been introduced into clinical practice. We compared this device with an automated oscillometric blood pressure monitor (Dinamap 1846SX) in 20 patients during spinal anesthesia for nonemergency cesarean section according to a procedure suggested by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. After administration of the spinal anesthetic, the Finapres monitor produced systolic, mean, and diastolic pressure measurements greater than those of the Dinamap monitor (6.6 +/- 12.5, 3.3 +/- 10.4, and 7.2 +/- 9.8 mm Hg, respectively). In most patients, the Finapres measurements were similar to those determined by the Dinamap; however, in 4 patients, mean systolic differences were greater than 20 mm Hg. These patients did not differ from the others in age, height, weight, or baseline blood pressure, and the pressure values recorded by the Finapres monitor were substantially higher than those measured by auscultation in the labor room. In 30% of the patients, the offset between Dinamap and Finapres blood pressure measurements changed markedly over the course of the surgical procedure. The Finapres monitor occasionally stopped working and had to be restarted. In 1 patient (not included in this analysis), the Dinamap monitor was unable to determine the blood pressure due to patient shivering; this did not appear to interfere with the Finapres. We conclude that the Finapres monitor does not consistently provide blood pressure information equivalent to that of the Dinamap in obstetric patients undergoing spinal anesthesia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Anesthesia for perinatal surgery.

A 30 year gravida 3 para 2002 woman presented at 28 weeks' gestation with polyhydramnios. Ultrasound revealed a single fetus with a large anterior neck mass. With halothane general anesthesia providing uterine relaxation and maintaining placental and umbilical blood flow, an otolaryngologist attempted to secure the airway. We discuss the rationale for our anesthetic management and suggest its use in similar situations in which surgical intervention may be required in the immediate perinatal period.

Anesthesia, General↗
PubMed1989

Needle bevel direction and headache after inadvertent dural puncture.

To study the effect of needle bevel direction on the incidence and severity of headache following inadvertent dural puncture occurring during the identification of the epidural space, the authors randomly assigned obstetric anesthesia residents to identify epidural space with the bevel of the epidural needle oriented either parallel or perpendicular to the longitudinal dural fibers. If dural puncture occurred, an observer unaware of the needle bevel direction, daily assessed the presence and severity of any subsequent headache. Of the 1,558 women who received epidural analgesia during this study, 41 women suffered dural puncture, 20 with the needle bevel oriented perpendicular to the longitudinal dural fibers and 21 with the needle bevel inserted parallel to the dural fibers (NS). Fourteen of 20 women in the group in which the needle bevel was perpendicular to dural fibers developed a moderate to severe headache, whereas only five of 21 in the group in which the needle bevel was parallel to dural fibers did so (P less than 0.005). Similarly, we administered a therapeutic blood patch to ten of 20 women in the perpendicular group but to only four of 21 in the parallel group (P less than 0.05). Thus, identifying the epidural space with the needle bevel oriented parallel to the longitudinal dural fibers limits the size of the subsequent dural tear and, therefore, lowers the incidence of headache should dural perforation occur.

Analgesia, Epidural↗
PubMed1989

Isoproterenol is an effective marker of intravenous injection in laboring women.

The purpose of this randomized, double-blind study was to determine if isoproterenol 5 micrograms iv produces a consistent, noticeable tachycardia in healthy, laboring women. Maternal heart rate, fetal heart rate, and uterine contractions were continuously recorded and maternal blood pressure was measured every minute for 10 min before and after each patient received either normal saline (NS group; n = 10) or isoproterenol 5 micrograms (ISO group; n = 10) iv. The data-collecting investigator and a nurse palpating the patient's radial artery determined which solution they thought had been administered. The authors analyzed the maternal heart rate tracings using baseline-to-peak (a greater than or equal to 25 beat/min maternal heart rate increase occurring within 120 s of drug injection and lasting greater than or equal to 15 s) and peak-to-peak (a greater than or equal to 10 beat/min increase in the maximum maternal heart rate during the 2-min postinjection over the maximum maternal heart rate during the 2 min preinjection) criteria for detection of an intravascular marker. Mean maternal heart rate in the ISO group was significantly higher than in the NS group 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 s following the injection (P less than 0.01). The peak-to-peak criterion and the data-collecting investigator correctly classified all patients. Five ISO group patients were not identified by the baseline-to-peak criterion. The nurse palpating the mother's radial artery misidentified two patients. Systolic blood pressure was significantly higher in ISO group than in NS group patients 1 min (P less than 0.05) and 2 min (P less than 0.01) following drug injection. Diastolic and mean blood pressures did not change. No fetal distress occurred. Isoproterenol 5 micrograms is an effective marker of intravascular injection in laboring women; however, the safety and efficacy of epidural isoproterenol must be demonstrated in animals before isoproterenol can be incorporated in an epidural anesthesia test dose.

Anesthetics, Local↗
PubMed1989

Air: an effective indicator of intravenously located epidural catheters.

The authors conducted a two-part study to evaluate the efficacy of 1 ml of air as a "test dose" for detection of intravenously located epidural catheters. In part 1, a Doppler fetal heart rate monitoring probe was placed over the precordium of 33 laboring patients in whom functioning epidural catheters were in place. Each patient received, more than 90 s apart, in random order: 10 ml of agitated saline (containing less than 0.5 ml of air microbubbles) via a peripheral vein; 2 ml of air via the epidural catheter; and a sham injection (i.e., nothing injected). In all 33 cases, a blinded observer identified Doppler changes 10-30 s following the injection of air (microbubbles) via peripheral vein. Doppler changes were never heard following epidural air injection (P less than 0.001 compared with iv air microbubble injection) or the sham injection (P less than 0.001 compared with iv air microbubble injection). In part 2, the authors listened for Doppler heart tone changes while injecting 1 ml of air via catheters that were accidentally inserted in the epidural veins of five other patients. Unequivocal Doppler changes compatible with intracardiac air always occurred within 3 s, and no signs or symptoms of air embolism developed. The results suggest that 1 ml of air may be a suitable indicator of iv epidural catheter location.

Adult↗