PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Mabey

Publications and source records attributed to B Mabey.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Immediate electronystagmography in the diagnosis of the dizzy patient.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the results of electronystagmography (ENG) testing improve an emergency physician's diagnosis of dizziness. DESIGN: Prospective, one-year. SETTING: University and three community hospital emergency departments. TYPE OF PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-three consecutive patients presenting with dizziness. INTERVENTIONS: ED impression was recorded after complete ED evaluation. An ENG was performed within one hour by an audiologist, who gave a reading of "central," "peripheral," or "normal." The result was given to the emergency physician, who was invited to revise his or her impression (the "ED impression after ENG result"). Final diagnosis was based on the ED impression and by contact with the patient's physician(s) as well as the patient by telephone after one and four weeks. Accuracy of ENG was assessed by comparing ENG reading with the final diagnosis using the chi(2) test. In addition, the contribution of ENG to ED diagnosis was assessed by comparing the accuracy of the ED impression after ENG reading with the ED impression alone using McNemar's test (hit versus no-hit). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Both ED impression and the ENG significantly correlated with the final diagnostic category (chi(2) = 104.9, P < .001; chi(2) = 70.79, P < .001, respectively). ENG correctly diagnosed nine of 11 patients with central dizziness. Of 23 patients with undetermined cause after ED evaluation, ENG correctly identified seven patients with peripheral dizziness and three with central dizziness. ED impression after ENG reading was more accurate than ED impression alone (chi(2) = 6.13, P < .05). CONCLUSION: Emergency physicians correctly categorized most dizzy patients, but audiologist performance and interpretation of an ENG significantly improved this categorization. ENG may have the potential to identify clinically unsuspected central dizziness and to categorize dizziness of "unknown" cause. Further study is needed to determine whether ENG could be performed by modifying certain types of heart monitors available in the ED.

Audiology↗

Application of clinical indicators in the emergency department.

Clinical indicators were developed and used to assess the quality of patient care resulting from the system of shared responsibility between emergency department (ED) and radiology department faculty physicians for interpretation of ED roentgenograms. The first indicator--all discrepancies in roentgenogram interpretation between ED and radiology department faculty--measured an overall discrepancy rate of 3.3% (776 films). Three hundred fifty-two apparent discrepancies were not related to the accuracy with which ED faculty interpreted films, resulting in a revised overall discrepancy rate of 1.8%. The second indicator--undesirable patient care outcomes as a result of delayed accurate radiological diagnosis--measured an occurrence rate of 0 after clinical reevaluation of more than 99% of patients within 24 hours of initial ED evaluation. Aspects of the development and use of clinical indicators are discussed in relationship to the broader monitoring and evaluating process necessary for the continuous improvement of patient care.

District of Columbia↗