Biomedical subjects

B Larder

Publications and source records attributed to B Larder.

31 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2000

Resistance profile of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase inhibitor abacavir (1592U89) after monotherapy and combination therapy. CNA2001 Investigative Group.

Abacavir (1592U89) is a nucleoside inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 reverse transcriptase (RT). Resistance to abacavir was studied with abacavir alone and with abacavir in combination with other nucleoside analogues in cell culture, in virus isolates from zidovudine/lamivudine clinical trials, and in the first dose-escalating 12-week clinical trial (CNA2001) to evaluate abacavir clinical potency. Abacavir alone in vitro selected for mutations at HIV RT codons K65R, L74V, Y115F, and M184V. However, abacavir combined with zidovudine selected against virus with the M184V mutation. Abacavir therapy in vivo resulted in large decreases in HIV load (>1 log), even in 1 subject who had the M184V mutation at baseline. A total of 51% of subjects showed new mutations at any of codons K65R, L74V, and M184V after abacavir monotherapy, compared with 11% who received zidovudine/abacavir. Small changes (2- to 4-fold) in abacavir susceptibility were detected. On stopping therapy, reselection of the pretherapy sequence occurred within 4 weeks.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

PubMed2000

Evaluation of lymph node virus burden in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients receiving efavirenz-based protease inhibitor--sparing highly active antiretroviral therapy.

Although efavirenz-containing regimens effectively suppress plasma levels of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA, it is now clear that undetectable plasma viremia may not reflect a lack of viral replication. Because lymphoid tissue is an active site of HIV replication, the lymph node virus burden was analyzed in persons who received highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) containing either efavirenz or a protease inhibitor (PI). Testing with in situ hybridization revealed no detectable follicular dendritic cell-associated HIV RNA in either group, and only 2 of 8 persons in the efavirenz group and 1 of 4 in the PI group had detectable RNA in lymph node mononuclear cells (LNMC) when tested by use of nucleic acid sequencebased amplification. Low levels of replication-competent HIV were identified in both groups by use of quantitative coculture assays. There was no evidence of development of resistance to either regimen in virus isolated from LNMC. These data support the use of efavirenz as an alternative to a PI in initial HAART regimens.

Alkynes↗

PubMed2000

HIV drug susceptibility and treatment response to mega-HAART regimen in patients from the Frankfurt HIV cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between viral susceptibility at baseline and virological response in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients treated with multi-drug salvage regimens after multiple previous treatment failures. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 50 patients from the Frankfurt HIV cohort who had received treatment with a minimum of six drugs, and for whom a sample for baseline viral phenotyping was available. METHODS: Viral drug susceptibility was measured retrospectively from stored samples using the Antivirogram, a recombinant virus assay based method. Virological response was defined as a viral load of < 400 copies/ml at week 24. For analysis of treatment response, drop-outs were dealt with in two ways, either as failures (DAF) or censored (DAC). Several logistical regression models were applied to identify predictors of response, including baseline virus load, number of new drugs and phenotypic sensitivity scores. RESULTS: At baseline, drug resistance was extensive: 96% of patients had viruses resistant to at least one drug class and 32% had viruses resistant to all three drug classes. In the DAF analysis, 39 patients experienced virological failure. In the DAC analysis, eight were censored and 31 patients experienced virological failure. In multivariate models that adjust for baseline viral load, the number of new drugs and total phenotypic sensitivity scores, the baseline viral load and phenotypic sensitivity score remained significantly associated with virological outcome, whereas in those adjusted for baseline viral load, the number of new drugs, NRTI phenotypic sensitivity score and PI phenotypic sensitivity score, only the latter remained significantly associated with virological outcome. Both the DAF and DAC analyses produced similar results. In all models used, virological failure was shown to be significantly associated with baseline viral load and phenotypic sensitivity score. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis based on a small number of patients, viral drug susceptibility at baseline was strongly associated with virological outcome at 24 weeks, independent of covariates such as baseline viral load and treatment history. Baseline viral load also maintained a significant, independent association with virological outcome in most models.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

PubMed1999

Baseline HIV drug resistance profile predicts response to ritonavir-saquinavir protease inhibitor therapy in a community setting.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether baseline drug resistance assays could help to predict treatment failure with the protease inhibitor combination ritonavir-saquinavir. METHODS: Baseline HIV-1 drug resistance was determined for 76 consecutive patients who started treatment with the dual protease inhibitor combination ritonavir-saquinavir between September 1996 and June 1997 either alone or in combination with other antiviral agents. Resistance to 10 different antiviral agents was assessed by both phenotype (Virco Antivirogram) and genotype (Vircogen). RESULTS: Resistance inferred from viral genotype was similar to measured phenotypic resistance for both ritonavir and saquinavir (P<0.01). Baseline drug resistance phenotype was predictive of poor virological response to this dual protease inhibitor combination, despite the confounding effects of other antivirals. Patients were at least four times less likely to achieve a 0.5 log10 decrease in plasma HIV RNA viral load if their viral isolates were resistant to ritonavir or saquinavir. Patients classified as resistant to either drug using either method had median decreases in plasma viral load of 0.05 log10 HIV RNA copies/ml or less, compared to >0.8 log10 for those with sensitive virus. Patients resistant to both drugs never achieved plasma viral loads <100000 copies/ml. As little as fourfold increases in baseline resistance appeared to be sufficient to compromise even dual protease inhibitor therapy. CONCLUSION: Baseline resistance to ritonavir or saquinavir or both was associated with a poor antiviral response. Our data suggest that the measurement of drug resistance may assist in optimizing antiretroviral therapy in the clinic.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

PubMed1999

Performance of the Affymetrix GeneChip HIV PRT 440 platform for antiretroviral drug resistance genotyping of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 clades and viral isolates with length polymorphisms.

The performance of a silica chip-based resequencing method, the Affymetrix HIV PRT 440 assay (hereafter referred to as the Affymetrix assay), was evaluated on a panel of well-characterized nonclade B viral isolates and on isolates exhibiting length polymorphisms. Sequencing of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) pol cDNAs from clades A, C, D, E, and F resulted in clade-specific regions of base-calling ambiguities in regions not known to be associated with resistance polymorphisms, as well as a small number of spurious resistance polymorphisms. The Affymetrix assay failed to detect the presence of additional serine codons distal to reverse transcriptase (RT) codon 68 that are associated with multinucleoside RT inhibitor resistance. The increasing prevalence of non-clade B HIV-1 strains in the United States and Europe and the identification of clinically relevant pol gene length polymorphisms will impact the generalizability of the Affymetrix assay, emphasizing the need to accommodate this expanding pool of pol genotypes in future assay versions.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

PubMed1998

A rapid method for simultaneous detection of phenotypic resistance to inhibitors of protease and reverse transcriptase in recombinant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates from patients treated with antiretroviral drugs.

Combination therapy with protease (PR) and reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors can efficiently suppress human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) replication, but the emergence of drug-resistant variants correlates strongly with therapeutic failure. Here we describe a new method for high-throughput analysis of clinical samples that permits the simultaneous detection of HIV type 1 (HIV-1) phenotypic resistance to both RT and PR inhibitors by means of recombinant virus assay technology. HIV-1 RNA is extracted from plasma samples, and a 2.2-kb fragment containing the entire HIV-1 PR- and RT-coding sequence is amplified by nested reverse transcription-PCR. The pool of PR-RT-coding sequences is then cotransfected into CD4+ T lymphocytes (MT4) with the pGEMT3deltaPRT plasmid from which most of the PR (codons 10 to 99) and RT (codons 1 to 482) sequences are deleted. Homologous recombination leads to the generation of chimeric viruses containing PR- and RT-coding sequences derived from HIV-1 RNA in plasma. The susceptibilities of the chimeric viruses to all currently available RT and/or PR inhibitors is determined by an MT4 cell-3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide-based cell viability assay in an automated system that allows high sample throughput. The profile of resistance to all RT and PR inhibitors is displayed graphically in a single PR-RT-Antivirogram. This assay system facilitates the rapid large-scale phenotypic resistance determinations for all RT and PR inhibitors in one standardized assay.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

PubMed1997

Prospective longitudinal analysis of viral load and surrogate markers in relation to clinical progression in HIV type 1-infected persons.

The temporal relationship between viral and surrogate markers and clinical status was analyzed prospectively every 8 weeks in 34 asymptomatic HIV-1-infected persons. After 3 years, 25 persons remained clinically healthy whereas 9 persons showed clinical progression. In accordance with other reports we found that at study entry HIV-RNA load was predictive of clinical progression. All markers tested evolved significantly in time in both progressors and nonprogressors. The HIV RNA load in plasma and HIV DNA load in T cells were linearly related only in nonprogressors. In addition, the RNA/DNA ratio during follow-up was significantly higher in progressors, indicating a higher replication rate in progressors. The HIV DNA load correlated inversely with CD4+ T cell counts and positively with p24 antigenemia in both nonprogressors and progressors. A significant correlation of HIV DNA load with SI phenotype occurred in progressors only. HIV RNA levels correlated with beta 2-microglobulin level and with p24 antigenemia but not with SI phenotype. These three markers can all routinely be measured in plasma; however, only the HIV RNA levels appear to be informative for clinical progression. Six to 8 months before clinical progression, an SI phenotype switch, increased HIV RNA in plasma, and decreased CD4+ T cell counts were all indicative of an impending clinical event.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte lysis inhibited by viable HIV mutants.

Immune evasion by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is unexplained but may involve the mutation of viral antigens. When cytotoxic T lymphocytes engaged CD4-positive cells that were acutely infected with HIV bearing natural variant epitopes in reverse transcriptase, substantial inhibition of specific antiviral lysis was observed. Mutant viruses capable of these transactive effects could facilitate the persistence of a broad range of HIV variants in the face of an active and specific immune response.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1995

Emergence and clinical relevance of mutations associated with zidovudine resistance in asymptomatic HIV-1 infected patients.

The dynamics leading to the emergence of a zidovudine-resistant mutation at codon 215 of the reverse transcriptase coding region was investigated in a cohort of HIV-infected individuals who received early zidovudine therapy. Clinical implications and the role of the resistance mutation at codon 41 were also assessed. Thirty-eight initially asymptomatic HIV-infected patients with a CD4+ cell count above 400 cells/mm3 were followed for a mean period of 121 weeks (20 received zidovudine and 18 matching placebo). Specific mutations in the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase coding region conferring resistance to zidovudine were detected using a selective polymerase chain reaction. During the follow-up period a mutation at codon 215 was detected in eight (40%) of the individuals in the zidovudine group, and in two of these eight subjects, a mutation at codon 41 was found. During the study, disease progression occurred in seven of the eight (88%) patients with a mutation at codon 215, compared with 7 of 18 (39%) patients assigned to the placebo group and 3 of the 12 (25%) patients receiving zidovudine treatment who did not develop a 215-mutant strain (p < 0.05). At entry, none of the patients harbored MT-2 tropic virus. Therefore, the emergence of a zidovudine-resistant mutation at codon 215 is associated with subsequent disease progression in asymptomatic HIV-infected patients who receive zidovudine monotherapy. This association suggests that the mutation at codon 215 is involved in a loss of therapeutic efficacy and, therefore, patients should be monitored during treatment with zidovudine.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Provirus load changes in untreated and zidovudine-treated human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients.

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) provirus burden was quantified during follow-up of untreated patients and mathematically analyzed by a parameter called intrinsic rate of increase (r). There was an increase in provirus burden in patients at early stages of the infection, and the increase occurred at a similar rate in later stages of the disease. Antiviral response to zidovudine was evaluated using r. Nearly 50% of patients responded with strong decreases of r, and the rest behaved as nonresponders. Parameter r is valuable in disease prognosis, as the mean r was higher in disease progressors than in nonprogressors, and this difference was significant and more pronounced in treated patients. The zidovudine resistance mutation at codon 215 of reverse transcriptase was associated with a worse response to therapy. Absence of antiviral response and resistance mutations were more frequent in patients with lower CD4+ cell counts and higher provirus loads. These findings support a more beneficial effect of early than late therapy.

CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes↗

PubMed1987

AIDS virus reverse transcriptase defined by high level expression in Escherichia coli.

The causative agent of AIDS the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) encodes as part of its pol gene a reverse transcriptase (RT) which has a key role in the replication of the virus and thus constitutes an ideal target for antiviral chemotherapy. The purified HIV RT from virus particles consists of two related polypeptides of 66 and 51 kd mol. wt and similar polypeptides are found on expression of the complete HIV pol gene using prokaryotic systems. Here we describe the expression of the 66-kd protein in Escherichia coli and demonstrate that this polypeptide alone has authentic RT activity. Thus, a central HIV pol gene segment encodes and is sufficient for high levels of RT activity. The RT has been purified from E. coli extracts using a purification procedure involving two chromotography steps resulting in an enzyme preparation near homogeneity. Deletion of the C-terminal region of the RT thought to encode the RNase H domain resulted in loss of polymerase activity.

Cloning, Molecular↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Antiviral activity of tenofovir (PMPA) against nucleoside-resistant clinical HIV samples.

The presence of the lamivudine-associated M184V RT mutation increases tenofovir susceptibility in multiple HIV genotypes. Tenofovir is uniquely active against multinucleoside-resistant HIV expressing the Q151M mutation, but shows reduced susceptibility to the T69S insertion mutations. HIV with common forms of zidovudine and lamivudine resistance are susceptible to tenofovir, corroborating phase II clinical results demonstrating the activity of tenofovir DF in treatment-experienced patients.

Adenine↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Baseline antiretroviral drug susceptibility influences treatment response in patients receiving saquinavir-enhancing therapy.

PURPOSE: To relate baseline plasma HIV genotypic and virtual phenotypic antiretroviral drug susceptibility to subsequent virological response in patients receiving saquinavir (SQV)-enhancing therapy. Individuals were randomized to receive stavudine (d4T), SQV, and one of ritonavir, nelfinavir, or delavirdine to enhance SQV blood levels. METHOD: The protease and reverse transcriptase baseline sequences of 31 treatment-experienced patients were analyzed by genotype and virtual phenotype and were related to viral load at weeks 12 and 24. Genotypic resistance to SQV was defined by the presence of G48V and/or L90M mutations in the protease gene. Potential cross-resistance to d4T in zidovudine (ZDV)-experienced individuals was defined by the presence of thymidine-associated mutations in the reverse transcriptase gene. RESULTS: ZDV-associated mutations did not affect the virological response at 24 weeks. Individuals who were sensitive to SQV at baseline as determined by either genotyping or virtual phenotyping showed a greater decrease in viral load at week 24 than those resistant to SQV, irrespective of treatment arm. By genotyping, SQV-sensitive individuals had a median log decrease of 1.12 compared to 0.32 for those individuals who were SQV resistant. By virtual phenotyping, SQV-sensitive individuals had a median log decrease of 1.0 compared to a rise of 0.08 in resistant individuals. CONCLUSION: Thymidine analogue-associated mutations at baseline did not influence the response to subsequent therapy involving d4T. Individuals who were sensitive or resistant to SQV by genotyping or virtual phenotyping responded to SQV-enhancing regimens, but the virological response was greater in those who were sensitive.

Anti-HIV Agents↗