PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Maliakkal

Publications and source records attributed to B Maliakkal.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Fish oil dietary supplementation for prevention of indomethacin induced gastric and small bowel toxicity in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if N-3 fatty acid (fish oil) dietary supplements could favorably alter indomethacin induced gastric and small bowel toxicity related to use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID). METHODS: Healthy volunteers consumed 8 g of N-3 fatty acids for 16 weeks, while controls consumed corn oil. Subjects ingested indomethacin 50 mg tid between Weeks 12 and 16. Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy with biopsies and Cr-EDTA swallows were performed at Week 12 and again at Week 16. Biopsy specimens were graded for inflammation and endoscopic scores were recorded. RESULTS: No significant differences were seen between groups in any study variable, although the direction of change favored the fish oil subjects for inflammation scores in both the stomach and duodenum (fish oil subjects -0.50 +/- 1.2 stomach, -0.28 +/- 0.97 duodenum; and corn oil subjects +0.10 +/- 0.84 stomach, +0.20 +/- 0.79 duodenum; p = 0.086). Direction of change in stomach inflammation showed a trend favoring fish oil (p = 0.056 by chi square). CONCLUSION: Although no significant differences were seen between groups, the changes observed in inflammation suggest a possible benefit of fish oil in the amelioration of NSAID induced GI inflammation.

Adult↗

Omeprazole inhibits growth of cancer cell line of colonic origin.

The direct effects of omeprazole on colonic cells has not been evaluated. Controversy exists regarding the potential adverse effects of omeprazole on cell proliferation. In order to mimic the in vivo situation in the patient treated with omeprazole, proliferation cell culture experiments were performed, monitoring directly the effects of gastrin and omeprazole both alone and in combination. Three colonic cancer cell lines were used, two with neuroendocrine features (NCI-H716, LCC-18) and one (DLD-1) not known to have these features. In these in vitro proliferation experiments, only the NCI-H716 colorectal cancer cell line responded to omeprazole by decreased proliferation (P < 0.05). The effect was concentration dependent shown for all doses of omeprazole used. Gastrin had a statistically significant effect on increasing proliferation in the NCS-H716 cell line alone but only at the highest concentration (10(-6) M). Omeprazole has a cytostatic effect on one of three colorectal cancer cell lines but the mechanism for this effect of omeprazole and its potential role in treatment awaits elucidation.

Cell Division↗

Urinary organ specific neoantigen. A potentially diagnostic test for colorectal cancer.

Urinary organ-specific neoantigen from colorectal cancer patients has been used to make a monoclonal antibody, BAC 18.1. In this study we assessed the potential of this antibody for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer. We evaluated binding in both urine and effluent samples and compared it with effluent carcinoembryonic antigen standardized for both volume (nanograms per milliliter) and protein. Urinary organ-specific antigen as detected by BAC 18.1 was significantly greater in 29 cancer patients (A405: 0.717 +/- 0.500) vs 27 controls [0.121 +/- 0.273 (P < 0.05)]. Considerable overlap of binding of BAC 18.1 was observed in the colonic effluent of patients with CRC (N = 13), adenomas (N = 26), inflammatory bowel disease (N = 8), or having a normal colonoscopic examination (N = 24). CEA levels (nanograms per milliliter) were significantly elevated in the effluent samples of patients with a past history of colorectal cancer, as compared to that of normal individuals (P < 0.05). The presence of the M(r) 30,000 organ-specific neoantigen in colonic effluent was also demonstrated by western blot. Organ-specific neoantigen originates in the colon and is excreted into the urine, so the BAC 18.1 binding levels in the urine may be a diagnostic aid for CRC.

Adult↗

Adenoma-derived antibody, Adnab-9 recognizes a membrane-bound glycoprotein in colonic tissue and effluent material from patients with colorectal neoplasia.

The binding in pre-colonoscopic effluent of Adnab-9, a monoclonal antibody raised against colonic adenomas, was evaluated for specificity in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer. A heterogeneous group of 58 patients was evaluated by ELISA. Effluent samples and tissue extracts were subjected to Western blotting or ELISA to confirm specificity. Immunohistochemistry was performed on the cancer tissue sections. The proportion of positive effluent binding was higher in the cancer when compared to the normal group (P = 0.036). A dominant 87 M(r) band was found in adenoma extracts and some effluent samples. Adnab-9 binding in effluent samples predominated in membrane-bound fractions. Immunohistochemistry showed no specific staining in the cancer cells. The antigen recognised is a glycoprotein shown by effects of N-glycanase digestion and not cross-reactive with carcinoembryonic antigen. Non-gastro-intestinal tissue extracts did not bind Adnab-9. The major 87 M(r) adenoma-derived antigen may be found in effluent material, particularly in the membrane-bound fraction.

Adenoma↗

Oral colon lavage solutions containing polyethylene glycol may interfere with ELISA detection of tumor-associated antigens in colonic effluent.

Immunologic methods for detection of colorectal neoplasia based on examination of stool or colonic effluent are being developed. Most current oral lavage preparations contain polyethylene glycol (PEG), and if PEG adversely interferes with immunologic testing these tests may become less useful. We describe a decrease in sensitivity of ELISA for tumor-associated antigens (TAA) when effluent samples are diluted in PEG-electrolyte lavage solution, equivalent to a commonly used oral lavage solution based on PEG. Radioisotope-labeled antigen binding to plastic plates was decreased by dilution in the PEG lavage solution. Antigen binding, present in colonic effluent collected by the laxative purge method, was absent in effluent collected by PEG oral lavage from the same patient. We conclude that PEG and PEG-containing lavage solutions interfere with ELISA detection of TAA in colonic effluents. We speculate that the in vitro, and possibly the in vivo, effect occurs at the level of antigen binding to the plate either by a steric effect or alteration of charge by the nonpolar properties of PEG.

Absorption↗