Biomedical subjects

B Linderoth

Publications and source records attributed to B Linderoth.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1997

Adenosine receptor activation suppresses tactile hypersensitivity and potentiates spinal cord stimulation in mononeuropathic rats.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the intrathecal (i.t.) action of a selective A1-adenosine receptor agonist, R-phenylisopropyl adenosine (R-PIA), on tactile withdrawal thresholds in a rat model of mononeuropathy produced by sciatic chronic constriction injury (CCI). An additional aim was to examine whether adenosine receptor activation is involved in the effects of spinal cord stimulation (SCS), which activates low-threshold fibers and suppresses touch-evoked pain both in patients and in experimental animals with neuropathy. Animals presenting hindlimb withdrawal to von Frey filaments with a bending force of < 7.5 g on the lesioned side (compared to > or = 35 g in the normal limb), were considered as having tactile hypersensitivity ("allodynia'). R-PIA (1-10 nmol i.t.) induced a dose-dependent suppression of the tactile allodynia without producing impairment of motor function. The effect of R-PIA (3 nmol i.t.), a clearly submaximal dose, was abolished by concomitant treatment with the selective A1-adenosine receptor antagonist cyclopentylxanthine (10 nmol i.t.). In animals where SCS failed to influence tactile allodynia, concomitant i.t. administration of R-PIA (3 nmol) and SCS induced a clear-cut and long-lasting suppression of the hypersensitivity to tactile stimulation. In conclusion, adenosine receptor stimulation antagonizes tactile hypersensitivity in a CCI model of mononeuropathy and potentiates the action of spinal cord stimulation.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

Spinal cord stimulation attenuates augmented dorsal horn release of excitatory amino acids in mononeuropathy via a GABAergic mechanism.

Neuropathic pain may be effectively relieved by electric stimulation of the spinal cord (SCS). However, the underlying mechanisms for the ensuing pain relief are poorly understood. In a rat model of neuropathy displaying hypersensitivity to innocuous tactile stimuli, (allodynia), we have earlier demonstrated that SCS may normalise withdrawal response thresholds. In the present study, using microdialysis, it is shown that SCS induces a decreased release of the dorsal horn excitatory amino acids (EAA), glutamate and aspartate, concomitant with an increase of the GABA release. Local perfusion with a GABA(B)-receptor antagonist in the dorsal horn transiently abolishes the SCS-induced suppression of the EAA release. Thus, the effect of SCS on neuropathic pain and allodynia may be due to an activation of local GABAergic mechanisms inhibiting the EAA release which is chronically elevated in such conditions.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

Incidence of mononeuropathy in rats is influenced by pre-emptive alteration of spinal excitability.

Both clinical and experimental data support the notion that the development of neuropathic pain is related to the state of excitability at the time of nerve injury. The present study was performed to investigate whether altering spinal excitability immediately before creation of a chronic constriction nerve injury in rats can influence the incidence of tactile hypersensitivity ('allodynia') by using pre-emptive: (1) intrathecal injection of a GABAB agonist or antagonists; (2) intrathecal lidocaine; or (3) C-fibre activation by electric stimulation. The incidence of tactile hypersensitivity was significantly reduced by the GABA(B) agonist baclofen while it was markedly enhanced by the administration of the GABA(B) antagonists 5-AVA and CGP 55845, as well as by C-fibre stimulation. Intrathecal administration of lidocaine did not influence the incidence of hypersensitivity. The results suggest that GABAergic mechanisms play an important role in the development of tactile hypersensitivity, and suggest that GABA(B) receptor agonists may be used as pre-emptive treatment to prevent the development of postinjury neuropathic pain.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1997

Modulation of spinal pain mechanisms by spinal cord stimulation and the potential role of adjuvant pharmacotherapy.

Experimental studies indicate that the effects of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on 'hypersymptoms' in neuropathic pain conditions may at least partly be mediated via GABAergic and adenosine-dependent mechanisms. Concomitant intrathecal administration of receptor-active drugs modulating the function of the GABA and adenosine systems may both depress and enhance the effects of SCS. The first few patients with simultaneous intrathecal administration of the GABAB agonist baclofen and/or adenosine together with SCS, when the stimulation alone proved insufficient, are reported.

Adenosine↗

PubMed1996

Photochemically induced ischaemic lesion of the rat sciatic nerve. A novel method providing high incidence of mononeuropathy.

The incidence of behavioural signs of mononeuropathy in rats subjected to chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve is unpredictable and often low. In the present study, an ischaemic lesion of the rat sciatic nerve was induced photochemically using a low power laser. In these rats tactile allodynia developed with a considerably greater incidence (95%) than in control rats subjected to CCI (45%). The allodynia lasted longer and was more prominent. Responses to thermal stimulation did not markedly differ between the two groups. The ischaemic lesions displayed marked degeneration, particularly of large myelinated fibres. The results suggest that laser irradiation of a peripheral nerve inducing a local photochemical reaction followed by Wallerian degeneration may be a convenient and reproducible experimental method of producing signs of peripheral mononeuropathy.

Animals↗

PubMed1996

Effects of spinal cord stimulation on touch-evoked allodynia involve GABAergic mechanisms. An experimental study in the mononeuropathic rat.

There is much evidence that tactile allodynia in rat models of mononeuropathy produced by sciatic nerve constriction is linked to disturbance of spinal GABAergic functions. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) applied to such animals via chronically implanted electrodes may in some of the animals induce a significant increase of the withdrawal threshold in response to innocuous mechanical stimulation with von Frey filaments applied to the paw of the nerve ligated leg. The present study was performed in mononeuropathic animals with definite signs of tactile allodynia, which did not respond to SCS, GABA and the GABAB-agonist baclofen were administered intrathecally, in doses per se insufficient to influence the withdrawal thresholds, together with the previously ineffective SCS. This combination resulted in a marked and long-lasting increase of the thresholds. The GABAA-agonist muscimol given together with SCS also produced a similar, but less prominent threshold increase. The GABAB-antagonist 5-aminovaleric acid (5-AVA) produced a transient suppression of the threshold increase induced by SCS together with either GABA or baclofen. In contrast, the GABAA-antagonist bicuculline had no apparent inhibitory effect on the threshold augmentation produced by SCS combined with GABA or baclofen. It is concluded that SCS may operate by upgrading the spinal GABAergic systems and that its potential for producing pain relief is dependent upon the availability of responsive GABA-containing inhibitory interneurons. Moreover, it seems that the effects of SCS are more linked to the GABAB-than to the GABAA-receptor system.

Animals↗

PubMed1996

Daily spinal cord stimulation suppresses autotomy behavior in rats following peripheral deafferentation.

Autotomy in experimental animals following peripheral nerve section has been interpreted as a sign of pain corresponding to the chronic pain observed in patients with extensive nerve lesions. Such pain may be alleviated by spinal cord stimulation. In the present study, the effect of such stimulation, via chronically implanted electrodes, on autotomy behavior following sciatic nerve section was assessed in the rat. The stimulation was applied for 30 min daily during a 10-day period. There were four groups of animals, 16 in each, half of them females. Stimulating electrodes were implanted in all and one group served as control, receiving sham stimulation. In one group, the stimulation was started when autotomy was observed, one received stimulation from the day of nerve section, and in one it was begun three days before section. The onset of autotomy was significantly delayed in the latter two groups. When stimulation was applied as "treatment", autotomy ceased but reappeared after the 10-day stimulation period. The incidence and severity of autotomy was markedly delayed and reduced when the stimulation had been applied just after the nerve section or before. In the latter groups, the diminished degree of autotomy persisted for the entire observation period, lasting 60 days after the stimulation was stopped. It seems that spinal cord stimulation, albeit applied only once daily and during a limited time period, can protect the spinal cord from developing the state of hyperexcitability believed to be the major cause of autotomy behavior. Peripheral mechanisms may also play a role by the antidromic activity evoked by the stimulation in the sectioned peripheral nerve. This study shows that spinal cord stimulation, which is a commonly employed method for treating chronic neurogenic pain, may have long-lasting effects on plasticity changes in the spinal cord following peripheral nerve injury, even when the stimulation is applied for short periods of time.

Animals↗

PubMed1996

Release of gamma-aminobutyric acid in the dorsal horn and suppression of tactile allodynia by spinal cord stimulation in mononeuropathic rats.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study is to monitor the extracellular gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels in the lumbar dorsal horn of allodynic rats, which respond to spinal cord stimulation (SCS) with a normalization of the tactile withdrawal threshold. In addition, we monitored the GABA levels in nonresponding and sham-stimulated rats. METHODS: Partial constriction injury of the sciatic nerve was performed, and a permanent electrode for SCS was inserted into the spinal canal. The response to SCS was assessed with von Frey hairs in awake animals. Later, microdialysis was performed in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord under halothane anesthesia. The concentration of GABA in the microdialysate was assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Extracellular GABA levels in rats with sciatic nerve lesions and allodynia (2.3 +/- 0.5 nmol/L) were significantly lower (P < 0.001) than in control rats with intact sciatic nerves (8.1 +/- 1.0 nmol/L), whereas only slightly decreased GABA levels (5.7 +/- 1.1 nmol/L) were detected in nonallodynic rats with sciatic nerve lesions. In the allodynic rats, which respond to SCS by a normalization of the tactile withdrawal threshold, significantly (P < 0.001) increased GABA levels (6.7 +/- 2.3 nmol/L) were detected after SCS. In contrast, neither the allodynic rats, which did not respond to SCS, nor the sham-stimulated allodynic rats displayed increased GABA levels in response to stimulation. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the development of allodynia, a common symptom in neuropathic pain states, may be linked to a decreased spinal release of GABA. We suggest that an SCS-induced release of GABA could be important for the suppression of allodynia observed in rats after SCS. Similar mechanisms could also be involved in the SCS-induced alleviation of pain in patients with peripheral neuropathy.

Animals↗

PubMed1996

Effects of spinal cord stimulation on the flexor reflex and involvement of supraspinal mechanisms: an experimental study in mononeuropathic rats.

The physiological mechanisms responsible for pain relief caused by spinal cord stimulation (SCS) are essentially unknown and recent experimental data are sparse. In the present study the authors explored the possible involvement of supraspinal mechanisms in the effects of SCS applied in rats with experimental mononeuropathy produced by sciatic nerve ligation according to the method of Bennett and Xie or that of Seltzer, et al. Confirming results of a previous study undertaken by the authors, the thresholds of the early component of the flexor reflex (latency 8-12 msec), which is mediated by A fibers, were significantly lower in the nerve-ligated than in the intact leg. In halothane-anesthetized animals the spinal cord was exposed and SCS was applied with parameters similar to those used in clinical SCS. Ten minutes of SCS produced a significant elevation of the lowered threshold of the early flexor component only in the nerve-ligated leg, and this augmentatory effect of SCS persisted for 30 to 40 minutes after cessation of the stimulation. The threshold elevation amounted to between 50% and 80% of the prestimulatory value and it was related to the intensity of SCS. The threshold of the late, C-fiber-mediated component of the flexor reflex was not influenced in either of the legs. After transection of the spinal cord at the T-6 level, there was a moderate threshold increase in both the early and late components in both legs, but the threshold of the early component in the nerve-ligated leg remained lower. Spinal cord stimulation produced an almost identical threshold increase in the early component in the nerve-ligated leg with the same time course as before the transection. There was no effect on the late component of the reflex in either leg. The results indicate that this effect of SCS in mononeuropathic rats does not necessarily involve supraspinal mechanisms; instead SCS is operative at a spinal, segmental level. In view of the similarities between the effects of therapeutic SCS on cutaneous hypersensibility in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain and the effects demonstrated in neuropathic rats, the clinical pain relief achieved with SCS may be produced, at least partially, by intraspinal mechanisms.

Animals↗

PubMed1995

Repeated spinal cord stimulation decreases the extracellular level of gamma-aminobutyric acid in the periaqueductal gray matter of freely moving rats.

Most of the previous experimental studies on the antinociceptive effects of electrical spinal cord stimulation (SCS) have focused on short-lasting effects mainly depending on spinal mechanisms. However, patients treated with SCS for chronic pain often report pain relief exceeding the period of stimulation for several hours. The long lasting effect of SCS might not only involve spinal, but also supraspinal mechanisms. A supraspinal region of major importance for the coordination of descending pain inhibition is the periaqueductal grey matter (PAG). The aim of the present microdialysis study, performed in awake freely moving rats, was to investigate if repeated SCS (two 30 min periods separated by a 90 min resting period) alters the extracellular neurotransmitter concentrations in the ventrolateral PAG. In a first series of experiments significantly decreased (-30%; P < 0.05; n = 7) gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels were detected immediately after the second SCS session. Neither the concentration of serotonin nor that of substance P-like immunoreactivity (SP-LI) was affected by SCS. The decrease of GABA after two SCS sessions was confirmed in a second series of experiments (-30%; P < 0.05; n = 7). No spontaneous decline of GABA was observed in sham-stimulated animals (n = 6). The glutamate concentration was also determined in this latter series of experiments and a significant decrease (-23%; P < 0.05; n = 5) was observed after the second SCS session. As GABA-neurons in the PAG exert a tonic depressive effect on the activity in descending pain inhibitory pathways, a decreased extracellular GABA level in this region, as detected following repeated SCS, might indicate an increased pain inhibition.

Animals↗

PubMed1995

Severe peripheral ischemia after vasospasm may be prevented by spinal cord stimulation. A preliminary report of a study in a free-flap animal model.

Electric spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is at present used in many centers to treat ischemic pain and ischemia in peripheral vascular disease. The most promising results have been obtained in cases where a vasospastic component is dominating. The knowledge concerning the mechanisms behind these effects has been scanty, but recent experimental studies indicate that suppression of sympathetic activity and the release of vasoactive substances may be important. A problem with many of the animals studies aimed at exploring these mechanisms is that they have almost exclusively been performed on normal animals without ischemia. However, in studies of the responsiveness of local ischemia to various pharmacological substances and to electrical transcutaneous nerve stimulation, animal models with ischemic skin flaps have been used. We applied SCS via chronically implanted electrodes in a model of local vasospasm in the rat, induced by mechanical stimulation of the vessel supplying an island flap in the groin. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were used. First, a monopolar system for spinal cord stimulation, with the intraspinal cathode at vertebral level T11, was implanted in halothane anaesthesia. After about three days of recovery the rats were anaesthetized with chloral hydrate ip and a groin neurovascular flap based on the epigastric vessels was raised. Microcirculation in the flap as well as in a control area in the contralateral groin was monitored by laser Doppler technique. Vasospasm was induced by gently pinching the superficial epigastric artery with microforceps. Two groups of animals were submitted to two spasm periods, one with SCS applied for 20 min. by 50 Hz; 0.2 msec and with 2/3 of the intensity required for a motor response before the first period. The second group, receiving sham SCS, served as a control. Both degree of ischemia after spasm provocation and the time to recovery were evaluated. In general SCS affected basal flow very little. In the control group the rats demonstrated increasing vasospastic reactions with subsequent flap ischemia to the two mechanical provocations. In the experimental group a response pattern emerged indicating that pre-spasm SCS could both reduce the spasm amplitude and significantly shorten the time for restoration of a satisfactory microcirculation in the flap. Some few trials with pharmacologically induced spasm by topical application of noradrenaline onto the feeding vessel also followed the same pattern. In conclusion, SCS seems to be able to reduce vasospasm, especially if the treatment is given before the ischemic period. This approach may supply an animal model for further studies of possible mechanisms behind the microcirculatory effects of SCS.

Animals↗

PubMed1995

Spinal cord stimulation in animal models of mononeuropathy: effects on the withdrawal response and the flexor reflex.

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is efficacious for pain due to injury of peripheral nerves, and therefore models of mononeuropathy appear to be particularly suitable for an experimental approach to the study of mechanisms underlying the clinical effect of this mode of treatment in chronic neuropathic pain. Virtually all previous experimental studies on SCS have utilized acute and nociceptive types of peripheral pain stimuli to explore the attenuating effects of SCS. In the present study we made use of the two models of supposedly painful neuropathy developed by Bennett and Xie (1988) and Seltzer et al. (1990) to explore the effect of SCS applied with stimulus parameters similar to those used in clinical practice. In rats subjected to ligatures of the sciatic nerve according to these two methods, SCS was applied via chronically implanted electrodes, or acutely via a laminectomy in the lower thoracic region. In awake, freely moving animals SCS produced a marked increase of the withdrawal thresholds to innocuous mechanical stimuli in the form of von Frey filaments. This threshold elevation lasted for up to 40 min after 10 min of SCS. In about one-half of the animals there was also a moderate, but short-lasting increase in the intact leg. The degree and duration of the withdrawal threshold elevation was clearly related to the intensity of SCS which was kept below the level of which a response in the thoracic or leg musculature was produced. In a second series of experiments the effect of SCS, applied acutely via a laminectomy, on the early component (latency: 8-12 msec) of the flexor reflex was studied. As a result of nerve ligation with either of the methods used, the thresholds for evoking the early as well as the late component in the nerve-ligated leg were significantly lower than in the intact one. SCS resulted in a marked and long-lasting increase of the threshold of the early component in the nerve-ligated leg. On the intact side only a slight and short-lasting increase was observed. The late, C fibre-mediated component was not influenced by SCS. The first component of the flexor reflex is conceivably mediated by A beta-fibre activation and it presumably corresponds to the withdrawal response induced by innocuous mechanical stimuli. The lack of effect of SCS on the late reflex component indicates that it selectively influences transmission of A-fibre activity. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Animals↗

PubMed1995

Preemptive spinal cord stimulation reduces ischemia in an animal model of vasospasm.

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been increasingly used in the treatment of ischemia caused by obliterative diseases in the extremities and in the cardiac circulation. The most promising effects have been obtained when physicians suspect that a major vasospastic component underlies the ischemic symptoms (e.g., as in Raynaud's disease). Despite the clinical success of this treatment method, little is known about the mechanisms underlying the pain relief it produces and its anti-ischemic effects. Most earlier experimental studies have used normal animals or animals with cerebral vasospasm induced by injection of autologal blood into the cerebrospinal fluid space. In the present study, we applied SCS in a rat model via implanted electrodes to study the effect of preemptive stimulation on the ischemia caused by vasospasm in a neurovascular flap in the groin; the vasospasm was induced by mechanical pressure applied to the feeding artery. In rats treated with SCS, delivered with parameters similar to those used clinically, the percentage of flaps recovering normal microcirculation after the spasm was significantly higher than in the untreated control group (100 and 28%, respectively; P < 0.05), and the maximal blood flow after the ischemic episode was significantly higher in the SCS group than in the control group (127 and 51 arbitrary units, respectively; P < 0.05). The percentage of animals regaining the premanipulation circulation after the provocation of a second spasm was also greater in the SCS-treated group than in the control animals (50 and 14%, respectively; P < 0.05). Pilot studies showed that this protective effect was specific to SCS given before spasm induction, an observation corroborated by clinical experiences.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗

PubMed1995

Spinal cord stimulation in cardiovascular disease.

Spinal cord stimulation in ischemic pain conditions has proved to be an effective method of treatment for many patients. The indications are ischemic pain in the extremities from peripheral vascular disease and angina pectoris. The long-term results show that the response rate for ischemic pain is 70% to 90%, while the corresponding results for neuropathic pain average approximately 50% to 70%, which actually makes ischemic pain a very good indication for SCS. SCS system implantation is a safe and quick operation performed under local anesthesia and well tolerated by the patient. A total implant of the lead and the pulse-generator in one stage seldom takes more than 1 hour. High sterility and prophylactic antibiotics are prerequisites to avoid postoperative problems. In atherosclerosis, SCS should be regarded as a method supplementary to vascular surgery, to be used for symptom recurrence after treatment or when there are technical obstacles to reconstructive surgery. SCS has proven to be extremely effective for the relief of ischemic rest pain, which constitutes the most severe problem for these patients. Today it is estimated that more than 7000 implants for PVD have been done in Europe. In a prospective randomized study, Jivegård et al have shown that SCS is a limb-saving treatment. For angina pectoris, SCS by now has become a routine supplementary method to conventional medical and surgical treatment. The technique is clinically effective, and several studies have shown decreased myocardial ischemia and decreased anginal pain during treatment. It is probable that the use of SCS in refractory angina will increase considerably in the 1990s.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗

PubMed1994

An experimental animal model of spinal cord stimulation for pain.

In spite of the routine usage of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) as treatment of chronic pain, there is an insufficient understanding of the mechanisms underlying its effect. The method was originally developed as a spin-off from experiments demonstrating the inhibitory control of nociceptive signals by the activation of large afferent fibers, and on the basis of these findings the gate-control theory was advanced. Later experiments showed that stimulation of the dorsal columns can inhibit the relay of nociceptive impulses to second-order neurons in the dorsal horn. It should be emphasized that all these experiments were performed with acute noxious stimuli; it is now universally recognized that SCS in patients is preferentially, or exclusively, effective for chronic neuropathic types of pain. For these and other reasons the mode of action of SCS in clinical pain cannot be inferred from these early animal experiments. In ongoing studies we have used animal models of mononeuropathy (rat) in which we have applied SCS acutely or chronically with stimulation parameters similar to those used in patients. In these animals the first component of the flexor reflex appears with a lower stimulus threshold in the nerve lesioned than in the intact, sham-operated leg. SCS was applied at the approximate level of Th-XII during 10-20 min and produced a marked augmentation of the stimulus threshold. This abnormally high threshold was not normalized until 30-60 min after the end of SCS. In awake animals SCS was applied via an implanted spinal electrode and the effect on behavior changes associated with mononeuropathy was studied.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗

PubMed1994

Gamma-aminobutyric acid is released in the dorsal horn by electrical spinal cord stimulation: an in vivo microdialysis study in the rat.

The mechanism underlying the beneficial effect of electrical stimulation of the posterior surface of the spinal cord in chronic pain states are unknown. The prolonged pain relief following a short stimulation period is believed to imply the activation of long-lasting neurochemical processes, mainly in the spinal cord, but possibly also involving other parts of the central nervous system. Previous studies have demonstrated that substance P and serotonin are released in the cat dorsal horn during spinal cord stimulation (SCS) with electrical parameters similar to those used in the clinic. However, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) has also been hypothesized to play a role in the effect of SCS, but there have been no studies of the possible effects of SCS on GABA release. The authors applied SCS to anesthetized rats and monitored the extracellular concentration of GABA in the lumbar dorsal horns by microdialysis and a sensitive reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography technique. After 30 minutes of SCS, the GABA level increased significantly (by almost 270%) in comparison with the basal level recorded before stimulation, from 3.6 +/- 1.0 nmol/L to 13.1 +/- 2.2 nmol/L (mean +/- the standard error of the mean; P < 0.05). The peak release was delayed and appeared in the 30-minute fraction collected after stimulation. Also, perfusion of the dialysis probes with potassium (100 mmol/L) induced an increase of the GABA level. In control experiments without electrical stimulation, slowly decreasing GABA levels were observed throughout the experiments. The present results may suggest an involvement of GABA in the mechanism of SCS-induced pain relief.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗

PubMed1994

Sympathetic mediation of peripheral vasodilation induced by spinal cord stimulation: animal studies of the role of cholinergic and adrenergic receptor subtypes.

Electric spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is widely used as a treatment modality for ischemic pain in peripheral arterial insufficiency. The background for the therapeutic effect may be a temporary inhibition of sympathetically maintained peripheral vasoconstriction. In this series of experiments, the involvement of different types of cholinergic and adrenergic receptor subclasses in the vasodilatory effect was explored in anesthetized rats. The microcirculation in hindlimb skin and hamstring muscle was studied by the laser Doppler technique. The ganglionic blocker hexamethonium as well as the nicotinic receptor antagonist chlorisondamine abolished the effect in both vascular beds, whereas the muscarinic receptor antagonists pirenzepine and atropine were ineffective. Among the adrenergic receptor active compounds, phentolamine, prazosine (an alpha 1-receptor antagonist), and clonidine in high doses suppressed the SCS-induced vasodilation. Yohimbine (an alpha 2-receptor antagonist) did not alter the effect. The beta-adrenergic compounds had a differential effect on muscle and skin perfusion. Atenolol, a beta 1-receptor antagonist, inhibited SCS-induced vasodilation only in the skin, whereas the beta 2-receptor antagonist butoxamine selectively depressed the muscle response. The vasodilatory effect of SCS in the animal model used here seems to a large extent to be mediated by an inhibitory effect on peripheral vasoconstriction maintained via efferent sympathetic activity involving nicotinic transmission in the ganglia and the postganglionic alpha 1-adrenoreceptors. The involvement of beta-receptors seems to be different in skin and muscle, beta 1 being more important for the changes in the skin and beta 2 being more important for those in muscle. The high-intensity antidromic response, earlier believed to explain how SCS exerted its vasodilatory effect, was resistant to cholinergic and adrenergic manipulations and seems to depend on entirely different mechanisms.

Animals↗

PubMed1993

Motor cortex stimulation as treatment of trigeminal neuropathic pain.

A report is given on first experiences with motor cortex stimulation in 10 patients with different forms of neuropathic pain. Three of them had central pain as sequelae of cerebrovascular disease. In none of them did the stimulation provide pain relief. Two patients had pain from peripheral nerve injuries. One did not respond, but the other obtained about 50% pain relief. The remaining 5 patients with trigeminal neuropathy experienced definite pain relief varying between 60 and 90%. During test stimulation most patients had one or two short-lasting generalized seizures. But no one had any motor effects after permanent implantation. Motor cortex stimulation appears to be a new and promising possibility of pain treatment, especially in cases with trigeminal neuropathy, but many problems have yet to be solved, before a clear indication could be given.

Electric Stimulation↗